•   
  •   

World Schumer: “Nothing is off the table” in Supreme Court nomination fight

23:25  20 september  2020
23:25  20 september  2020 Source:   vox.com

Chief Justice Roberts’s lifelong crusade against voting rights, explained

  Chief Justice Roberts’s lifelong crusade against voting rights, explained He has fought to undermine voting rights his entire career.It was 1981. Roberts had just completed a prestigious clerkship with Justice William Rehnquist — then the most conservative judge to serve on the Supreme Court in decades — and, as an aide to Attorney General William French Smith, Roberts was tasked with making the case against one of the most consequential voting rights laws in the nation’s history.

Chuck Schumer said that " nothing is off the table next year" if Republicans try to rush to fill the open Supreme Court seat, formerly held by Schumer , the minority leader, has generally been cautious about pushing big institutional changes in the past, but his new statement signals a renewed fight for

is possible if Republicans fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg before the inauguration in January. “Let me be clear: if Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year,” Schumer said

Chuck Schumer wearing a suit and tie: Sen. Chuck Schumer speaks in New York City in September 2020. © Lev Radin/Pacific Press/LightRocket/Getty Images Sen. Chuck Schumer speaks in New York City in September 2020.

In the wake of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death on Friday, President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have announced their intention to fill her seat on the Court as swiftly as possible.

Democrats have not yet settled on one particular strategy to counter the Republican agenda, but they’re signaling that they’re not ruling out aggressive responses like rebalancing the Court through court-packing or seeking unconventional ways to delay the nomination.

Incredible life of the woman who became the Notorious RBG

  Incredible life of the woman who became the Notorious RBG Ruth Bader Ginsburg served as a Supreme Court justice for almost 27 years. Her death at aged 87 means that President Donald Trump will be able to nominate another justice.She passed away from complications of pancreatic cancer at the age of 87.

Schumer tells Dems: “Let me be clear: if Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year. The threat leaves open the possibility of packing the Supreme Court , an idea many Democratic presidential candidates said they were at least open to.

Schumer also warned that if Republicans push through the nominee, “ nothing is off the table ” for Senate Hundreds of mourners gathered for a second night outside the Supreme Court building “What Mitch McConnell doesn’t understand is that the fight has just begun.” A confirmation vote in

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said during a Democratic caucus call on Saturday that “everything Americans value is at stake” and that he is willing to consider all options should Republicans begin the process of filling Ginsburg’s seat this week, as is planned.

“Let me be clear: If Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year,” Schumer said. “Nothing is off the table.”

Democrats are furious that McConnell plans to proceed with the nomination process despite having led the Republican effort to block President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February 2016. At that time, McConnell said the “vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president” given that it was an election year.

Trump’s shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees, explained

  Trump’s shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees, explained Trump wants to remind loyalists that, if he wins in November, they’ll get more judges who will enact Republican policy.With Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s passing Friday night, he now has that opportunity.

The fight to replace Ginsburg on the Supreme Court is likely to be one of the nastiest political skirmishes in recent American political history, and Schumer doubled down on his declaration over the weekend by declaring that " nothing is off the table " for a potential Democratic Senate majority in

Nothing is off the table .” — Ed O'Keefe (@edokeefe) September 19, 2020. Schumer ’s comments signal an apparent willingness to pursue drastic reforms to the Supreme Court , including expanding Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

“Mitch McConnell set the precedent. No Supreme Court vacancies filled in an election year,” Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) tweeted Friday. “If he violates it, when Democrats control the Senate in the next Congress, we must abolish the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court.”

Enacting either of those policies would transform American political life. Ending the filibuster would allow legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority of more than 50 votes. If Democrats won control of the Senate in November and scrapped the filibuster, they’d be able to pass ambitious legislation with far greater ease than they could during the Obama administration.

And court-packing is a bold strategy that Democrats could use to gain ideological influence over the Court if they win back the Senate in the 2020 elections.

“If Democrats control the White House and the Congress, in other words, they can pass a law adding seats to the Supreme Court. If Biden is president, he could then quickly fill them (with the consent of the Senate),” Vox’s Ian Millhiser recently wrote. “And four new seats could give Court a Democratic-controlled majority, despite another Trump pick.”

GOP Senator's Fundraising Highlights Supreme Court Opening Less Than an Hour After Ginsburg's Death

  GOP Senator's Fundraising Highlights Supreme Court Opening Less Than an Hour After Ginsburg's Death Iowa Senator Joni Ernst sent out a fundraising campaign email detailing the Supreme Court vacancy shortly after the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was announced.Iowa Senator Joni Ernst's campaign sent a fundraising email detailing the key SCOTUS opening at 7:08 p.m. with the subject line, "BREAKING: the future of the Supreme Court is on the line," according to a Twitter post by Radio Iowa News Director O. Kay Henderson. Justice Ginsburg's passing was announced roughly around 6:30 p.m., Iowa time.

