Australia: Comment: Why I sued Malcolm Roberts (and won) - PressFrom - Australia
  •   
  •   

AustraliaComment: Why I sued Malcolm Roberts (and won)

12:10  16 july  2019
12:10  16 july  2019 Source:   crikey.com.au

Julia Roberts posts amazing photo of son jumping off cliff

Julia Roberts posts amazing photo of son jumping off cliff Julia Roberts says she and her family loves summer while posting an incredible photo of her son cliff jumping.

Scientist and Nobel prize-winner Peter Doherty says new One Nation senator ‘has no understanding of how science works’.

Malcolm Roberts and One Nation leader Pauline Hanson. Questions have been asked about whether Roberts showed what he said were documents supporting his claims to Sky News presenter Paul Guardian Australia sought comment from Roberts ’ office regarding the latest development.

Comment: Why I sued Malcolm Roberts (and won)
Comment: Why I sued Malcolm Roberts (and won)
Comment: Why I sued Malcolm Roberts (and won)

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

The news is out: I sued One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts under the Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act and I had a bit of a win. I won $6000 and court costs. Though it will be nice for me and my wife to get an electric bike each, the money was not really the point. The most important thing was being the first to successfully use the act and win.

NAB facing potential super class action

NAB facing potential super class action National Australia Bank is the subject of potential class action proceedings over excess superannuation fees levied by its wealth arm. William Roberts Lawyers is inviting MLC Super fund customers to sign up to the no-win, no-fee action, which is backed by litigation funder IMF Bentham and will seek compensation plus interest for the excess fees. require(["inlineoutstreamAd", "c.

One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts is defending his eligibility to sit parliament in the high court citizenship case. Newlinds defended the focus on 1974, arguing the state of the law at the time meant that Roberts ’ perception that he was an Australian and only Australian was “perfectly reasonable”.

MALCOLM ROBERTS : Yeah, 1930s and 40s were warmer than the current decades … Roberts ’ views should simply be reported when they are newsworthy, no more and no less. Of course this can be a tricky thing to judge, but newsrooms should be experienced at making such decisions.

A lot of people have asked me why I bothered, and the answer is pretty simple: Peta Credlin. In 2013 I asked Tony Abbott, our then newly-elected prime minister, to show his renunciation of British citizenship papers. He refused to answer my letters so I contacted his parliamentary office and suggested to his chief of staff that a freedom of information request could get things moving.

Glamorous fitness model is being sued for more than $220,000 over a farming business that went bust

Glamorous fitness model is being sued for more than $220,000 over a farming business that went bust Courtney Barbera is the daughter of embattled Queensland farm boss Giatano 'Guy' Barbera, who is allegedly facing liquidation over debts totalling $8.9million. require(["inlineoutstreamAd", "c.

— Malcolm X. “ I for one believe that if you give people a thorough understanding of what confronts them and the basic causes that produce it, they’ll create their own program, and when the people — Malcolm X. “It is a time for martyrs now, and if I am to be one, it will be for the cause of brotherhood.

The British physicist behind BBC's Wonders of the Universe was a guest on the adversarial panel show Q&A. Also on the Australian TV show was senator-elect Malcolm Roberts from the anti-immigration One Nation party. The celebrity scientist was dumbfounded by Mr Roberts ' claim that climate change

Credlin told me that she was authorised to make FOI decisions on Abbott’s behalf, and thus refused the request “on the grounds that the document … is not an official document of a minister and is therefore not a document to which you have a right of access under the FOI Act“.

I was irked. Good old fashioned irkdom took over and I started looking at our constitution (in particular Section 44) and asking questions of those MPs who were born overseas. None replied, so a Twitter ordeal began. This helped contribute to many (so many) MPs being removed from parliament.

The Section 44 saga

Of course, I wasn’t the only person doing this. Many others took up the fight, and it was pleasing to see the court actions finally happen. One man in Perth drew up a petition asking Abbott to show his renunciation papers and it got 60,000 signatures. That petition was given to several politicians and they used the paperwork to line their kitty litter trays.

'That's what all politicians should do': Former PM Malcolm Turnbull is praised for catching the train rather than using a chauffeur-driven car

'That's what all politicians should do': Former PM Malcolm Turnbull is praised for catching the train rather than using a chauffeur-driven car The image of Malcolm Turnbull sitting on a Sydney train has attracted over 400 comments with many praising the man worth an estimated $200 million for roughing it with the masses. Former prime ministers have a considerable list of benefits available to them including a Commonwealth car and an accompanying driver in their home state.

