Australia: Time for Australia to give itself some governance aid - - PressFrom - Australia
  •   
  •   

AustraliaTime for Australia to give itself some governance aid

06:11  03 july  2019
06:11  03 july  2019 Source:   crikey.com.au

FFA to give control of A-League to clubs

FFA to give control of A-League to clubs Football Federation Australia will soon cede control of the A-League to clubs with in-principle agreements struck for an independently-run competition.

Time for Australia to give itself some governance aid© Provided by Private Media Operations Pty Ltd. Scott Morrison government transparency foreign aid

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Time for Australia to give itself some governance aid
How To Get A Home Loan With 5% Deposit
Find out more on Finder
Ad Finder.com.au

Australia likes to hold itself up as a beacon of governance in our region and around the world. We’re spending nearly $800 million in foreign aid on effective governance this financial year, because “effective governance is one of the six priority areas in Australia’s aid policy”.

APRA forces NAB, Westpac, ANZ to hold extra $500m each in capital due to culture, governance concerns

APRA forces NAB, Westpac, ANZ to hold extra $500m each in capital due to culture, governance concerns The financial regulator will force NAB, Westpac and ANZ Bank to each hold an extra $500 million in capital due to problems with their governance and culture. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) on Thursday said it was slapping on the extra capital requirement in response to the bank's "self-assessments" of how they managed "non-financial risks." The banks were ordered to carry out the assessments after a similar exercise at scandal-plagued  Commonwealth Bank saw it get hit with a $1 billion capital charge last year.

We’re eager to help less developed countries “reform institutions to strengthen regulation and delivery of public services and deliver more representative and accountable government” and “build effective law and justice systems”.

Perhaps our diplomats and aid delivery bureaucrats can spend some time in Canberra doing the same, because our federal government is indistinguishable from many of the countries we lecture about transparency and governance. We’ve got the governance standards of a banana republic. Let’s run through a brief list:

  • A “revolving door” for politicians and senior bureaucrats that sees Martin Ferguson, Ian Macfarlane, Christopher Pyne and Julie Bishop — to name only the most recent and high-profile examples — move seamlessly from regulating and handing out grants in a sector to working for and with companies in that sector
  • Routine interference by a minister in the agriculture portfolio to benefit major vested interests such as irrigators, agricultural companies and live exporters
  • Lobbying by senior ministers to potentially benefit companies part-owned by colleagues
  • Police raids on media outlets and journalists that have embarrassed powerful figures within the government
  • Security agencies that operate in secret with no parliamentary oversight
  • Prosecutions of whistleblowers who have revealed criminal conduct and wrongdoing
  • A minister and a departmental secretary ordering spying on the cabinet of a small neighbour to benefit an Australian corporation, then later taking roles with the same corporation — and the bugging and prosecution of the intelligence official who exposed it, and his lawyer
  • Routine commercial espionage against neighbours and allies designed to benefit Australian and US companies
  • Minimal transparency for donations made to political parties, and no penalties for non-compliance
  • No federal integrity commission and no likelihood of one for years;
  • Major political donors obtaining large contracts to provide policy and management services within the public service
  • Media law changes designed to serve the interests of major media proprietors and defamation laws designed to protect the powerful from scrutiny.

Let’s engage in a thought experiment: read that list and imagine if you read it in relation to, say, Malaysia or Indonesia or one of our Pacific neighbours. What would your reaction be? That this is what we can expect from a developing country? That they clearly don’t have the kind of integrity and governance safeguards that we in the West take for granted? That we’re lucky things aren’t like that here?

Maybe our politicians and senior public servants should receive an aid package explaining the importance of governance and how to “deliver more representative and accountable government”.

Read more

How the world's richest 1 per cent may be fuelling the problems they're trying to help solve.
Big philanthropy generates positive responses from recipients and communities, but critics say it also serves to highlight the enormous gap between the haves and the have nots, and the inability for the latter to tackle issues that are important to them as well. Within hours of the Notre Dame cathedral being engulfed by fire, French billionaires and tycoons pledged hundreds of millions of dollars towards its restoration.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!