•   
  •   

World Google Accused of Not Fixing 'Illegal Advantage' Competition Problems

00:26  29 september  2020
00:26  29 september  2020 Source:   newsweek.com

Justice Ginsburg died believing that Trump is an “aberration.” Her death ensures that he won’t be.

  Justice Ginsburg died believing that Trump is an “aberration.” Her death ensures that he won’t be. Ginsburg’s death places her entire legacy in dangerAnd yet her death means that the age of Trump will almost certainly be our new normal. With Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, the power to shape our Constitution was split between four liberals, four archconservatives, and Chief Justice John Roberts — a conservative whose respect for institutions and for procedural regularity sometimes tempered his fellow conservatives’ tendencies.

Google was told that it should "offer the [advertising] space on the same terms to Google Shopping and its competitors " and the search site says it has taken measures to fulfill the ruling's requirements but competitors are not convinced. Google has been fined a number of times by the European Union

Google ’s online shopping search engine is still disadvantaging EU rivals despite a regulatory crackdown three years ago that led the search giant to alter its practices, a new study has claimed. Less than 1 per cent of traffic through Google Shopping is currently being directed to rival comparison

Margrethe Vestager holding a sign: European Union Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager has already overseen judgements against Google for its shopping services and Android operating systems © Getty European Union Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager has already overseen judgements against Google for its shopping services and Android operating systems

Google Shopping, the company's online shopping search engine, still unfairly favors Google's own results instead of competitors in the European Union (EU), a study has claimed.

The research of over 10 billion search clicks, conducted by Lademann & Associates and commissioned by 25 comparison shopping sites, showed that under 1 percent of traffic using the shopping search site currently goes to competitors like Idealo or Kelkoo.* A judgment from the European Commission in 2017 fined Google a then-record €2.4 billion ($2.8 billion) for abusing its search dominance and using an "illegal advantage" in prioritizing its own shopping results.

Pandemic panners: Indonesians hunt for gold in desperate times

  Pandemic panners: Indonesians hunt for gold in desperate times With the coronavirus devastating jobs across the country, desperate Indonesians are flocking to illegal gold mines as the soaring price of the precious metal overrides the risk to their lives and the environment. The arduous job also carries the risk of catching the coronavirus or skin infections from wading through waters chock full of waste from the nearby mine. © ADEK BERRY Spooked by the economic destruction wrought by the pandemic, consumers and investors around the world have been snapping up gold, which is seen as a hedge against volatility "This is very dangerous for our health.

Google Accused of Not Fixing ' Illegal Advantage ' Competition Problems . " Google is still in the mood that Microsoft once was, they think [they are] above the law," lawyer Thomas Höppner tells Newsweek.

com. google .protobuf.UnsafeUtil WARNING: Use -- illegal -access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release.

Google was told that it should "offer the [advertising] space on the same terms to Google Shopping and its competitors" and the search site says it has taken measures to fulfill the ruling's requirements but competitors are not convinced. Google has been fined a number of times by the European Union in antitrust rulings since.

"Google is still in the mood that Microsoft once was, they think [they are] above the law," lawyer Thomas Höppner, of international law firm Hausfeld who is advising the companies, tells Newsweek. "They are fully aware of the huge information asymmetry between them and any regulator. So they believe that if they only blur the water enough, they will get through with it. Unfortunately, for too long this strategy has actually worked pretty well for Google."

Supreme Court Could Take Intellectual Property Protections Back 50 Years | Opinion

  Supreme Court Could Take Intellectual Property Protections Back 50 Years | Opinion A ruling in Google's favor would have significant negative implications for not only the software industry, but also for musicians, news publishers, health care professionals and the U.S. economy writ large. Even Justice Department officials in both the Obama and Trump administrations filed amicus briefs in three separate instances positioning the federal government against Google's unlicensed use of Java. They both understood that ruling in this manner would undercut the efficacy of the nation's intellectual property laws.

Grace periods and troubleshooting suggestionsIAB Europe has finalized v2.0 of its Transparency and Consent Framework developed with IAB Tech Lab and mutual member companies. Google now fully.

- illegal -access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal reflective access operations WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release. The message does not cause robot operation to exit, or fail to execute. I silenced the message by adding a VM option to the shell script.

The study says that in the three years since the ruling, search visibility and profitability of competitors has halved.

This mirrors similar action expected in the U.S., with the Trump administration working towards, it is believed, antitrust action to protect competition in big tech markets like search and social media. The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission have been engaged in widespread antitrust investigations of the big four tech companies, looking at whether Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple, or GAFA as they have come to be known, have worked to limit competition or otherwise illegally interfered in the market.

"No rival demands any fixed share of the traffic, let alone free traffic," Hopper says. "They just want to be treated fairly, equally, within Google's general search results pages – because this is the gateway of the vast majority of consumers to the Internet. If you are not found there, you simply do not exist in their world – even if you are much better than Google's favored service."