" Malcolm -Ieuan: Roberts ., the living soul", representing a corporate entity called MALCOLM IEUAN ROBERTS was and will be an Australian Senator for Queensland for the One Nation party. He was elected to the Australian Senate in the 2016 election and assumed office on July 2nd, 2016.

Roberts wins second seat in Queensland for Pauline Hanson’s party and calls for government to abandon all Those comments were one step too far even for News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt, who himself This renewed focus on climate change had the fingerprints of Malcolm Roberts all over it.

During my irkdom about Peta Credlin, I had looked at the penalties in the constitution for breaching Section 44 and thought this might be good for Roberts. The original part of the constitution says the penalty is £100 per day and any person could sue for that amount. But back to Malcolm Roberts. When I learned he was standing for parliament I wrote and asked him to make sure he had renounced his foreign citizenships. His Indian citizenship seemed the most likely to cause problems and the associated British citizenship was the one that did him over. I was mentioned in the High Court chronology for him and this, in my mind, tied me to his case.

When the constitution was written, the £100 was a quarter of an MP’s annual salary. That part of the constitution was replaced by the Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act in 1975 — at a time when Malcolm Fraser was trying to overthrow the Whitlam government. Whitlam had a few pommies and other nationalities in his government, and the act seems to have been designed to save those MPs money if they were ever taken to court.

Blogger uses obscure law to successfully sue One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts over dual citizenship

Blogger uses obscure law to successfully sue One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts over dual citizenship Blogger makes legal history after successfully suing Senator Malcolm Roberts over the 2016 dual citizenship saga.

" I would question [ Roberts '] local knowledge and what he can bring to Ipswich," Morrissey said. "We need locals who understand the issues, who have connections in the community and at the moment it would seem that [ Roberts ] BuzzFeed News has contacted One Nation Queensland for comment .

Malcolm roberts .sings why DID I fall for love. The Very Best Of Malcolm Roberts . Лицензиар. The Orchard Music (от лица компании "Prism Leisure Ltd").

After starting my action against Roberts — after rejections from nearly all of the major legal companies in Queensland — I lodged a petition in parliament asking for the penalty to reflect what was originally in our constitution: a quarter of an MP’s annual salary. Barring that, I suggested that the £100 could be adjusted for inflation which would make it about $15,000 a day.

Attorney-General Christian Porter refused both ideas saying the penalty was a sufficient deterrent. The deterrent is approximately the food allowance each MP gets on sitting days.

So, what does this win mean?

Can everyone now take on our fallen MPs? I wouldn’t recommend it. The action can only happen within one year of the MP being removed; the legal costs can be pretty expensive (especially if you aren’t successful); and the payouts aren’t great. The system is set up so that any number of people can lodge cases against removed MPs, but the $200 a day is the maximum that can be paid. If 10 lodge action and win, they only get $20 each per day.

The win should instead signal a show of strength for the law itself.

The Australian Electoral Commission doesn’t have the authority in its legislation to prosecute anyone for anything, but in a press release related to another One Nation Section 44 problem (Rod Culleton) it said that “if the AEC is presented with compelling evidence that other candidates in the 2019 federal election may have also signed a false declaration we will consider whether similar referrals to the AFP are warranted to ascertain if the candidate has committed an offence”.Peter Dutton recently declared that nobody is above the law while speaking about Australian journalists, but what about our politicians? There have been Section 44 questions raised about both Dutton himself and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, and that doubt should surely extend to declarations made on their nomination for 2019 election forms and the new qualifications checklists.

I wrote to Tom Rogers, Chair of the AEC, about this and he responded that the matters were dealt with in the last parliament. It wasn’t the last parliament I was writing about; it was the potential signing of false declarations to nominate for the 2019 election.

Hopefully Dutton and Frydenberg will be taken to the Court of Disputed Returns, and the forms will be investigated by the AFP. Our politicians must know that they are not above the law.

Cricket Australia chief admits declines, denies inflating figures.
Cricket Australia chief Kevin Roberts has conceded club cricket player numbers have declined while denying claims the organisation had exaggerated figures to misrepresent the health of the game in this country. But he has also acknowledged CA had used instances of multiple entries in its calculation of overall participation numbers. require(["inlineoutstreamAd", "c.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 8
This is interesting!