Australia Hegemony and ideology: David Brophy’s China Panic offers up an alternative pathway to the Middle Kingdom
China Faces World's Longest Civil War in Neighboring Myanmar, A Crisis It Can't Avoid
China is "staring at possible chaos, rising anti-China feelings, and little hope that its planned China-Myanmar Economic Corridor can be materialized anytime soon," Thant Myint-U, an award-winning writer and historian of Myanmar origin, told Newsweek.As unrest deepens across China's porous border with Myanmar, the outbreak of an all-out war could trigger a triple security, economic and humanitarian crisis that would motivate Beijing to rein in the conflict before being forced to take more heavy-handed measures that would have far-reaching strategic ramifications.
For a profession that believes it’s writing the “rough first draft of history,” it’s a shame so much journalism is ahistorical. The news cycle has little time to dwell deeply on the complexities of the past and how they shape our present.
Nowhere is that more evident than in much of the analysis of our troubled relationship with China. The conventional narrative — of Australian sovereignty on the brink, of an uncompromising Beijing demanding we bend to its will — is an article of faith which frames most stories on China these days.
There’s truth to all that. And yet what reporting struggles to do is explain the why. Why do we view China’s superpower behaviour as uniquely evil while seeking comfort in American hegemony? Why did our spies come in from the cold and start sounding the alarm on China? Why do we fulminate over some human rights abuses and merely shrug at others?
Exclusive: Polish Prime Minister Morawiecki on Threats Posed by Russia, China—and Big Tech
In his first in-depth conversation with a U.S. media outlet, the Polish prime minister expressed frustration with President Biden's energy policy, offered a nuanced view of China and stressed the need to push back on Big Tech.Newsweek Opinion Editor Josh Hammer and Polish-American journalist Matthew Tyrmand sat down in Warsaw with Prime Minister Morawiecki on May 27. A member of the national conservative Law and Justice party, Morawiecki has served as prime minister of the Republic of Poland since December 11, 2017.
University of Sydney historian David Brophy tries to answer the why in his new book, China Panic, the latest in a glut of recent tomes (all written by white men) about the torrid state of relations with our biggest trading partner.
Brophy is, of course, a white man. But he’s also a historian of modern China, who crucially specialises in Xinjiang, the sprawling “autonomous region” in China’s far west which has been the centre of the regime’s persecution of the Uyghurs. His insights on Xinjiang alone, based on firsthand experience watching the ramping up of surveillance and repression, are worth reading.
Seeking to pose an alternative to the hawkish, often shrill attitude around China means Brophy picks many targets. One is Clive Hamilton, the progressive academic turned China doomsdayer, who frequently warns Australia is on the brink of a hostile takeover.
China is repressing the feminist movement, but women's voices are only getting louder
China's Chairman Mao said that "women hold up half the sky", but decades later, feminists in China are still fighting against subjugation.China's Chairman Mao Zedong once famously said that "women hold up half the sky" — a powerful manifesto for gender equality and a legacy for the Chinese Communist Party.
Another is the fourth estate itself. China panic, Brophy writes, “has given journalists carte blanche to lob sensational stories into the public domain without anyone going back and checking if they stood up”.
Is this fair? Brophy argues journalists have been far too cosy with security agencies, willing to write up their drops uncritically. He also makes interesting parallels between Australia’s China panic, which kicked off about 2017, and Russiagate in the US, gathering steam around the same time.
Video: Whatever happens in the Indo-Pacific, 'it can't be Australia alone' (Sky News Australia)
Both narratives centred on a sinister, meddlesome foreign power. As Brophy explains, there was much cross-pollination between the domestic national security establishment and their American counterparts during this period. But the Mueller report fizzed, and Russiagate is all but forgotten now. It’s not a perfect parallel, but as a cautionary tale of how paranoia about an evil empire can lead to journalism that places too much faith in spooks, and tries to join dots that simply aren’t there, it’s instructive.
