Tech & Science The US government is urging Apple to unlock a gunman's iPhone, but experts explain why that would create a privacy nightmare for iPhone owners
FBI Asks Apple To Unlock iPhone Of Suspect In Pensacola Naval Base Shooting
The FBI is seeking Apple’s assistance in unlocking the mobile phone of the gunman authorities say killed three people and wounded eight others last month at a naval base in Pensacola, Florida. Gizmodo has confirmed that FBI General Counsel Dana Boente requested Apple’s help to unlock the mobile phone in a letter sent late Monday after obtaining a court order to search its contents. require(["inlineoutstreamAd", "c.
- Apple's decision not to unlock or create a backdoor into the iPhones used by a gunman in a Florida shooting last month puts the tech giant at odds with the United States government yet again.
- Security experts agree, however, that circumventing the iPhone's security poses a significant risk to iPhone users since it would provide a means to obtain private data that even Apple can't presently access.
- There's a risk that such a tool could fall into the wrong hands, some experts warn.
Attorney General William Barr recently called on Apple to help unlock the iPhones used by a gunman in Pensacola, Florida last month - a situation that once again requires the tech giant to balance protecting consumer privacy with its legal obligation to assist in investigating a shooting that's resulted in the loss of American lives.
Apple could be headed for another battle with the FBI after the agency requested help unlocking 2 iPhones belonging to the suspected Florida shooter
The FBI sent a letter to Apple on Monday asking for help unlocking two iPhones thought to belong to the suspected shooter who killed three people at Pensacola, Florida Naval Air Station last month. The case bears similarities to the San Bernardino shooting of 2015, which led to a major standoff between the FBI and Apple.In the San Bernardino case, Apple refused to help the FBI break the encryption on the shooter's iPhone, saying it would create a security backdoor which would make every other iPhone vulnerable. Eventually the FBI dropped the case after finding an unidentified third party to help it break into the device.
But security experts agree that providing access to the shooter's iPhone could jeopardize the security of the millions of iPhones in use around the world.
"In essence, you're trying to make a weapon that can only be used on a single target," Jacob Doiron, an information systems lecturer at San Diego State University, said to Business Insider. "But that's not the nature of weapons, or exploits. They are applicable to any device that has that profile or configuration."
On Monday, Barrhad not provided any "substantive assistance" in getting access to two iPhones belonging to the shooter, Mohammad Alshamrani, who killed three people at a naval airbase last month. But Apple has since refuted that characterization, saying that it had provided iCloud backups, information, and other data from Alshamrani's account in cooperating with the investigation. Now, Apple is reportedly gearing up for a legal battle with the Department of Justice to defend its position, according to .
Apple made a rare appearance at tech's biggest conference and defended encryption on the iPhone
Apple made a rare public appearance at the world's biggest tech conference, CES, in Las Vegas. The iPhone maker usually shuns public appearances at industry conferences, but put its most senior privacy executive on stage to defend the company's pro-privacy stance.According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, iPhone privacy chief Jane Horvath - who was peaking on a panel at this year's CES tech conference in Las Vegas - said that iPhones' susceptibility to being stolen means they must be encrypted to protect personal information such as financial and health data.
"We have always maintained there is no such thing as a backdoor just for the good guys," Applein a comment to Business Insider. "Backdoors can also be exploited by those who threaten our national security and the data security of our customers."
Apple took a similar position in 2016 when it was caught in a stand-off with the Federal Bureau of Investigation over whether it should unlock an iPhone linked to a shooting in San Bernardino, California. Apple refused to unlock the iPhone, and theto gain access to the device.
The crux of the issue when it comes to unlocking an iPhone or bypassing its encryption , according to privacy experts, is that once Apple creates a backdoor, there's a risk that it can be used in unpredictable and in some cases harmful ways.
"I would say the chances of it falling into the wrong hands are 100%,"said Mark Nunnikhoven, vice president of cloud research for cybersecurity firm Trend Micro.
Apple Might Replace Your iPhone's Battery Case For Free
If you’ve noticed that your $199 Smart Battery Case is struggling to charge your iPhone, or you can’t really charge the case itself that well (or at all), then you’ve got a defective product on your hands. Apple is aware of these issues and is ready with replacements, and you only have to jump through a single hoop to get one. First, let’s talk eligibility. Apple’s replacement program is only good for the Smart Battery Case on the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR. And affected cases were manufactured at some point between January and October of 2019. Apple isn’t, however, replacing every case that was sold between this time period.
There's also the question of why Apple couldn't just create the tool for the purposes of the investigation and then push an update to iPhones that would render it obsolete. For that to work, the backdoor would have to be tied to the software only, not the iPhone's hardware, says Doiron. "Sometimes these vulnerabilities take place on the hardware, level," he said. "That's not something that could be fixed via software."
"We're on your side"
The broader issue, however, may be that creating such a tool would put private, encrypted data from iPhone users in the hands of Apple and its employees - a privilege the company doesn't want to begin with. Such a move that would be in stark opposition to Apple's stance on consumer privacy.
"You are not our product," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in an interview withlast year. "Our products are iPhones and iPads. We treasure your data. We want to help you keep it private and keep it secure. We're on your side."
Theoretically, if Apple were to create some type of tool or key that would provide backdoor access to encrypted iPhone data, employees from Apple would have access to that information as well since they would likely be assisting in the investigation. What's to prevent an Apple worker from going rogue and possibly leaking iPhone user data, or using the tool for nefarious purposes?
Apple is offering the FBI 'no substantive assistance' in unlocking two iPhones related to a shooting case, says Attorney General Barr
Attorney General William Barr told reporters Monday that Apple has given the FBI "no substantive assistance" in its investigation into a deadly shooting last month at a Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Florida. The FBI has asked for Apple's help unlocking two iPhones used by the shooter, a request Apple has refused. Apple previously refused a similar request from the FBI following a deadly shooting in San Bernardino, California, setting off a fierce public debate over whether the company should be required to offer the government tools to counter its own encryption technology.
Nunnikhoven pointed toas an example of how a tool built for specific purposes could fall into the wrong hands. EternalBlue was a National Security Agency hacking tool that leaked to the public in 2017 that was linked to the WannaCry ransomware attack that infected computers all over the world during that same year.
Creating the tool in general would also require a significant effort on Apple's part. It's not simply about cracking the passcode of the device, but would likely require that a dedicated team at Apple create a piece of software capable of accessing the data stored on the device, says Nunnikhoven. The government, in other words, is asking Apple to enable something that isn't even possible on iPhones today.
Unlocking these iPhones for the Pensacola investigation would also likely set a precedent for law enforcement agencies to request similar treatment for future cases as well, says Matt Wilson, chief information security advisor at BTB Security.
"It's just more evidence to prove this isn't just [cybersecurity experts] saying, 'I don't want to think about it,'" said Wilson. "It's [experts] saying we've thought about it very long and very hard, and we don't see a viable way that addresses all of these issues."
Here's more evidence that Apple could be planning to bring back the smaller-sized iPhone in 2020 .
Apple could release a new iPhone with a 5.4-inch screen that would fall between the iPhone SE and iPhone 8 in terms of size, according to a report from blog Mac Otakara. The report further fuels existing rumours that Apple will release a new smaller-sized iPhone this year, marking a departure from the 5.8-inch, 6.1-inch, and 6.5-inch screen sizes Apple has implemented on its iPhones in recent years. If Mac Otakara's report turns out to be true, this new smaller-sized iPhone would be around the same size as the iPhone 8, but with a screen that's almost as large as the iPhone 8 Plus.