World Why Iran rejected the US and EU offer for nuclear deal talks
Israel's Politicians Are Divided—But Not on Iran | Opinion
Although Israel is in the midst of an election campaign, Netanyahu's challengers are toeing his line on the nuclear deal.Whatever the reason, one item discussed on the call has become urgent: what to do about Iran's nuclear program, and whether or not the U.S. should rejoin the current agreement. The imperativeness of the conversation between the two leaders is underscored by Iran's announcement that as of February 23rd it would stop the voluntary implementation of the Additional Protocol that allowed for snap inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities.
Iran has rejected an opportunity to discuss the future of a nuclear deal with the United States, keeping both nations on a confrontational path instead of a diplomatic one.
On February 18,brokered by the European Union. The goal was for both sides to negotiate a way forward so the US could reenter the multinational pact that limited Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief the Trump administration left in 2018. After that exit, Iran pressured America to lift those penalties by, among other things, enriching uranium above agreed-to levels in the accord.
Iran could enrich uranium to 60%, warns Supreme Leader
© Supplied by Le Point L Iranian number one Ali Khamenei warned on Monday that his country could enrich uranium to 60% if need, a gesture of defiance towards the West in full diplomatic exchanges to try to save an agreement supposed to frame the Iranian nuclear program.
Now, the Trump administration has been replaced by Biden’s, which wants to reenter the deal. But efforts to do that have reached a stalemate: Iran wants reimposed sanctions on it lifted before welcoming America back into the fold, and the US pushes for Tehran to comply with the.
Iran had said it was “” the offer to meet, signaling EU-brokered negotiations were mere days or weeks away. But that “maybe” turned into a “no” on Sunday, a troubling indicator that the diplomatic path won’t be straightforward.
The “time isn’t ripe for the proposed informal meeting,”, the spokesperson for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, tweeted on Sunday.
Considering US/E3 positions & actions, time isn't ripe for the proposed informal meeting.
U.S.-Iran Stare-off Needs to End | Opinion
While both sides returning to the nuclear deal is the right policy, this common-sense exit-ramp will remain out of reach as long as U.S. and Iranian officials continue to joust in front of the cameras and talk past each other. The only way this is going to work is if Washington and Tehran take steps together, where the U.S. lifting of oil and banking sanctions is synchronized with Iran shipping out its large stockpile of low-enriched uranium and disassembling its advanced centrifuges.
Remember: Trump failed to meet because of his ill-advised 'Max Failure'. With sanctions in place, same still applies. Censuring is NOT diplomacy. It doesn't work with Iran.— Saeed Khatibzadeh (@SKhatibzadeh)
The, which first reported Tehran’s decision, noted Iran doesn’t want to meet with the US until it’s clear it would get sanctions relief from such a meeting. Instead, the Islamic Republic wants the EU to mediate a “step-by-step process” whereby both Washington and Tehran offer concessions before any talks.
A White House spokesperson noted the Biden administration is “disappointed at Iran’s response,” but added, “We remain ready to reengage in meaningful diplomacy to achieve a mutual return to compliance” with the nuclear deal.
Keeping chances for diplomacy alive, however, is easier said than done.
Why Iran rejected the offer for nuclear deal talks, at least for now
It’s always hard to know why, exactly, Iran’s government does what it does. But in his, Khatibzadeh offered two concrete clues.
Biden’s Syria Airstrikes May Feel Like Trump Déjà Vu. Here’s What’s Different.
American airstrikes on Iran-linked paramilitaries in Syria this week were a deterrent response to attacks on U.S. forces in neighboring Iraq. Yet they also to seem have been a conscious refutation by the Biden administration of the Trump administration’s wild, dangerous approach to both Iraq and Iran. Trump’s recklessness almost ignited a regional war. The Biden team’s handling of Thursday’s airstrikes looks very intentionally un-Trump—but Trump left Biden with a dangerous enough predicament in Iraq that even a more careful, deliberate approach might not be enough to fix it.On Thursday evening, U.S.
He said the reason “the time isn’t ripe” for US-Iran talks was because of “US/E3 actions,” meaning recent moves made by the US and three European signatories to the nuclear deal: the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.
The US part seems straightforward. Tehran is upset that sanctions continue to strangle its economy, and it’s also surely unhappy within eastern Syria on Thursday. That attack — in retaliation for multiple aggressions by Tehran-aligned militants against US and allied targets over the last few weeks — hit nine facilities helpful to the proxies’ smuggling of weapons.
Agreeing to talks soon after the bombs dropped was surely viewed as infeasible among key Iranian officials, experts said.
And the E3 part likely has to do with a plan to censure Iran over its nuclear development. Simply put,— a UN watchdog — to inspect its nuclear sites as stipulated in the Iran nuclear deal. To show their displeasure, the US and the three European nations want to formally rebuke the Islamic Republic in the global body.
Iran rules out nuclear deal meeting, says time not 'suitable'
Iran on Sunday dismissed Europe's offer for an informal meeting involving the United States on the troubled 2015 nuclear deal, saying the time is not "suitable" as Washington has failed to lift sanctions. The European Union's political director earlier this month proposed the informal meeting involving all parties of the Vienna deal, a proposition accepted by US President Joe Biden's administration. Following Biden's election, the US, theThe European Union's political director earlier this month proposed the informal meeting involving all parties of the Vienna deal, a proposition accepted by US President Joe Biden's administration.
The motion set to be presented this week is meant to “express the board’s deepening concern with respect to Iran’s cooperation with the IAEA,” the US wrote in ato other member states of the agency. Tehran, unsurprisingly, called the pending move “ ” and threatened to weaken its ties to the IAEA even further — perhaps cutting them off altogether.
For the moment, it doesn’t look like the Biden administration is panicked by Iran’s meeting refusal. “We are not going to be dogmatic or sticklers for form,” an unnamed senior official told the. “We want to make sure that whatever formal process is agreed is one that is going to be effective.”
The chance for diplomacy, then, isn’t dead, and some experts say Washington and Tehran will eventually reach an agreement. What is dead, though, is any lingering chance for a smooth and easy way forward.
Iran's Rouhani urges Europe to avoid 'threats or pressure' .
Iran's President Hassan Rouhani Sunday urged Europe to avoid "threats or pressure" in any negotiations with Tehran, as he received Ireland's foreign minister amid diplomatic efforts to revive a landmark nuclear deal. Ireland is currently "facilitator" for the United Nations Security Council resolution that enshrined the 2015 nuclear accord between Iran and six major powers, according to the Irish foreign ministry. The deal, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), has been hanging by a thread since former US president Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from it in 2018 and reimposed punishing sanctions on Tehran.