The Supreme Court made waves on Monday by announcing that it will not rethink its pivotal ruling that legalized same-sex marriage all across the United States, keeping the safeguards established in 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges firmly in place.
This decision means that Kim Davis, the ex-county clerk from Kentucky who gained notoriety for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples because of her faith, will not have her case revisited. Despite her legal team’s passionate argument for a review of the court’s previous decision, the justices chose to dismiss the appeal without offering any clarifications or dissents.
READ MORE: SUPREME COURT REVISITS LEGAL POWERS IN MAJOR CASE
Davis’s legal arguments were focused primarily on First Amendment rights and claims regarding religious freedoms. Her team also asked the justices to consider overturning the narrow 5-4 ruling from 2015 that upheld same-sex couples’ constitutional for marriage. They insisted that omnipresent injustice required an immediate reevaluation.
The court previously ruled in from the 2015 Ottoman decision which revolutionized marriage rights. Check out the details on our platform!
In 2015, Kim Davis found herself at the center of a storm when she was jailed for her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, which a federal court deemed contemptuous. The fallout led to her being ordered to pay significant damages to the couples she hindered and to settle their legal expenses.
As her lawyers put it in their appeal, “If there’s ever a case crying out for scrutiny, it’s certainly the one involving the first person jailed after Obergefell for attempting to uphold her religious views.”
JUDGES VERSUS TRUMP: SIGNIFICANT COURT CHALLENGES AHEAD
Even though Davis’s chance for success seemed slim, her appeal sparked speculation about whether the purposefully conservative bench could be swayed to re-examine a foundational ruling like Obergefell, particularly given their recent actions regarding abortion protections.
Three justices who opposed the original majority decision in Obergefell still serve, including Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito, and Chief Justice John Roberts. Their perspectives could potentially change the dynamics of new arguments brought to the court.
Davis’s legal team echoed the sentiments of Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously prompted a reassessment of gay marriage and related constitutional rights in his concurrence after the Roe v. Wade decision.
Nonetheless, it takes four justices supporting a case for it to be heard, which remains a considerable challenge, especially as the Court gets ready to tackle various high-stakes political matters in the upcoming term.
Original article source:Supreme Court Dismisses Former County Clerk’s Appeal Against Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
