World Senate Republicans are doing what they do best: supporting Trump

17:46  29 january  2021
17:46  29 january  2021 Source:   vox.com

Trump exits White House with drop in approval ratings

  Trump exits White House with drop in approval ratings President Trump’s one-term tenure in the White House is ending amid sinking approval public opinion ratings in the wake of this month’s attack on the U.S. Capitol. Only 34% of Americans say they approve of the job Trump’s doing steering the country in the final Gallup national poll of his presidency. That’s down five points from Gallup’s December poll. And Trump’s final approval rating is the lowest of his presidency in Gallup surveys.FOUR UNFORGETTABLE INAUGURATION MOMENTS IN HISTORYThe longtime polling organization noted that "the 34% job approval rating for Trump in Gallup's Jan.

Donald Trump speaks to members of the media following a Senate Republicans policy luncheon on January 9, 2019, at the US Capitol in Washington. Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images. Many Senate Republicans say they haven’t yet decided where they stand on Donald Trump ’s conviction in an impeachment trial. “I’ll listen to the evidence and seek out as much as possible what the truth is and that will determine how I vote,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) in an interview with the Advocate. And though it’s unlikely, it’s possible more lawmakers will decide to convict based on what they hear.

However, Trump is no ordinary Republican , these are not ordinary times, plus Biden is hardly a Molotov-cocktail-throwing socialist. In this combination photo, president Donald Trump , left, speaks at a news conference on Aug. Three years ago, Paulson and his wife wrote a letter to the elite Spence school in NYC, where the couple’s daughters were enrolled to complain about what they claimed was an “alarming pattern” of “anti-white indoctrination” in its curriculum,” according to the New York Post.

Many Senate Republicans say they haven’t yet decided where they stand on Donald Trump’s conviction in an impeachment trial. But if past is at all precedent — and a recent vote seems to suggest it is — a majority are likely inclined to let him off the hook.

a man standing in front of John Barrasso, John Thune, Donald Trump, Mike Pence, Roy Blunt, Mitch McConnell, Todd Young posing for the camera: Donald Trump speaks to members of the media following a Senate Republicans policy luncheon on January 9, 2019, at the US Capitol in Washington.  © Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images Donald Trump speaks to members of the media following a Senate Republicans policy luncheon on January 9, 2019, at the US Capitol in Washington.

In a vote on the constitutionality of the trial on Tuesday, just five of the 50-member Republican conference sided with Democrats in favor of moving forward, an indication that the other 45 members were questioning the validity of the proceedings or using that argument as a way to get out of what will probably be a politically challenging situation. The vote was largely viewed as a sign that the majority of Republicans weren’t open to convicting the former president, though several lawmakers emphasized that they still planned to weigh the evidence.

White House Dodges Taking a Position on Trump Impeachment Trial, Says Biden Leaving it to Congress

  White House Dodges Taking a Position on Trump Impeachment Trial, Says Biden Leaving it to Congress The Biden administration is avoiding taking a position on whether the U.S. Senate should vote to convict former President Donald Trump on an impeachment charge that he incited the deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. © Win McNamee/Getty Protesters supporting U.S. President Donald Trump break into the U.S. Capitol on January 06, 2021 in Washington, DC. Congress held a joint session today to ratify President-elect Joe Biden's 306-232 Electoral College win over President Donald Trump. Pro-Trump protesters entered the U.S. Capitol building during demonstrations in the nation's capital.

Several Senate Republicans were privately stunned Wednesday and questioned the White House’s judgment after it released a rough transcript of President Trump ’s call with the Ukraine president that showed Trump offering the help of the U.S. attorney general to investigate Democratic presidential Trump has been caught red-handed trying to enlist a foreign power in digging up dirt on a political opponent as he dangled U.S. aid to that country. What is more, Trump was too clueless to realize how damaging this was . His fitness for office and his political judgment as a candidate for reelection are so

And Castor notably " did what Trump himself has not: conceded Joe Biden won the presidential election," The Associated Press notes. He called Trump a "former president," said he " was removed by the voters," and argued that Americans are "smart enough to pick a new administration if they don't like the Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has reportedly suggested to his Republican colleagues that voting whether to convict former President Donald Trump of “inciting an insurrection” is a matter of conscience and need not align with senators ’ earlier votes to dispute the constitutionality of the trial.

