•   
  •   

Tech & Science The debate over Pluto will never die. Here’s the latest argument for why it’s a planet.

07:35  08 may  2018
07:35  08 may  2018 Source:   vox.com

Warren Buffett doubles down on anti-crypto stance, says 'buying bitcoin is not investing'

  Warren Buffett doubles down on anti-crypto stance, says 'buying bitcoin is not investing' 87-year-old American investor and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett, has again scorned investment in cryptocurrencies, claiming that “buying bitcoin is not investing”, in an interview with Yahoo Finance in Omaha, Nebraska, over the weekend. “There’s two kinds of items that people buy and think they’re investing,” he said. “One really is investing and the other isn’t.” He added:“If you buy something like a farm, an apartment house, or interest in a business ... you can do that on a private basis ... and it’s a perfectly satisfactory investment. You look at the investment itself to deliver the return to you.

The debate over Pluto will never die . Here ’ s the latest argument for why it ’ s a planet . In March 2017, Neil deGrasse Tyson responded to Runyon’s proposal on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. Tyson, a longtime “ Pluto is not a planet ” advocate — jibed that Pluto sometimes crosses Neptune’s

If Pluto was a planet , why wasn’t Eris? Or Haumea or Makemake? Here it is: Or simpler: “A simple paraphrase of our planet definition — especially suitable for elementary school students In March 2017, Neil deGrasse Tyson responded to Runyon’ s proposal on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert.

  The debate over Pluto will never die. Here’s the latest argument for why it’s a planet. © Johns Hopkins University/APL

Scientists’ potential new definition of “planet” includes Pluto — and at least a 100 other objects in the solar system.

In 2006, Pluto was demoted from a full-fledged planet to a dwarf planet. The reason: Pluto wasn’t special anymore.

Astronomers had discovered many other Pluto-size objects in Pluto’s section of the solar system, called the Kuiper belt. If Pluto was a planet, why wasn’t Eris? Or Haumea or Makemake?

As Vox explained in 2015, there are likely dozens more yet-to-be-discovered Pluto-size objects in the Kuiper belt. That, combined with the fact that Pluto is tiny, closed the case: Pluto was to be known as a dwarf planet.

20-Year-Old Data Could Explain Ganymede’s Unique Magnetosphere

  20-Year-Old Data Could Explain Ganymede’s Unique Magnetosphere Jupiter’s moon Ganymede, the largest planetary satellite in the solar system, was studied by NASA’s Galileo spacecraft between 1996 and 2000. It is the only known moon with a magnetosphere.Larger than Mercury and Pluto, and twice as massive as the moon we are familiar with here on Earth, Ganymede is the largest natural planetary satellite in the solar system. It is thought to have a large subsurface ocean, sandwiched between two layers of ice and possibly containing more saltwater than all the water in Earth’s oceans.

It ’ s also not guaranteed to work. The goal is to test the viability of drone exploration of an alien world rather than conduct a scientific assessment of the planet . The debate over Pluto will never die . Here ’ s the latest argument for why it ’ s a planet .

Here , too, our thinking about Pluto went through a parallel evolution. The discovery of other Arguing about the “correct” classification for Pluto will never reach a meaningful resolution Why not call them all planets and the ones picked out by the IAU dynamical planets as you call them in your article?

  The debate over Pluto will never die. Here’s the latest argument for why it’s a planet. © NASA / Johns Hopkins University

But then something unexpected happened: Pluto became incredibly fascinating. When the New Horizons spacecraft flew past Plutoin 2015, it showed that it wasn’t just some boring ball of rock and ice at the end of the solar system. It was a geographically dynamic world. Its mostly smooth surface suggests its crust has been constantly reshaping itself, erasing impact craters. Astronomers even speculate there may be a dynamic, slushy sea underneath Pluto’s heart-shaped basin.

“When we see [a world] like Pluto, with its many familiar features — mountains of ice, glaciers of nitrogen, a blue sky with layers of smog — we and our colleagues quite naturally find ourselves using the word ‘planet’ to describe it,” David Grinspoon and Alan Stern, authors of a new book on the New Horizons mission, write in the Washington Post. (Stern was the principal scientific investigator on the New Horizon’s mission. Grinspoon is an astrobiologist and science writer.)

