World Trump Is Running His Campaign Like He Ran His Businesses

15:41  09 september  2020
15:41  09 september  2020 Source:   theatlantic.com

Trump hits Biden saying 'he's blaming the police more than rioters'

  Trump hits Biden saying 'he's blaming the police more than rioters' President Trump accused Joe Biden of 'blaming the police' after Biden delivered a speech blasting Trump for escalating the violence between cops, protesters and his supporters.In Pittsburgh Monday, Biden went after Trump calling him a 'toxic presence' and accused him of 'stoking violence in our cities' to make Americans feel unsafe, while the Democrat called on Americans to 'stand against violence - in every form it takes.

Trump 's history of running various businesses into bankruptcy — including Atlantic City casinos — isn't exactly some big secret. Of course he runs his campaign the same way. Giving the man money is like lighting it on fire, and always has been.

Mitt Romney said during his 2012 presidential campaign he 'd like a provision in the Constitution to "say that the president has to spend at least three years working in business before he could And his administration is failing precisely because Trump is running the country like he ran his business .

Donald Trump wearing a suit and tie smiling at the camera © Jim Watson / AFP / Getty

In 2016, Donald Trump’s campaign ran on a shoestring, and won. He planned a different 2020: It would be the biggest, richest, most expensive presidential campaign ever. But with just two months to go before the election, the president has burned through massive amounts of money, and now his campaign is at a cash disadvantage to the Democratic nominee, Joe Biden.

This is an amazing feat—how did the campaign blow through nearly $1 billion to so little effect?—yet also inevitable. The Trump 2020 campaign seems to be running on the same principle as many of the president’s commercial endeavors: Trump gets richer, while other people’s money gets lit on fire. This was how some of the president’s real-estate ventures and casinos operated, and so it’s unsurprising that it’s how he’s chosen to run his campaign—and the country.

Kenosha Could Cost Trump the Election

  Kenosha Could Cost Trump the Election The president thinks that inflaming racial tension and provoking violence will aid his campaign. The numbers suggest otherwise.Today, Trump is traveling to Kenosha, over the objections and pleas of the governor and mayor (both Democrats), who say he will only make the situation worse, which is probably the goal anyway. Yesterday, he passed up an easy chance to condemn violence on all sides—just as he’d dared Joe Biden to do, and as Biden had happily done—and defended Kyle Rittenhouse, who was charged with two murders in Kenosha last week.

President Trump ’s businesses and the federal government have one big thing in common: he ’s forced them to shut down. No, not the Trump campaign promise to build the wall and have Mexico pay for it, but the one that he will run the government like one of his businesses .

He had left that door open when he left the show. However, his big mouth, as usual, got him into trouble and NBC said they would never have He is actually running the nation like he ran his businesses . Run successful businesses into ground and then bilking his employees and filing for

Few things get Trump peeved faster than bringing up the four times his companies declared bankruptcy. Chris Wallace of Fox News learned this in 2015, when, during a GOP primary debate, he asked Trump whether voters should trust him to run the government, given his private track record.

The unintended consequences of #SupportBlackBusiness

  The unintended consequences of #SupportBlackBusiness Some Black business owners have been overwhelmed by the demands of impatient customers and broken supply chains.Over the past few months, calls to #SupportBlackBusiness in the wake of the George Floyd protests — one of the biggest uprisings America has seen — have undoubtedly helped Black business owners. But many of them have enjoyed these boosts with trepidation about how long the support will last, afraid to make long-term business decisions based on good faith, as history has shown these moments of reckoning rarely linger.

The GOP frontrunner likes to brag that he self-funds his presidential campaign . What he doesn’t mention is that he ’s profiting off it as well. Never before has a candidate funneled so much of his money into his own campaign and then relied on his own businesses to run that campaign .

Death Star blows itself up: Trump ran his campaign finances like his businesses — into the Trump Has Reportedly Already Blown Through Nearly a Billion Dollars of His Campaign Cash. A man sits on his roof during a hurricane. The flood waters are rising, and he prays to God to save him .

