•   
  •   

World Canada’s top court could be asked to rule if US safe for refugees

00:05  18 april  2021
00:05  18 april  2021 Source:   aljazeera.com

Biden’s Supreme Court reform commission won’t fix anything

  Biden’s Supreme Court reform commission won’t fix anything The president’s new commission has a lot of fans — in the Federalist Society.On Friday, President Joe Biden announced that he would sign an executive order creating a “Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States.” Griffith — who retired from the federal bench in 2020, allowing former President Trump to choose his successor — is one of several prominent conservatives on this commission, which the White House says Biden appointed to “provide an analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform.

Montreal, Canada – It was early April 2017 when Nedira Mustefa, an Ethiopian woman who had lived in the United States since childhood but did not hold immigration status, reached the Canadian border in search of protection.

a sign on the side of a tree: A line of asylum seekers waiting to cross the Canada-US border near Champlain, New York, on August 6, 2017 [File: Geoff Robins/AFP] © A line of asylum seekers waiting to cross the Canada-US border near Champlain, New York, on August 6... A line of asylum seekers waiting to cross the Canada-US border near Champlain, New York, on August 6, 2017 [File: Geoff Robins/AFP]

After 30 hours of interrogation, Canadian officials turned her back, pointing to an agreement between the two neighbouring nations that allows Canada to summarily return most asylum seekers who arrive at its border from the US.

Advocate urges Canada to do more to help people in Hong Kong

  Advocate urges Canada to do more to help people in Hong Kong Canada unveiled new work, study and residency permit programmes this year, but group says more support needed.That is why the 22-year-old, who recently completed a computer science degree at the University of Toronto and now works at a local healthcare tech firm, hopes to make Canada his permanent home.

Back in the US, Mustefa was detained at a New York state correctional facility for one month, including one week in solitary confinement, which she described as “a terrifying, isolating and psychologically traumatic experience”. She said she was fed pork against her beliefs as a Muslim woman, could not use blankets during the day despite the frigid cold, and did not know when she would be released.

Her experiences were included in a legal challenge seeking to overturn the bilateral Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA), which human rights advocates say violates the rights of refugees and Canada’s own constitution, known as the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

But the Federal Court of Appeal on Thursday sided with the Canadian government and upheld the deal, now forcing the litigants to decide whether to ask the country’s highest court to take up the case – and ultimately determine whether the US is a safe place for refugees.

Danish plan to repatriate Syrian refugees sparks controversy

  Danish plan to repatriate Syrian refugees sparks controversy Legal experts and UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) among those concerned by Denmark’s decision.The tough Danish stance is a new sign of the country now having one of Europe’s most restrictive migration policies.

The justices said a lower court had erred in its ruling last year that the STCA was unconstitutional.

“We’re very disappointed,” said Justin Mohammed, a human rights law and policy campaigner at Amnesty International Canada, one of the groups involved in the legal challenge.

“Unquestioningly, there are people who are being returned to the US who are being subject to serious human rights violations at the hands of the US authorities,” Mohammed told Al Jazeera, adding that Amnesty and the other litigants are considering their next steps, including a possible request to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The deal

Under the STCA, signed in 2002, asylum seekers must make claims for protection in the first country they arrive in, either the US or Canada. The idea underpinning the agreement is that both countries are “safe” and offer people access to fair refugee status determination systems. In practice, it means most people who try to make a claim at a Canadian port of entry are turned back to the US.

Biden Just Threw Israeli-Palestinian Peace Under the Bus | Opinion

  Biden Just Threw Israeli-Palestinian Peace Under the Bus | Opinion At a time when the Abraham Accords finally mark acceptance by some Arabs of Israel's belonging and permanence in the region, the Biden administration is refinancing an agency that provides international legitimacy to the Palestinian view that Israel is a temporary and illegitimate creation. It is hard to imagine a more anti-peace U.S. policy choice. Dr. Einat Wilf, a former member of the Israeli Knesset on behalf of the Labor Party and Adi Schwartz, a researcher and former senior editor at Haaretz, are the co-authors of "The War of Return: How Western Indulgence of the Palestinian Dream has Obstructed the Path to Peace" (St.

