Australia Many hand sanitisers are ineffective against coronavirus, experts warn
Stars of 'Contagion' reunite for a PSA
The stars of the 2011 virus thriller “Contagion” — a prescient film these days — have reunited for a series of public service announcements to warn about COVID-19. Matt Damon, Laurence Fishburne, Kate Winslet and Jennifer Ehle have teamed up with scientists from Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health to offer four individual homemade videos.
Many Australians are unaware they are using hand sanitiser that is ineffective, particularly in preventing transmission of coronavirus, experts fear.
Hand sanitiser has rapidly been selling out in shops for weeks, but there are concerns that variations in alcohol levels mean some are not providing adequate protection.
"It's dangerous in that they may not work anywhere near as well as you'd expect," Peter Collignon, professor of infectious diseases at the Australian National University, said.
Zimbabwe universities making face masks, gloves amid coronavirus
Zimbabwe is looking within to beat Covid-19The economic upheaval and notorious hyperinflation has decimated much of the country’s manufacturing base which in previous decades had been supported by its higher learning institutions.
Pictures: Who should wear a face mask, and do they stop the coronavirus? (Reuters)
Across Australia, there are thousands of products that are marketed as hand sanitiser, but not all are equal.
The least effective are sanitisers that contain no alcohol.
These are often chosen by customers who have suffered a reaction to alcohol-based products, but buyers are warned they offer a low level of protection.
"I think it might provide them with a false sense of security," Andrew McLachlan from Sydney University's School of Pharmacy said.
"If you're out and about and you need to use the bathroom and you want to reduce your risk of infection or exposing yourself to bacteria, then the alcohol-free products are probably fine for that.
"But when it comes to viruses, where we're trying to inactivate them, that is much more effective with alcohol-based hand sanitiser."
Coronavirus: THATs really bring disposable gloves
© provided by COSMOPOLITAN What do disposable gloves really do? How can you protect yourself against the corona virus? Are disposable gloves a useful barrier between the skin and the viruses that make you sick? Many precautions are taken to avoid protection against infection with the Coronavirus . Disposable gloves are now standard equipment for many when it comes to the supermarket.
Low-alcohol sanitisers 'should be avoided'
Experts warn not to reach for just any alcohol-based sanitiser.
A nice-smelling spray with 30 percent alcohol content can be virtually useless at killing viruses, particularly if used in the same doses as high-alcohol content sanitisers usually are.
"30 percent might be better than nothing, but it would take longer to work and require greater volume than an appropriate-strength one," Professor Collignon said.
"The trouble with low-alcohol sanitisers is that they might not have been tested or approved with data showing they will work, so they should be avoided if they can."
Experts say the gold standard is a sanitiser with 60–80 percent alcohol — the level required to kill the virus if it is on your hands.
"The high-alcohol-based sanitisers are the most effective at killing not only the bacteria but the particular types of virus," Professor McLachlan said.
Coronavirus: death of a 12-year-old girl in Belgium
Follow us on Facebook Download the application Microsoft News Subscribe to the newsletter
"They do so by disrupting their outer membranes or envelope, and that won't happen unless there's at least 60 percent alcohol content."
Pictures: 9 coronavirus myths you should stop believing (Reader's Digest)
Too much alcohol is a problem too
What is not effective, though, is 100 percent alcohol, because water is necessary to make sanitisers effective.
It's a message the World Health Organisation (WHO) is hoping to get out with the release of formulas for making alcohol-based sanitiser at home.
"100 per cent alcohol is nowhere near as effective as 70 per cent, for instance, so getting the right concentration is important," Professor Collignon said.
Ultimately, the best way to stay safe is to stay home — and when it comes to keeping hands clean,is more effective than any hand sanitiser.
"None of them are helpful unless you're minimising your touching practices and using good hand hygiene," Professor McLachlan said.
Iran plans to fight coronavirus at least until summer
© - Iranian firefighters during disinfection operation in Tehran, March 13, 2020 Tehran announced Monday that the new coronavirus More than 40,000 people are now affected and 2,775 have been killed in Iran, where authorities say they will prepare to fight the epidemic at least until early summer. The Islamic Republic is one of the countries most affected by the pandemic.
"So, making sure you're avoiding high-touch surfaces like ATMs, handrails, lift buttons, using other parts of your body like elbows, knees or feet to open doors, and also not touching your eyes, face and nose.
Coronavirus: Does a flu shot increase the risk of getting Covid-19?
© iStockphoto A German doctor claims that anyone who is vaccinated against the flu has an increased risk of contracting the lung disease Covid-19, which is caused by the coronavirus - and thereby fuels fears. But experts are sure that this claim is simply wrong. While the world is waiting for a vaccine against the new coronavirus , opponents of vaccination are trying to capitalize on the crisis. Latest example: the German doctor and author Ruediger Dahlke.
"These are the things that are so important."
Coronavirus: Rutte promises to contribute to the success of discussions in the Eurogroup .
HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-EUROGROUPE-NETHERLANDS: Coronavirus: Rutte promises to contribute to the success of discussions in the Eurogroup © Reuters / EVA PLEVIER CORONAVIRUS: RUTTE PROMISED TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE SUCCESS OF EUROGROUP DISCUSSION AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - The Dutch Prime Minister ruled that an agreement was possible during Thursday's Eurogroup on the 500 billion euro support plan proposed for deal with the economic consequences of the coronavirus crisis in the euro area.