“I have never gone bankrupt, by the way. I have never,” Trump snapped—he’d merely used the nation’s bankruptcy laws to his advantage.

[William D. Cohan: What exactly is Donald Trump’s deal?]

“At the same time, financial experts involved in those bankruptcies say that lenders to your companies lost billions of dollars,” Wallace replied. “With that record, why should we trust you to run the nation’s business?”

“I have used the laws of this country just like the greatest people that you read about every day in business have used the laws of this country, the chapter laws, to do a great job for my company, for myself, for my employees, for my family, et cetera,” he said.

Trump was right. He and his family have made out well, but at the expense of others. Each time a company declares bankruptcy, it sheds debt—in other words, someone who it owes money loses some or all of their stake.

Start with the first bankruptcy, in 1991. When Trump built the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City, he bragged he didn’t have to use then-hot junk bonds to finance the project. He was lying. He did use junk bonds, and within three years he’d fallen behind on interest payments, even in a business famous for always earning cash. When he declared bankruptcy, he was forced to sell off some treasured assets—his yacht, his airline—but he owed the banks so much that they opted to work with him rather than take everything. In other words: They took a big loss. The following year, another casino, the Trump Plaza, failed. This time, Trump lost his stake and control of the company, but kept his CEO title.

Melania Trump calls out 'malicious gossip' after release of book by Stephanie Winston Wolkoff

  Melania Trump calls out 'malicious gossip' after release of book by Stephanie Winston Wolkoff US first lady Melania Trump takes to Twitter to call out 'delusional' gossip after a new book written by a former close friend was released. Here's what we know about it.She made the comments in a tweet after the release this week of the book Melania and Me: The Rise and Fall of My Friendship with the First Lady by Stephanie Winston Wolkoff.

During the 2016 election campaign , Donald Trump repeatedly emphasized that our country was run terribly and needed a businessman at its helm. As president, The Donald has done just what he promised the American people he would do: run the country like he ran his businesses .

President Donald Trump idolizes Vladimir Putin as a leader because he runs Russia like his own company, and because of his Nonetheless, Cohen insisted that there was no outright collusion between the Trump campaign and Putin in 2016, saying that it was "really a confluence of shared

By the mid-1990s, Trump was toxic enough that practically no bank would lend him money, figuring there was a good chance they’d end up losing it. One exception was Deutsche Bank, which, as The New York Times Magazine put it, had developed a reputation “as a reckless institution willing to do business with clients nobody else would touch.” But in 2008, amid the financial collapse, Trump couldn’t make debt payments, and turned around and sued Deutsche Bank to forestall it from collecting. (Why Deutsche Bank continues to loan Trump money is an intriguing question.)

Trump also sought alternative ways of financing projects. For example, Trump turned to Russian investors as a new source of cash. (You know how that story ends.) He also simply issued bonds to the public, trading on his name, which may have been tarnished on Wall Street but had been burnished by his TV show and other projects. In 2009, when the Trump Organization again declared bankruptcy, these small investors took the hit.

“People knew who Donald Trump was and for that reason were willing to trust the bonds, and they got burned,” the bankruptcy expert Lynn LoPucki told ABC in 2011. “The people who invested with him or based on his name lost money, but he himself came out pretty well.”

Everyone Knows It’s True

  Everyone Knows It’s True As Trump vehemently disputes reports that he has disparaged veterans, some silences speak loudly.Never has he shouted louder than in the days since my colleague Jeffrey Goldberg reported the president’s disparaging comments about those who have fallen, been maimed, or taken prisoner in war.

“I ran the campaign the same way I did in 2016, which also included all of the marketing, strategy and expenses under the very close Veteran GOP strategist Ed Rollins blasted Parscale for spending “ like a drunken sailor.” “If you spend 0 million and you’re 10 points behind, I think you’ve got to answer

Donald Trump . The 45th president, a deeply divisive leader, was running for re-election on immigration, trade and the economy. Former reality show host and New York City real estate developer who never ran for political office until his 2016 presidential campaign .

