World The Al Capone Approach to Anti-vaxxers

19:16  23 september  2021
19:16  23 september  2021 Source:   theatlantic.com

Cooking up controversy … you can bank on a banker … COVID makes strange bedfellows

  Cooking up controversy … you can bank on a banker … COVID makes strange bedfellows There has been an almighty uproar in the upmarket restaurant world over vaccine mandates, and bankers are making a killing in the business world.The post made it clear “only fully vaccinated guests will be allowed to enter our venue”. A total of 9729 comments later, the post is still acting as a virtual front of the vaccine wars, as pro- and anti-vaxxers slug it out over whether restaurants and other hospitality venues have the right to keep out the unvaxxed. Ironically, and inevitably, these include death threats and a thousand yelps of “discrimination” and “medical apartheid”.

At the end of August, Reddit users told the company’s leadership they had blood on their hands. As part of an organized protest, the moderators of dozens of large subreddits, or forums on the site, shared a letter condemning Reddit for failing to act on the “rampant” spread of COVID-19 misinformation and allowing conspiracy-minded anti-vaccine subreddits to proliferate. The letter emphasized that vaccines are safe, masks are effective, and social-distancing measures are useful. “Subreddits which exist solely to spread medical disinformation and undermine efforts to combat the global pandemic should be banned,” it said.

NT premier unleashes on anti-vaxxers

  NT premier unleashes on anti-vaxxers NT's Chief Minister has unleashed on anti-vaxxers in an extraordinary rant as he vows to keep the border shut until every worker in high-risk industries gets a Covid jab. Speaking on Wednesday, Mick Gunner said his stage 3 reopening plan would involve 'the strongest vaccination rules in Australia'.'I know I'm supposed to say I respect people's choices and reasons for not getting vaccinated, I don't. I don't understand it. I don't respect it.' Mr Gunner said.'You don't get to choose to burden out health system because you refuse to follow preventative health measures.

  The Al Capone Approach to Anti-vaxxers © Getty ; The Atlantic

Reddit’s CEO, Steve Huffman, responded with his own open letter noting that “dissent is a part of Reddit and the foundation of democracy,” and that those who disagree with the CDC are not violating the site’s policies. Shortly after his post, many of the moderators who had shared the letter shut down their subreddits in outrage. (The blackout protest included the 3.3-million-member forum for Pokémon Go, which became its own news item.) In the end, Huffman did take action: On September 1, Reddit removed its most notorious subreddit for anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, called r/NoNewNormal, and “quarantined”—meaning, covered with a warning screen and removed from search results—54 others, including the subreddit dedicated to the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. “r/NoNewNormal has been banned!” read a post in the subreddit dedicated to on-site drama. “Discuss this dramatic happening here!” (Others celebrated with memes, obviously.)

Taking the nuclear option

  Taking the nuclear option Good morning, early birds. China says Australia's new security pact with the UK and US could severely damage regional peace and intensify the arms race, and 70% of Australians over the age of 16 have now had their first COVID vaccine dose. It's the news you need to know, with Emma Elsworthy.AUKUS — our most significant security development since WWII, Morrison reckons — will see Australia become one of seven countries with nuclear submarines (US has 68, Russia 29, China 12, UK 11, France 8, and India 1). So why nuclear submarines? They can stay underwater for months and shoot missiles further (not that we’ve said we’ll put nuclear weapons on them).

But Reddit’s leadership hadn’t quite acceded to the protesters’ demands. The moderators’ letter had specifically asked for special attention, enforcement, or rules around COVID-19 misinformation. That’s not exactly what they got. The ban of r/NoNewNormal was not on account of its users’ habit of sharing health misinformation and disinformation, but rather for “brigading”—that is, their history of attacking other Reddit communities with spam or trolling. The 54 quarantined subreddits were also not cited for any specific mangling of true facts but rather for violating the first rule of Reddit’s content policy, which protects users from bullying, hate speech, and threats of violence. That rule, a spokesperson explained to me in an email, can be interpreted to prohibit the spread of “falsifiable health information that encourages or poses a significant risk of physical harm to the reader.”

