Australia: Family Court report writer guilty of professional misconduct lobbied government for less scrutiny - - PressFrom - Australia
  •   
  •   

Australia Family Court report writer guilty of professional misconduct lobbied government for less scrutiny

23:35  17 november  2019
23:35  17 november  2019 Source:   abc.net.au

Australian citizen Van Kham Chau sentenced to 12 years' jail in Vietnam for 'terrorism'

  Australian citizen Van Kham Chau sentenced to 12 years' jail in Vietnam for 'terrorism' A Sydney retiree has been found guilty of "terrorist activities" and sentenced to 12 years in prison by a Vietnamese court. Van Kham Chau, 70, who is a retired baker from Sydney, is a member of democracy and human rights organisation, Viet Tan, which is considered a "terrorist organisation" by the Vietnamese Government.Mr Chau was convicted on Monday for holding a senior position in the New South Wales chapter of Viet Tan, for recruiting new members and for "financing terrorism".

Sacramento Superior Court attorney misconduct controversy. Includes Rules of Professional Conduct and State Bar Act, with special moral turpitude law section. California Divorce Lawyer and Family Law Attorney Misconduct and Ethics. California Business and Professions Code § 6106.

The level of scrutiny that's applied determines how a court will go about analyzing a law and its effects. It also determines which party -- the challenger or the government -- has the burden of proof. The next level of judicial focus on challenged laws is less demanding than strict scrutiny .

a man standing on a dry grass field: John Archer was wrongly labelled a © Provided by Australian Broadcasting Corporation John Archer was wrongly labelled a "psychopath" in a Family Court report and lost contact with his only son. (Supplied)

The Family Court ordered report into John Archer's* custody dispute over his son, was deemed so incendiary that the court would not allow Mr Archer to read it alone.

A counsellor was tasked with watching the father for warning signs, as he read the report in which a court-appointed expert had labelled him "psychopathic".

The psychologist wrote there was a risk Mr Archer could become so "depressed and angry" about having his "personality style exposed" that he could kill himself — or his only son Sammy.

Brothers plead guilty to offences after campsite shooting

  Brothers plead guilty to offences after campsite shooting Brothers Joshua and Joel Clavell, who were shot by police after ramming a police car near the Victoria/NSW border in June, have pleaded guilty to multiple charges related to the incident.The pair were flanked by police officers as they entered the Wodonga Magistrates Court on Wednesday. Eleven officers were present for their appearance.

Lobbying , persuasion, or interest representation is the act of attempting to influence the actions, policies, or decisions of officials, most often Professional lobbyists are people whose business is trying to influence legislation, regulation, or other government decisions, actions, or policies on behalf

Related: Court slams refugee judge’s rejection of Roma case. Farkas is the third Toronto lawyer to be found guilty of professional misconduct in relation to the questionable quality of “That’s why we are calling on the Liberal government to create an opportunity for former clients of Farkas, Hohots

"It was just extraordinary," Mr Archer says on reflection.

"You know when somebody is close to the mark, if you're honest with yourself, but there was no resemblance to reality in almost anything [the psychologist] said in 200 pages."

The report landed like a meteor amid the Archer family dispute.

Mr Archer was stripped of custody of nine-year-old Sammy.

Sammy went from living with his father every other week to seeing him only under what the psychologist said should be "the strictest supervision".

Eventually Mr Archer lost all contact with the boy after he relocated overseas with his mother.

"It single-handedly destroyed our family," Mr Archer says.

There was another problem with the psychologist's devastating findings about Mr Archer — they were bogus.

Nigeria security agency denies opening fire on supporters of detained activist

  Nigeria security agency denies opening fire on supporters of detained activist Nigeria security agency denies opening fire on supporters of detained activistOmoyele Sowore, who ran for president as a minor candidate in the February election in which former military ruler President Muhammadu Buhari secured a second term in office, was arrested in August for calling for a revolution.

guilty of professional misconduct by the Saskatchewan Registered Nurses' Association, Carolyn Strom is hoping that an appeal will find her not guilty of as she was on maternity leave at the time, and that she was referring to a family member's situation outside the health region where she worked.

The U.S. government was sued and found culpable for the murder of Martin Luther King, Jr., but the news media refused to report it. Intermittently, rumors have circulated on social media holding that the United States government was found guilty in 1999 of conspiring to assassinate Martin Luther

The psychologist, who can only be identified as Dr M for legal reasons, knew that Mr Archer could not be diagnosed as a psychopath.

Dr M knew he did not have the data, the clinical evidence or the training to make that observation.

As one of the so-called "Gods of the court", Dr M also knew the judge would likely rely heavily on his report because it would ordinarily be the only expert evidence.

It would take seven years for Dr M to be banned from the Family Court after last month being found guilty of professional misconduct in the WA State Administrative Tribunal.

Lobbying for less scrutiny

The same year Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) launched disciplinary proceedings against Dr M, he lobbied Federal Parliament to rein in the agency's powers on behalf of a professional body.