“The trial hasn’t started yet. And I intend to participate in that and listen to the evidence,” Minority Leader Mitch McConnell recently told reporters. “I’ll listen to the evidence and seek out as much as possible what the truth is and that will determine how I vote,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) in an interview with the Advocate. And though it’s unlikely, it’s possible more lawmakers will decide to convict based on what they hear.

A statement like that from McConnell — who notably said during Trump’s first impeachment trial that he wasn’t an “impartial juror” — isn’t insignificant. But there hasn’t been a sweeping change in the Senate GOP’s stance, at least publicly.

Meanwhile, there are other indicators that signal how most Republicans could vote, namely, their past support of Trump through everything from his disastrous handling of the current pandemic to his lies about the 2020 election results. (Most Senate lawmakers did not contest the certification of the results, but they were silent for weeks after Biden’s victory had already been declared.) While a few members have occasionally spoken out or pushed back on Trump, most Senate Republicans have for years enabled or defended the president’s behavior.

Is it constitutional to hold an impeachment trial for a former president?

  Is it constitutional to hold an impeachment trial for a former president? The Constitution is not at all clear about whether Trump remains vulnerable to impeachment. Supporters of Trump’s impeachment can point to the fact that a majority of the Senate did vote to allow impeachment proceedings to move forward. Meanwhile, opponents of Trump’s impeachment can point to Belknap’s ultimate acquittal, and to the fact that a critical minority of senators believed Belknap’s impeachment to be unlawful.

Senate Republicans , fresh from big Election Day victories, are largely sitting on the sidelines as President Trump mounts legal challenges against vote counts in key battleground states that aren’t trending his way. If they do , I think the president will get a fair amount of deference,” the aide said, cautioning that will be the case as long as the legal challenges aren’t “frivolous.” But the aide cautioned that support from Republican senators will erode if Trump falls further behind. “If he loses all these states — Nevada, Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania — then it’s going to be a lot tougher to sustain

Republican senators are hearing what they want to hear when it comes to President Donald Trump . The latest controversy over his fans’ “send her back” chant is no different. Initially, many Republican senators made an almost unbelievable claim: They told Vox they hadn’t seen coverage of a campaign rally in South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, too, said he couldn’t comment because he “ was busy doing homework and didn’t have a chance to watch any of it last evening.” Those who admitted to seeing the rally footage or coverage also offered little in the way of criticism. “It would be nice if both sides

On the impeachment trial — much like on myriad issues in the past — many could well do the same.

These are the reasons Republicans have given for questioning the impeachment trial

There are a couple reasons Republicans have given to explain their stances on impeachment so far. Among those who’ve pushed back on the effort, some have raised questions about the constitutionality of the trial itself since Trump is no longer president, while others argue that moving forward with the process is bad for the country’s unity.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), in forcing the Senate vote on the trial’s constitutionality, revealed widespread Republican concerns regarding the impeachment process. “The Senate lacks constitutional authority to conduct impeachment proceedings against a former president,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) previously said in a statement. “The Founders designed the impeachment process as a way to remove officeholders from public office — not an inquest against private citizens.”

What’s next for Trump’s Senate impeachment trial

  What’s next for Trump’s Senate impeachment trial The House transmitted its article of impeachment to the Senate. Here’s what we know about the trial.That main action in that trial is still about two weeks away, set to start around February 9 (though we’ll be seeing documents — including Trump’s response to the charges — sooner.) Many details about how the trial will be structured and proceed remain unsettled, though it will likely be short. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Sunday it will “move relatively quickly” because the Senate has “so much else to do” — for instance, confirming President Joe Biden’s nominees, and trying to pass a coronavirus relief bill.

