Australia Voluntary assisted dying law passes South Australia's Parliament on way to becoming law
Animal testing status made clearer in new voluntary cosmetic industry code
Shoppers looking for cosmetic products that support animal welfare will have more clarity, with the Australian government beefing up consumer law to address misleading advertising claims. Laws that banned testing cosmetics on animals in Australia came into effect in July 2020, and now the federal government is backing the legislation with a new voluntary code for the cosmetic industry.Cosmetics are defined to include make-up, soaps, shampoos, toothpaste, and other personal care items.Accord Australasia, which represents the cosmetics industry, led the development of the voluntary code.
A bill to legalise euthanasia has passed South Australia's Lower House for the first time and is now all but certain to become law.
The major milestone was the 17th attempt in 26 years to legalise voluntary assisted dying in South Australia.
MPs debated the legislation for six hours into the early hours of Thursday before voting 33 to 11 in favour of giving terminally ill patients the right to request a lethal drug to end their lives.
Several amendments were added to the bill, which now has to go back to the Upper House to be ratified before euthanasia can be legalised.
Key debate in SA on assisted dying laws
The lower house of state parliament is set to begin a key debate on legislation to legalise voluntary assisted dying in South Australia.The debate is scheduled to begin at 7.30pm on Wednesday night, with the House of Assembly to consider a number of amendments to the original bill which comfortably passed the upper house last month.
If endorsed there, South Australia will become the fourth state in the country to legalise euthanasia.
The bill was introduced to the Lower House by Labor MP Susan Close, who said it was a historic night for South Australia.
"It will be, in my view, the right thing, but importantly in the view of countless South Australians, something that they will be grateful we took on, we did seriously, and I hope turned into law," she said.
The bill was first introduced to the Upper House by Labor MP Kyam Maher and.
Mr Maher said he became an advocate for voluntary assisted dying after witnessing his mother die in pain from cancer.
"After she passed away I knew, being a supporter wasn't enough anymore, I had to do everything I could," he said.
SA lower house passes assisted dying laws
The South Australian lower house has passed by 33 votes to 11 a bill to legalise voluntary assisted dying in the state.The House of Assembly met on Wednesday evening to consider a number of amendments to the original bill, which had comfortably passed the upper house last month.
"We heard stories tonight about other people who had had those same types of moments. It was emotional, and it was Parliament and our democracy at its best.
"It showed how Parliament can and should be."
Late on Wednesday night MPs went through the 117 clauses, scrutinising the finer details and debating amendments.
One of the amendments would allow private hospitals to exercise conscientious objection to euthanasia and instead refer patients seeking the procedure to other institutions.
Opposition leader Peter Malinauskas supported the amendment and said contemplating the bill had weighed on him in recent months.
"It is a subject, quite frankly … I personally have struggled with," he said.
If the amended bill is endorsed by the Upper House it will go to the Governor for royal assent.
After that, the new laws are expected to come into effect within 18 to 24 months.
Victoria, Western Australia and Tasmania have already made voluntary assisted dying legal.
SA's legislation, which is modelled on Victoria's laws, includes over 70 safeguards and has been described as among the most conservative in the world.
Eligible patients must be 18 year or over, an Australian citizen and have lived in South Australia for at least one year.
They must have a terminal condition deemed to cause intolerable suffering and expected to cause death within weeks or months.
The process requires approval by two separate doctors within a prescribed time frame.
Seoul courts risk after ‘no shackles’ missile development deal .
South Korea can now develop missiles of whatever range and payload it wants, but analysts worry it could stoke tension.But the move, announced following the two leaders White House summit on May 21, introduced new security risks surrounding South Korea’s missile development and some analysts were concerned about the potential effect on the wider region.