Schumer tells Dems: “Let me be clear: if Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year. We kept our promise. Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year

Democrat senators, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), on Saturday threatened that “ nothing is off the table ” if Republicans hold a vote on a new Supreme Court Justice before the election.

Leaders of the anti-Trump group Indivisible, the abortion rights organization NARAL, and the court advocacy nonprofit Demand Justice reportedly discussed the maneuver on a call on Friday.

So far, it’s unclear which, if any, of the potentially sweeping policies like packing the Court or ending the filibuster are being taken seriously by Democratic leadership or could emerge as tangible threats against the GOP. Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) was asked to explain what Schumer meant by “nothing off the table“ and declined to offer specifics.

“I think he’s talking about the fact that there’s reforms that we’ve all looked at that you could consider ... but, again, I’m not going to concede this,” she said.

She continued by arguing that Republicans need to be consistent in their statements, pointing out that a number of Republicans previously publicly said they would follow 2016’s precedent if faced with a Supreme Court vacancy ahead of November’s election. Some of these Republicans, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham (SC), have since said they’ve changed their minds; others, like Sens. Susan Collins (ME) and Lisa Murkowski (AK), have argued following Ginsburg’s death for waiting until after the election to seat a new justice.

If GOP Creates 'Illegitimate Majority' on Supreme Court, More Justices Should be Added: Former U.S. Attorney General

  If GOP Creates 'Illegitimate Majority' on Supreme Court, More Justices Should be Added: Former U.S. Attorney General Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder accused Republicans of "blatant hypocrisy" for moving to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death so close to the presidential election. Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has said that if Republicans create an "illegitimate" conservative majority on the Supreme Court, more justices should be added.

Democrat senators, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), on Saturday threatened that “ nothing is off the table ” if Republicans hold a vote on a new Supreme Court Justice before the election.

Nothing is off the table ." Behind the scenes, Democrats are talking about a lot of steps they could take, including nuking the filibuster, if they win in November, even adding additional seats to the Supreme Court . But, right now, all of those things would depend on Schumer winning the Senate

Nancy Pelosi signals potential receptivity to a number of options

During an appearance on ABC’s This Week on Sunday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also signaled an openness to aggressive strategies.

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos asked Pelosi about the idea floated by some activists that Democrats could use impeachment hearings against Trump or Attorney General Bill Barr to tie up the Senate if Republicans try to push through a nomination during a lame-duck session (after a potential win for Democrats in Congress and the White House).

“Well, we have our options,” Pelosi replied. “We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now, but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country. This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election with statements that he and his henchmen have made.”

Stephanopoulos pressed Pelosi further on the issue, and tried to get her to confirm that she wasn’t “ruling anything out” as an option, and she again said her party feels it has a number of options at its disposal.

“We have a responsibility. We’ve taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,” she said. “We have a responsibility to meet the needs of the American people. That is when we weigh the equities of protecting our democracy requires us to use every arrow in our quiver.”

If Elected, Who Would Joe Biden Pick for the Supreme Court?

  If Elected, Who Would Joe Biden Pick for the Supreme Court? The Democratic presidential candidate hasn't released a list of potential candidates for the high court. But legal experts say the pool of qualified prospects is small enough to make some very good educated guesses about who the former veep might nominate if he wins in November.All Biden has indicated on the record so far is a desire to appoint the first Black woman to the high court. But if Democrats make good on a threat to add justices to the high court in the event that they capture the Senate and White House in November, Biden could have an unusual opportunity to break other Supreme Court barriers on race, ethnicity and identity, too.

During the interview, Pelosi did rule out using a looming government shutdown as leverage over Republicans but refuses to issue a statement on adding justices to the Supreme Court.

What is clear is that Democrats do not yet have the votes to block a Trump nominee in the Senate. They will need four Republican senators to either abstain or vote no on that nominee; as of Sunday, only two — Collins and Murkowski — have said they believe the Senate shouldn’t vote on the president’s nominee before November’s election. Trump is expected to announce his nominee this week, meaning Democrats will need to unveil a firm strategy soon.

Will you help keep Vox free for all?

The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election: Contribute today from as little as $3.


Video: Nadler proposes Senate expand number of SCOTUS justices if Dems win election (FOX News)

Amy Coney Barrett's Expected Supreme Court Nomination Sets Up Battle Over Her Role in Election Lawsuits .
Democratic senators argue she cannot possibly be viewed as impartial in potential legal challenges over the presidential election.Several Democratic senators, including Vermont's Patrick Leahy and Virginia's Tim Kaine, say Barrett—or any nominee expedited through the Senate before November 3— cannot possibly be viewed as impartial in potential legal challenges over the election. Law ethics groups say U.S. Circuit Court Judge Barrett, who Trump is expected to nominate Saturday evening, must recuse herself in order to "faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties" of being on the Supreme Court.

usr: 3
This is interesting!