World Did America’s top spy release Russian disinformation to help Trump?

02:11  02 october  2020
02:11  02 october  2020 Source:   vox.com

Yes, Russia is interfering in the 2020 election

  Yes, Russia is interfering in the 2020 election It wants to cause chaos, again. But it’s also learned some lessons from 2016.“Note to my readers: I had this piece published elsewhere and it is no longer online,” it says at the top of his article, titled “The Hidden Corruption of the CARES Act.” “Sadly, it was a victim of a form of censorship that we can discuss at a later date. For now, understand how important it is to protect the right to free speech and a free press.

Trump says after FBI docs reveal agents bought liability insurance during Flynn probe. The news made a splash among the president’ s supporters and other Russiagate skeptics, one of whom observed that the timing of the events described in the declassified material dovetailed seamlessly with the timetable

N. America . Mr. Trump is not just soliciting Ukraine’ s help with his presidential campaign; he is using U. S . military aid the country desperately needs in an attempt to extort it. Anyone who says trump isn't helping Russia ' s interests at this point is either a traitor or a fucking moron.

It sure looks like the guy who’s in charge of the entire US intelligence community is selectively declassifying unverified intelligence to make Democrats look bad ahead of the 2020 presidential election.

Rep. John Ratcliffe wearing a suit and tie: Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe testifies before a Senate Intelligence Committee nomination hearing on May 5, 2020, in Washington, DC. © Andrew Harnik-Pool/Getty Images Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe testifies before a Senate Intelligence Committee nomination hearing on May 5, 2020, in Washington, DC.

Even worse: The intelligence, at least in the minds of some critics, may actually be Russian disinformation.

The Election That Could Break America

  The Election That Could Break America If the vote is close, Donald Trump could easily throw the election into chaos and subvert the result. Who will stop him?There is a cohort of close observers of our presidential elections, scholars and lawyers and political strategists, who find themselves in the uneasy position of intelligence analysts in the months before 9/11. As November 3 approaches, their screens are blinking red, alight with warnings that the political system does not know how to absorb. They see the obvious signs that we all see, but they also know subtle things that most of us do not. Something dangerous has hove into view, and the nation is lurching into its path.

The Kremlin has played down U. S . media reports of a CIA spy inside Russia ' s presidential administration, calling it "pulp fiction".

Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help Donald Trump win the presidential election, a US intelligence report says. The unclassified report says the Russian leader "ordered" a campaign aimed at influencing the election. Moscow has not commented, but Russia has previously denied the claims.

In a letter sent on Tuesday to Sen. Lindsey Graham, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe — a former Republican congressman from Texas and a staunch ally of the president — declassified information relating to the FBI’s probe into possible collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Here’s the core of the disclosure:

In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee. The IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.

Joe Biden Tries to Close the Deal with Latino Voters, As Florida Remains a Headache

  Joe Biden Tries to Close the Deal with Latino Voters, As Florida Remains a Headache He'll win the Latino vote—but will it be enough to win in November?That's the story of Hillary Clinton, who looked set to win four years ago, until she didn't.

Trump retweets Russian propaganda about Biden that US intel agencies say is intended to By retweeting material that the US government has already labeled as propaganda -- and doing so with the Trump ' s amplification of this disinformation comes as Biden is set to accept the Democratic

Allies of President Trump promoted a supposed Russian intelligence assessment declassified by the Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe on Tuesday that alleges Hillary Clinton devised a plan to tie President Trump to Russian hacking during the 2016 election—even though Ratcliffe himself

Let’s be clear about what this says: America obtained information that Russian spies believed Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign fabricated ties between Trump and the Kremlin, but the US intelligence community couldn’t confirm whether that was true because Moscow may have just made it up.

In other words, Ratcliffe acknowledged he released material that would likely be harmful to Clinton and the Democrats — and helpful to Trump — without knowing its veracity.

But it gets worse: Recent news reports have revealed that Ratcliffe declassified the intelligence against the advice of nonpolitical, career US intelligence officials who feared his doing so “would give credibility to Kremlin-backed material,” according to the Wall Street Journal.

As DNI, Ratcliffe doesn’t have to listen to his subordinates, of course. But the reporting further suggests that Ratcliffe, who fiercely defended Trump during the impeachment hearings as a then-member of Congress, prioritized Trump’s political interests over the interests of, well, the entire country.

Trump Has Nothing Else up His Sleeve

  Trump Has Nothing Else up His Sleeve In business and in politics, he falls back on the same tricks, but his tax returns show how poorly those tricks work.Trump is not the first president to encounter difficulty in his personal finances, though none has premised his political appeal so narrowly on business acumen. But the Times revelations are important not only because they raise the question of whether the president is fleecing the federal government on taxes, but because they illustrate his failures as a leader.

Read more: The US reportedly extracted a top spy from Russia after Trump revealed classified information to the Russians in an Oval Office meeting. Trump with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Sergei Kislyak, then Russia ' s ambassador to the US, at the White House on May 10, 2017.

The Russian intel was about a plan 'to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security Ratcliffe acknowledged the U. S . ' does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Democrats howled and said it was Russian ' disinformation '.

The letter went public mere hours before Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden squared off in the first 2020 presidential debate. And, intentionally or not, the disclosure had an immediate impact: During the debate, the president mentioned what Ratcliffe released. “You saw what happened today with Hillary Clinton, where it was a whole big con job,” he said.