Maintaining the Trump database over four years required about 400 additional 8-hour days over four years beyond our regular jobs for three people. Biden is off to a relatively slow start but who knows what will happen. We will keep doing fact checks, just not a database. Nor does Biden spend much time on social media, unlike his “Twitter-obsessed predecessor.” Whether or not this implies that Biden lies less because he has fewer opportunities to do so, it doesn’t actually help Kessler’s case that maintaining a presidential fact-check database is too labor-intensive.

Republican Voters Against Trump , a group using hundreds of personal testimonials from disillusioned GOP voters to argue against a second term for the president, has no plans to choose sides in Senate races. But its leaders acknowledge that an overwhelming Democratic victory up and down the ticket “His level of power over the party could be determined by what happens in November. If Joe Biden wins in a landslide and takes the Senate down with him, then Republicans are going to realize they ’ve made a massive miscalculation.” But even among the harshest Trump critics within the GOP, not all

As Vox’s Ian Millhiser has explained, the majority of legal scholars believe the trial is constitutional, though the precedent for it is hazy: In 1876, the majority of the Senate opted to move forward with a trial for Secretary of War William Belknap even though he’d already resigned — but he was not convicted, and many who declined to do so cited questions about constitutionality.

Since Trump is now out of office, some lawmakers have also wondered about the purpose of the impeachment trial because it’s historically been used as a way to remove people from power. Democrats, meanwhile, have emphasized that the push for impeachment is about making sure the president is held accountable for his role in inciting the insurrection that took place on January 6, during which five people died. They’ve noted, too, that they would pursue a vote to bar him from federal office if he was convicted by the necessary 67 members of the Senate.

Video: As Senate trial remains in flux, lawmakers slam Trump (The Washington Post)

Republicans, however, have framed the proceedings as a slippery slope to using impeachment for “political revenge against a private citizen” and questioned whether barring Trump from federal office would be undemocratic.

The Biggest Decision Democrats Face

  The Biggest Decision Democrats Face Will they get rid of the filibuster if it means passing their voting-rights and election-reform agenda?The party’s immediate political fate in the 2022 and 2024 elections is likely to turn mostly on whether Joe Biden can successfully control the coronavirus outbreak—restarting the economy and returning a sense of normalcy to daily life. But the contours of American politics just over that horizon, through 2030 and beyond, will be determined even more by whether Democrats can establish new national standards for the conduct of elections through a revised Voting Rights Act and sweeping legislation known as H.R.

“Congress would be opening itself to a dangerous standard of using impeachment as a tool for political revenge against a private citizen, and the only remedy at this point is to strip the convicted of their ability to run for future office — a move that would undoubtedly strip millions of voters of their ability to choose a candidate in the next election,” Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) said in a statement.

An emphasis on how this trial could harm the country’s unity has also been brought up again and again — even though Trump and Republican lawmakers are the ones who previously exacerbated partisan divides — most recently with unfounded claims about election fraud that prompted many GOP voters to question the election outcome.

“Moving forward with impeachment at this juncture will only further divide our already hurting nation,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), one of the 147 Republican lawmakers who voted to challenge the election results.

Republicans’ past behavior foreshadows how they could vote

Many Republicans’ willingness to stand by Trump these last four years is indicative of how they will likely vote in the trial: Already, 45 Republicans have effectively said they think the trial is unconstitutional, a sign that the majority of the conference is likely leaning toward acquittal.

After Trump's election loss, Republicans across the US are racing to enact new voting restrictions

  After Trump's election loss, Republicans across the US are racing to enact new voting restrictions In the wake of Biden's win, Republicans across the US are rolling out new voting restrictions. Republican leaders contend that the proposals are about maintaining voter integrity, though fraud is a rare occurrence. Here are some of the voting proposals that are being debated across the country. Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

And Republicans’ prior support of Trump underscores this dynamic: When Trump called for foreign governments to investigate Joe Biden, a handful of Republicans spoke out against it while most of the conference did not directly oppose it. During the Black Lives Matter protests this past summer, peaceful protesters were tear-gassed to clear a path for a Trump photo opportunity, which garnered little backlash from Republican lawmakers. Trump has also faced more than 20 allegations of sexual misconduct, which has not prompted notable blowback from his party, either. Since the start of the pandemic, Trump has dismissed its severity and used xenophobic terms to describe it — both issues few Republicans confronted. Most recently, although the majority of Senate Republicans voted to certify the election results, many waited weeks before acknowledging Biden’s victory last winter.