At the same time, Trump was also leveraging his celebrity for other projects. He licensed his name to several developments at the height of the real-estate bubble, attracting buyers who (erroneously) viewed his name as a gold standard. When the projects failed, it became clear that Trump had no personal stake, having simply taken a fee for the use of his name.

[David A. Graham: Trump’s aides are desperately trying to soothe his anxieties]

The Trump campaign seems to have a great deal in common with these earlier business ventures. This is not just a matter of poor results, though the campaign does seem shaky. At the moment, Biden has a consistent, though not commanding, lead in the polls, and has for months. In several key states he won in 2016, Trump trails Biden. In July, the president sacked his campaign manager, Brad Parscale.

Trump’s 2020 campaign was always going to be challenging—it’s hard to persuade voters to reelect a president of whom most of them disapprove. But he had the advantage of incumbency (only two presidents since World War II have not been reelected) and a huge money machine.

Now that machine seems to be sputtering a bit. The New York Times reports that the Trump campaign is in a cash crunch. This matches up with circumstantial evidence, such as Trump pulling much of his television advertising, even as Biden widely outspends him. From January 2019 to July 2020, Trump raised $1.1 billion, but has already spent $800 million. The Biden campaign and the Democratic Party raised a combined $364 million in August—setting a record—but Trump has still not reported August numbers.

Trump loves sanctioning foreign countries — but he’s terrible at it

  Trump loves sanctioning foreign countries — but he’s terrible at it How the president’s failures sanctioning Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela can inform future presidents, or even Trump during a second term.Change the Iranian regime’s behavior? Sanctions. Dismantle North Korea’s nuclear arsenal? Sanctions. Depose Venezuela’s dictator? You guessed it: Sanctions.

Trump could still win the election, and perhaps all will be forgotten. Even if he does, though, the campaign has been a colossal, profligate use of money. Figuring out why the campaign is in tough straits now is difficult, especially without the latest filing available. Perhaps the campaign banked on getting more big-dollar donors. Perhaps it isn’t getting the small-dollar return it heavily invested in, or perhaps the price tag has just proved too dear. As my colleagues Ian Bogost and Alexis C. Madrigal explained in April, “People have marveled that Trump never stopped running Facebook-ad campaigns. And the reason is, he couldn’t. The whole point is that the campaign has to keep fresh data flowing through the system.”

[Read: How Facebook works for Trump]

In any case, the campaign has also spent millions and millions of dollars on things that clearly benefit Trump, his family, and his company, but do not so clearly aid the cause of electing Republicans to office.

As Eric Lipton reports in The New York Times, Trump has spent nearly $60 million of campaign money on legal bills. Candidates need good lawyering, of course, but this number far outstrips other campaigns’ tabs because the president has drawn on political fundraising to foot the bill for his litigiousness, to pay attorneys to represent him in investigations by House Democrats and Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and to pay for the defense of aides who have been swept into legal inquiries in his various scandals.

There are also multiple former aides who have been hired by the Trump campaign or the Republican National Committee after leaving the White House. Omarosa Manigault Newman claims that when she left the administration, she was offered a $15,000-a-month no-show job to keep her happy and quiet. She is not the most reliable source, but other former White House aides have taken a similar path, including a former bodyguard, Keith Schiller, and a body man, John McEntee, who was fired amid a fraud investigation but, because irony is dead, has since returned as head of personnel for the White House.

An Experiment in Wisconsin Might Reveal the Key to Defeating Trump

  An Experiment in Wisconsin Might Reveal the Key to Defeating Trump Changing voters’ minds is famously difficult, but a recent progressive effort found real success.Trump’s weaknesses with the electorate are familiar: Voters find him coarse, and they deplore his handling of race, the coronavirus, and protests. One recent YouGov poll found that just 42 percent of Americans approved of his performance as president, while 54 percent disapproved. But when the pollsters asked about Trump’s handling of the economy, those attitudes reversed: 48 percent approved and 44 percent disapproved, despite the havoc wreaked by the pandemic.

