World Why Tuesday's Senate vote on S.1 gave Democrats fissile material to go nuclear on filibuster

00:27  24 june  2021
00:27  24 june  2021 Source:   foxnews.com

U.N.'s Nuclear Watchdog Has 'No Indication' Chinese Nuclear Plant Is Leaking

  U.N.'s Nuclear Watchdog Has 'No Indication' Chinese Nuclear Plant Is Leaking "At this stage, the agency has no indication that a radiological incident occurred," the International Atomic Energy Agency said.The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that it knew of media reports about possible radioactive danger and that it would share more information when available on the Taishan Nuclear Power Plant. The facility is owned by the China Guangdong Nuclear Power Group and France's Électricité de France, the main owner of Framatome, a French company that designs and manufactures nuclear power plant equipment and systems.

Democrats may have reached the periphery of their power in Washington already.

That’s despite controlling the House, Senate and White House.

This phenomenon was best on display Tuesday evening when Democrats didn’t summon a single Republican to vote to trigger debate on a voting rights bill.

This was not a straight, up/down vote on the measure. It was just procedural to begin debate on the legislation. The measure needs 60 yeas to launch debate. It was expected to fail, and did. That stymied even consideration of the measure on the floor.

The vote revealed the limits of the Democratic majority in a split Senate. And, it played it to the letter.

Nuclear reactor problem a new headache for designer and China

  Nuclear reactor problem a new headache for designer and China The emergence of problems in a new-generation nuclear reactor in China threatens to undermine efforts by its French designer to sell it elsewhere, and could hurt Beijing's nuclear industry, analysts said. Taishan could also undermine the development of nuclear energy within China. While the nation has the world's third-largest park of reactors, nuclear energy remains a relatively small part of China's energy mix.After the Fukushima disaster in 2011, Chinese authorities have become prudent in further developing nuclear power in the face of sceptical public opinion.

Fifty Democrats voted to start debate. Fifty Republicans opposed, effectively filibustering the legislation.

But that’s well short of what Democrats needed.

And that was that.


By mid-afternoon Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., rushed to the microphones in the Ohio Clock Corridor just outside the Senate chamber with a breaking announcement.

Schumer had negotiated with Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., about the bill. Manchin developed his own voting rights plan. But Manchin had agreed to vote yes to proceed to the voting rights legislation.

News alerts instantly lit up the phones of reporters and Democratic activists all over Washington. Manchin would allow the voting bill to come to the floor.

Joe Manchin Meets With Texas Dems on Voting Rights Legislation

  Joe Manchin Meets With Texas Dems on Voting Rights Legislation U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin met with a group of Texas Democrats Thursday evening who blocked a state law there that would put new restrictions on early voting. © Drew Angerer/Getty Images Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) speaks during a hearing on Capitol Hill June 15, 2021 in Washington, DC. A Manchin spokesperson told Newsweek the senator met privately with Texas state Senators Royce West and José Menendéz; and Texas state Representatives Chris Turner; Nicole Collier, who is the chairwoman of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus; and Jessica Gonzalez, the vice chairwoman of the Texas House Elections Committee.

But Schumer’s wrangling of Manchin’s vote wasn’t exactly a breakthrough at Yalta.

It didn’t change anything.

Manchin had taken lot of heat from the left about not being a team player. He wasn’t supporting the Democratic agenda. In fact, the day after the vote, the Poor People’s Campaign staged a rally on Capitol Hill titled the "Moral March on Manchin and McConnell."

Still, Manchin had gotten to work and developed a compromise plan which Schumer embraced. It was even blessed by Stacey Abrams. In fact, part of Schumer’s pact with McConnell was that if the Senate ever cleared the procedural hurdle to begin debate on the bill, Schumer would strip out the base text of the original plan and substitute it with Manchin’s proposal. In other words, this was Manchin’s bill.

But, it was never going to get that far under present circumstances since Democrats couldn’t vault the Republican filibuster.

Israeli PM says Raisi win a ‘wake up’ call over Iran nuclear deal

  Israeli PM says Raisi win a ‘wake up’ call over Iran nuclear deal Naftali Bennett said Iran’s presidential election was a sign for world powers to ‘wake up’ before returning to a deal.Bennett made the comments on Sunday as he opened his first cabinet meeting since swearing in his new coalition government last week.

Naturally, Democrats want to weaponize this roll call vote against Republicans. With the GOP’s unanimous opposition blockading debate on the bill, Democrats can deploy that vote as a wedge in the 2022 midterms. Democrats hope to show their voters that Republicans stopped voting rights reform. Democrats will then encourage their base to get to the polls based on the outcome on this issue.


