•   
  •   

Australia The Pell legacy: lessons for cops, courts and all those who serve God and justice

06:11  11 may  2020
06:11  11 may  2020 Source:   crikey.com.au

Judge orders Corrections Victoria to assess coronavirus risk in Port Phillip Prison

  Judge orders Corrections Victoria to assess coronavirus risk in Port Phillip Prison Supreme Court Justice Timothy Ginnane orders a COVID-19 risk assessment be undertaken at Port Phillip Prison after finding there was a prima facie case prison authorities breached their duty of care.Supreme Court Justice Timothy Ginnane has made the order during a ruling rejecting an initial bid by inmate Mark Rowson to serve some of his sentence on his mother's property because of the threat of the coronavirus.

Kennedy, who announced his retirement in July after 30 years of service , held the key vote on high-profile issues, such as abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, guns, campaign finance and voting rights. Here's a look at the sitting Supreme Court justices .

Pell 's legacy . Pell was the man who established the problematic Melbourne Response to child sexual abuse, undermining a more generous regime preferred by the Bishops Conference. Faith and good deeds were meaningless, unless who a person was matched who the church wanted them to be.

George Pell wearing a suit and tie © Provided by Crikey There was a time in the not-so-distant past when a priest was the first person you would believe. Now? Not so much. 

The royal commission into, among others, the Catholic Church and Cardinal George Pell, has killed that off. Then-prime minister Julia Gillard’s decision to bring it on in 2012 triggered an eight-year unravelling which reached its endpoint with the judges of the High Court and the royal commission now delivering their final verdicts.

In the space of four weeks, we’ve learnt there was a “significant possibility” that Pell was innocent of charges that he committed child sex abuse, but that he was mostly guilty of allowing predator priests to keep abusing children under the church’s care.

Royal commission findings on Cardinal George Pell released by Federal Government

  Royal commission findings on Cardinal George Pell released by Federal Government Cardinal George Pell should have advised senior Catholic authorities to remove a paedophile priest in 1989, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has found. Cardinal George Pell should have advised senior Catholic authorities to remove a paedophile priest in 1989, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to In its unredacted reports tabled by the Federal Government this morning, the commission found that Cardinal Pell, who was then an auxiliary bishop in Melbourne, should have advocated for Father Peter Searson to be removed.

There is concern for justice in our world today. However, to achieve justice for the world, we must better understand how God views it.Turn to these Bible verses for a better understanding of God intentions.

The district court and a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit dismissed the suit, but the full appeals court reinstated it and the town A 1989 decision, DeShaney v. Winnebago County, held that the failure by county social service workers to protect a young boy from a beating

George Pell standing in front of a building © Provided by Crikey

The High Court found a jury had not been acting “rationally”. A royal commission found Pell’s versions “implausible”. All in an era where a priest is only innocent because no victim has yet come forward.

With all this wreckage of lives and the damage to faith, who knows what to believe any more? And where does it leave the justice system if the highest court in the land says a jury isn’t capable of working out what it should believe? 

A judge’s message for police and prosecutors

Victorian Court of Appeal judge Justice Mark Weinberg has effectively blown the whistle on the quagmire of truth, half-truth and fantasy that juries confront when it comes to claims of historic child sex abuse in an era when anything can be believed.

Alleged sex offenders to lose anonymity under changes to South Australian law

  Alleged sex offenders to lose anonymity under changes to South Australian law SA legal reforms that will allow alleged sex offenders to be named earlier in proceedings are being hailed as an important safety measure, but the Law Society is concerned about vigilantism.But senior legal figures have warned the change could lead to vigilante justice and destroy the reputations of those who are charged but later acquitted.

“These are responsibilities that I take seriously, as should everyone, they are bigger than any one party; they are about our democracy. Like other candidates, Cruz has used fiery rhetoric about the court and conservative touchstones while on the campaign trail. In Iowa recently, prior to winning the state’s

The court divided along ideological lines, and the two sides drew sharply different lessons from the history of the civil rights movement and the nation’s progress in rooting out racial discrimination in voting. At the core of the disagreement was whether racial minorities continued to face barriers to

His is a call aimed primarily at police and prosecutors to smarten up their act.

Last year Weinberg raised the cautionary tale of UK man Carl Beech, who made lurid allegations of child sex abuse by a VIP paedophile ring operating in Westminster.

Beech was ultimately revealed as a fantasiser and convicted of making false allegations of historical sexual abuse. Australia’s 60 Minutes also covered the case in detail, including claims that children were killed to cover up for the VIP ring.

“The police clearly regarded Beech as a credible and reliable witness,” Weinberg warned, “notwithstanding the fact that there was no independent support at all for any of his allegations.”

He continued: “Some of those allegations were inherently improbable, bordering on the preposterous. Yet, various media organisations took up Beech’s cause, broadcasting his claims on national television, and clearly implying that they should be taken as truthful and reliable.”

