Entertainment Misinformation on Facebook is three times more popular than it was during the 2016 election, according to new research

03:51  13 october  2020
03:51  13 october  2020 Source:   businessinsider.com.au

The Challenge of Observing American Democracy

  The Challenge of Observing American Democracy The factors that have bolstered the need for international election observers are the same ones that have made their job more difficult.A majority of American voters believe that the upcoming presidential election stands to be the most important of their lifetime, yet it is also one that many believe will not be easy, free, or fair. This contest, after all, is taking place amid a global public-health crisis that is changing the way voters cast their ballots, and within a political environment where the incumbent has refused to commit to accepting defeat.

During the 2016 presidential election , Russian operatives used Facebook , Instagram, Twitter and other social media People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election , according to new research from

Americans used Facebook more than any other online site – including social media platforms and news sites – for their information during the election , according to the study. He tied the assumption that misinformation is spreading more now than in the past to the distrust of those on

Mark Zuckerberg wearing a suit and tie: Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Financial Services Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill October 23, 2019 in Washington, DC. Facebook co-founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Financial Services Committee in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill October 23, 2019 in Washington, DC.
  • Engagement on Facebook posts from misleading websites has spiked by 242 per cent from 3Q of 2016 to 3Q of 2020, according to a new report from German Marshall Fund Digital.
  • Only 10 outlets, which researchers labelled as "False Content Producers" or "Manipulators," were responsible for 62% of interactions.
  • Facebook in the past has been slammed by civil rights leaders for inadequately handling the spread of misinformation on its platform.
  • Facebook's attempts to moderate misinformation on the platform come into focus ahead of the US presidential election.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Engagement from misleading websites on Facebook has tripled since the 2016 US presidential election.

American Voter: Sophia Madana

  American Voter: Sophia Madana Al Jazeera asks the same key questions about the presidential election to voters across the United States.Trump has been focusing on “law and order”, while Biden has been trying to strike a conciliatory note. The Black Lives Matter movement and whether Trump will release his taxes are among the many issues Americans will consider when choosing their president.

Facebook also announced that it has rolled out a special reporting option dedicated specifically to telling the company about voting information that “ Many used the same techniques to make their content appear more popular on Facebook than it really was ,” Facebook said in a statement from

In 2016 , for example, Hillary Clinton led in the polls and won nearly three million more votes than Donald Trump, but she With that caveat aside, Joe Biden has been ahead of Donald Trump in most national polls since the start of the year. According to data from an ABC News/Ipsos poll, just 35

The total number of user interactions with articles from "deceptive outlets" has increased by 242% between the third quarter of 2016 and the third quarter of 2020, according to a study published Monday by the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital wing of the Washington, DC-based public policy think tank.

Only 10 outlets â€" out of thousands â€" received 62% of those interactions, GMF Digital found. The researchers categorised outlets as either "False Content Producers" for sites, including The Federalist, that provide information that's false, and "Manipulators" for sites, like Breitbart, that present claims that aren't backed by evidence.

The study concluded that since the third quarter of 2016, the number of articles from False Content Producers jumped by 102 per cent and the number of articles from Manipulators increased by 293 per cent.

Anti-vaxxer misinformation goes viral in the Philippines

  Anti-vaxxer misinformation goes viral in the Philippines Online misinformation is leaching out from cheap mobile phones and free Facebook plans used by millions in the Philippines, convincing many to reject vaccinations for polio and other deadly diseases. Nearly all of them access the site on their mobile phones, where Facebook offers free data to access a limited version of its platform and other selected websites. Many poorer Filipinos rely on Facebook's Free Basics plan to use the internet, trapping them in the social media giant's information bubble.

Even more weird is the fact that there does not seem to be any time limit to this. In addition, in those epidemics far more younger people died. With Covid-19, if you are under fifteen, the chance of dying of it is around one in two million, which is three times less that the chance of being struck by lightning.

E. A research showed that those young people who have a mobile feel more independent and often use it to plan meetings both relatives and peers. E. Lifelong learning does not mean spending all my time reading. It is equally important to get the habit of asking such questions as ‘what don’t I know

"Disinformation is infecting our democratic discourse at rates that threaten the long-term health of our democracy," Karen Kornbluh, director of GMF Digital, said in a press release. "A handful of sites masquerading as news outlets are spreading even more outright false and manipulative information than in the period around the 2016 election."

