Australia Comment: Who will benefit from a new coal-fired power plant in Queensland?

07:31  14 february  2020
07:31  14 february  2020 Source:   crikey.com.au

New Acland Coal pursues Oakey Coal Action Alliance for legal costs ahead of possible High Court appeal

  New Acland Coal pursues Oakey Coal Action Alliance for legal costs ahead of possible High Court appeal A Queensland miner is considering seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal costs from a landholder group led by 84-year-old Aileen Harrison, ahead of a possible High Court appeal. Aileen Harrison is the president of a landholder group known as the Oakey Coal Action Alliance (OCAA), who, since 2015, has been locked in a lengthy legal battle against plans to expand the New Acland Coal mine, 180 kilometres west of Brisbane. The group's primary concerns centre on what it says is the irreversible impact of the mine on groundwater and prime agricultural land.

Mining giant Glencore has managed to keep its name more or less out of the news that the government has backed a proposal for a new coal - fired power plant in northern Queensland . Which is interesting, given the company has been lobbying for a new “high efficiency, low emissions” (HELE) plant in

“I want to get a coal - fired power station in north Queensland (and there’s no reason) why that cannot be done through the NAIF,” Canavan told The And it happens to offer up five very good reasons why building a new coal plant in northern Queensland would be a really bad idea – for the state, for the

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Mining giant Glencore has managed to keep its name more or less out of the news that the government has backed a proposal for a new coal-fired power plant in northern Queensland.

Which is interesting, given the company has been lobbying for a new “high efficiency, low emissions” (HELE) plant in Australia for some time now.

a person riding a snowboard down a snow covered mountain© Provided by Crikey But Inq can reveal that the multinational is hoping to develop a coal supply agreement with Shine Energy, the company behind the recently announced $4 million government-backed feasibility study into the new plant in Collinsville.

Minister says Queensland doesn't need a new coal-fired power station

  Minister says Queensland doesn't need a new coal-fired power station Queensland Environment Minister Leeanne Enoch on Sunday pushed back against a federal government announcement that it had set aside $4 million to investigate a new coal-fired power plant.Queensland does not need a new coal-fired power station but coal will remain part of the state’s energy mix for some time, state Environment Minister Leeanne Enoch says.

A new coal - fired plant is also supported by the Turnbull government and One Nation. Palaszczuk said it was “very clear that Queensland does not need a new coal - fired power station ”. Palaszczuk, whose campaign has been dogged by criticism of her support for Adani’s mining

Far from considering new coal - fired power stations , the real debate is about how fast existing ones will be closed. Attempts to form a government in Germany have foundered on If the policies being pushed by the LNP, nationally and in Queensland , are implemented, there is virtually no chance that

The government’s support for the project follows an intense campaign led by rebel Nationals MPs, including former resources minister Matt Canavan, as well as Michelle Landry and George Christensen.

The announcement has driven a wedge into the Coalition over climate, even though experts say there is no market for the plant unless the government indemnified it to the tune of billions.

But it’s not exactly clear who has been pushing the project, and who stands to benefit the most from the proposal — if it ever goes ahead.

Shine Energy, a First Nations traditional owner company based in Brisbane, is responsible for the plan. Its chief executive, Ashley Dodd, has been campaigning for the plant alongside the Queensland Nationals triumvirate, spruiking the project on Andrew Bolt’s show last year.

Welcome to Collinsville, the new home of the climate wars 

  Welcome to Collinsville, the new home of the climate wars  This small Queensland town is at the centre of a bitter debate over coal-fired power.Now, the tiny mining town in northern Queensland is at the centre of a bitter dispute over coal-fired power between moderate Liberals and conservative Nationals.

HONG KONG — Coal - fired power plants have propelled much of China’s economic rise for decades, helping In guidelines released on Monday, China halted plans for new coal - fired power stations in many parts of the country, and construction of some approved plants will be postponed until at least

A farmer near a power plant in Shuozhou. Critics say most or all of the 155 new coal plants approved this year are unnecessary.Credit Gilles Sabrie for The New York Times.

a yellow truck driving down a dirt road© Provided by Crikey

Collinsville already has a decommissioned power plant, built in the ’60s, that was switched off in 2018. The town is also home to one of Australia’s oldest coal mines, which is owned by Glencore. The mine has been running on and off for almost 100 years and was most recently reopened in 2017.

The Australian reported last year that Shine’s proposal for a new power plant had received the initial backing of Glencore, which said it would provide the company with “project management and governance expertise during the feasibility phase of the project”.

In a statement to Inq, Glencore said while it did not have a financial stake in the project, it said a new plant, if viable, would benefit its supply chain.

“We have indicated we would consider a coal supply agreement to the project, given we have a mine located nearby,” a spokesperson said.

Glencore has done a lot of work to lobby for a new HELE plant in Queensland. In November, chief executive Ivan Glasenberg met with Prime Minister Scott Morrison to argue that a HELE coal-fired power station should be part of Australia’s energy mix as it transitions to renewables.

Thrown under the Cbus

  Thrown under the Cbus Good morning, early birds. Cbus Super has invested $128 million across 23 coal companies despite pushing the tagline "invest in a better future", and Queensland is staring down a tropical cyclone. It's the news you need to know, with Chris Woods.The Melbourne-based fund, which represents the construction and building industries, has also backed 90% of shareholder resolutions from those coal companies. Cbus investment officer Kristian Fok has defended the exposure, arguing “divestment is a simplistic approach”.

Matt Canavan’s comments come as Queensland Nationals push for ‘immediate’ action to underwrite power stations . That message was echoed by the finance minister, Mathias Cormann, who indicated the Deal signed for huge coal - fired power plants in Hunter Valley, Hong Kong firm says.

Power up queensland ! Head on over and check out QCC's new Climate and Energy Campaign page. And watch this space for actions you can take to help New reports show that potentially deadly fine particle emissions are soaring from coal - fired power plants in Victoria, NSW and Queensland .

At the time, Glencore told The Australian Financial Review: “Glencore believes government policy should be extended to support all low emission technologies, including HELE and CCS [carbon capture storage] which can co-exist with renewables.”

Glencore would not say whether this discussion involved the Collinsville power plant. “Glencore meets with local, state and federal government officials from both major parties on a regular basis across a wide range of issues,” the spokesperson told Inq.

A new HELE plant has been part of Glencore’s “clean coal” agenda for some time. In a sustainability document from May 2018, it said its strategic response to climate change was to give “support for low emission technologies” including “advocating HELE technology”.

“HELE and CCS exist and are proven technologies; the economics will markedly improve with the right public policy backing — policy parity is required for this,” it said.

And then there’s Project Caesar. Project Caesar was Glencore’s secret, multimillion-dollar astroturfing campaign to prop-up coal demand by undermining environmental activists and spreading sophisticated pro-coal messaging on social media.

The campaign was uncovered by The Guardian last year, and was orchestrated by none other than world-renowned spin doctors the C|T group, the firm founded by Sir Lynton Crosby and Mark Textor.

The campaign was reportedly responsible for posts by the now-defunct Facebook group, Energy in Australia, which attacked renewables while supporting HELE coal plants through memes and graphics. The page’s posts were shared by George Christensen at the time.

Inq sought comment from Shine Energy.

Origin Energy says coal plant closure date open to review .
The closure of Australia's largest coal-fired power plant could be brought forward, as Origin Energy assesses a "range of scenarios".After pushing back against a move by shareholder activists last year to bring forward the 2032 closure of the Eraring coal-fired generator in New South Wales by two years, Origin on Thursday indicated it remained open to retiring the facility or winding it down in a staged approach sooner than 2032.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!