The Department of Justice requests the dropping of charges against Flynn, ex-advisor to Trump

 The Department of Justice requests the dropping of charges against Flynn, ex-advisor to Trump USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA-FLYNN: The Justice Department requests the dropping of charges against Flynn, ex-advisor to Trump © Reuters / Joshua Roberts DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CALLS FOR DROP CHARGE AGAINST TRYNP FLYNN by Sarah N. Lynch WASHINGTON (Reuters) - US Justice Department asked judge to drop criminal prosecutions of Donald Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn appear to be yielding to mounting pressure from the most conservative wing of the President's political allies.

Murphy, who had been Attorney-General in the Whitlam government, which appointed him to the High Court , had I was surprised when the first jury found him guilty but thought justice of a rough kind had been done Pell jury could not have come to its decision on the basis of reason and evidence alone.

The Court ’s timidity, combined with steadfast local resistance, meant that the bold Brown v. Board of Many lower court judges in the South, who had been appointed by segregationist politicians, were The legacy and impact of Brown v. Board. More than 60 years after the landmark ruling

Weinberg sat on two appeals, one after the other, which picked over the modus operandi of the state’s public prosecution office and Victoria police’s task force SANO, established to investigate allegations of child sex abuse arising from the royal commission.

The Pell case was one. The other was the prosecution of Christian Brother John Tyrrell.

A tale of two cases

The two cases had much in common. Both started in 2015. Both prosecutions relied on the word of one complainant, with little or no corroboration. Both Pell and Tyrrell were found guilty by a jury and both cases went to the Victorian Court of Appeal. The Tyrrell appeal was decided in March last year — crossing paths with the Pell appeal which came along three months later.

In the first case, the three-judge Court of Appeal unanimously acquitted Tyrrell who had been found guilty of offences stretching back 50 years. The judges described the sole accuser’s evidence as “improbable”, “inconsistent”, and as “straining credulity”. Dates were wrong. Places were wrong. Some events simply could not have happened.

Supreme Court appears headed for a split decision on Trump taxes, financial records

  Supreme Court appears headed for a split decision on Trump taxes, financial records The cases involve efforts by House Democrats and a N.Y. prosecutor to obtain the president's documents.The justices heard three hours of argument by telephone conference call, and lawyers for the president seemed to find more traction for their claim that Congress does not have unlimited authority to issue subpoenas, especially when a president may find it distracting to respond.

Submit interesting and specific facts about something that you just found out here. Starting your title with a why/what/ who /where/how modifier should be unnecessary. I recently read a Lincoln biography and god , everything McClellan did makes me angry every time I read it, no matter that I know it all

In their often censored writings, those philosophers advocated that men were born free and equal. The contradiction between the claim that "all men are created equal" and the existence of American slavery attracted comment when the Declaration of Independence was first published.

A key part of the prosecution’s case crumbled when the complainant admitted that a vivid scene he described as real — when he violently confronted his abuser — could not have occurred and must, in fact, have come from one of his nightmares.

In historic child sex abuse cases juries are instructed to cut the complainant some slack on dates and details, but the Tyrrell case went too far.

Weinberg referred to the Tyrrell prosecution when giving his judgement in the Pell appeal a few months later. The Tyrrell decision, he said, was “a classic illustration of an apparently compelling witness whose account had to involve a substantial measure of complete fantasy”.

“In that case, the fact that the prosecution was brought more than 50 years after the alleged offending was, in itself, a portent of unreliability. Such a prosecution would never have been brought even as recently as 20 or so years ago and, if it had, it would have been stayed as an abuse of process,” the judge said.

The Pell prosecution, too, had relied on the uncorroborated word of one witness, Witness J. This witness claimed Pell committed four sex acts on two boys in the space of five minutes having just delivered Sunday mass. One of the boys was no longer alive to give evidence and had denied when he was alive that he was ever abused.

German judges versus European judges: what consequences for the EU?

 German judges versus European judges: what consequences for the EU? © Sebastian Gollnow The judges of the German Constitutional Court deliver their judgment on May 5, 2020 What action should be taken on the disavowal by the German Constitutional Court of European justice? Faced with the danger of destabilizing the Union, the European Commission has raised the threat of proceedings against Germany, but this is not without risk.

When it came to the Pell case, Weinberg, the dissenting voice on the three-judge appeal panel, zeroed in on the question of just how compelling Witness J was. He noted the prosecution’s reliance on his recollection. 

Weinberg cited the fact that the first jury in the Pell trial had not been able to reach even a majority verdict, forcing the trial to be held a second time.

“That might suggest that [the prosecutor] Mr Boyce’s submission as to the unanswerably compelling nature of the complainant’s evidence might be something of an overstatement,” the judge noted.

Weinberg found that Witness J “seemed almost to ‘clutch at straws'” when he was questioned to “minimise inconsistencies in the evidence”. “There were inconsistencies, and discrepancies, and a number of his answers simply made no sense,” the judge found.

“The complainant’s allegations against [Pell] were, to one degree or another, implausible,” he wrote. “In the case of the second incident, even that is an understatement,” he said of the prosecution’s allegation that Pell, dressed in full ceremonial garb had accosted the young choirboy and violently squeezed his testicles in full view of a 40-strong choral procession.