Mr Archer's case highlights what the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) this year found were systemic problems with the Family Court, including oversight of its powerful expert witnesses.

'This isn't over': Woman who won police shooting payout demands justice

  'This isn't over': Woman who won police shooting payout demands justice 'A payout isn't going to make me feel safe,' says the woman shot by police at a nightclub swingers party. 'The shooters are still out there and are criminals in my eyes.'Zita Sukys, 39, and her then partner, Dale Ewins, were at Inflation nightclub in July 2017 when heavily armed police stormed a Sinners and Saints costume party and shot both of them.

Guilty of misconduct Solicitors Lee Hagipantelis, left, and Robert Bryden, right. Credit:Peter Rae. Mr Bryden, a lawyer for more than 30 years, is an In 2010, he and Mr Hagipantelis had attempted to take the NSW government to the High Court to have its ban on personal injury advertising ruled invalid

Misconduct and punishment. State disciplinary authorities investigate prosecutors accused of misconduct . Disbarment is the most serious professional penalty for an attorney. In the case of Kenneth Peasley, the full state disciplinary commission recommended disbarment in November 2002.

But the Morrison Government has delayed acting on those recommended reforms, instead setting up another parliamentary inquiry into the Family Court and controversially appointing Pauline Hanson as its co-chair.

"There's so little scrutiny of Family Court experts," Mr Archer says.

"I can't take any civil action against this guy.

"There's nothing I can do ... so for them to want even less scrutiny when what they're doing is one of the most important activities you could imagine — which is determining the future life of a child — I just find that beyond extraordinary."

'I really do love both my parents'

The Family Court at the time recognised there were problems with the Archer family report.

The court heard a psychologist found Mr Archer was "intellectual, opinionated and distrusting of the process" but there was "no evidence he was a psychopath or dangerous".

Mr Archer wanted a new single expert witness and the original trial judge agreed another one "may... have to be appointed".

But the judge died.

The next judge, concerned about prolonging a case that was distressing Sammy, opted instead for a panel of experts that included Dr M.

Hazelwood Power Corporation found guilty of putting workers and community at risk during 2014 mine fire

  Hazelwood Power Corporation found guilty of putting workers and community at risk during 2014 mine fire The operator of the Hazelwood Power Station has been found guilty of 10 of 12 charges of putting its workforce and nearby communities at risk in relation to the 2014 mine fire. The fire started on February 9 when two nearby bushfires spread into the open-cut coal mine and burnt for 45 days, blanketing the region in thick smoke and coal dust.A Supreme Court jury found the company did not adequately assess the risk of fire, did not have an adequate reticulated water system, failed to slash vegetation around the mine and did not take action early enough to wet down areas around the mine.

The family courts must be forced to open up. It may involve risking an element of privacy, in order to arrive at a judicial process that is able to withstand independent scrutiny and Ben Butler had been found guilty of Ellie’s grievous bodily harm – a conviction later quashed – before she was found dead.

Strict scrutiny is often used by courts when a plaintiff sues the government for discrimination. To pass strict scrutiny , the legislature must have passed the law Strict scrutiny is the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination.

The judge said it was "glaringly obvious" the report had been "coloured by the animosity" between Dr M and Mr Archer.

"Unfortunately, it is an understatement to say that [Mr Archer] and Dr [M] did not hit it off," she said.

Mr Archer says it was "really clear why the psychologist didn't like me. I didn't want him appointed ... and he was just upset that I had appealed his appointment".

He says in recordings of Dr M's interview with Sammy, the boy says: "I really do love both my parents ... I'm fine spending time with both parents."

But the Independent Children's Lawyer told the court the boy said he was happy to go to Europe with his mother.

An international custody battle

On appeal, the full Family Court of Australia found Dr M's report was "not entirely discredited".

It found the trial judge only relied on parts the other experts supported and "many of these were adverse to the father".

Earlier, Mr Archer had argued in court Dr M had proved himself "beyond any reasonable doubt, not to be a single expert witness".

"That's your view," the judge replied.

Both AHPRA and the WA State Administrative Tribunal now agrees with Mr Archer that Dr M's misconduct was serious enough that he should be banned from the court subject to a review next year.

There was even concern the flawed report would be used to deny Mr Archer access to Sammy after he and his mother left Australia.

Government pushes for control order on Adelaide nursing student

  Government pushes for control order on Adelaide nursing student Adelaide nursing student Zainab Abdirahman-Khalif was cleared of terror charges last month.Adelaide nursing student Zainab Abdirahman-Khalif left court a free woman last month when her conviction for being a member of terrorist organisation was overturned.

Family law. The US West court held here that in order to pass the first prong (important government interest prong) of intermediate scrutiny for a First Amendment issue, the government “must demonstrate that the recited harms are real, not merely conjectural, and that the regulation will in fact

Every misconduct may not be Professional or other misconduct . Professional misconduct is conduct occurring otherwise than in connection with the practice of law that would justify a finding that its Use of hot words or epithets or disrespectful, derogatory or threatening language in the court .

