•   
  •   

World The U.S. Is Leaving Afghanistan. We Must Not Abandon It | Opinion

20:06  22 april  2021
20:06  22 april  2021 Source:   newsweek.com

Biden wants all US troops out of Afghanistan by September 11

  Biden wants all US troops out of Afghanistan by September 11 Biden promised to end forever wars. America’s forever war may be ending.Biden is expected to announce the decision, which was first reported by the Washington Post and confirmed by Vox, on Wednesday. A senior administration official told reporters on Tuesday that US forces “will begin an orderly drawdown of the remaining forces before May 1 and plan to have all US troops out of the country” by the 9/11 anniversary.

In early April, President Joe Biden announced that America will be ending its military presence in Afghanistan by September 11th of this year. "It is time to end America's longest war. It is time for American troops to come home," the President said in his speech announcing the withdrawal.

a military vehicle on a road: In this photograph taken on March 25, 2021, an Afghan Commandos soldier stands guard as an Afghan Air Force Black Hawk helicopter takes off at the Shorab Military Camp in Lashkar Gah, in the Afghan province of Helmand. © WAKIL KOHSAR/AFP via Getty Images In this photograph taken on March 25, 2021, an Afghan Commandos soldier stands guard as an Afghan Air Force Black Hawk helicopter takes off at the Shorab Military Camp in Lashkar Gah, in the Afghan province of Helmand.

Biden's decision likely brought about a sigh of relief to many Americans, who surveys suggest are increasingly wary of our overseas involvements. That's no surprise; we've paid a heavy cost in blood and treasure in Afghanistan.

Exit Strategy

  Exit Strategy There will be no power-sharing, no reconciliation, no peace of the brave. The war will grind on, with the edge going to the brutal fundamentalist warriors of the Taliban, who will torture and slaughter even as they repeal the advances made in women’s education and secularism in any form. But they will not have it all their own way. Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan, India, and the Central Asian republics have their own stakes in this war, and not all of them want to see an outright Taliban victory. So they will fund clients and proxies, as will, in all likelihood, the United States.

But we should remember that this is only the "end" of America's "longest war," as the President says. As U.S. troops depart from Afghan soil, that country's conflict between a central government based in Kabul and the Taliban insurgency will continue.

I talked to a range of advocates and researchers who have spent years working in and around Afghanistan. They were united in hoping that the United States continues to offer economic and diplomatic support to Afghanistan even after it militarily disengages.

"The gains—democratic gains, human rights gains, and so on—since 2001 are very, very fragile," Patricia Gossman, Associate Asia Director at Human Rights Watch told me.

Advocates for human rights like Belquis Ahmadi fear that these gains could be erased. She spent 20 years working in Afghanistan on issues like gender equality, human rights, and democracy reform. Today, she serves on the Board of Directors of Women for Afghan Women (WAW), which advocates for the women of Afghanistan, and as a Senior Program Officer at the United States Institute of Peace.

Good riddance to a bad war: Afghanistan forever war inflicted a colossal and ongoing cost on the West

  Good riddance to a bad war: Afghanistan forever war inflicted a colossal and ongoing cost on the West This war has been a monstrous failure, in which a vast amount of money has been spent and blood shed to make us less safe.Along with Iraq, Afghanistan stands as one of the greatest policy failures of recent decades, with a horrific human and economic toll. This is all a result of the hysterical abandonment of reason in the wake of 9/11 by Western leaders like George W. Bush, John Howard and Tony Blair — and what they believed were the political benefits of embracing militarism.

"We are not there, so we presume the issue is resolved. That goes back to the 1980's when the Soviets withdrew their troops. Americans and other internationals thought, 'mission accomplished,'" she lamented.

Ahmadi was referring to the Soviet Union's occupation of Afghanistan, which prompted the Reagan administration to funnel covert aid to Afghan rebels. This investment helped rout the Russians, but after the end of that war, the U.S. disengaged from the country entirely. The Taliban ended up taking over, and Afghanistan was denied the opportunity to properly develop itself. (This history was dramatized in the film "Charlie Wilson's War").