Why are you seeing this digital political ad? No one knows!

  Why are you seeing this digital political ad? No one knows! Online political ads are wildly unregulated — and increasingly important for campaigns.If you want to find out how or why you’re being targeted, good luck. Most answers are hidden beneath layers of ad technology and data collection that tech companies aren’t legally required to disclose. And unlike TV, print, and mailed political ads, which can’t target you nearly as well and are regulated by Federal Election (FEC) and the Federal Communications (FCC) Commissions, the online political ad world is largely unregulated.

In most situations, the problem can be fixed by altering your file and re-saving. You can then try to upload your file again. To fix the issue, search for the above unsupported tags in your creative code. You’ll need to check all files stored within your .ZIP file and delete them.

A friend of mine has had recaptcha problems for a few hours. They happen when he tries to load certain websites that use recaptcha, every time he tries verifying the box he same exact problem and nobody can tell me why it's happening or how to fix it, please someone respond. Google user.

There is still legal action ongoing, with hearings already haven taken place, but a judgment is not expected this year. In November 2019, Europe's competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager said this "overhaul" that Google said it had undertaken was not working. Opinion is split within the EU, however, as the director-general of the EU's competition unit, Olivier Guersent, said officials were seeing "positive developments" and cited data saying that nearly half of clicks went to competitors' sites.

"There is no such intensive monitoring," Höppner says. "For instance, the Commission has not yet requested relevant data from affected companies. Thus far, all the Commission looked at was data conveniently provided by Google."

Google said that it did not accept the findings of the study.

"These figures ignore the facts of the Shopping decision," a Google statement said. "The remedy has worked successfully for three years, generating billions of clicks for more than 600 comparison shopping services, and is subject to the intensive monitoring of the EU Commission."

The fine in this anti-competition case could set new records if Google is found to be in continued breach of the original ruling.

If Google and Alphabet "were to fail to comply with any of the requirements set out [in the Decision], the Commission hereby imposes a daily periodic penalty payment of 5% of Alphabet's average daily turnover in the business year proceeding such a failure to comply," the original ruling said.

Gmail: users will soon be able to cut connections to maps, calendars and other services

 Gmail: users will soon be able to cut connections to maps, calendars and other services Google seems to want to give users of its Gmail mail app more control over their privacy. In the future, data exchange between Google services and smart features should become optional. © Shutterstock Gmail. The Gmail mail service, which is now over 15 years old, could soon receive one of the biggest updates in its history. However, this is not about adding more functions, but rather optionally removing features to give users more privacy.

Alphabet's total revenue was $161.9 billion in the 2019 calendar year, according to its own reports, with "Google Search and other" making up $98 billion of that total.

*Survey methodology and notes

The study, "Google's (Non-) Compliance with the EU Shopping Decision"

is "a study based upon empirical data of 25 comparison shopping services" and is not available in the public domain for now but has been received by Newsweek.

For its methodology, it states: "The data basis consists of various traffic and revenue measures for all markets in which Google operates the CM [content module] and across all devices (desktop and mobile).

"The analysis is based upon 400 MB raw data, assessing a total of 10.5 billion clicks on Google (5.9 billion clicks on generic search results, 1.3 billion clicks to merchants ("leadouts") and 3.3 billion clicks on Google Ads (ex AdWords). This relating to over 1 billion in total revenues

"Crucially, 99% of the clicks that ultimately lead the user to a website outside of Google go directly to a merchant's website, where the product can be purchased (see "buy-page-condition" above). On such merchant's website, however, users cannot further compare products and prices.

"They can only purchase the individual product. If the user does not find what s/he was looking for on this page, s/he needs to click back to Google's Shopping Unit. This is how users search for products today: they click back in forth within Google's Shopping Units and between the unit and the various merchants' websites with individual product offers; each click triggering a payment to Google. During this entire customer journey, from entering the first search query to finally purchasing the product, the user has only ever seen one frontend for the comparison of the products and prices: Google's Shopping Units.

"If the user makes a purchase, s/he must have consumed the comparison service somewhere. The only service that can have satisfied a user's demand for a product or price comparison between entering a query on Google Search and purchasing a product on a merchant's site is Google's provision of Shopping Units.

"Since no other CSS [cascading style sheets] is involved in this customer journey, there can be no doubt that the provision of Shopping Unit as such constitutes the relevant CSS."

Start your unlimited Newsweek trial

Google vs French media: Paris court to rule on talks .
A Paris appeals court is to rule Thursday on whether France's competition authority overstepped its jurisdiction in ordering Google to negotiate with media groups in a dispute about digital copyright. - 'Good faith' - AFP and other media groups lodged a complaint against Google with France's competition regulator last November, claiming the company was not negotiating in good faith to settle the dispute. In April, the competition authority ordered Google "to conduct negotiations in good faith with publishers and news agencies on the remuneration for the re-use of their protected contents."Google contested that decision.

usr: 3
This is interesting!