World How an anti-democratic Constitution gave us Amy Coney Barrett

03:21  27 october  2020
03:21  27 october  2020 Source:   vox.com

Women’s March holds rallies against Trump’s Supreme Court pick

  Women’s March holds rallies against Trump’s Supreme Court pick Women’s rights groups have raised concerns that Amy Coney Barrett will restrict abortion access in the United States.Speaking to a crowd gathered at Freedom Plaza in the US capital, Rachel O’Leary Carmona, the Women’s March executive director, said more than 400 similar protests were organised across the country.

Amy Coney Barrett (born Amy Vivian Coney ; January 28, 1972) is an American Associate Justice-designate for the Supreme Court of the United States , attorney, jurist

Democrats refuse to participate as Amy Coney Barrett nomination advanced – video. To critics, the rushed process represents one of the most naked power Kurt Bardella, a senior adviser to the Lincoln Project, an anti -Trump group, said Republicans have betrayed their claims to be the party of fiscal

In 2016, President Trump lost the national popular vote to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. He lost it by a lot — 2,865,075 votes, to be precise.

a man standing in front of a building: Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the US Supreme Court, meets with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). © Susan Walsh/Getty Images Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s nominee for the US Supreme Court, meets with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

Meanwhile, the Senate just voted to confirm Trump’s third nominee to the Supreme Court. The vote was almost entirely along party lines, with Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) crossing over to vote with all 47 members of the Senate Democratic caucus.

Yet, while pro-Barrett senators control a majority of the Senate, they represent nowhere near a majority of the entire nation. Indeed, the senators who voted against Barrett represent 13,524,906 more people than the senators who voted for her. (I derived this figure using 2019 census estimates of each state’s population. You can check my work using this spreadsheet.)

How South Carolina became one of 2020’s most unexpected Senate battlegrounds

  How South Carolina became one of 2020’s most unexpected Senate battlegrounds The historically Republican state is now considered a toss-up.In a state where no Democrat has won a Senate seat for more than two decades, former South Carolina Democratic Party Chair Jaime Harrison has fielded an incredibly strong challenge to incumbent Sen. Lindsey Graham, a high-profile Trump ally. Although early polling had Harrison lagging Graham by as much as 17 percentage points in February, recent surveys have the two lawmakers in a statistical tie.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett appearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Capitol on They characterized Judge Barrett as a conservative ideologue who would overturn the Affordable Care Judge Barrett will be the last to speak, and is expected to give a short, mostly biographical statement

By nominating Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court, President Donald Trump took the first step Saturday toward solidifying a 6-3 conservative Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice presidential nominee who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee that will hold Barrett 's confirmation hearings

These two numbers — 2,865,075 and 13,524,906 — should inform how we view the actions Barrett will take now that she is one of the nine most powerful judges in the country. Barrett owes her new job to two of our Constitution’s anti-democratic pathologies.

If every American’s vote counted equally in a presidential election, Hillary Clinton would be president right now and Barrett would still be a law professor at Notre Dame. And if the Senate did not give Wyoming the same number of senators as California — despite the fact that California has more than 68 times as many people as Wyoming — Barrett would not have been confirmed.

And Barrett is not unique. The first justice in American history to be nominated by a president who lost the popular vote, and confirmed by a bloc of senators who represent less than half of the country, is Neil Gorsuch, Trump’s first nominee. The second is Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s second nominee. The third is now Barrett. That’s half of the Supreme Court seats held by Republicans.

Pro-Trump rally in NYC leads to violent clashes

  Pro-Trump rally in NYC leads to violent clashes Pro-Trump rally in NYC leads to violent clashesGood morning and welcome to Fox News First. Here's what you need to know as you start your day ...

Amy Coney Barrett is set to be voted onto the Supreme Court - what has that got to do with Hillary Clinton? 3. Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner have threatened to sue a conservative anti -Trump group for giant billboards they put up in New York's Times Square that implied the couple

current edition: US edition. As Mitch McConnell, the top Republican leader in the Senate, stood before his party this weekend on the verge of confirming Amy Coney Barrett to a lifetime seat That statement suggests Barrett is among a relatively narrow subset of anti -choice activists who believe

It is likely, moreover, that the Court’s newly enlarged Republican majority will make the United States even less democratic. Republican-appointed justices severely weakened the Voting Rights Act — the primary legal safeguard against racist voter discrimination — in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) and Abbott v. Perez (2018). Just last week, the Court divided 4-4 on whether to toss out an unknown number of ballots in the pivotal state of Pennsylvania.

