World Senate Republicans promise a quick floor vote on a Trump Supreme Court nominee

00:25  20 september  2020
00:25  20 september  2020 Source:   vox.com

Chief Justice Roberts’s lifelong crusade against voting rights, explained

  Chief Justice Roberts’s lifelong crusade against voting rights, explained He has fought to undermine voting rights his entire career.It was 1981. Roberts had just completed a prestigious clerkship with Justice William Rehnquist — then the most conservative judge to serve on the Supreme Court in decades — and, as an aide to Attorney General William French Smith, Roberts was tasked with making the case against one of the most consequential voting rights laws in the nation’s history.

Other senators facing tough races announced their support for a vote on President Donald Trump ’s eventual nominee . Lindsay Graham (R-SC) — who currently chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee — openly promised that he would not vote on a Supreme Court nominee in the final year of a

Only two Republican senators have voiced opposition to Mr Trump ’s desire to install a replacement to Ruth Bader Ginsburg as quickly as possible. In 2016, Republicans led by Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, blocked a vote on Barack Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court , citing

Lindsey Graham wearing a suit and tie: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) listens during a hearing of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee reviewing coronavirus response efforts on September 16, 2020, in Washington, DC. © Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) listens during a hearing of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee reviewing coronavirus response efforts on September 16, 2020, in Washington, DC.

The prognosticating over how quickly a replacement justice would be nominated to the US Supreme Court began immediately as news of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death broke late Friday evening. Saturday, Senate Republicans intensified that speculation as they increased calls to rapidly ram a conservative through the nominating process ahead of the upcoming election.

Mitch Ready to Steamroll Dems on Ginsburg Replacement

  Mitch Ready to Steamroll Dems on Ginsburg Replacement On Feb. 13, 2016, then-Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead in a ranch bedroom in Texas. It was 268 days before the November election and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was quick to quip that there would not be a replacement until the next president was chosen. On Friday evening, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died of complications from cancer 46 days before the presidential election. But McConnell has already made it clear that he sees no reason to wait for voters to weigh in on who should pick her replacement.

Republican senator says ‘if the nominee reaches the floor , I intend to vote based upon their qualifications’ – follow the latest Senator Mitt Romney said he would support moving forward with Trump ’s supreme court nominee . GOP laying groundwork for a quick SCOTUS confirmation battle.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been steadfast that the US Senate will vote on President Donald Trump 's nomination to the Supreme Court this year. In less than three days -- and before a nominee has even been selected -- it appears McConnell is already on track to have the votes .

Friday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and many of his Senate Republican colleagues signaled that they would work quickly to ensure a Supreme Court nominee receives a floor vote.

And several senators who are locked in tight reelection campaigns announced their support for a vote on President Donald Trump’s eventual nominee. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who is trailing Democratic challenger Cal Cunningham in North Carolina, went one step further and pledged his support for Trump’s nominee — even though a nominee hasn’t been named as of yet. Tillis, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, would be able to help steer any nominee to a full Senate vote.

“There is a clear choice on the future of the Supreme Court between the well-qualified and conservative jurist President Trump will nominate and I will support, and the liberal activist Joe Biden will nominate and Cal Cunningham will support, who will legislate radical, left-wing policies from the bench,” he said Friday evening.

Schumer: “Nothing is off the table” in Supreme Court nomination fight

  Schumer: “Nothing is off the table” in Supreme Court nomination fight Democrats signal they won’t rule out court-packing or other significant changes.Democrats have not yet settled on one particular strategy to counter the Republican agenda, but they’re signaling that they’re not ruling out aggressive responses like rebalancing the Court through court-packing or seeking unconventional ways to delay the nomination.

Republicans have secured the numbers needed to ensure that President Trump 's Supreme Court nominee will face a confirmation vote in the Senate . Senator Mitt Romney of Utah has given the party the 51 votes needed to move forward with voting on Mr Trump 's candidate to replace Ruth Bader

President Donald Trump said he wants his looming Supreme Court pick confirmed before the Nov. 3 election, escalating pressure on Senate Republicans and Mitch McConnell as the majority leader seeks to protect McConnell has promised a vote on Trump ’s nominee , but hasn’t set a timetable.

Arizona Republican Sen. Martha McSally also indicated she supports a floor vote for Trump’s nominee, tweeting, “This U.S. Senate should vote on President Trump’s next nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court.”

McSally, who was appointed to fill the late Sen. John McCain’s seat, faces a difficult race — recent polls show her down significantly against Democratic challenger Mark Kelly.

Questions around how Supreme Court nominations should be handled in an election year were first raised four years ago, when Justice Antonin Scalia died nine months before the election. Following Scalia’s death, McConnell refused to hold confirmation hearings for Judge Merrick Garland, who was nominated to the Supreme Court by then-President Barack Obama, arguing that it was unfair to voters to seat a new justice ahead of the election.

But Friday, McConnell reversed his position on Supreme Court nominations in an election year, essentially arguing that the rule only applied when the Senate and presidency are held by opposing parties.

