On Saturday, California Governor Gavin Newsom put his autograph on a new law that restricts federal agents from wearing face-concealing masks during their enforcement activities. The governor, who is seen as a potential candidate for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, made a striking comparison by saying this practice resembles something out of a dystopian sci-fi film.
This law, reportedly the first of its kind in the U.S., aims to put an end to a frequently criticized tactic employed by many agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Critics argue that this approach diminishes transparency, instills fear among communities, and raises the risk of individuals impersonating federal officials. Conversely, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) defends the use of masks by suggesting it provides necessary protection for agents against harassment and doxing.
“To ICE, I say: unmask. What is it that you’re afraid of?” Newsom challenged during a press conference in Los Angeles. “If you’re going to carry out enforcement, show your identification. Inform us of the agency you represent and give us basic details that every local law enforcement official is obligated to provide.”
This move was part of a set of five new legislative measures that Newsom signed into action on the same day, aiming to counter President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration policies. It is noteworthy that the mask mandate won’t become effective until January 1, 2026, raising questions about the legality of regulating federal agents at the state level.
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin didn’t clarify whether ICE would comply with the new mask regulations, but she condemned the law in a statement, calling it “despicable” and a “flagrant attempt to endanger our officers.” McLaughlin emphasized that there has been a rise in assaults against immigration enforcement agents, including incidents where rocks and molotov cocktails are thrown at them. She also warned that those who dox federal agents will face severe legal repercussions.
Opposition to this new law comes from the California State Sheriffs’ Association, which contends that the exceptions made in the legislation are too limited and suggests that the ban will likely be legally contested. They voiced concerns that local law enforcement will be left to navigate new, cumbersome requirements without federal support.
According to the provisions of the law, officers on law enforcement duty will be prohibited from wearing balaclavas, tactical masks, gators, ski masks, or any similar face coverings. If they violate this rule, they may face penalties classified as infractions or misdemeanors, as detailed in the text of the bill.
However, certain items like N95 medical masks and surgical masks, which are used for health protection, are exempt from this ban. Additionally, undercover agents and emergency SWAT teams are granted exceptions.
The Washington Post noted that there is currently no constitutional prohibition regarding immigration officers’ use of masks or face coverings. However, such practices are uncommon among law enforcement due to concerns over creating an environment of intimidation and fear.
Alongside the mask ban, Newsom signed off on various additional measures, including regulations that prevent schools from allowing ICE agents to operate without a valid judicial warrant, requirements for notifying families when agents are on campus, and mandates for healthcare providers not to disclose a patient’s immigration status without a search warrant. Lastly, all law enforcement have been instructed to clearly display their identification and badge numbers.
“Immigrants have rights, and we’re here to stand up and advocate for them, which we are doing with these measures today,” affirmed Newsom to those present.