All of this is deeply troubling and threatens to politicize the intelligence community at a time when untainted, clear information is at a premium. “He has declassified information for patently partisan reasons, and he has done so in an underhanded manner,” said John Sipher, who ran the CIA’s Russia operations during a 28-year career in the agency’s National Clandestine Service.

In one fell swoop, then, Ratcliffe may have tainted the reputation America’s spy agencies try so hard to build. “The damage to US intelligence will be difficult to undo for years,” said Alina Polyakova, president and CEO of the Center for European Policy Analysis in Washington, DC.

“Among the worst sins of a professional intelligence officer”

Perceptions of the intelligence community as a whole are positive only when it’s seen as an apolitical entity offering unbiased, fact-based information to policymakers.

Timeline: President Trump’s comments on the coronavirus

  Timeline: President Trump’s comments on the coronavirus In briefings, interviews and rallies, Trump has repeatedly claimed the virus is ‘under control and will ‘go away’On the campaign trail, Trump has mocked his Democratic rival Joe Biden for excessive caution and warned voters Biden would seek to shut down the US economy to control the virus.

In early August, top counterintelligence official Bill Evanina singled out a pro - Russia Ukrainian parliamentarian, Andriy Derkach, for “spreading Johnson, who has denied that he is “being used to disseminate Russian disinformation ,” has publicly admitted that his investigation could help Trump

Trump was led to falsely believe that Rep. Adam Schiff was fed exclusive information that could help Democrats if released publicly. Trump decided to replace his top spy chief after his aide told Congress that Russia is interfering in 2020 to help Trump win.

That information is typically presented only when America’s intelligence agencies have verified and placed it within a broader context to help government officials — from the president on down — make informed decisions.

Trump’s intelligence chief, who took the job after the impeachment hearings, broke that cardinal rule.

“Ratcliffe’s actions are among the worst sins of a professional intelligence officer,” Sipher told me. “They know that a single piece of information is meaningless without having the necessary context. To release one piece of information without providing context is unprofessional and damages the reputation of our intelligence community.”

To understand why that’s the case, it’s apt to use the metaphor of a puzzle here.

It’s hard to see the full picture by looking at just one of thousands of puzzle pieces. Once they’re mostly in place, the final image becomes clear and evident to all. The same, roughly speaking, goes for intelligence. One piece is good, but more pieces are better. And if spies can show a policymaker the entirety of the puzzle image, it’s easier for them to make informed decisions.

That’s why many experts were surprised by Ratcliffe’s decision. It’s the job of intelligence officials to present as full a picture as possible to their intended customers, not just hand over a single piece and say, “Here you go, make of it what you will.”

America Is Having a Moral Convulsion

  America Is Having a Moral Convulsion Levels of trust in this country—in our institutions, in our politics, and in one another—are in precipitous decline. And when social trust collapses, nations fail. Can we get it back before it’s too late?These moments share certain features. People feel disgusted by the state of society. Trust in institutions plummets. Moral indignation is widespread. Contempt for established power is intense.

Let’s go a step further: What if that singular puzzle piece isn’t from the set at all? What if someone purposefully slipped in a piece that looks like it fits but doesn’t? Well, the earlier that piece can be discounted and discarded as not being part of the actual puzzle you’re trying to put together, the better.

That’s what Republican and Democratic lawmakers on the Senate Intelligence Committee did. The Clinton-related nugget Ratcliffe declassified didn’t feature at all in the panel’s five-part report on how Russia interfered in the 2016 election. That’s not to say the committee was unaware of the tidbit or dismissed it entirely, but it clearly didn’t fit into the overall picture.

This is partly why the administration’s critics immediately seized on Ratcliffe’s decision.

“It’s very disturbing to me that 35 days before an election, a director of national intelligence would release unverified” information coming from Russia, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told the New York Times.

After all, it’s entirely possible Russia wanted the US to “find” that puzzle piece to mislead American spies. Russian hackers aimed to sow discord in the US during the 2016 election, and few things would ratchet up tensions more than having the government believe Clinton created an explosive conspiracy theory to beat Trump.

Ratcliffe defended his decision hours after releasing the letter, saying in a statement the intelligence he declassified “is not Russian disinformation and has not been assessed as such by the intelligence community.” He then provided a briefing on the sources behind the snippet just for Graham — and no Democrats — on Tuesday night, the Times reported.

How the Trump campaign is trying to dig its way out of Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis

  How the Trump campaign is trying to dig its way out of Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis Trump’s Covid-19 diagnosis is bad. His allies are trying anything to fix that.President Donald Trump has tested positive for the coronavirus. As has former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, Republican Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, former senior White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, and Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien, among other officials.

Even if Ratcliffe is telling the truth about the intelligence, declassifying it obscured more than illuminated and clearly provided Trump and his allies a weapon ahead of the biggest event in the 2020 election season so far. And he did so even as multiple US agencies say Russia is once again interfering to aid the president’s reelection chances.

That’s not the work of an impartial intelligence chief. That’s the work of a crony.

Help keep Vox free for all

Millions turn to Vox each month to understand what’s happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world: Contribute today from as little as $3.

How Mike Pence enabled Donald Trump’s botched Covid-19 response .
Time and time again, Pence dutifully implemented Trump’s disastrous coronavirus agenda.Vice President Mike Pence will go into Wednesday’s vice presidential debate versus Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) with a big stain on his record: his prominent leadership role in the White House’s failed response to Covid-19.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
usr: 1
This is interesting!