Minority rule in America

  Minority rule in America Our various undemocratic institutions are reenforcing each other in a deadly spiral.It didn’t happen, and in fact, the line of argument we pursued — that democratic legitimacy ought to count for something — wasn’t even taken up by the Gore campaign or Democrats. They instead pursued a legalistic argument that was denied by a 5-4 majority of conservative Supreme Court justices. Two decades later, we’re staring down the barrel of exactly what I worried about that November: not an old Constitution with some funny quirks, but a self-reinforcing spiral of minority rule.

The Republican senator Mitt Romney, who has clashed with Trump and is seen by Democrats as a potential holdout, avoided questions Mitch McConnell, the Republican US Senate majority leader, says Donald Trump 's supreme court nominee would see a vote 'this year' as he clashes with the

Trump says he will announce his Supreme Court choice on Saturday. How Ginsburg’s death has reshaped the Senator Mitt Romney, a Republican who has broken with the president in the past, had been If the nominee reaches the Senate floor , I intend to vote based upon their qualifications.”

Several other senior Senate Republicans who had previously argued against Garland’s appointment have also reversed their positions, now arguing for a vote on Trump’s nominee.

Regardless of what they may have once said, GOP senators now want a new justice as soon as possible

Four years ago, Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC) — who currently chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee — openly promised that he would not vote on a Supreme Court nominee in the final year of a Republican president’s term.

“I want you to use my words against me. If there’s a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsay Graham said, ‘Let’s let the next president, whoever that might be, make that nomination,’” he said at the time during a Senate Judicial Committee hearing.

Graham, who is locked in what recent polls suggest is an unexpectedly close race in South Carolina against Democratic challenger Jaime Harrison, tweeted a statement Saturday that he has more recently expressed that a vacancy in Trump’s final year is different from the Garland situation. Like McConnell, Graham has more recently argued that a delay is only warranted when opposing parties control the Senate and the White House.

McConnell and company were able to get away with the electoral year delay in 2016 because they had the votes to do so — and they hold the majority this year as well, meaning if they decide to hold a vote on a new justice, there is likely little to stop them.

There are, however, a number of Senate Republicans who are on the record with recent statements indicating that it would be inappropriate to hold a Senate confirmation vote so close to the election.

Republican Sen. Susan Collins said earlier this month that she would not seat a new justice before the election or in the lame-duck session. “I think that’s too close, I really do,” she said. Collins took heat from her constituents in Maine over her vote to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 as well as her stance during President Trump’s impeachment trial, and, like Tillis, has struggled in recent polls on her reelection campaign.

The Election That Could Break America

  The Election That Could Break America If the vote is close, Donald Trump could easily throw the election into chaos and subvert the result. Who will stop him?There is a cohort of close observers of our presidential elections, scholars and lawyers and political strategists, who find themselves in the uneasy position of intelligence analysts in the months before 9/11. As November 3 approaches, their screens are blinking red, alight with warnings that the political system does not know how to absorb. They see the obvious signs that we all see, but they also know subtle things that most of us do not. Something dangerous has hove into view, and the nation is lurching into its path.

Collins, who won her last reelection campaign in Maine by 37 percent, trailed Democratic challenger Sara Gideon by 5 percentage points, according to a recent New York Times/Siena poll, with a margin of error of 5.1 percentage points, while a Quinnipiac University poll found Gideon leading by 12 percentage points, with a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points.

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski didn’t address the issue of succession in her statement on Ginsburg’s death, but earlier this year, and just ahead of the justice’s death, she said she would not be in favor of appointing a new justice so close to the election.

To prevent a new nominee from being seated before the election — or during the lame-duck session — four Republicans would need to vote against confirmation. It’s unclear at this point if there are four willing to buck the party to do so.

As figures like Murkowski and Collins remain silent, and the stances of lawmakers like Graham evolve, some Republicans have called for an immediate vote — like Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, who is on a shortlist of potential new justices Trump released recently.

In an appearance on Fox News, Cruz argued that seating a new justice is necessary because there will likely be a challenge to November’s election results and an eight-person Court would be insufficient to settle such a conundrum.

Leaving aside that a justice appointed ahead of the election would face pressure to recuse themselves, leaving the Court again at eight justices, the only candidate who has consistently stated he would contest a lost or close election has been Trump, who is currently trailing Democratic nominee Joe Biden in most national polls. And should a new Trump-appointed justice choose to weigh in, the president would be at an advantage in any ruling given a third Trump appointee would give conservatives a majority on the Court.

And, of course, Cruz’s argument is also a curious one given that his colleagues were fine with an eight-person court during the 2016 election.

Will you help keep Vox free for all?

The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election: Contribute today from as little as $3.

Can Democrats pull off another Senate win in Arizona? .
The same voters who helped Kyrsten Sinema win could boost Mark Kelly, too.Just two years after running — and narrowly losing — to Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, Sen. Martha McSally is running again, this time against retired astronaut Mark Kelly, in an attempt to keep her seat. In a unique twist, McSally was appointed to an open Senate seat by Gov. Doug Ducey to serve out the term of the late Sen. John McCain after she’d previously lost. And experts say McSally’s candidacy isn’t the only thing that feels familiar.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 0
This is interesting!