Some costs come from sops to the president’s fragile ego. The campaign has spent more than $1 million on ads in the District of Columbia so that Trump will see them, even though neither D.C. nor Virginia nor Maryland is likely competitive in November. It also shelled out $11 million for Super Bowl ads in order to go toe-to-toe with Michael Bloomberg. The campaign also spent more than $100,000 on magnetic pouches for cellphones, to keep fundraiser attendees from recording and leaking the president’s private remarks. This may spare the president some embarrassment—though he’d probably get more benefit from a magnetic pouch around his own phone, keeping him from his Twitter account—but it’s a dubious use of campaign resources.

Even more questionable is the cash that the Trump campaign has not just wasted, but has directed to Trump. Forbes reported that the campaign had paid $2.3 million of donor money to the Trump Organization for things like food, lodging, and rent. That includes $380,000 in just two days in March. The RNC has spent more than $17 million at Trump properties since 2016.

That’s a nice surge of revenue for the president from his own campaign—or rather, from his donors—and one enabled by the fact that, unlike other presidents, he did not divest from his business interests upon taking office. Trump could waive a fee for these costs, or offer discounts; he’s the only one legally allowed to make that sort of in-kind donation. But he has not.

In fact, as of August, he hadn’t given a dime to his reelection effort. Bloomberg reports that Trump is now considering a $100 million gift to his campaign, which would be unprecedented. Believe it when you see the Federal Election Commission reports. That would put Trump in the red for the campaign, when it appears he’d rather line his pockets with the hard-earned cash of supporters who presumably expect he’s using it to get reelected president. If his track record is any guide, revenue for Trump is the whole point. When Parscale was fired, one reported reason was that Trump was upset that he was making a neat profit on the campaign. Only Trump is allowed to do that.

Trump’s shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees, explained

  Trump’s shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees, explained Trump wants to remind loyalists that, if he wins in November, they’ll get more judges who will enact Republican policy.With Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s passing Friday night, he now has that opportunity.

At this point, a cynical reader—especially one who opposes the president—might say: Who cares? The people who are being exploited have willingly given to Trump, and they ought to know by now how he operates. This is true, to a point. But such bad-faith use of donor dollars is a problem because it creates cynicism about the election system, and because it further tips the balance of political power toward large donors, who can afford to give more.

[David A. Graham: Why would a billionaire charge the Secret Service $650 a night?]

More important, this profiteering is how Trump has run the country as well. The economy is in shambles; the unemployment rate is high, and signs of more danger are on the horizon. The stock market, a rare bright spot, has taken a beating recently. The federal deficit is at record levels—in part because of much-needed COVID-related spending, though Trump had driven it up, including with tax cuts for wealthy people like himself, even when the economy was good.

But Trump is doing okay. In addition to the RNC and campaign spending coming his way, there’s also the business at hotels like the Trump International in Washington, which has become a magnet for foreign officials seeking to curry favor. There are also the charges to the federal government to use his facilities when he visits them, which are frequent. The Washington Post calculates that the government has paid Trump more than $900,000, including charges like room rates of $650 a night for Secret Service agents.

Trump likes to boast that he donates his presidential paycheck, but don’t worry—if you pay taxes in the U.S., you’re still paying him. It’s like he told Chris Wallace in 2015: He’s doing a great job for his company, himself, his employees, and his family. For campaign donors and taxpayers? Not everyone can win.

Gallery: The most expensive US presidency campaigns in recent history (Lovemoney)

Michael Bloomberg holding a sign: They say money talks, and the US presidency campaigns are a classic example of how cash is an integral part of gaining power as candidates spend millions in the fight for job of the leader of the free world. Over the years, nominees have spent serious cash on their campaigns to cover everything from advertising costs to the clean-up after rallies. We take a look at the candidates who have spent the most in their bid to become the next president of the United States, and reveal the candidate who spent the most money ever on their campaign but didn’t even make it to the election itself... Click or scroll through to find out.

Trump’s shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees, explained .
Trump wants to remind loyalists that, if he wins in November, they’ll get more judges who will enact Republican policy.With Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s passing Friday night, he now has that opportunity.

usr: 0
This is interesting!