World Gregg Jarrett: Rep. Adam Schiff's fury and outrage over seized phone records is a perverse irony

20:46  16 june  2021
20:46  16 june  2021 Source:   foxnews.com

Fury is looking 'unstoppable' and could fight NEXT WEEK, says Salita

  Fury is looking 'unstoppable' and could fight NEXT WEEK, says Salita The Gypsy King is deep into his training camp for his heavyweight trilogy clash against Deontay Wilder, which will be his first fight back since dethroning him almost a year-and-a-half ago. Fury, who has been out in the States since early April, had been putting in the hours in the gym for the past few months in anticipation of his blockbuster showdown with Anthony Joshua being confirmed for the summer before he was ordered to face Wilder in a rematch.

Spare me the pious lecture and phony indignation.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., threw an apoplectic fit the other day when he learned that what he did to others was done to him.  There is some perverse irony in all of this.  But, of course, Schiff neglected to mention his own hypocrisy.

Schiff’s tantrum was triggered by the recent disclosure that the Trump Department of Justice obtained his phone records, along with another California Democrat, Eric Swalwell and several journalists.  Their data was seized pursuant to grand jury subpoenas served on Apple in 2017 and 2018 when Schiff was the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and Swalwell was his lackey-in-chief.

Adam Schiff Urges Merrick Garland to 'Clean House' Over DOJ-Apple Subpoena

  Adam Schiff Urges Merrick Garland to 'Clean House' Over DOJ-Apple Subpoena The California Democrat said the attorney general needs to make sure there is "accountability" for those involved.In an interview with MSNBC, the House Intelligence Committee chairman said the attorney general has to "make sure there's accountability" for those in the Department of Justice who were involved in "partisan investigations" under Trump.

At the time, the DOJ was trying to track down government leaks to reporters of classified information involving sensitive national security matters, which constitutes crimes.  The Intel Committee was a natural focus, given Schiff’s reputation for politically motivated leaks aimed at harming then-President Trump.


When Schiff learned last Thursday that his phone records had been collected he predictably accused Trump of using the DOJ as a "cudgel against his political opponents and members of the media."  The House Democrat called it "a blatant attack on our democracy."  Cue the feigned outrage and sanctimony.

The insufferably self-righteous Schiff didn’t bother to note that he was guilty of engaging in the exact same tactics.  Moreover, he was counting on the mainstream media to conceal it.  Naturally, they complied.

Nancy Pelosi Brands Trump DOJ Data Seizure 'Egregious Assault' on Democracy

  Nancy Pelosi Brands Trump DOJ Data Seizure 'Egregious Assault' on Democracy The House speaker accused Donald Trump of weaponizing law enforcement against his political opponents. "Recently, it has become public that the Trump Administration sought account metadata of House Intelligence Committee Members and staff and their families," her statement read."The news about the politicization of the Trump Administration Justice Department is harrowing. These actions appear to be yet another egregious assault on our democracy waged by the former president.

Here’s a quick refresher on Schiff’s duplicity.  During the Trump impeachment proceedings in 2019, he secretly subpoenaed the phone records of ranking Intelligence Republican Devin Nunes of California, Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Jay Sekulow, attorney Victoria Toensing, journalist John Solomon, Fox News host Sean Hannity and others.

Schiff secured the records from a telecommunications provider, just as the DOJ had done.  But whereas the Justice Department endeavored to locate criminal leaks of classified information, Schiff was simply snooping on political opponents or, as The Wall Street Journal called it, "abusing surveillance powers for drive-by-smears of Republicans and a free press."


Schiff then compounded the injustice by publishing the call records and some telephone numbers of those he had targeted.  All the while, he refused to turn over any of his own electronic communications with the impeachment press and the so-called "whistleblower."

US to investigate Trump-era seizures of Democrats’ phone data

  US to investigate Trump-era seizures of Democrats’ phone data Calls grow for former attorneys general Bill Barr and Jeff Sessions to testify about the data seizures.The announcement by Inspector General Michael Horowitz came shortly after Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco made the request on Friday. Horowitz said he would examine whether the data turned over by Apple followed the department policy and “whether any such uses, or the investigations, were based upon improper considerations”.

When the watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit seeking access to Schiff’s secretive subpoenas to determine whether he had abused the power of his office, he fought to keep them sealed despite his repeated commitments to transparency.


Citing the Speech and Debate Clause of the Constitution, Schiff told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that he had unlimited surveillance power and unfettered authority to invade the privacy rights of American citizens without notice. Sadly, the liberal-dominated panel of judges agreed.

Its decision to give Schiff a free pass that allows him to cover-up his suspected abuse is as frightening as Schiff’s assertion of absolute power to do as he pleases, even if it includes exploiting the legal process for partisan gain and trampling on Fourth Amendment rights.  Apparently, the notion of an open and transparent government is an illusion for suckers.  The term "public records" doesn’t mean what it says.

It is equally troubling (but not surprising) that so many in the liberal media never considered it important –much less relevant– to inform their readers or viewers that Schiff’s outrage over having his phone records subpoenaed must have been the same outrage that others felt when he did the identical thing to them.  You won’t find any reference to it in The Washington Post or see it on CNN.  It’s as if Schiff never did it.

Jeff Sessions Claims He’s Clueless About His DOJ’s Snooping on Congress

  Jeff Sessions Claims He’s Clueless About His DOJ’s Snooping on Congress Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions is telling associates that he had no idea his Justice Department seized phone records of two top Democratic Congressional critics of then-President Donald Trump. In the hours since the New York Times broke the news on Thursday that prosecutors subpoenaed Apple metadata from Reps. Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, former Attorney General Sessions has privately told people that he wasn’t aware of, nor was he briefed on, the reported data seizures while he led the Trump DOJ. This week’s revelations were a surprise to him, according to a source familiar with the matter, and another person close to Sessions.

There is no balance or equivalency in today’s press; there is only a shameless double standard.  The media yawned when Schiff covertly collected phone records of journalists and lawyers.  But now they’re seething with anger that Trump’s DOJ did it.


Schiff has always been the beneficiary of media fawning because of his self-appointed role as Trump’s chief antagonist in Congress.  Documents made public last year show that Schiff knew all along that there was no credible evidence of Trump-Russia collusion.  But that never stopped him from stoking incendiary rhetoric that his nemesis conspired with the Kremlin. He claimed to have secret evidence (which never existed).  And the gullible media lapped it up.

Today, those same faux journalists are still doing the bidding of Adam Schiff.


High-profile Democrat calls for US to go ‘on the offense’ on foreign cyberattacks .
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., called for the U.S. to play offense, not just defense, amid the rising threat of cyberattacks. "I think we do have to go more on the offense," Schiff told "Face the Nation" on Sunday. "That means when we identify cyber groups that are working in conjunction with foreign states, that we treat them as an arm of the state. And we use our cyber-capability to destroy or disrupt the infrastructure they're using, and to raid whatever funds they're accumulating from these attacks. Does that yield to greater instability? Very possibly, because we would be taking action against foreign parties.

usr: 3
This is interesting!