Senate Republicans’ unwillingness to grapple with Trump’s incendiary comments and stances became so commonplace that many developed a standard response when asked about his remarks or legislative positions: They often said they hadn’t seen them. It’s an approach that Republicans initially used when they were asked about people chanting “send her back” regarding Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), a congresswoman of color, following a Trump rant about her. And it’s an approach they used when confronted with comments Trump previously made to journalist Bob Woodward, acknowledging that he understood how serious the coronavirus was even as he downplayed it to the public.

The Marjorie Taylor Greene committee removal vote, explained

  The Marjorie Taylor Greene committee removal vote, explained The House will vote on a resolution today to take the first-term member known for spouting QAnon conspiracy theories off committee assignments.The vote comes after days of back-and-forth between party leaders, as Democrats have pushed for consequences for the first-term representative, who has supported or suggested, in no particular order: the QAnon conspiracy theory; Parkland and 9/11 denial; the killing of Democratic leaders; and the idea that 2018 forest fires were started by a Jewish-manned space laser.

In some instances, Republicans have even avoided television interviews about Trump’s actions, including in recent weeks as the focus has been on his role in inciting the violence at the Capitol. “One of the hallmarks of the Trump era that anyone who works for a mainstream Sunday show knows all too well has been the selective silence of a large chunk of the elected leaders of the Republican Party, particularly in the United States Senate,” Meet the Press anchor Chuck Todd wrote in Politico Playbook in mid-January. “This week is no different from just about every other Sunday of the Trump era: a large swath of mainstream GOPers choosing silence over being forced to reconcile their role and the party’s role in the Trump era.”

In the previous impeachment trial, just one Republican senator, Mitt Romney, voted to convict, and only two — Romney and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) — voted to have witnesses testify. Romney remains the only senator in history to convict a president of the same party, so it is worth noting that party allegiances have heavily influenced these votes in the past as well.

There had been some speculation about whether Republicans’ approach toward Trump would shift following the attack on the Capitol and the former president leaving office, but it appears as though it’s not changing much. Although there were signs of Senate Republicans distancing themselves from Trump recently, including most of the conference voting to certify the election results and stonewalling his demands for $2,000 stimulus checks, a concern about upsetting the GOP base is likely to be a major factor in the impeachment trial.

“One of the biggest threats Republicans do face, especially if they come from red states, is the threat of a primary challenge if they’re seen as insufficiently pro-Trump,” Cook Political Report’s Jessica Taylor previously told Vox.

Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA), a retiring senator, received strong blowback from Pennsylvania Republicans after he called for Trump to resign following the Capitol attack. And others, like Sen. John Thune (R-SD), have been the direct target of the former president’s ire after backing the certification of the election results.

“We are seeing the fear of Trump or of Trumpism continuing to permeate the behavior of these senators,” Republican strategist and Lincoln Project adviser Chip Felkel said.

Assuming Republicans predominately support Trump in the impeachment trial, as they appear on track to do, it’s clear that many members of the party still aren’t able to break with him even though he’s no longer in office.

These GOP Senators Are Democrats' Best Bet to Vote for a Trump Conviction .
Senate Democrats aren't likely to get 17 Republicans on board to convict the former president, but they could get a few.A month after 10 House Republicans voted to impeach Trump, the former president's trial is set to begin in the Senate. While a conviction won't have an immediate impact on Trump, as he's already left office, it could bar him from ever holding office again, dashing any hope for a potential 2024 run against President Joe Biden.

usr: 0
This is interesting!