Tech & Science : The U.S. EPA Amends Its 'Transparency' Proposal To Somehow Be Even More Terrible - - PressFrom - Australia
  •   
  •   

Tech & Science The U.S. EPA Amends Its 'Transparency' Proposal To Somehow Be Even More Terrible

01:30  13 november  2019
01:30  13 november  2019 Source:   gizmodo.com.au

Apple's AirPods Pro are the best wireless buds for iPhone users

  Apple's AirPods Pro are the best wireless buds for iPhone users New AirPods are the best sounding headphones Apple has ever made, and they're more comfortable and better performing than other truly wireless buds.I've never liked in-ear buds; the ones with tips you're supposed to jam right in your ear canal. They've felt uncomfortable in my ear, like a permanent wet-willy, and only a few flavours of Jaybird buds were small enough to snuggly fit my ear canal. But until now, they've been the price of admission for active noise cancellation (ANC) in an earbud; there's no point spending all that money and technology on noise cancelling if ambient sound can leak through loose tips.

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency announced a new regulation Tuesday that would restrict the kinds of scientific studies the agency can use when it develops policies, a move critics say will permanently weaken the agency’ s ability to protect public health.

The proposed supplement “ is even worse than we thought it would be ,” says Gretchen EPA officials have argued that the data transparency policy is needed to ensure that the agency uses only But the proposal doesn’t discuss how much such vetting might cost, or how the rule might affect efforts

a train on a track with smoke coming out of it: That’s what pollution looks like. (Photo: Getty)© Photo: Getty That’s what pollution looks like. (Photo: Getty)

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking its denial of science a step further. The New York Times got its hands on a new draft of “Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science,” a proposal the agency first announced last year. Unfortunately the latest version of the document looks even worse than the last.

In an effort to supposedly increase the transparency of the science behind environmental regulations, the EPA wants American scientists to share all the data and information behind their research publicly, including private patient data, before the agency uses it to base regulations on. Public health research, however, requires pulling data from thousands of individuals whose information is kept confidential. Even though that data remains confidential, studies are peer reviewed by outside experts before being published. But the EPA proposal would make so peer review alone isn’t enough for a study to be used in rule-making.

Sydney council set to ditch Australia Day celebrations

  Sydney council set to ditch Australia Day celebrations Australia Day celebrations in Sydney's inner west are set to be scrapped in favour of the Aboriginal festival Yabun.The Inner West Council will next week vote on a motion to move celebration events from January 26, following an edict from Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton that councils that refuse to hold citizenship ceremonies on Australia Day will be stripped of the right to hold them altogether. Citizenship ceremonies will continue.

Image. Scott Pruitt, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, wants to block the use of studies that do not make public the raw data behind research.Credit Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images. The Environmental Protection Agency is considering a major change to the way it assesses

A government proposal this year, called Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, could Under the Obama administration, the E.P.A., which had long favored tests on rats and other laboratory animals in its pesticide regulation, began considering epidemiological studies more seriously.

The Times is reporting that the latest draft of the proposal would affect regulations that are already in place. If the Trump administration can make a case for the proposal once it’s finalised next year, it would make it easier for it to continue rolling back environmental and public health protections. A proposal like this is almost certain to head to the courts, John Bachmann, former EPA associate director for science, policy, and new programs for Office of Air and Radiation, told Earther.

“I think they’re going to get sued and lose when it gets down to promulgating this thing,” he said.

A lot of that will depend on what the proposal looks like when it’s finalised. EPA spokesperson Corry Schiermeyer wrote in an email to Earther that the draft the Times obtained is a “draft version of the Supplemental, not the actual text submitted to [the Office of Management and Budget].” On November 8, the agency submitted a draft supplemental federal register notice to the office that modified its initial proposal from 2018. The agency got public comment on the main new rule proposal last year, but now it will take comment only on these additions, Schiermeyer said in the email.

User-Upload DNA Sites Just Became Even Less Private

  User-Upload DNA Sites Just Became Even Less Private Ever since American police tracked down the alleged Golden State Killer with a public DNA database, those sites have been privacy minefields for people who just want to learn more about their genetics. Now, a Florida judge has signed a warrant that allows authorities to search even the DNA of people who opted out of being part of police searches. Forensic genealogy has helped law enforcement solve decades-old cold cases, but law enforcement’s new enthusiasm for the technique is a privacy issue for anyone who has used an open genetics database like GEDmatch.

The Environmental Protection Agency , the story suggested, was considering relaxing guidelines for low-dose ionizing radiation, on the theory that “a bit of radiation may be good for you.” Instead, the EPA was doing something much scarier: It was holding hearings on the “ Transparency Rule,” which

Protection Agency if Scott Pruitt, the agency’ s top official, follows through on a plan to require more public disclosure of data used for research. The EPA has used health data like Bell’ s study to protect Americans from everything from air pollution to the chemicals found in household products.

These changes largely revolve around what types of policies the proposal would impact. And now we know the answer: all of them.

“And that opens up all kinds of obvious problems,” Bachmann told Gizmodo. “There are, for example, risk assessments that are done based on older, toxicology studies that are maybe 10, 15 years old. What’s the likelihood that the scientists that did those studies kept all the data that would be needed to evaluate them? So does that mean industry could now sue EPA to withdraw a risk assessment that a regulation was based on because you can’t get data that was thrown away in the past? My goodness, they don’t even know, and that’s one of the biggest issues here.”

This proposal can be especially dangerous to the health of communities of colour in the U.S. that are often living near polluting facilities and will be directly impacted if regulations for, say, mercury or lead suffer at the hands of this policy. Plus, these communities—especially black and Native American—have a troubled history with the scientific community. Safeguarding their private information is a way scientists have tried to repair the trauma there. Releasing it is the opposite of what is needed to keep building trust.

The EPA won’t finalise this proposal until next year. Hopefully, the U.S. has got a new president in the White House by then who would just replace it with a new policy or roll it back altogether. If the U.S. is stuck with another four years of Trump, the final rule will likely fall in a judge’s hands.

Facebook nixes billions of fake accounts .
Facebook on Wednesday said it has nixed 5.4 billion fake accounts already this year, in a sign of a persistent battle on social media against manipulation and disinformation. "We have improved our ability to detect and block attempts to create fake, abusive accounts," the internet firm said in its latest transparency report."We can estimate that every day, we prevent millions of attempts to create fake accounts using these detection systems.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 1
This is interesting!