But Canadian law allows asylum seekers to apply for protection once in Canada – and this loophole has pushed thousands of people to make sometimes dangerous treks across the 6,416km (3,987-mile) US-Canada land border.

For years, human rights and refugee advocates have raised concerns that Canada is violating its obligations under its own constitution, as well as under international law, by enforcing the STCA. The current case is not the first seeking to challenge the agreement, after an effort from more than 10 years ago ultimately failed.

Yet as thousands of asylum seekers left the US for Canada since 2017, pushed largely by former US President Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant policies, another legal case was launched against the deal. In July 2020, the Federal Court of Canada ruled the STCA violated refugees’ right to life, liberty and security, as well as their right to equality, guaranteed under the charter.

This week’s appeal court ruling overturns that and means the deal remains in place.

“I think that the reality that people experience has been completely ignored in this decision,” said Jamie Liew, an immigration lawyer and professor at the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa, adding that the appeal court said the evidence was “individualised and piecemeal”.

Trump-Era Family Planning Policy Resulted in About 180K Unintended Pregnancies, HHS Says

  Trump-Era Family Planning Policy Resulted in About 180K Unintended Pregnancies, HHS Says The Biden administration is working to reverse a Trump-era family policy directive that caused Planned Parenthood to leave the federal family planning program, a move that officials believe may have resulted in an estimated 180,000 unplanned pregnancies. © Michael B. Thomas/Getty Images ST LOUIS, MO - JUNE 04: A group of demonstrators gather during a pro-life rally outside the Planned Parenthood Reproductive Health Center on June 4, 2019 in St Louis, Missouri. The fate of Missouri's lone abortion clinic could be decided today in St.

“It really raises questions about future cases where people may claim that their charter [rights] are violated. What’s the threshold now? It sets a really high bar for anybody who has felt the impact of a government decision on their lives,” Liew told Al Jazeera.

She added: “I think it is a decision that can be appealed. I think that the parties will appeal, and I think that there is a very good chance that leave will be granted.”

‘Step backwards’

The Canadian government welcomed the appeals court’s decision, saying “the STCA has served Canada well for 16 years, ensuring that our shared border remains well managed”.

“Canada remains firmly committed to upholding a fair and compassionate refugee protection system and the STCA remains a comprehensive means for the compassionate, fair, and orderly handling of asylum claims at the Canada-U.S. land border,” it said in a statement.

But Maureen Silcoff, president of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, said the ruling “represents a step backwards for human rights in Canada” as evidence presented in the lower court shows the risks refugees face when sent back to the US, including many who are jailed under harsh conditions.

The US asylum system is more restrictive than in Canada, especially for people fleeing gender-based violence, she explained, while refugees must file their claim within one year of arriving, a restriction that many cannot meet.

Silcoff told Al Jazeera there are “serious deficiencies in the US asylum system” and the enduring trauma many refugees face should compel Canada “to be careful about not just slamming the door shut to groups of people, simply because an asylum system exists in the US”.

The low number of asylum seekers sent back under the STCA in recent years – 4,400 people were expelled between 2016 and late September 2020, according to government figures released last year – also indicates Canada has the resources to process claims at the border, she added.

“They constitute a very small percentage of the overall refugee claims in Canada, but for each individual person, having that door slammed in their face at the border is a life-changing decision with sometimes dire consequences.”

“Dying by blood or by hunger”: The war in Ethiopia’s Tigray region, explained .
A humanitarian and political crisis, with no clear resolution.The brothers were Kahsay and Tesfay, who both cared for young children and elderly parents in a small village in the northeastern corner of Ethiopia’s Tigray region, in an area home to the Irob, a small ethnic minority.

usr: 3
This is interesting!