•   
  •   

WorldNotre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results

08:00  20 april  2019
08:00  20 april  2019 Source:   msn.com

Fire wrecks Notre-Dame Cathedral, centuries-old Parisian landmark

Fire wrecks Notre-Dame Cathedral, centuries-old Parisian landmark A fire broke out at Notre Dame Cathedral in central Paris on Monday afternoon, a spokesman from the fire department said.

Notre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results© Vanessa Pena/Associated Press Notre Dame Cathedral burning in Paris on Monday.

The architect who oversaw the design of the fire safety system at Notre-Dame acknowledged that officials had misjudged how quickly a flame would ignite and spread through the cathedral, resulting in a much more devastating blaze than they had anticipated.

The system was based on the assumption that if the cathedral ever caught fire, the ancient oak timbers in the attic would burn slowly, leaving ample time to fight the flames, said Benjamin Mouton, the architect who oversaw the fire protections.

Unlike at sensitive sites in the United States, the fire alarms in Notre-Dame did not notify fire dispatchers right away. Instead, a guard at the cathedral first had to climb a steep set of stairs to the attic — a trip Mr Mouton said would take a “fit” person six minutes.

Crown of Thorns saved from Notre Dame fire

Crown of Thorns saved from Notre Dame fire The Notre Dame cathedral in Paris is home to ancient relics held sacred by Catholics, and as the structure burned on Monday, there were fears that all of the irreplaceable items inside might be destroyed. By late Monday, police announced that the fire was under control, and Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo shared some good news: The Crown of Thorns, a relic believed to have been worn by Jesus Christ, was safe, along with the Tunic of Saint Louis. She also said several pieces of artwork made it out unscathed, but did not specify which pieces. © Phillipe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images The Crown of Thorns.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing: Asia and Australia Newsletter

Only after a blaze was discovered could the fire department be notified and deployed. That means even a flawless response had a built-in delay of about 20 minutes — from the moment the alarm sounded until firefighters could arrive and climb to the attic with hundreds of pounds of hoses and equipment to begin battling a fire.

Notre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results© Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters A Good Friday procession near Notre-Dame. Those delays turned out to be devastating.

“I was stunned by the speed with which the oak in Notre-Dame burned,” Mr Mouton said. “Oak that old can’t burn like a match. It’s absolutely incomprehensible.”

But fire safety experts said that Mr Mouton and his team underestimated the risk — and that the fire response they designed was far too slow to fight a blaze in time.

The hero who saved the Crown of Thorns: Fire brigade chaplain entered flaming Notre Dame to recover holy relic - three years after he bravely helped Bataclan terror victims

The hero who saved the Crown of Thorns: Fire brigade chaplain entered flaming Notre Dame to recover holy relic - three years after he bravely helped Bataclan terror victims Jean-Marc Fournier, chaplain of the Paris Fire Brigade, saved the Blessed Sacrament and the Crown of Thorns from the blazing Notre Dame cathedral on Monday night.

“It doesn’t make any sense,” said Jonathan Barnett, a fire safety authority at Basic Expert in Australia. “Twenty minutes is a huge delay before you get people involved. Once that heavy timber starts to burn, you can’t put it out. So I have no idea why they built in this delay.”

François Chatillon, a senior architect involved in numerous restorations of France’s historic monuments, also stressed that the intense fire risk in the oak timbers underneath Notre-Dame’s lead roof was well known.

Once lit, he said, “It is like throwing a match in a matchbox, it’s impossible to put out.”

For him the surprise was not that Notre-Dame burned this week, but “that it didn’t burn before.”

Mr Mouton and his team were not solely responsible for all the decisions made to secure a monument as precious as Notre-Dame. At a minimum, their plans required approval up the chain at the Culture Ministry.

Shock, sadness, but no panic: Minutes that saved Notre Dame

Shock, sadness, but no panic: Minutes that saved Notre Dame Fueled by a network of ancient wooden beams, the fire moved hungrily across Notre Dame's rooftop toward the cathedral's iconic spire. It belched yellow smoke, spitting out gritty particles of wood, stone, lead and iron and wanted more. Far below, their vision obscured by fumes and tears, firefighters, priests and municipal workers passed treasures hand-to-hand, hoping the speed of desperation could outrun the flames. They had 66 minutes. The first alarm sounded at 6:20 p.m., silencing the priest and a few hundred worshippers and tourists inside.