Scientists Discover Almost Completely Black Planet

  Scientists Discover Almost Completely Black Planet The dark planet only reflects 1 percent of the light hitting it.But for one planet 466 light-years away, there’s almost nothing that astronomers can measure. That’s because this planet is one of the blackest worlds ever discovered.

Scientists propose a new definition of " planet " that includes Pluto — and at least 100 other objects in the solar system. Now there' s a small grassroots effort underway among scientists to expand the definition of what a planet is, and restore Pluto ' s status.

Scientists propose a new definition of " planet " that includes Pluto — and at least 100 other objects in the solar system.

They’re not alone. There’s a small grassroots effort underway among scientists to expand the definition of what a planet is.

“If you don’t call a round world a ‘planet,’ it just falls off people’s mental radar,” Kirby Runyon, a planetary geomorphologist at Johns Hopkins University, told me in a 2017 interview. “There is a psychological power to the word ‘planet’ that helps people realize it’s an important place in space.”

Runyon was a member of the team that analyzed New Horizons’ geologic data during the flyby. “I was blown away by how beautiful and geologically diverse Pluto and its satellite Charon are,” he says. Once he’d seen this side of Pluto, Runyon was bothered that it wasn’t a full-fledged planet anymore.

So Runyon, along with five New Horizons colleagues (including Stern) from different institutions, recently proposed a new definition of a planet that recognizes there are amazing geological features on space objects big and small. And they’ve reignited the debate about Pluto that some other planetary scientists say they wish would just be left alone.

NASA's newest Mars lander to study quakes on Red Planet

  NASA's newest Mars lander to study quakes on Red Planet NASA is poised to launch its first lander to Mars since 2012, an unmanned spacecraft called InSight that aims to listen for quakes and unravel the mystery of how rocky planets like Earth form. It is scheduled to launch on Saturday at 7:05 am Eastern time (1105 GMT) from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, and if all goes as planned, it should land on the Red Planet November 26.

“ Pluto should never have been a planet in the first place,” Williams said, saying that errors in its discovery had mischaracterized it from the start. Astronomer Owen Gingerich told a Harvard symposium last year that ultimately “ it ’ s a culturally defined word” whose meaning has shifted over

The debate over Pluto will never die . Here ’ s the latest argument for why it ’ s a planet . Scientists propose a new definition of " planet " that includes Pluto — and at least 100 other objects in the solar system.

Runyon’s new definition of a planet would mean there are hundreds of planets in our solar system

a view of the earth from space© Johns Hopkins University/APL
Just 15 minutes after its closest approach to Pluto on July 14, 2015, NASA's New Horizons spacecraft looked back toward the sun and captured this near-sunset view of the rugged, icy mountains and flat ice plains extending to Pluto's horizon.

The solar system is filled with all kinds of intriguing moons and dwarf planets that don’t get attention because they don’t match the official definition used by the International Astronomical Union, which stipulates that a planet:

  1. Is an object that orbits the sun (and is not a satellite of another planet)
  2. Is basically spherical
  3. Has “cleared” its path of orbit (meaning it doesn’t share its orbit with any other significant space object)

Among the objects that don’t fit this are Enceladus, a moon of Saturn that spits off huge plumes of water vapor into space. Jupiter’s Ganymede is the ninth-largest object in the solar system. Titan, another moon of Saturn, is the only moon with a dense atmosphere. The definition also doesn’t account for the huge numbers of planets astronomers are discovering outside out solar system. In their Post article, Stern and Grinspoon argue that the official definition makes it so “that essentially all the planets in the universe are not, in fact, planets.”

First NASA lander to study Mars' interior launches from California

  First NASA lander to study Mars' interior launches from California An Atlas 5 rocket soared into space early on Saturday from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, carrying NASA's first robotic lander designed for exploring the deep interior of another planet on its voyage to Mars.The Mars InSight probe lifted off from the central California coast at 4:05 a.m.PDT, treating early-rising residents across a wide swath of the state to the luminous pre-dawn spectacle of the first U.S. interplanetary spacecraft to be launched over the Pacific.