"I really hope that this time around, the international community does not abandon Afghanistan," said Ahmadi. "Afghan people have sacrificed so much for a better future, and they have accomplished a lot."

Mother of soldier killed in action and an Afghan interpreter reflect on troops leaving Afghanistan

  Mother of soldier killed in action and an Afghan interpreter reflect on troops leaving Afghanistan People whose lives are entwined with the war in Afghanistan reflect on troops withdrawing from the country. Susan Chuck, the mother of an Australian soldier who was killed in action in 2010, says it's time for the troops to come home, while interpreter Jan Bismillah Rahime fears for the future of his country.There are concerns the Taliban may yet regain control over the country — a prospect that especially alarms the Afghan interpreters who worked alongside Australian forces, some of whom have since been allowed to resettle here.

Indeed, over the past 20 years, Afghans have faced bullets to cast ballots in a series of relatively free elections. While corruption remains a problem, a fledgling government has made progress in expanding the rights of women and others.

"The wins that are among the most important are the opening of some space for civil society," Gossman said about some of the progress the country has made. "The fact that there are media who are critical voices that can try to hold government to account," or that women are holding public office, and women owning businesses.

So what can we do to preserve these fragile gains? Advocates said that leveraging foreign financial assistance is key.

"What we know is that Afghanistan is still a poor country; as of now half of its annual budget comes from international donors," Kevin Schumacher, the deputy executive director of WAW told me. "And through international financial and political pressures and persuasions, I think there is a very real chance that the international community can play a major role in Afghanistan."

20 years in Afghanistan: Was it worth it?

  20 years in Afghanistan: Was it worth it? The BBC's Frank Gardner asks the awkward question about a war with an astronomical human cost.The date is significant. It is exactly 20 years since Al-Qaida's 9/11 attacks on America, planned and directed from Afghanistan, that brought in the US-led Coalition that removed the Taliban from power and temporarily drove out Al-Qaeda.

In addition to economic support, domestic actors in Afghanistan also value diplomatic ties with the rest of the world. We can use that leverage to pressure actors within Afghanistan to respect human rights. We can leverage the fact that the Taliban have made clear that they also want diplomatic recognition, Gossman said.

But we should also think about engagement with Afghanistan as much more than just altruism on our part. "A lawless Afghanistan is in nobody's interest," Schumacher said.

After all, it was in the vacuum of chaos in the post-Soviet withdrawal that the Taliban took over the country and Al Qaeda found friendly sponsors. Americans often chafe at foreign aid, but the almost $5 billion we gave to Afghanistan in foreign aid during fiscal year 2019 is a drop in the bucket compared to the trillions we have spent on overseas conflict in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Of course, in continuing to support the people of Afghanistan, America probably can't do it alone. Many of our allies and regional partners will also have to play a key role in promoting stability and human rights in the country.

Ahmadi noted that countries like Pakistan and Qatar have influence over the Taliban. And they have to decide what side of history they want to be on, she said.

After two decades at war, the United States has decided that it cannot continue an indefinite military presence in Afghanistan. But that doesn't mean that Washington—and the rest of the world—should turn their backs on a country that has been through decades of conflict.

Millions of people in Afghanistan are depending on us to help preserve the progress of the past two decades, and it may very well be in our own interest to use the economic and diplomatic tools we have to prevent the country from spiraling into a situation where its violence may not stay within its own borders for long.

Zaid Jilani is a journalist who hails from Atlanta, Georgia. He has previously worked as a reporter-blogger for ThinkProgress, United Republic, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, and Alternet. He is the cohost of the podcast "Extremely Offline."

The views in this article are the author's own.

Start your unlimited Newsweek trial

Khalilzad defends Afghan peace chances amid rising violence .
US senators voice fears of a Taliban takeover in Kabul after US and NATO forces leave later this year.Khalilzad testified to Congress on Tuesday, the same day the State Department advised US citizens “wishing to depart Afghanistan should leave as soon as possible” and ordered non-essential US embassy workers to leave the country, saying “travel to all areas of Afghanistan is unsafe.

usr: 0
This is interesting!