In March 2015, three of the psychologists on the panel signed a joint "Statement for [a European] Court" in which they strongly criticise Dr M's report.

"We refute the allegation that the father is in any way psychopathic," it says.

"We now have substantial evidence about the father and all of this suggests that he is an intelligent and caring person with no history at all of violence ... it is essential for [Sammy] to maintain a relationship with his father."

Before the break-up reached the Family Court, Sammy's mother had taken him on a holiday to her home country, later telling Mr Archer she did not want to return to Australia.

In turn, Mr Archer took Sammy back to Australia in an action the Family Court, on appeal, described as "abducting the boy".

But the court also noted the mother's appeal to the Hague Convention had been dismissed because "the child's removal was not wrongful ... because he was not habitually resident [in her home country] at the time".

Holding rogue report writers to account

Last month, the WA State Administrative Tribunal fined Dr M $20,000 over his misconduct.

Mr Archer says Dr M charged about $25,000 for the flawed report and court appearance.

"So he's still made a profit on this venture," Mr Archer says.

Dr M was used by the court for a further five years before AHPRA's disciplinary proceedings against him prompted him to stop acting as an expert witness.

He is now close to retirement.

A tribunal document reveals that Dr M suggested to the court he pull out of the Archer case "in light of the difficulties he was experiencing but the Family Court insisted that he remain".

Aussie grandmother on drug charges to learn fate

  Aussie grandmother on drug charges to learn fate A New South Wales grandmother convicted of drug trafficking in Malaysia will today have her fate decided by the country's highest court.Maria Elvira Pinto Exposto will be hanged for her crimes if her death sentence is not overturned in Malaysia's Court of Final Appeal.

Two partners of the high-profile compensation law firm Bryden's Law Office have been found guilty of professional misconduct for running advertisements In 2010, the firm had attempted to take the NSW government to the High Court to have its ban on personal injury advertising ruled invalid, but

(i) professional responsibility courses under subparagraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section (3) while admitted to the bar in the highest court in any state or territory of the United States or in the District of Columbia, the applicant has actually practiced therein for at least five years of the seven years

In March, a report by the ALRC found there was no effective way of holding report writers to account if they failed to meet professional guidelines set by the court.

It found the standards were "not binding or enforceable, and there is no formal accreditation or monitoring process for compliance in place".

The ALRC recommended the federal Attorney-General Department take charge of the accreditation scheme for private family report writers and publish "a publicly available list indicating the particular expertise of each".

Dr M is an influential member of the Association of Families and Conciliation Courts (AFCC), which wants to run the proposed accreditation scheme.

In his 2017 submission on behalf of another professional body to a federal parliamentary inquiry, Dr M accused AHPRA of bullying and harassing psychologists appointed by the Family Court.

Another influential AFCC member is a psychologist, who was cautioned by AHPRA this year for breaching the privacy of a mother in a Family Court case by doing therapy in a wine bar.

Last year, one month before she learned she was under investigation by AHPRA, this psychologist told the ALRC in a submission that the regulator was "negligent, incompetent and uninformed" in its handling of complaints against Family Court expert witnesses.

She also lobbied Federal Parliament to curtail AHPRA's powers while Dr M was under investigation in 2017.

In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, she cited Dr M's case as an example of a parent trying to use AHPRA's complaints process to intimidate an expert witness during a case.

"The practitioner reports that AHPRA not only asked for and received his report but conducted an investigation concurrently with the Family Law proceedings," she said.

Mr Archer rejects this, saying he complained about Dr M's dealings with him before the report was even delivered but AHPRA took years to act.

Mr Archer says AHPRA's findings against Dr M have come too late.

"The damage was done. It lost my son a loving relationship with his dad ... and with half of his family," he says.

"My son's grandmother passed away earlier this year. I hope his grandfather gets to see him before he's too old but I really can't be absolutely sure.

"I used to joke that after the Family Court case, I was going to go to Guantanamo Bay for a holiday.

"But the torture that the children go through, makes what the adults go through seem like nothing."

AHPRA did not respond to the ABC's request for comment.

A spokesperson for the Family Court of WA said it was "inappropriate to comment on any specific case".

Dr M did not respond to attempts by the ABC to seek comment.

*For legal reasons the ABC cannot name parties in family law matters.

Teancum Petersen-Crofts pleads not guilty to Ellebrook triple murder of mother and siblings .
After more than 16 months of treatment since his arrest for killing his mother, brother and sister, Teancum Vernon Petersen-Crofts pleads not guilty to three counts of murdering the family at their Ellenbrook home.Teancum Vernon Petersen-Crofts is alleged to have murdered his 48-year-old mother, Michelle Petersen, and two of her children — Bella, 15 and Rua, eight — whose bodies were found at the family's home in Brixton Crescent, Ellenbrook, in July last year.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 26
This is interesting!