World Bill Barr and Elizabeth Warren find a common enemy: Google
AG Bill Barr Used His Office to Further Trump's Re-election Campaign, Bipartisan Ethics Group Alleges
The group urged Congress to open an impeachment inquiry into the attorney general's conduct on Monday.The report, authored by lawyers from University of Pennsylvania's Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law, and Citizens for Responsibility in Washington, some of whom served in staff positions at the White House and Justice Department during past presidential administrations, ultimately called for Barr's impeachment on charges of alleged abuse of power, obstruction of Congress and obstruction of justice.
You have to do something extraordinary to unite Elizabeth Warren and Bill Barr.
But that’s what Google has done. President Trump’s attorney general and personal fixer has filed an antitrust suit against the trillion-dollar internet titan. And the Massachusetts senator, who despises everything about the Trump administration and, is cheering him on. Sort of.
“Two things can be true at the same time: Bill Barr is a corrupt Trump crony who should not be the Attorney General and the Justice Department has the power to pursue a legitimate, long-time coming suit against Google for engaging in anti-competitive, manipulative, and often illegal conduct,” Warren said in a statement to Recode.
The Baldwin brothers, cinema's savviest siblings
The Baldwin brothers—Alec, Daniel, William, and Stephen—are cinema's savviest siblings. All actors, each has enjoyed success in film and television, with eldest brother Alec the A-lister of the pack. But along with the starry-eyed highs of fame, there have been some barrel-scraping lows, including embarrassing run-ins with the law. But the brothers somehow always bounce back, and they continue to endear themselves to Hollywood and the profession they excel in. Intrigued by this family? Browse this gallery for a Baldwin brothers career throwback.
This would be a striking alliance in any time. It’s even more so now that we’re days before an election, when you’d think that a Democrat would go out of their way not to support what the Trump administration wants.
But Warren and many others on the left have decided that going after Google, in what may be the most important tech lawsuit since the US government sued Microsoft nearly two decades ago, is worth making common cause with a bitter enemy.
Tuesday’s lawsuit is the most consequential result of the so-called “techlash” that has been brewing over the past few years — a feeling, often hard to quantify, that the big tech companies have grown without any kind of checks or balances from the government, and need to be reined in … somehow.
Missed last night's ACT election coverage? Here are the results from voting day
With 80 per cent of the vote counted, the shape of the ACT's next parliament looks fairly set. Here is what came out of last night's results, and what comes next.With more than 70 per cent of Canberrans voting before the official polling day, and most of those done electronically, the count was almost instant.
News organizations now scrutinize Google and other big companies with newfound zeal, and Congress has hauled in tech executives for public hearings. But that hasn’t slowed these companies’ velocity or reduced their power. Even punitive acts like a.
And while a landmarkthis month, there’s no guarantee that lawmakers will end up acting on any of that.
Barr’s suit, though, has the potential to fundamentally change the way Google works: A victory for the DOJ — or a settlement in advance of a verdict — could require Google to divest itself of crucial properties.
Just as crucially, the fact that Google is likely to spend years fighting the federal government in court could slow down the company, forcing it to pass on moves it wants to make, or simply by distracting it from its core business. Which is what some Microsoft executives say happened at that company when it fought a Clinton-era antitrust suit.
Poisonous tax reform proves less than fatal yet again in Canberra
Despite being gifted an apparently guaranteed vote-winner, the ACT Liberals have failed again. Maybe land tax isn't the political killer it's made out to be.Part of the reason is that during those 19 years, the Canberra Liberals have gone from being a pragmatic centrist party under Kate Carnell and Gary Humphries to a clutch of bitter right-wingers led by the reactionary Alistair Coe, the only political leader in the country to oppose marriage equality, and Senator Zed Seselja, another marriage equality opponent and hardline anti-choice campaigner. Humphries understandably quit the party in disgust in 2014.
“In the case of Microsoft, some say that the trial was the remedy — it created a culture within Microsoft that paralyzed the company from bulldozing into adjacent markets,” says Luther Lowe, who heads public policy at Yelp, the restaurant review company that has complained bitterly about Google for years. “I hope that US versus Google will do the same.”
Make no mistake: Many of Google’s most vocal opponents wish Bill Barr weren’t the one making the case against the company. Barr is overseeing the Google case directly, after his top antitrust lawyer recused himself because of a conflict of interest. It’s possible that his presence in the case could work in Google’s favor.
Not only is Barr routinely accused of turning the DOJ into Trump’s personal law service, but Trump — and Barr — have made it clear that punishing technology companies is a political act, meant to win points with Trump’s base.
Trump routinely goes after tech companies in tweets, of course. But more than that, in recent months he’s turned that into action, by attempting to ban both TikTok and WeChat, citing national security concerns. And his White House has reportedly told its Republican allies that Trump would like them to “,” in the runup to next month’s presidential election; and they have obliged. Last week’s flurry of press releases slamming and threatening Facebook and Twitter after those companies’ aimed at Joe Biden underscores the point.
The US government is suing Google over anticompetitive practices
The Department of Justice is filing an antitrust lawsuit against Google for illegally trying to preserve its search dominance.The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed its lawsuit against Google in a federal court, accusing Google of using money it makes from its dominant position in search to pay other companies to help maintain its lead and block out competitors. Google pays Apple billions each year to be the default browser on Safari, for example, and search comes preloaded on devices using Google’s Android operating system.
