•   
  •   

World The Question of Who Counts

14:01  26 may  2021
14:01  26 may  2021 Source:   theatlantic.com

Eurovision winner says contest is history for him

  Eurovision winner says contest is history for him Eurovision's highest-scoring winner Salvador Sobral says he now has to go his own way and set new goals.This year's final will take place in the Dutch City of Rotterdam on 22 May.

This is an enormously consequential question . As the late Republican strategist Thomas Hofeller put it in a 2015 report, excluding noncitizens “would be advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic whites.” Urban areas tend to lean Democratic and have a younger, more diverse population, including more Remember that noncitizens are not the only residents of the United States who do not vote. Children are barred from voting, and many adults who are eligible to vote choose not to. Nonetheless, the 50 states have always counted these nonvoters when allocating political power, because they are

The Most Important Question Facing Americans Today. Who counts ? In this project that we are announcing today, and will be rolling out more formally in the weeks to come, Slate’s reporters, editors, and producers are going to be spending the next 14 months exhaustively exploring the central question of our time: Who counts ? It’s a big project, one that will require additional resources for issue-clarifying interactive storytelling, for traveling to places that too often go overlooked, for ambitious commissioned features.

Now that the 2020 census is over and the data are in, the redistricting wars can begin. All 50 states must divide their population into voting districts for the purpose of electing representatives to Congress and to the legislature of each state. The process is sure to be messy, partisan, and contentious—in other words, business as usual. But this year the decennial cycle brings with it a new constitutional question that could rewrite the fundamental rules of American democracy: whether to count noncitizens when apportioning political representation.

diagram © Getty / The Atlantic

This is an enormously consequential question. As the late Republican strategist Thomas Hofeller put it in a 2015 report, excluding noncitizens “would be advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic whites.” Urban areas tend to lean Democratic and have a younger, more diverse population, including more immigrants, than rural areas. Those older, whiter rural areas, then, tend to have fewer immigrants and vote Republican. Excluding noncitizens from being counted in redistricting would shift political power—and the state tax dollars and resources that come with it—to Republicans representing these less populated, less diverse rural regions.

Wayne Yanko pleads not guilty to weapons offences over alleged interstate trafficking scheme

  Wayne Yanko pleads not guilty to weapons offences over alleged interstate trafficking scheme Wayne Yanko is on trial in the Brisbane District Court facing four counts of the cross-border offence of acquisition of a firearm — the first time the offence has been prosecuted in Queensland. Crown prosecutor Lincoln Crowley alleged that in 2016 Mr Yanko and two other men devised a plan to obtain a gun dealer licence under a business name so they could legally purchase weapons and then on-sell them to people who were not licensed."This plan was about getting those guns and moving them out of the system," he told the court.

What counts as a date? Ad by Forge of Empires. Because much of the questions on Quora on the girl hasn't made her move, when to kiss, when to touch, the guy hasn't made a Half of the questions could be resolved by two people commnicating with each other instead of asking "what does it mean?"

One version of a quote about those who count votes determining the outcomes of elections was attributed to Joseph Stalin in a book by his former secretary. It’s the people who count the votes.” Since no published source was cited at the time, it was widely assumed that the quote was apocryphal. The opinion of Slate‘s “Explainer” columnist on 13 December 2000 was representative: “But did Joe really say it? Almost certainly, no. Let’s just say Joseph Stalin is not known to have waxed forth on the nature of voting and was singularly unconcerned with elections.”

Over the past few years, some Republicans have been laying the groundwork for excluding noncitizens from being counted in both federal and state redistricting. Republican officials in Arizona, Missouri, Nebraska, and Texas have discussed excluding noncitizens when apportioning the state legislature. In November, Missouri voters passed an amendment to their state constitution that would seem to permit such a move.

[Amanda Frost: The fragility of American citizenship]

Is barring noncitizens from the population counted toward apportionment constitutional? In recent years, the Supreme Court has twice been asked to address that question but has dodged the issue both times—most recently in December. Soon, both the courts and state officials will be forced to decide. When they do, they must be guided by the nation’s shameful history regarding who “counts” for the purpose of political apportionment—a history that reveals the issue to be about far more than partisan power.