“The complainant’s account of the second incident seems to me to take brazenness to new heights, the like of which, I have not seen,” the judge wrote. “I would have thought that any prosecutor would be wary of bringing a charge of this gravity against anyone, based upon the implausible notion that a sexual assault of this kind would take place in public, and in the presence of numerous potential witnesses.”

Eased coronavirus restrictions could see some jury trials resume in June, Queensland Chief Justice says

  Eased coronavirus restrictions could see some jury trials resume in June, Queensland Chief Justice says Supreme and District Court jury trials could resume at a "trickle" if COVID-19 restrictions are further eased in mid-June, Queensland's Chief Justice Catherine Holmes says. New jury trials in Queensland were suspended in March in order to comply with social distancing regulations.Chief Justice Catherine Holmes said she was optimistic that if Queensland got to stage two of easing restrictions in mid-June, jury trials could resume.

It has since emerged that SANO task force detectives failed to interview eyewitnesses to that account including Father Brian Egan who was in procession with Pell at the time. 

Weinberg’s step in finding that the prosecution case should not have satisfied a jury beyond reasonable doubt was unusual — and not just for him, but for appeal court judges full stop. Appeal judges are loath to overturn jury decisions on fact grounds alone because they accept that jurors have a unique advantage: they can observe a witness to weigh up if they are truthful and reliable. 

Last year Weinberg attested to his faith in jury verdicts: “I have said previously in judgments that juries almost always get it right,” he said. “But the word is almost.” 

According to research by Melbourne University law academic Jeremy Gans, in the three years before the Tyrell and Pell cases, Weinberg had ruled only two jury verdicts unsafe out of 17 applications — a rate of one in nine. This was far lower than the Court of Appeal’s average rate of one in four. 

For Weinberg to twice find a jury finding unsafe in the space of four months was extraordinary by his own standards. Weinberg is a former federal director of public prosecutions, a one-time dean of Melbourne Law School and arguably Australia’s most experienced criminal law jurist. That both of his recent decisions findings relate to the modus operandi of Victoria’s Office of Public Prosecutions and police task force SANO should ring alarm bells.

What now?

The Office of Public Prosecutions declined to answer Inq‘s questions on its decision to proceed, or the cost involved in taking on Pell all the way from a Magistrates’ Court to the High Court. Ditto the Victorian police and its much-vaunted SANO taskforce. 

The police or public prosecutions office are unlikely to face pressure from the Victorian government. There’s no public clamour to right lawfare wrongs against the likes of Pell who, they might reason, has played the justice system against victims for years.

Medich's murder verdict a 'miscarriage of justice,' court hears

  Medich's murder verdict a 'miscarriage of justice,' court hears "Errors and irregularities" throughout trial of wealthy property developer Ron Medich led to a "substantial miscarriage of justice", court hears.Medich is currently serving a minimum 29-year sentence after a 2018 jury found him guilty of the 2009 murder of a business rival Michael McGurk and the subsequent intimidation of McGurk's widow Kimberley.

a close up of a car © Provided by Crikey

And besides, the royal commission dismantling of the Catholic Church and Pell is a made in Victoria affair. Gillard, who established the commission, is from Victorian Labor. Victoria’s Attorney-General Jill Hennessy, a former lawyer with Labor-leaning law firm Holding Redlich, counts Gillard as a close colleague. The third member of the powerful Victorian trio is Viv Waller, a leading lawyer and campaigner for church victims who once worked with Gillard at Slater and Gordon. It is Waller who represents Witness J, the key witness in the Pell prosecution.

Premier Daniel Andrews’ only public comment has been to victims: “I see you. I hear you. I believe you.” Never mind that it is the utter reliance on one victim’s word which has arguably led to the collapse of the high-profile prosecution of Pell — a case so heavy with symbolism that sex abuse survivor groups have needed to reassure victims that they shouldn’t give up hope.

According to the Blue Knot Foundation’s president Dr Cathy Kezelman, telephone counsellors with the advocacy organisation received a large increase in calls from abuse victims in the wake of the High Court decision.

“And not just the number. There was a depth of hopelessness and despair that they had not experienced before,” said Kezelman, who has her own harrowing but contested story of childhood abuse.

“There had been so much legal process and it had taken enormous courage [for Witness J] to speak out against an alleged perpetrator of such power. People were asking what is the point of speaking out?”

If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au. Lifeline on 13 11 14. In an emergency, call 000.

David Hardaker has a record of revealing Catholic Church sex abuse stretching back to his work on Christian Brothers’ orphanages in Western Australia in the early 1990s. David subsequently won a Walkley Award for revelations of sex abuse — and consequent 30-year coverup — perpetrated by a teacher in a Jesuit-run school. After his report, the victim received an apology and the payment of compensation from the Jesuit order.

The post The Pell legacy: lessons for cops, courts and all those who serve God and justice appeared first on Crikey.

Medich's murder verdict a 'miscarriage of justice,' court hears .
"Errors and irregularities" throughout trial of wealthy property developer Ron Medich led to a "substantial miscarriage of justice", court hears.Medich is currently serving a minimum 29-year sentence after a 2018 jury found him guilty of the 2009 murder of a business rival Michael McGurk and the subsequent intimidation of McGurk's widow Kimberley.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 8
This is interesting!