Video: Twitter criticised after it removes viral video of awkward Biden comment (Sky News Australia)

Earlier this year, the Wall Street Journal reported that a team of Facebook employees told senior executives that the algorithms on its website were more divisive than unifying. Civil rights leaders have slammed Facebook for inadequately handling the spread of misinformation on its platform. Major brands have boycotted the platform, and celebrities, including Kim Kardashian, led a daylong protest against Facebook last month entitled Stop Hate for Profit.

Facebook is banning political ads ... after the election

  Facebook is banning political ads ... after the election The temporary ban doesn’t solve Facebook’s organic content problem or the problematic political ads appearing on its platform before voting.Facebook is going to temporarily ban all political ads … but only after the 2020 election, a move that solves neither its organic content problem nor the problematic political ads appearing on its platform prior to voting.

Perhaps most notably, the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks came on the morning of a municipal primary election in New York City, and It was reported in 2004 that some Bush administration officials had discussed putting in place a method of postponing a federal election in the event of a terrorist attack.

That 's more likely to be an in-person event because Republican leaders are generally more bullish It is possible to win the popular vote, but lose the electoral vote, as happened to Democrats Al Gore Most offer early voting, which allows registered voters to cast their ballots ahead of Election Day ( 3

A spokesperson from Facebook told Business Insider that engagement doesn't take into account what the majority of Facebook users actually see on the site, and that it doesn't reflect the progress Facebook has made in limiting misinformation since 2016.

"Over the past four years we've built the largest fact-checking network of any platform, made investments in highlighting original, informative reporting, and changed our products to ensure fewer people see false information and are made aware of it when they do," the spokesperson said.

Third-party fact-checkers are responsible for verifying much of the content publishers post on Facebook, and are part of "a three-part approach" that Facebook takes in "addressing problematic content across" its apps, including Instagram and WhatsApp. Some groups, like climate activists, say the program doesn't do enough. Many articles that incorrectly state that global warming doesn't exist escape the company's fact-check policies as they're labelled as opinion articles, which fall outside of the fact-checkers' responsibilities. And a recent study found that 84% of medical misinformation is never tagged on Facebook.

David Icke and the reptilian conspiracy theory

  David Icke and the reptilian conspiracy theory It's hard to believe that David Icke is a real person and not some character plucked out of a wacky sci-fi thriller from the '80s. For better or worse, he seems to be the real deal. He is the king of conspiracy theories, having produced one of the biggest in the world as well as highlighting and expanding on many others. The secret to his success is unclear. Everything points to him being an unstable eccentric, yet he has made a lucrative career out of peddling his theories and has managed to convince millions. Click through the following gallery to learn how David Icke got to this point, and find out what the lizard people are all about.

According to the Broadcasters' Audience Research Board, the average Briton watches/ is watching just over thirty hours of television per week. Pampas Products _ own a subsidiary in Florida, but they were obliged to sell it to recoup their losses during the recession of the early 1980s.

But that figure rises to more than a third of the planet if temperatures rise to 2C. This would require carbon prices that are three to four times higher than for a 2C target. Bob Ward, of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change, said the final document was “incredibly conservative” because

Facebook's attempts to moderate misinformation on the platform â€" including posts from President Trump â€" come into focus ahead of the presidential election, eliciting parallels in how the company handled user data and moderation efforts during the 2016 election cycle.

In 2017, the company revealed in sworn testimony to Congress that Russian interference campaigns reached nearly 130 million Americans in the weeks before the 2016 election. The company recently took down two Russian networks with ties to groups that interfered with the 2016 election, the Washington Post reported.

President Trump finds himself needing to make up a lot of ground with the election being just 22 days away. He's trailing Democratic nominee Joe Biden by an average of 10.5 percentage points nationally. Also, Trump is falling behind Biden in many swing states he won back in 2016, such as Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

Early voting began in four states on September 18, and voters in eight more states will start visiting the polls this week.

The Mess Congress Could Make .
The Bush v. Gore fight has become the template of a disputed election, but many of the worst-case scenarios could end up before Congress, not the Court.In the current anxiety over the possibility of a disputed election, attention has focused most on the battle that could rage in America’s courts to count the votes. But Al Gore’s acceptance of the Supreme Court’s judgment in 2000 has obscured a more likely venue for that fight: Congress.

usr: 2
This is interesting!