"Everything counts" -star Francisco Medina: 8 months after the exit: He returns as the Maximilian of Altenburg

 It is now seventh comeback at " everything counts ", but this time hardly someone has expected it: how He betrayed today (May 25) himself on Instagram, Actor Francisco Medina (44) will soon be watched again on TV. As the Maximilian of Altenburg, who always fluctuates between good and evil, he is one of the absolute fan favorites of the RTL series. But his role died around 8 months ago (again) the serientod - at least believe that all who do not belong to Maximilian's closest family circle.

Wh- questions begin with what, when, where, who , whom , which, whose , why and how. We use them to ask for information. The answer cannot be yes or no We can add emphasis to wh- questions in speaking by stressing the auxiliary verb do. We usually do this when we have not already received the information that we expected from an earlier question , or to show strong interest. When the wh-word is the object of the sentence, the do auxiliary is stressed to make it more emphatic

Do you have trouble with asking questions in English? In this essential lesson, I look at some of the most common questions using " who ". The word " who " is

At the federal level, the question was supposedly put to rest long ago. The Fourteenth Amendment, added to the United States Constitution in 1868, requires that seats in the House of Representatives (and by extension the Electoral College) be apportioned based on the “whole number of persons in each State.” The framers of that amendment considered and rejected using the word citizen, explaining that “representation … was to be based upon population, independent of the franchise, independent of citizenship.” Representative John Bingham, during the 1866 debates over the Fourteenth Amendment, argued, “Under the Constitution as it now is and as it always has been, the entire immigrant population of this country is included in the basis of representation.” States have followed the federal lead—counting all “persons,” including noncitizens, when allocating political power.

Uber agrees world-first union deal for UK drivers

  Uber agrees world-first union deal for UK drivers US ride-hailing giant Uber announced Wednesday a "historic" pact with a British trade union to represent its 70,000 drivers in the UK, after a court ruling granted them workers' rights. The GMB union said the collective bargaining agreement "shows gig economy companies don't have to be a wild west on the untamed frontier of employment rights". "When tech private hire companies and unions work together like this, everyone benefits -- bringing dignified, secure employment back to the world of work," GMB official Mick Rix said in a statement."We now call on all other operators to follow suit.

I asked this a few times and kept trying to follow the steps without success. Finally I got it when a friend explained it. This is for PCs: Click on the question . It will appear in the long search window near the top of the screen. Go all the way

There are likely between 110,000 and 120,000 polling locations in the US at which ballots/votes are collected. Depending on things like the number of voters, the size of the ballot, the variety of ballots, the voting technology, and the laws/regulations of the state, sometimes the count starts at the polling Regardless of where they are counted , a bunch of paperwork follows the ballot boxes or recording devices for voting machines. And, records are kept and tracked of registrations, spoiled/damaged ballots, priovisional ballots, challenged voting/voters/votes, equipment malfunctions and so forth.

The Fourteenth Amendment was one of three amendments made to the Constitution during the Reconstruction era immediately following the Civil War. The goal was not only to abolish slavery but also to end “caste” and “oligarchy of the skin,” as Senator Charles Sumner put it, by enshrining the equality principles of the Declaration of Independence into the nation’s constitutional values.

As originally written in 1787, the Constitution counted slaves as three-fifths of a person when allocating representation in Congress—one of several provisions incorporating slavery into the document. The Fourteenth Amendment put an end to such vestiges of slavery, ensuring that all persons (not just citizens) were entitled to “equal protection of the laws,” and further requiring that all persons were to be counted equally when apportioning political representation. That basic equality principle has been accepted by the nation for more than 150 years.

That is, until now.

The Trump administration fought hard to exclude noncitizens generally—and undocumented immigrants in particular—from legislative apportionment. At the 11th hour, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross sought to add a citizenship question to the decennial census. Had he succeeded, the 2020 census would have generated the data needed to exclude noncitizens, and likely would have chilled responses to the census by immigrants and their families in the process. (Two birds, one stone). The Supreme Court rejected the effort, and the census went forward without the citizenship question.

Paedophile Adam Neil Wonnocott jailed for producing and possessing child exploitation images

  Paedophile Adam Neil Wonnocott jailed for producing and possessing child exploitation images A paedophile who was found with 12 disks of child exploitation material and more than 11,000 images is jailed for at least two years — backdated to shortly after his Adelaide home was raided more than a year ago.Adam Neil Wonnocott was sentenced in South Australia's District Court to three-years-and-eight-months' imprisonment, backdated to March last year, with a non-parole period of two years.