Celebs seek crowd-funding for LGBTQ rights in Poland
A Nobel Prize laureate joined celebrities on Tuesday to launch a global crowd-funding platform intended to support LGBTQ rights in Poland, whose populist leaders have reaped harsh criticism on the issue. Gay rights have become a flashpoint issue in the EU member country under the governing right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party, which campaigns against what it calls "LGBT ideology". Olga Tokarczuk, who won the 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature, Oscar-nominated film director Agnieszka Holland and Emmy-award winning "Queer Eye" host Antoni Porowski are among the high-profile members of the Equaversity Foundation.
I suspect many journalists might feel slightly aggrieved. In, Aaron Patrick hastily dismissed China Panic as “tendentious ideological analysis”. Instead Patrick believes we need objective journalism on China. True. But we also need an understanding of how history and ideology shaped our moment, which is what Brophy is well placed to do.
Where other recent China books, like the, from The Sydney Morning Herald’s Peter Hartcher, take US hegemony as an inevitable, positive feature of our world, Brophy tries to deconstruct the why.
Australia’s ties to the US, for Brophy, are in part a product of our historical role as a “sub-imperial power” doing the hegemon’s bidding in return for our own little patch of hegemony in the Asia Pacific. It’s why we see China’s activity in the Pacific — building things and doing aid — as malevolent, fears we’ve held about the region before. And it’s why when China rises, behaves like any superpower does, and seriously challenges American supremacy in the Asia Pacific, so much of our defence and national security establishment have responded with alarm bells, taking cues with an influential US Lobby whose influence is frequently overlooked.
China, Pakistan Partner in Afghanistan Against Foe U.S. Denies Exists
Pakistan ambassador to the U.N. Munir Akram told Newsweek that the East Turkestan Islamic Movement was among "the real threats of regional and international terrorism that exist in Afghanistan," but the State Department says "there has been no credible evidence that ETIM continues to exist."Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Pakistani Foreign Minister Mahmoud Shah Qureshi presided Thursday over the fourth trilateral dialogue between their countries and Afghanistan, a mutual neighbor where conflict has raged between a U.S. and NATO-backed government and the Taliban movement.
As an academic historian, Brophy is perhaps sometimes guilty of spending a little too long dwelling in the past. Still, maybe that’s the point. The historical depth allows Brophy to dig into the weeds of our China panic, and shatter some of the more annoying shibboleths that abound.
One particularly stupid phrase that gets tossed around is the “rules-based international order”. China’s threat, we are told, lies in its failure to abide by the “rules”. Brophy explains such a notion is essentially meaningless in a world where the US (and in fact Australia) frequently opt out of international law-making bodies, and throw their support behind autocracies.
“There’s an obvious contradiction between rules,” he writes, “and the role of a privileged lone superpower in maintaining them.”
On racism too, Brophy explains how Australia’s history of exclusion and xenophobia means the inevitable conclusion of over-hyped language about Australia’s sovereignty under siege is a climate where Chinese Australians will always be treated as a suspicious fifth column.
Brophy’s most important contribution to the discourse is his attempt to chart a progressive course on how to deal with China. Most of the voices dissenting from hawkish dogma are billionaires like Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest and Kerry Stokes, who as Brophy explains have a vested economic interest in business as usual. The left, meanwhile, is tied up in knots on the China issue, and struggles to find a middle ground between Hamilton’s warnings of invasion, and those who can be far too easily
Brophy is a progressive who falls into neither camp. Maybe his book is ideological. But unlike others writing on China, he doesn’t shy away from ideology. That’s a good thing.
China Panic, David Brophy, La Trobe University Press, $32.99
The postappeared first on .
Despite three-child policy, many in China can’t afford more kids .
As China allows married couples to have up to three children, boosting birth rates could collide with living costs.Men get light blue cards, women light pink, grouped by decade of birth. The cards hang stiff and impersonal from hundreds of wires in the circular “Matchmaking Corner” structure built by the municipal government, whose offices are a quick walk away.