The Pennsylvania Republican Party, which hopes to see these ballots tossed out, has already asked the Supreme Court to take up this case again. With Barrett on the Court, the GOP may now have five votes to prevail.

And that’s just the beginning. The Supreme Court plans to hear two related cases this term, Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee and Arizona Republican Party v. Democratic National Committee, which could potentially dismantle what remains of the Voting Rights Act. At the very least, these cases are likely to weaken the nation’s protections against racist voting laws, adding to the damage done by Shelby County and Perez.

People Across U.S. Wear 'Handmaid's Tale' Cloaks to Protest Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Nomination

  People Across U.S. Wear 'Handmaid's Tale' Cloaks to Protest Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Nomination Women in cities across the U.S. joined the "Red Cloak Protest"—a national effort to rally against Barrett's Supreme Court nomination.Protesters in red cloaks and white bonnets took to the steps of state government buildings and courthouses, in cities such as Boston, Little Rock, Madison and Fort Myers, in a silent demonstration against Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee.

Donald Trump scores pre-election victory as US Senate confirms his pick for the vacant Supreme Court seat, Amy Coney Barrett . This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett (University of Notre Dame). This is not the first time that Barrett ’s name has been mentioned in connection with a possible Three Democratic senators – her home state senator, Joe Donnelly; Tim Kaine of Virginia; and Joe Manchin of West Virginia – crossed party lines to vote for

Giving states broad leeway to target Black and brown voters will also likely hamper the ability of the Democratic Party, with its multi-racial coalition, to compete for the presidency or for control of Congress.

American democracy, in other words, has slipped into a death spiral. Anti-democratic features of our Constitution enabled a party that does not enjoy majority support to gain power. That party is now entrenching its power by appointing judges who tend to be hostile to voting rights. And, as the courts hand down more and more decisions undermining the right to vote, Democrats will find it harder and harder to compete in national elections.

Democrats, however, may have a brief opportunity to pull the nation out of this death spiral. Right now, polls show Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden favored to win his upcoming election, and Democrats are favored to gain control over both houses of Congress.

If Democrats control Congress and the White House, they can add seats to the Supreme Court or enact other judicial reform measures that can dilute the influence of judges like Barrett and even reestablish a pro-democracy majority on the nation’s highest Court.

Robert Reich: Barrett Is the Culmination of the GOP Power Grab. Biden Must Reverse It | Opinion

  Robert Reich: Barrett Is the Culmination of the GOP Power Grab. Biden Must Reverse It | Opinion What's at stake is not partisan politics. It is representative government. If Democrats get the opportunity, they must redress this growing imbalance—for the sake of democracy. Robert B. Reich is an American political commentator, professor and author. He served in the administrations of Presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Reich's latest book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now. The views expressed in this article are the author's own.

Amy Coney Barrett Faces Questioning: Highlights of Day 2 of the Confirmation Hearings. “Justice Ginsburg, with her characteristic pithiness, used this to describe how a nominee should comport On Tuesday, senators began their questioning of Judge Amy Coney Barrett during her Supreme Court

When she was a law professor, Judge Amy Coney Barrett tried to puncture arguments favoring Obamacare. Now senators will probe how Barrett , as a Supreme Court justice, would rule on the decade-old health insurance overhaul.

Even in the best-case scenario for Democrats, however, there is no guarantee that they will hold onto the Senate for more than two years. Indeed, because of Senate malapportionment, Republicans stand a decent chance of regaining control of the Senate in the 2022 midterm elections — especially if a Republican Supreme Court spends the two years between now and the midterms limiting the right to vote.

Democrats, in other words, will likely need to make a very difficult decision very quickly: add seats to, or drastically reform, the Supreme Court, or risk the further entrenchment of Republican power thanks to our anti-democratic Constitution.

Will you help keep Vox free for all?

The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election: Contribute today from as little as $3.

Girl Scouts Post Tweet Congratulating Amy Coney Barrett, Then Delete It After Criticism .
The Girl Scouts said the post congratulating Justice Amy Coney Barrett was "quickly viewed as a political and partisan statement which was not our intent."Barrett, the third conservative justice appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Donald Trump, faced opposition from some lawmakers who expressed concern that Barrett would overturn rulings concerning access to health care. Among those rulings was Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion.

usr: 0
This is interesting!