Notre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results© Gigarama.ru, via Associated Press Unlike at sensitive sites in the United States, the fire alarms at Notre-Dame did not notify fire dispatchers right away. Charlotte Hubert, who presides at the same group of chief architects in charge of historical monuments that Mr Mouton belongs to, underscored that security at such buildings was tightly regulated.

“The chief architect isn’t handed the keys and left to do exactly as he wants,” Ms Hubert said.

Still, fire experts said that two of the top officials on the project, Mr Mouton and a former firefighter, Lt. Col. Régis Prunet, appeared to have miscalculated what was needed to protect such an unusual, complex and irreplaceable building from a fire.

Scientists consulted by The New York Times said fire dynamics indicated that, while the dense timbers may take time to burn completely, a fire would naturally race across the original timbers at Notre-Dame. It was a mistake to assume otherwise, they said.

Mr Mouton was the architect in charge of Notre-Dame between 2000 and 2013, and in that position he oversaw a revamp of fire safety.

Notre Dame fire: Was the crown of thorns that survived the blaze THE crown of thorns?

Notre Dame fire: Was the crown of thorns that survived the blaze THE crown of thorns? Notre Dame fire: Was the crown of thorns that survived the blaze THE crown of thorns? © Reuters: Philippe Wojazer French Archbishop Patrick Chauvet holds the crown of thorns. So it should come as little surprise that a fire that threatened to destroy the centuries-old Notre Dame cathedral where the religious relic was housed was unable to cement its demise. But as authorities count the cost of the treasure trove of historic and religious artefacts lost to Tuesday's blaze, some have questioned how Parisians even got their hands on a relic purported to have originated in first-century Judea.

“The issue of fire safety was brought up as soon as I arrived,” he said. “I managed the issue from beginning to end.”

Mr Prunet, the former firefighter, became fire safety adviser at the Culture Ministry and worked with Mr Mouton and his team.

The two men faced a monumental task. There was no proper fire protection plan in place, not even a plan to evacuate tourists or worshipers in case of a blaze, Mr Prunet said in a separate interview. It was a miracle that nothing had happened before, he said, and “a great irony” that it should happen so soon after a plan was put in place.

Both Mr Mouton and Mr Prunet said they had been given a free hand to design the most effective fire protection system. Money was not an issue.

When the budget came in higher than expected, the authorities found the money and merely stretched the number of years to put the plan in place, to four from two, Mr Mouton said.

“The project was not downsized because of financial considerations, I can absolutely guarantee that,” he said.

But even if no cost was spared, there was also a conservative approach to preserving the historic wooden structure in its unadulterated form. The designers were determined not to alter the attic with protective measures like sprinklers or fire walls.

A willingness to sacrifice its pristine state for a compromise between what was possible 850 years ago and what is sensible today could have saved the spire, experts said.

Millions in Notre-Dame Donations Pour In as France Focuses on Rebuilding

Millions in Notre-Dame Donations Pour In as France Focuses on Rebuilding Days after a fire tore through Notre-Dame cathedral in Paris, France on Wednesday started to focus on reconstruction, with President Emmanuel Macron having set the ambitious goal of rebuilding the Gothic landmark within five years and donations pouring in from around the world. 

Notre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results© Maxime Brunet, via Agence France-Presse — Getty Images Smoke and flames rising during the fire at the cathedral. Firewall technology was used elsewhere in the cathedral — but not in the attic. Mr Prunet said the scale and complexity of the attic structure at Notre-Dame was of a different order.

“In Notre-Dame, it was very complicated because the oak beams were entangled with each other in what we call the forest,” Mr Prunet said.

But the main reason to opt against fire walls, Mr Mouton said, was because it risked “mutilating” the structure.

“It’s true,” he said, that the idea had been floated at the time, “but it was discarded.”

“It changes the appearance but also the elements, because to put up a partition you need to cut the wood. It’s mutilating,” Mr Mouton said.

Mr Prunet added that sprinklers were not added because they would “drown the whole structure.”

Instead, they said, the team had banked on prevention and detection. This was a conscious choice.

Two guards were on site to monitor the delicate roof structure, day and night, like a bank vault. The cathedral was covered in smoke and heat sensors. Three times a day someone went up to check that the system was working.

Mr Mouton said he performed a trial of the time it took for a guard to investigate an alert, racing one of his guards to the top of the attic.