Manchin also got a lot of what he wanted. He developed a compromise. But, for a bill which went nowhere. So maybe Manchin didn’t lose much skin in the process. Manchin reaps the benefits of looking like a team player and not an obstructionist. Plus, Schumer keeps his caucus together and delivered all 50 members as yeas on the procedural vote.

Still, another internecine battle brews as liberal House Democrats are increasingly turning up the heat on President Biden for not getting the voting bill done.

"He’s not absent," said Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., of the president’s efforts on voting rights. "But he needs to be a lot more vocal and a lot more out front." White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki defended the president when asked about Bowman’s criticism.

The Democrats’ Dead End on Voting Rights

  The Democrats’ Dead End on Voting Rights They claim that democracy is under threat, but they lack the collective will to save it. Self-interest is also at play. Aggressive attempts by Republicans at the state level to restrict voting in advance of the 2022 midterm elections have led many Democrats to believe that their only chance to retain power is to pass voting-rights legislation in the next few months. Their resulting desperation, in turn, has invited GOP attacks that the election bill’s aim is partisan in nature.

"Those words are a fight against the wrong opponent," said Psaki.

In other words, Manchin’s vote and compromise inoculates the president from internal criticism from his left flank. Schumer and company delivered all 50 Democratic votes. There’s not much more the president can do unless someone can cajole 10 Republicans to come around.

And, there’s a reason why the president deployed Vice President Kamala Harris to the Senate dais. From there, Harris would preside over debate on the motion to proceed to the bill and subsequent failed vote. The choreography sent a message to the left that the administration is doing all it can on voting rights.

Harris voted to break two ties earlier in the day to help confirm Kiran Ahuja as the Director of the Office of Personnel Management. But Harris was barred from casting a tie-breaking vote on the motion to proceed to the voting bill since 60 votes were necessary to crush the filibuster.

"The president and I are very clear. We support S.1," said Harris during a gaggle with reporters just off the floor following the vote. "The fight is not over."

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., described Tuesday’s vote as "round one" for the voting bill. But when pressed by reporters about what was "round two," Schumer really didn’t offer a path forward. Schumer offered boilerplate about having more discussions and not "putting the cart before the horse."

Dubious donations … daughters of Joyce … Oz going nuclear on carbon?

  Dubious donations … daughters of Joyce … Oz going nuclear on carbon? We're all for state governments supporting those in need, but as a tipster points out, the organisation WA is promoting is a tad controversial.A 2002 investigation by the UK’s Channel 4 tracked money raised from British donors by Sewa International for earthquake relief and found that they went towards Hindu nationalist organisations and projects in India, without proper disclosure of how the funds were being used.

This brings us back to one key: the future of the filibuster.

If all 50 Democrats can stick together, they could lower the threshold for changing the filibuster – with a tie-breaking vote by Vice President Harris. But Manchin opposes that. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., made it clear she doesn’t want to kill the filibuster, penning an op-ed in the Washington Post.

So Tuesday’s vote didn’t advance the voting bill. But it did return the Senate to the debate about the future of the filibuster. Groups working to alter the filibuster are now ramping up their efforts.

"There’s a lot of members who support the (voting) bill, who have supported the filibuster over the years who now realize that it’s being abused," said Eli Zupnick, a former aide to Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. Zupnick says those members "are now more open than ever to reform."


Changing filibuster provisions likely requires the "nuclear option." That’s where one party unilaterally changes filibuster provisions, lowering the bar to end a given filibuster. Democrats ignited the first nuclear option in 2013. They dropped the threshold to overcoming a filibuster from 60 to 51 for most executive branch nominees with the initial nuclear option. Senate Republicans followed suit with a nuclear option of their own for Supreme Court nominees in 2017.

The only thing which remains is the 60 vote threshold to impede legislation.

Democrats lack the votes for a nuclear strike on the filibuster just yet. But Tuesday’s vote awarded them something they needed in their arsenal to alter the filibuster: a failed procedural vote. A failed procedural vote is what Democrats and Republicans both used when they nuked parts of the filibuster in 2013 and 2017. And the failed cloture vote Tuesday awards Democrats the parliamentary fissile material for nuclear strike on the filibuster of their own.

Sen. Barrasso slams Biden for flip-flopping position on signing bipartisan infrastructure bill .
Sen. John Barrasso argued during an exclusive interview on “Sunday Morning Futures” that “there’s no way” Republicans are going to support the nearly $1 trillion infrastructure package “if it is any way linked and connected to” the broader Democratic spending package, which the Wyoming senator called a “freight train heading towards socialism.”Barrasso, a Republican, made the comment one day after President Biden backtracked on previous remarks he made on his intent to sign the bipartisan infrastructure package and confirmed he will "fully stand behind it.

usr: 0
This is interesting!