Here it is: A planet is a sub-stellar mass body that has never undergone nuclear fusion and that has sufficient self-gravitation to assume a spheroidal In March 2017, Neil deGrasse Tyson responded to Runyon’ s proposal on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. Tyson, a longtime “ Pluto is not a planet ”

Pluto (minor planet designation: 134340 Pluto ) is a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, a ring of bodies beyond Neptune. It was the first Kuiper belt object to be discovered. Pluto was discovered by Clyde Tombaugh in 1930 and was originally considered to be the ninth planet from the Sun.

Like-minded planetary scientists think the IAU definition, especially the third component of it, is vague and unhelpful. Over Christmas 2016, when Runyon was back at his parents’ house in Michigan, he woke up one morning, and wrote down a new, more inclusive definition of what a planet is.

“It was just passion; it was just bubbling up inside me,” he says.

Runyon, along with several prominent science co-authors presented it at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in March 2017. Here it is:

A planet is a sub-stellar mass body that has never undergone nuclear fusion and that has sufficient self-gravitation to assume a spheroidal shape ... regardless of its orbital parameters.

Or simpler: “A simple paraphrase of our planet definition — especially suitable for elementary school students — could be, ‘round objects in space that are smaller than stars,’” Runyon and his co-authors write.

That definition would mean the moon is a planet. All round moons in the solar system would be planets. Pluto would be a planet. So would Charon, which orbits it.

This debate over Pluto’s planetary status is unlikely to end anytime soon

In March 2017, Neil deGrasse Tyson responded to Runyon’s proposal on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. Tyson, a longtime “Pluto is not a planet” advocate — jibed that Pluto sometimes crosses Neptune’s orbit, and that "That's no kind of behavior for a planet. No!" Meanwhile, other planetary science heavy hitters like Mike Brown, who discovered some of the Kuiper belt objects that kicked Pluto off the planet list, are also not backing down. "Nobody wants the moon to be a planet,” Brown told the CBC. (Indeed, his Twitter handle is still “@plutokiller.”)

Yes, Pluto is a planet

  Yes, Pluto is a planet Two planetary scientists say Pluto, exoplanets and even many moons are planets, or “round objects in space that are smaller than stars."Three years ago, NASA’s New Horizons, the fastest spaceship ever launched, raced past Pluto, spectacularly revealing the wonders of that newly seen world. This coming New Year’s Eve — if all goes well on board this small robot operating extremely far from home — it will treat us to images of the most distant body ever explored, provisionally named Ultima Thule. We know very little about it, but we do know it’s not a planet. Pluto, by contrast — despite what you’ve heard — is.

It ’ s painful every time I see something that gives the wrong impression of reality.” But a lot of people were sentimentally The latest research suggests that Brown’ s speculations about the existence of Planet Nine, based on The argument against Pluto ’ s classification as a planet gathers momentum.

When we first discovered Pluto , it was crazy to think it was anything other than a planet . It will be an interesting object, a tremendous discovery and a fascinating world whether it makes it as a planet or not. But will it meet not just the geophysical but the astronomical criteria for being a planet ?

But Runyon and his co-authors aren’t calling for the IAU to adopt their definition. They’re hoping to inspire a grassroots movements among planetary scientists and science educators to just start using it.

So under this new definition, how would one describe a round moon? “They are planets that orbit other planets,” Runyon says. “And you can mix and match adjectives. Enceladus could rightly be classified as an icy dwarf satellite planet.”

Isn’t this confusing? In elementary school, kids are taught about the eight planets in the solar system. And sometimes that can be difficult.

“Having 110 or more planets shouldn’t be viewed as a confusion,” he says. Thinking about planets in the new way, he argues, will help students understand the science behind them better. “If you’ve memorized the periodic table, you haven’t learned chemistry.” The new definition would have kids understand the intrinsic scientific properties that make a planet a planet first, and them give them names.

I still think it might be confusing.

But Runyon brings up another possible benefit of teaching kids about more planets, and this I’m more sold on: It’ll stoke their sense of wonder.

“One thing I really want is for [educators], writers, and illustrators of kids’ books on space to become aware of this definition,” he says. “So they can present space in a way kids can see how many places in space there are that they can imagine landing a spacecraft on.”

Astronomers Photograph "Toddler Planet" .
Astronomers Photograph "Toddler Planet"Now, astronomers think they've caught a glimpse of that process in action just hundreds of light-years away from Earth, according to a new paper accepted for publication by the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!