•   
  •   

Australia The government wants to reduce emissions with technology. Will it work?

13:26  26 october  2021
13:26  26 october  2021 Source:   crikey.com.au

Exposed: Morrison’s plan to lift emissions under the cover of net zero

  Exposed: Morrison’s plan to lift emissions under the cover of net zero The government's 2050 net zero 'debate' isn't about a lack of climate ambition. It's cover for a plan to increase coal exports that will continue to drive global warming.Documents leaked to Greenpeace from the International Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) process to determine options to reduce emissions show the Morrison government’s strategy for preparing for more concerted international action on emissions abatement.

“Technology not taxes,” the Morrison government screams. Its plan to reduce emissions, even before making any commitment to net zero by 2050, is to invest in a suite of newer, more renewable technologies. The problem is that not all of them work that well, and not all of them are that much more renewable. Here’s five of the key technologies the government is relying on.

  The government wants to reduce emissions with technology. Will it work? © Provided by Crikey

Hydrogen

In the budget, the government promised $275.5 million towards developing a series of hydrogen “hubs” in regional Australia. Because hydrogen is cheap, plentiful, and produces no emissions, it’s long been considered a future fuel source. But because it combusts easily and is tough to transport, there are doubts around its suitability for, say, powering cars. Where hydrogen could be most effective is in powering emissions-heavy manufacturing industries (more on that later).

Scott Morrison announces historic net zero emissions target

  Scott Morrison announces historic net zero emissions target Scott Morrison has announced a commitment to net zero carbon emissions by 2050.The Prime Minister will show off his 'uniquely Australian' proposal at crunch climate talks in Glasgow with world leaders at the end of this month.

But there’s a catch: not all hydrogen is emissions neutral. It requires a huge amount of energy to extract in a pure, usable form. One way of doing that is with gas or coal-fired power. This is highly emissions intensive. The gold standard is “green hydrogen,” where solar or wind power — which Australia has plenty of — is used to electrolyse water and separate hydrogen. Australia has the potential to become a green hydrogen “superpower” according to the Lowy Institute, which could account for a quarter of global energy demand by 2050.

Then there’s “blue” or “clean” hydrogen, which uses coal or natural gas to extract hydrogen, but then catches the CO2 emissions and stores them underground. Which brings us to…

Carbon capture and storage

We hear about this a lot, especially from the Nationals. It’s basically a neat trick that allows the coal industry to keep chugging along, except emissions are caught and stored underground. The Morrison government earmarked $250 million in the budget to support its development along with hydrogen, and will give little treats (carbon credits) to fossil fuel companies that use it. That’s a clear sign of what kind of hydrogen the government supports.

Fiat Chrysler nears guilty plea in emissions fraud: Report

  Fiat Chrysler nears guilty plea in emissions fraud: Report The plea, currently being brokered, could include financial penalties between $250m and $300m, Reuters reported.FCA lawyers and US Justice Department officials are brokering a plea deal that could be unveiled in coming weeks and include financial penalties totalling between $250m and $300m, they said.

  The government wants to reduce emissions with technology. Will it work? © Provided by Crikey

Exposed: Morrison’s plan to lift emissions under the cover of net zero

Read More

But here’s the thing: CCS doesn’t have a good track record. Even mining billionaire Andrew “Twiggy” Forrest, now an evangelist for green hydrogen, reckons it “fails 19 out of 20 times.” Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull calls it a “scam”. The Climate Council says it’s a “big expensive failure”.

Australia is home to the biggest, most expensive of those failures in the world — Chevron’s Gorgon Gas Plant off the coast of Western Australia. The plant aimed to capture and inject 80% of CO2 produced. So far, it’s gotten about 30%.

That didn’t stop Nationals Deputy Leader David Littleproud talking up CCS last Friday as being key to extending the life of coal-fired power stations while keeping emissions down. It will definitely do one of those things.

Green steel

As we mentioned, hydrogen’s greatest potential is in emissions-heavy manufacturing. One of those sectors is production of steel, where iron ore, which Australia produces in abundance, is blasted in a coal-fired furnace to strip away excess oxygen. Steel production accounts for 7% of worldwide emissions.

The climate clock: What's the world's carbon budget, and what's Australia's share?

  The climate clock: What's the world's carbon budget, and what's Australia's share? This is the world's gameplan for averting the worst of climate change: staying within a safe "carbon budget" as we shift to green energy. But how are the numbers crunched? And how will countries divvy it up at COP26?The dinosaurs didn't have an early-warning system for their climate-changing crisis, but we do. It's been going off since at least the 1950s, when the first measurements found too much planet-warming carbon dioxide was being pumped into the atmosphere. And we've known how to fix it since the 1980s, with the emergence of renewable energy technology to replace CO2-belching fossil fuels.

“Green” steel is made using energy from renewable-extracted green hydrogen, instead of coal. It’s got a range of backers as a potentially lucrative export industry for Australia. While we produce a lot of iron ore, we don’t make very much steel. With the right policy settings, that could change.

Forrest is a big believer in green steel and is planning to build a plant in the Pilbara. Progressives have also voiced their support for green steel. Analysis from the Grattan Institute found it could become an export market with $65 billion annually, creating 25,000 jobs in NSW and Queensland. Greens Leader Adam Bandt says green steel will be key to getting a just transition for workers in the coal sector.

Long-duration energy storage (i.e. batteries)

“Find me a solar panel that works in the dark,” Resources Minister Keith Pitt told question time last Thursday. That’s where batteries come into play, as a technology to support the electricity grid when the sun doesn’t shine and the wind doesn’t blow without resorting to coal-fired power.

There’s already movement here from the big polluters. Last year, AGL announced the development of a long-duration battery in South Australia. This year, the British government created a competition where developers could win funding to create a battery.

Climate crisis: The world has a long, hard climb to ‘net zero’

  Climate crisis: The world has a long, hard climb to ‘net zero’ The findings in three major documents will be guiding the decisions of world leaders in Glasgow.The first – the 6th assessment of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published on August 9 – expresses greater scientific certainty than previous reports that human activity is responsible for global warming. “It is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, ocean and land,” it states.

And while the Morrison government is now offering millions to researchers who want to help Australia develop battery storage, let’s not forget the prime minister’s own past statements on this. When the South Australian government announced a collaboration with Elon Musk to build the world’s largest lithium ion battery, Morrison pulled out the gags.

“I mean, honestly, by all means have the world’s biggest battery, have the world’s biggest banana, have the world’s biggest prawn like we have on the roadside around the country, but that is not solving the problem,” the then treasurer said.

Soil carbon

Essentially, this is about improving agricultural practices to take CO2 from the air and store it in the ground. It’s also a favourite of the Nationals, who’ve pushed for more support for farmers to do it. Despite government interest, its effectiveness at reducing agricultural emissions on its own is still unclear.

And according to a report from the Grattan Institute, as an emissions reduction tool, soil carbon is vulnerable to changes in the climate. Hotter and drier temperatures reduce plant growth, making it harder to return organic matter to the soil.

The post The government wants to reduce emissions with technology. Will it work? appeared first on Crikey.

Global CO2 emissions set to rebound this year to pre-Covid levels .
Global CO2 emissions mainly caused by burning fossil fuels are set to rebound in 2021 to levels seen before the Covid pandemic, according to an assessment published Thursday that served as a "reality check" to vague decarbonisation pledges at a UN climate summit. Worldwide, decarbonisation -- mainly switching from fossil fuels to renewable -- continues to be outpaced by the demand for energy. But the report highlighted some positive signs.

usr: 0
This is interesting!