•   
  •   

Tech & Science Apple Tried To Catch Red On Vague Patents -- And Lost

18:15  11 november  2019
18:15  11 november  2019 Source:   gizmodo.com.au

Apple, Intel file antitrust case against SoftBank-backed firm over patent practices

  Apple, Intel file antitrust case against SoftBank-backed firm over patent practices Apple, Intel file antitrust case against SoftBank-backed firm over patent practicesThe suit follows an earlier case filed by Intel against Fortress in October. Intel withdrew that suit and on Wednesday filed a new version in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California with Apple also joining as a plaintiff.

Apple argued that since RED 's patent was a combination of two prior patents , its own technology was "unpatentable." RED fired back with in-depth responses stating that their work was unique from those patents , and that it had been working on the technology prior to the timeframe that Apple had claimed.

In the United States, 37 states including Puerto Rico allow left turns on red only if both the origin and destination streets are one way. Four other states

Photo: Sam Rutherford© Photo: Sam Rutherford, Gizmodo Photo: Sam Rutherford

Red Digital Cinema appears to be the winner in a months-long patent spat with Apple over its RAW video codec. Apple claimed in its challenge that Red shouldn’t have been able to patent its RedCode Raw codec in the first place. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ultimately didn’t agree.

To rewind a bit, the Apple–Red dispute dealt with capturing RAW video. Specifically, Apple contended that Red’s patent was overly vague when it should have been super detailed because it was cribbed from two other existing patents. One dealt with how to capture lossless RAW video at 2K and 4K resolutions; the other had to do with video compression. Following that logic, Apple argued that anyone with a basic understanding of this tech would be able to figure out how it all works, thereby making Red’s tech “unpatentable.”

Apple, Intel file antitrust case against SoftBank-backed firm over patent practices

  Apple, Intel file antitrust case against SoftBank-backed firm over patent practices Parody created by Hitler Rants Parodies using clips from Downfall (Der Untergang) HRP Discord: https://hitlerrantsparodies.com/discord Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hitlerrantsparodies Website https://www.hitlerrantsparodies.com BitChute Channel https://www.bitchute.com/channel/hitlerrantsparodies/ Twitter Accounts https://twitter.com/HitlerHRP https://twitter.com/HRP_Parodies https://twitter.com/ReichNews Facebook Group & Page https://www.facebook.com/HRPDownfallParodies https://www.facebook.com/groups/HRP.Downfall.Parodies/ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hitlerrantsparodies Subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/HitlerRantsParodies Fegelbook https://www.fegelbook.com/ Steam Group http://steamcommunity.com/groups/hitlerrantsparodies Hitler Rants Parodies Wiki http://hitlerrantsparodies.wikia.

Apple tried to have the case thrown out. However, a judge in Delaware has determined that there is enough there for the case to be decided for a jury. Given the generally vague wording of pretty much everything in law, yes they do. Apple does have some tricks up their sleeve though.

Faintly i’ll go to take this head on soon i’ll come around lost and never found waiting for my words seen but never heard buried underground but i’ll keep

If that seems petty, there were also some other dynamics at play. Red had previously taken Sony and Blackmagic to court over patents and royalties, and the company itself has a reputation for being litigious. It’s not clear what made Apple file its claim, but it’s possible Red got in the way of Apple’s plans for its own Pro Res Raw format. Not that it ultimately mattered.

In its final ruling, the USPTO noted Apple had “not shown a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in showing that any challenged claim is unpatentable.” Overall, it seems the agency took issue with how Apple presented its case. In the conclusion, the USPTO says Apple played fast and loose with its definitions and references, leading to “multiple contradictory interpretations” of its assertion that Red’s tech was obvious and, therefore, unpatentable. It also noted Apple’s challenge failed to account for “all limitations or lacks adequate reasoning.”

Apple is quietly working on the perfect iPhone

  Apple is quietly working on the perfect iPhone iPhone owners know that Apple only refreshes the handset’s design every once in a while, usually when it has something significant to say, design-wise. But, if you’ve been following the iPhone from the start, you probably realized that all the changes Apple made to the iPhone over the years, from the first model all the way to the iPhone X, are baby steps that Apple has been taking towards delivering the perfect iPhone design.

Apple 's request for a review of a patent owned by high-performance camera maker Red relating to Rawcode RAW has failed, and Red claims that its relationship with Apple is stronger than ever. Apple 's challenges were mostly dismissed because of the non-obviousness of the patents in question.

Can't Catch Tomorrow (Good Shoes Won't Save You This Time). "SME (от лица компании " Red Ink"); LatinAutor, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, ASCAP, CMRRA" и другие авторские общества (4).

Red President Jarred Land downplayed any animosity between thew two companies in a comment posted to a Red forum about the decision. “We are pleased to see our Redcode patents withstand another challenge,” he wrote. “To be clear, as I mentioned before, this never really was Apple vs. Red. It has always been Apple + Red, and this was all part of the process defining how we work together in the future.”

Land went on to note that Red and Apple’s respective teams are playing nice with regard to getting Redcode onto Apple’s Metal framework: “We are very excited for the new Mac Pro and the new XDR pro display and the power they bring to the entire Red workflow.”

Sure. It’s easy to be magnanimous when you’ve already won. In any case, the decision will likely strengthen Red’s grip over RAW video codecs. It’s also likely to have some impact on Apple’s future Pro Res Raw plans. In the meantime, it means companies that want to futz around with RAW video will either have to hammer out a licensing agreement, or figure out a way to do it on their own.

Apple could raise annual ad income to $11 billion by 2025 - JPMorgan .
Freelance.com Chief Executive Matt Barrie says to improve the Australian economy “we need to elaborately transform things that we dig out of the ground” instead of “shipping the raw materials”.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 2
This is interesting!