•   
  •   

World Passing the Responsibility of Vaccination Risk to Pregnant Women | Opinion

23:36  19 february  2021
23:36  19 february  2021 Source:   newsweek.com

Covid-19: in Chile, vaccination is progressing well

 Covid-19: in Chile, vaccination is progressing well © REUTERS - IVAN ALVARADO Chile: kick-off of vaccination against Covid-19 for the entire population, on February 3, in the capital Santiago. After health personnel, vaccinated in December, it is the turn of the elderly and public service employees.

Pregnant individuals in the U.S. are faced with a decision: take an approved COVID-19 vaccine once available or skip getting the shot.

A nurse takes Moderna COVID-19 vaccines ready to be administered at a vaccination site at Kedren Community Health Center, in South Central Los Angeles, California on February 16, 2021. © APU GOMES/AFP via Getty Images A nurse takes Moderna COVID-19 vaccines ready to be administered at a vaccination site at Kedren Community Health Center, in South Central Los Angeles, California on February 16, 2021.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Center for Disease Control (CDC) are now all in general agreement that pregnant women may take one of the approved COVID-19 vaccines. The World Health Organization (WHO), who initially stated that pregnant women should not be vaccinated unless they are at high risk, changed its position to be consistent with the other organizations by stating that pregnant women at high risk may be vaccinated.

Covid jabs extended to all over-65s from Monday

  Covid jabs extended to all over-65s from Monday The clinically vulnerable are also being invited, as the rollout in England enters a new phase.The clinically vulnerable are also being offered the jab as the vaccine rollout is officially expanded beyond the top four priority groups.

ACOG recommends that pregnant women decide for themselves "in the interest of patient autonomy." Emily Miller, an obstetrician and a member of the COVID-19 task force of the Society for Maternal and Fetal Medicine told The New York Times "this is a really huge step forward in recognizing women's autonomy to make decisions about their own health care."

Pregnant individuals should have the ability, or autonomy, to make decisions in regard to their health and their babies. But pregnant women are not specially positioned. Like every other adult in the U.S., each pregnant person can choose whether to be vaccinated when it is their turn.

Unlike the rest of the population, pregnant individuals are making this decision without the necessary information regarding the safety of the vaccines for themselves or their babies.

The first of FEMA's mass coronavirus vaccination sites have opened in California as the state continues to struggle with supply

  The first of FEMA's mass coronavirus vaccination sites have opened in California as the state continues to struggle with supply Two mass vaccination sites organised by FEMA and the CA Governor's Office opened Tuesday in the state. The sites located in Los Angeles and Oakland each have the capacity to vaccinate 6,000 people per day. The state has struggled with inconsistent vaccine supply, forcing some sites to close temporarily. Visit Insider's homepage for more stories. Two mass vaccination sites opened Tuesday in supply-strapped California as part of a wider movement by the federal government to increase the rate of COVID-19 shots nationwide.

"The unfair playing field here is that pregnant women are making that choice with way less evidence specific to safety for them and their babies that other adults are making. So the deep underlying problem is that they are positioned differently," said Ruth Faden, an expert in biomedical ethics at Johns Hopkins University.

The exact risk a pregnant person is faced with when deciding whether to be vaccinated is unknown. Pregnant women were left out of the clinical trials, so there is currently scant data on the safety of the vaccines for this population. To make this decision, pregnant women are advised to consult with their doctor and weigh the benefits and risks based on their potential exposure to the virus and any underlying health conditions.

Historically, pregnant women have been left out of clinical trials for a number of reasons including potential risk to the fetus, potential costs to include them in trials and the complexity of a pregnant woman's ever-changing body, among others.

In Serrana, 1st mass vaccination against covid in Brazil

 In Serrana, 1st mass vaccination against covid in Brazil © Supplied by Le Point S errana, a small town in the State of Sao Paulo, began to vaccinate its entire adult population on Wednesday, a first clinical experience mass vaccination campaign in Brazil , the second most bereaved country in the world by the coronavirus.

But many experts agree that this should change.

"The core ethics problem has been the unfair treatment of the interests of pregnant women in biomedical research," says Faden. Although pregnant women do not necessarily need to participate in the first round of trials, "the interests of pregnant women should be included in the research and development process for vaccines."

There is great benefit to protecting a pregnant person against COVID-19. Pregnant individuals are more likely to experience severe symptoms, be admitted to an intensive care unit, need a ventilator or die from COVID-19 as compared to similar non-pregnant individuals. COVID-19 may also increase the risk for premature birth. Pregnant women are generally encouraged to get vaccinated, with the exception of getting the smallpox vaccine.

Despite the threat of the virus and the administration of other vaccines during pregnancy, pregnant women were not given the option to participate in COVID-19 vaccine trials.

"Pregnant women have the same capacity for autonomous decision making as their nonpregnant counterparts, including decisions regarding whether to participate in appropriate research studies," ACOG wrote in a committee opinion.

Australians banned from the PUB if they refuse coronavirus vaccine

  Australians banned from the PUB if they refuse coronavirus vaccine Safe Work Australia said while it's unlikely companies will be forced to ask customers for proof of vaccination under current work health and safety laws, they are free to do so if they please. The safety regulator recommended that businesses - including cafes, restaurants and bars - consider taking further precautionary action once the vaccine is administered.

Pregnant individuals are now left to decide whether to be vaccinated without relevant studies. Many face additional pressure due to the high risk of contracting the virus in their profession. Approximately 80 percent of health care workers in the U.S. are women and over 330,000 U.S. health care workers are pregnant.

Women at risk of contracting the virus because of their profession are, of course, not just limited to health care. More than 50 percent of American retail workers are women and almost 75 percent of teachers are women.

Most experts agree that the benefit of protecting pregnant women against the virus outweighs any potential risk of the vaccine. So far around 20,000 pregnant women decided to get the vaccine in the U.S.

Anthony Fauci, chief medical advisor to President Joe Biden, stated that so far there are no "red flags." Some early evidence suggest that the COVID-19 vaccines are not harmful to a fetus.

The apparent safety of the COVID-19 vaccines does not minimize the uncertain and needless position we have placed this population in.

Pregnant individuals should and do have the autonomy to decide whether to vaccinate. What we must recognize is that we are unnecessarily asking them to carry the risk of this decision without providing the relevant facts to do so.

Katie C. Reilly is a writer and attorney. Her writing primary focuses on women's health and social justice issues.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Start your unlimited Newsweek trial

Vaccination: Fewer doses of AstraZeneca in February, the Janssen vaccine planned instead in May .
The expected total of nearly 6 million AstraZeneca doses at the end of March is already below previous forecasts, which were set at 9 million at the end of the first trimester © FRANCOIS GREUEZ / SIPA / SIPA Illustration of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

usr: 0
This is interesting!