‘‘It does take a certain amount of time, including for someone who is very fit,” he said. “That solution seemed reasonable to me, considering that it’s old oak and doesn’t burn like that.”

Beyond that assumption, the alert system appears to have been flawed, too, beginning with the response to the first alarm at 6:20 p.m.

France Debates How to Rebuild Notre-Dame, Weighing History and Modernity

France Debates How to Rebuild Notre-Dame, Weighing History and Modernity Workers are still focused largely on shoring up the damaged structure, but how closely the planned reconstruction should adhere to the original design and materials has become a point of contention in a nation long accustomed to arguing over the balance between modernity and cultural heritage. © Pool photo by Christophe Petit Tesson President Emmanuel Macron addressing the Paris emergency workers on Thursday. President Emmanuel Macron gave the debate particular urgency when he said the cathedral would be rebuilt within five years, a time frame that some experts have called too optimistic. Mr.

The guard, seeing no obvious fire, gave the all-clear and came down.

But when an alarm goes off, it is imperative to identify which alarm it was — and why — including whether a malfunction or an insect crawled into the apparatus, said Glenn Corbett, an associate professor of fire science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City.

“There wasn’t an adequate investigation of that first alarm,” Mr Corbett said. “That was probably the biggest mistake they made.”

At that point, presumably, a smouldering fire somewhere in the attic had begun to spread, though how the fire started has yet to be determined.

Fire safety experts struggled to understand how Mr Mouton came to believe that fire would spread slowly in old hardwood.

Mr Corbett said that in long-discredited lore, fires in heavy timber buildings dating to the 19th century were sometimes referred to as “slow burning.”

Mr Barnett, the Australian expert, underscored that the time it takes a fire to burn a piece of thick timber completely is entirely different from calculating how quickly a fire will spread.

“He miscalculated the large surface area,” Mr Barnett said. “There’s lots of energy and it’s spreading very quickly.”

By the time the second alarm sounded at 6:43 p.m. and a guard climbed the stairs again, the fire was already a conflagration.

The call finally went to the fire brigade at 6:51 p.m.

“We could have avoided all this with a modern detection system,” said Guillaume Poitrinal, president of Fondation du Patrimoine, an organization that promotes French architectural heritage.

The early detection technology was an aspirating smoke detection system provided by Siemens in 2013, but the company said it had not been given a service contract and could not speak to possible operational questions.

Fire alarms in France never automatically alert the fire department, a spokesman for the Paris Fire Brigade confirmed.

Workers smoked at Notre-Dame cathedral, admits contractor

Workers smoked at Notre-Dame cathedral, admits contractor Workers renovating Notre-Dame flouted a ban on smoking at the monument, a contractor admitted on Wednesday, while denying any link with last week's devastating blaze that ripped through the cathedral. 

“There can be false alarms, that’s why the firefighters ask that someone go check,” said Gabriel Plus, the spokesman. He called this “removal of doubt.”

But outside experts suggested that in the case of Notre-Dame, the choices in the fire safety design did not leave enough time for that.

There would have been one other solution: A permanent presence of firefighters on site. Buildings that run “a significant risk” in case of a fire, Mr Plus said, sometimes get such a presence, among them the Louvre, the Paris court, the National Assembly and the National Library.

Notre Dame, he said, was not in this category.

Mr Mouton acknowledged that firefighters on standby would have been the only reliable way to ensure against fire damage, but he said this would not have been justified when “there are fires going off everywhere in Paris and in the suburbs.”

Some risk had to be accepted, he said. “All things are relative.”

“I am very troubled by what has happened,” Mr Mouton said.

Would he design the system differently today, knowing what he knows now?

“The detection system would have been the same,” he said, “but the response system would have changed.”

“Of course it’s the first minutes that count,” he said, pausing. Then he added: “After the fact, one is always wrong and could have done better.”

Pictures: See inside Notre Dame Cathedral after the fire (USA TODAY)

Notre-Dame’s Safety Planners Underestimated the Risk, With Devastating Results
Adsponsored topics
  • Get the latest headlines from MSN on Messenger

  • The richest people in Australia revealed

  • The 19 hottest new hotels opening this year

Read more

Workers smoked at Notre-Dame cathedral, admits contractor.
Workers renovating Notre-Dame flouted a ban on smoking at the monument, a contractor admitted on Wednesday, while denying any link with last week's devastating blaze that ripped through the cathedral. 

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!