Barr, meanwhile, has a very long list of critics — not just ideological opponents like Warren, but also, , and who says Barr has “has brought shame on the department he purports to lead.”
And when it comes to the Google suit, there are specific concerns. In September, thethat some DOJ officials worried that Barr was rushing to bring a suit before the election, “overrul[ing] career lawyers who said they needed more time to build a strong case against one of the world’s wealthiest, most formidable technology companies.”
The most damning argument against Barr comes from Barr himself, via a jaw-droppingwhere he claimed there is anti-conservative bias in the tech industry and said one way to fix that would be “through the antitrust laws and challenging companies that engage in monopolistic practices.”
To hammer that home: There’s no substance to conservative complaints of systemic bias among technology companies. But even if there were, no one would argue in court that you would use antitrust laws, which are supposed to protect consumers from economic harm, to fix that.
Antitrust lawsuit: A turning point for Google - and the entire tech industry
The US government is targeting Google. This not only affects the search engine giant, it could also shake Silicon Valley. Why this is just the beginning - and why Donald Trump is striking right now. © ddp images Is Google just the first Silicon Valley company that the US Department of Justice is now doing seriously? The PR crisis experts of the Silicon Valley high-tech icons, above all those from Google, of course, are currently in top form.
So why doesn’t this alarm Warren, or anyone else who wants to see Google brought up on charges?
There are a few schools of thought:
- The most straightforward argument is that even though Barr may be suspect or corrupt, his career staff at the DOJ is not, and they have been taking the case seriously. Ditto for the staff who work for the attorney general in Texas and other states, who are pursuing their own cases against Google.
- Another is that it doesn’t matter what Barr says or does outside of court — what happens in a federal courtroom is what will matter. Which is something we’ve seen more than once in the Trump era. In 2017 and 2018, when the DOJ sued to stop AT&T from buying Time Warner, AT&T’s lawyers argued that the suit was politically motivated, because of Trump’s many complaints about the Time Warner-owned CNN. But those arguments didn’t go anywhere. Ditto for opponents of Trump’s first travel ban, who argued, unsuccessfully, that Trump’s first executive order was in fact a ban against Muslims, based on Trump’s own commentary.
But the main argument you hear from people who hate Barr but support his pursuit of Google is that someone needs to do it. And if it has to be Barr, then fine.
“I would much rather Bill Barr not be involved, because it gives Google ammunition to argue that it’s politically motivated,” says Sally Hubbard, director of enforcement strategy at Open Markets, an antitrust nonprofit. “But I’m not thinking about it as Bill Barr’s case.”
Open Markets was one of several-left leaning groups that signed an open letter in September urging the DOJ and state attorneys general to move forward with the case: “... the time for this enforcement action to proceed is now. In fact, it was long before now. As days, weeks, months, and years, continue to pass, more and more companies go out of business as Google’s dominance becomes more and more deeply entrenched.”
Queen Elizabeth II .: The evening before the wedding, Philip got cold feet.
They have been married for almost 73 years and are considered an iron couple that can not easily be disturbed: Queen Elizabeth (94) and her husband Prince Philip (99). A new documentary now reveals that Philip should have got cold feet the night before the wedding. And for a good reason! © Topical Press Agency / Getty Images Queen Elizabeth II. The Queen and her husband Prince Philip married in 1947. In the video above we show you the romantic story of their love.
As Hubbard, Warren, and other Google opponents point out, some of them have been waiting for the federal government to move against Google for years. As the, some officials in Barack Obama’s Federal Trade Commission recommended an antitrust lawsuit against the search giant in 2012. Instead, the FTC concluded that Google hadn’t violated antitrust laws, and gave .
And while there is a lot of conversation in Washington about reforming and regulating Google and other big tech companies, none of that is likely to happen anytime soon, and may never happen at all.
That’s because overhauling antitrust laws — or the laws around Section 230, which gives tech platforms a sort of immunity from prosecution over content they host — would require lawmakers to ... work together to change the laws. That’s a nonstarter in today’s Congress, where Republicans and Democrats aren’t even close to being on the same page.
And even in a theoretical Democratic Congress, which we might see after the November elections, lawmakers would have to make tech legislation a priority — and they are going to have a long list of priorities competing for their time.
But while an antitrust suit could take years to play out, it could actually affect the way Google does business — both in the future and in the present tense, as it spends time and attention fighting the government in federal court. Which is enough for Elizabeth Warren, and everyone else who hates Bill Barr, to root for him, for now.
Millions turn to Vox each month to understand what’s happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world:
Russell Wilson, Ciara fund charter school in Seattle area .
SEATTLE (AP) — Football star Russell Wilson and his wife Ciara, the Grammy-winning performer, are the latest wealthy philanthropists to back a charter school — though the celebrity couple say they’re not focused on the politically charged school choice issue and undeterred by challenges that have plagued Washington state’s charter sector. Through their Why Not You Foundation, Wilson and Ciara are contributing about $1.75 million to rebrand an existing charter program known as Cascade Midway Academy, just south of Seattle. It’s where the couple have their home base because Wilson plays quarterback for the Seattle Seahawks football team.