Australia Tasmanian government and UNESCO seemingly at odds over national park development: Greens
Tas premier makes AFL bid funding threat
Tasmania's premier has threatened to withdraw the state government's funding offer for an AFL team if the league "doesn't respect" its magnitude.Jeremy Rockliff also says the state government won't pay more than half the cost of a new stadium, something league boss Gillon McLachlan has indicated is required for a Tasmanian bid to be successful.
"Confused" is how Tasmanian Greens leader Cassy O'Connor says she feels about the way the Tasmanian government is continuing to support development in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA).
Since 2014, the state government has been encouraging tourism operators to put forward their proposals for development in national parks, which it says will help create regional jobs.
Some proposals are up and running, but others are proving contentious.
The centuries-old mines stirring Japan-South Korea tensions
Under a split-top mountain on the Japanese island of Sado lies a network of centuries-old mines that have sparked a new diplomatic row with South Korea. Some of the gold and silver mines of Sado, off Japan's west coast, are believed to have started operating as early as the 12th century and produced until after World War II. Japan believes that lengthy history and the artisanal mining techniques used there at a time when European mines had turned to mechanisation merit recognition on UNESCO's World Heritage List.
With developers behindtrying again to win approval, and plans for huts in a remote corner of the south-west yet to reach the approvals phase, will UNESCO's stance on development have any impact?
What is the situation with the TWWHA?
UNESCO, the United Nations body that oversees World Heritage areas, in July 2021 urged the government "to avoid any development at the [TWWHA] before the detailed plan for a comprehensive cultural assessment is implemented".
In a statement to the ABC, a UNESCO World Heritage Centre spokeswoman said "any further development" was to be understood as "major restoration or new constructions along with any project which may affect the outstanding universal value of the property".
SPD and Greens open: Do the nuclear power plants stay longer?
In the debate about an extension of the run times of the three remaining nuclear power plants beyond the end provided for December 31, there is increasing movement within the traffic light coalition. The FDP has been making it clear for weeks that it advocates a runtime extension of the Meiler Neckarwestheim 2 in Baden-Württemberg, Emsland in Lower Saxony and Isar 2 in Bavaria. Now SPD chairwoman Saskia Esken said that she was "not on the move" on the subject.
A Tasmanian Natural Resources and Environment Department spokeswoman said urgent clarification of this decision was previously sought because of "potential risks of the decision halting all development and maintenance projects in the TWWHA".
The spokeswoman said UNESCO's decision "failed to recognise that a detailed plan for a comprehensive cultural assessment of the TWWHA was in fact already being implemented at the time of the decision and will take a decade or more to fully implement".
She said the Tasmanian and Australian governments had received advice from the World Heritage Centre that the plan did not need to be implemented before developments took place in the TWWHA.
"This is an important clarification and acknowledges that the state government has made significant progress with … [the] plan and that putting all developments on hold until it is completed is unnecessary, subject to ongoing impact assessment processes being applied."
How US foreign aid could save more lives
USAID’s funding largely leaves out the people it’s supposed to work for.But how much good is this money doing? And is that money accomplishing as much as it could be?
Ms O'Connor said she was confused by the government's response.
"UNESCO is really clear with the Tasmanian government — they don't want to see new commercial developments and constructions in the World Heritage Area until this assessment is undertaken, and they certainly don't want to see new developments that compromise those wilderness and cultural values of our beautiful TWWHA."
The TWWHA, declared in 1982, covers about one-fifth of Tasmania's landmass and includes the Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair, Mole Creek Karst, Franklin-Gordon Wild Rivers, Mount Field, Hartz Mountains and South West national parks and several conservation areas.
The South Coast Track proposal
Tourism company Experience Co is continuing with plans for a guided walk on the South Coast Track, which would involve six walkers' huts to be built along the 85km track from Melaleuca to Cockle Creek in the Southwest National Park.
It is an area with significant Aboriginal cultural heritage as well as its wilderness values.
No formal assessment process is underway yet, because the documentation required is still being prepared.
Calls for more social housing and higher allowances for Tasmania's homeless youth
Layla was only in year 8 when she found herself on the streets. It was an incident she does not want to detail that prompted her to seek a different path — to a place where she now helps other young people in Tasmania.After family conflict, she spent four months homeless, couch surfing, going to shelters and even sleeping rough.
What is the relationship between UNESCO and governments?
UNESCO liaises with what it refers to as a "state party" in each country where there are World Heritage areas. The state party is the national government.
In Australia, while the federal government is the "state party", state governments manage World Heritage areas.
"Essentially, the state governments … operate not completely under the radar, but they operate without having to deal directly with UNESCO," Griffith University eco-tourism emeritus professor Ralf Buckley said.
"It's very commonplace that state governments essentially bulldoze ahead with whatever they feel like doing and if they can get away with it, then they're happy."
Dr Buckley said while UNESCO did not have the power to control day-to-day management of parks, it did have the power to list World Heritage areas as "World Heritage in danger".
"The Australian government would be concerned to avoid that,, because that listing is very bad for tourism," Dr Buckley said.
What power does the federal government have?
"The federal government under the constitution,… does have the legal power to prohibit any kind of development in a World Heritage Area," Dr Buckley said.
Tasmanian premier's statue could go
Hobart City Council has been told to vote to remove the statue of a former Tasmanian premier who mutilated the corpse of an Aboriginal man in 1869.William Crowther was a doctor and Tasmania politician who served as premier for less than a year between December 1878 and October 1879.
He said the federal government could exercise this power again "if they felt it was a political winner for them, and that will depend very much on what kind of representation from different stakeholders are made to the recently-appointed Minister for Environment [Tanya Plibersek]".
Ms Plibersek did not comment on whether she had any concerns about the Tasmanian government's continued support of development in the TWWHA.
A federal Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water Department spokesman said:
"The Australian government's expectation is that proposals for tourism in the Tasmanian Wilderness undergo rigorous assessment, under both state and commonwealth environmental law as necessary, and meet requirements described in Tasmania's 2016 management plan for the World Heritage property."
Who is the responsible Tasmanian minister?
With the, Roger Jaensch has become Tasmania's new Parks Minister.
It is a portfolio he previously held from January 2020 to May 2021.
Mr Jaensch is also Aboriginal Affairs Minister, something Ms O'Connor said could be a positive.
"We do need to be looking after our national parks and World Heritage Area in a way that makes Tasmanian Aboriginal people central to that story and to that management," she said.
The absolute worst action movies of all time .
Explosions, car chases, shootouts, impressive falls: it’s hard to beat a good action film for having fun at the movies. However, if you prefer a guaranteed snore fest, check out the following 25 cinematic flops.