Undeterred, in the summer of 2020, President Donald Trump issued a memorandum declaring that his administration would not count undocumented immigrants when providing Congress with the numbers to be used in apportionment. The administration planned to rely on alternative sources of data regarding citizenship and immigration status, such as passport applications and naturalization records—never mind that gaps and discrepancies in these records make them insufficient for identifying noncitizens with the pinpoint accuracy needed for redistricting. If Trump had succeeded, California, Texas, New York, and Florida would surely have lost seats in Congress as a direct result of the change. (A revealing side story: In an act of wishful thinking in the fall of 2020, the Trump administration rewrote a question on the civics test required for naturalization. The accepted response to “Who does a U.S. Senator represent?” was changed from “All people of the state” to “Citizens.”)

Upon taking office, President Joe Biden immediately rescinded Trump’s executive order (as well as the flawed question on the naturalization test). So the issue at the federal level is moot, at least for now.

But it remains very much alive at the state level. Proponents argue that because noncitizens cannot vote, they also should not be counted when apportioning representation in the state legislatures. Republican lawmakers in Nebraska, Texas, Arizona, and Missouri have said they would consider excluding noncitizens from apportionment if they could obtain the data on citizenship status to do so. A bill to accomplish that was introduced in Nebraska, though it did not become law. Missouri voters plowed ahead, recently approving an amendment to their state constitution that seemingly allows the exclusion of all people not eligible to vote from being counted in redistricting.

Baggy green back-up bowlers: Every wicket counts

  Baggy green back-up bowlers: Every wicket counts A lucky captain can call upon four Test-class bowlers, or at least a genuine fifth bowler who doesn’t weaken his batting line-up. For any other skipper, part-timers must suffice. Following my article on tail-enders’ batting, this one will focus on batsmen’s bowling. In the current era such a player is rarely entrusted with ten overs in an one-day match or even four in a Twenty20 game. The stakes are too high, conditions too favourable for willow-wielders, and apparently batting now too demanding to allow secondary employment.

[From the March 1895 issue: Immigration and naturalization]

Does the Constitution permit this? Although it states that all persons must be counted when allocating representation in Congress, it is silent on how states should apportion their own legislature. In the past, the Supreme Court made clear that legislative districts must be equal in size, but did not specify whether equality required the same number of citizens, eligible voters, or the total population of each legislative district.

The absence of clear text makes historical experience all the more important. The founding generation’s embrace of slavery, embodied by the three-fifths compromise, must inform this constitutional debate. Putting an end to slavery came with a renewed constitutional commitment in the Fourteenth Amendment to ensure that all persons are counted, as well as entitled to equal protection of the law.

As the Fourteenth Amendment recognizes, every inhabitant of the United States, whatever their citizenship status, has a stake in its future. All use its roads, libraries, hospitals, parks, bridges, and schools. Citizens and noncitizens alike breathe the same air and drink the same water. Principles of equality support allocating political power based on the whole population to ensure that elected representatives of each district protect the interests of all who live there, whether or not those individuals can vote.

Remember that noncitizens are not the only residents of the United States who do not vote. Children are barred from voting, and many adults who are eligible to vote choose not to. Nonetheless, the 50 states have always counted these nonvoters when allocating political power, because they are members of the community who equally deserve political representation, as well as a fair share of taxpayer dollars and government resources.

Missouri State Senator Dan Hegeman, a sponsor of the Missouri law, argued on the Senate floor that the new redistricting law would ensure that only “the people that are able to vote are the people to be counted.” When asked whether his logic required excluding children, Hegeman quickly backtracked, explaining that “nothing in [the law] prohibits the counting of children.” He meant to exclude only noncitizens.

Apparently, Hegeman understands that children should be counted when it comes to political representation and fair allocation of resources, even though they cannot vote or exercise all the rights of full citizenship, because they are persons whose interests matter. That reasoning inspired the Reconstruction-era Congress to choose to count all persons equally, and not only citizens, when apportioning representation in Congress. The same principle should continue to guide the country today.

South Australian woman released on suspended sentence after dogs starve .
A case of animal cruelty involving two starved young Siberian Huskies, one of which died, finalised in the Christies Beach Magistrate's court today.The 31-year-old woman responsible for the animals' care faced two counts of ill-treatment of an animal and two counts of abandonment at Christies Beach Magistrate's Court.

usr: 0
This is interesting!