Eric Trump Signs Up to Hype Daddy’s Record at Anti-Vax Event

  Eric Trump Signs Up to Hype Daddy’s Record at Anti-Vax Event Donald Trump’s son Eric Trump will give the keynote speech next month at an anti-vaccine conference, marking the latest alliance between the Trump family and the GOP’s fringiest elements. Trump is set to speak at the Truth About Cancer Live! convention between Oct. 22 and 24 in Nashville, joining a speakers’ lineup that includes some of the most prominent promoters of disinformation about vaccines, as well as leading figures in the QAnon conspiracy theory movement.

In other words, when confronted with a problem that its policies did not cover—health misinformation—Reddit jerry-rigged a fix. It used tools developed for a prior crisis in content moderation, over hate speech and harassment, and adapted them to meet the present one. We should expect this drama to play out again and again in the months to come. Platforms, their users, and social-media experts are still in the early stages of debating what effective content moderation around health misinformation should look like, and many of them know that overbroad policies would create serious problems and dramatically limit reasonable debate. Until that tension is resolved, the platforms are relying—to a significant extent—on anti-vaccine activists’ and COVID-19 conspiracy theorists’ inclinations to break unrelated, existing rules. For the moment, it’s the best fix available.

Reddit is notorious for having spent a very, very long time deciding that it should deal meaningfully with harassment, hate speech, and other forms of abuse. The platform was a free-for-all for many years, rampant with misogyny and racism, and a good chunk of the user base had to be led gradually toward policies that could protect the speech of some by limiting the speech of others. (Also, a bunch of really hateful users had to be removed.) To many of its current users, the new moderation debate—the one over health misinformation—should be less complicated than what came before. “If people are discussing whether Bigfoot is real, okay. If people are arguing over political candidates, okay,” said a moderator of the popular advice forum r/AmITheAsshole named Frank, who—like the other moderators quoted in this story—asked to go by his first name out of concern about harassment. “I think that there’s a substantial difference when it comes to questioning basic science in the midst of a global pandemic. While [Reddit’s leaders] aren’t legally liable, certainly they’re ethically liable for permitting ideas that are dangerous to the health and lives of their user base.”

Freedom Day for anti-vaxxers: Key date for the unvaccinated in NSW

  Freedom Day for anti-vaxxers: Key date for the unvaccinated in NSW Ms Berejiklian said she expects NSW to relax restrictions at 70 per cent double dose vaccination from October 11 - and hit 80 per cent double dose just two weeks later. Under the roadmap, the barriers will then dramatically disappear for everyone who is double-dose vaccinated, she said. Deputy premier John Barilaro warned: 'The message to the unvaccinated is is that you will not achieve any further freedom unless you get vaccinated.' However almost all restrictions will be removed by December 1 even for anti-vaxxers, by which time double-dose vaccinations of adults are tipped to pass the 90 per cent mark.

Some scientific facts are black-and-white, of course, but moderators may be underestimating the challenge of determining which facts are which in the contest of a broad policy on health misinformation. “Harassment is a question of values—what is too mean or too harmful,” James Grimmelmann, a professor at Cornell University Law School who has written extensively on content moderation, told me. “Health information is about truth—what is the truth about how viruses spread, what drugs prevent them, what other measures prevent them?” Moderating for the truth is easier said than done, he told me, especially when scientific facts are in the process of evolving. At the beginning of the pandemic, for example, the “truth” was that regular people shouldn’t buy masks, because we needed to save them for health-care workers. “That understanding changed,” Grimmelmann said. “Platforms would have been doing harm if they had moderated that on a bright line.”

[Evelyn Douek: The lawless way to disable 8chan]

In an emailed statement, a Reddit spokesperson made a similar argument: “The term misinformation can be vague and difficult to define, given the pace of changes to our understanding of COVID-19, vaccines, and public health guidance over the past year,” they wrote.

Murders are spiking. Police should be part of the solution.

  Murders are spiking. Police should be part of the solution. There’s solid evidence for the crime-fighting abilities of police. But it requires a close look.American policymakers now want answers on this surge. One approach has good evidence behind it: the police.

Reddit’s moderators do seem to understand this. They recognize that asking social-media companies to adjudicate medical information is complicated and could produce sloppy results. Researchers and academics have also pointed this out. Robyn Caplan, a doctoral student at Rutgers University, called COVID-19 “a crisis of content mediation” last year, writing, “What we must ask now is whether we trust tech companies to play this role of reconciling the user-generated internet with hierarchies of knowledge production.” Still, the Redditors are asking for … something. When I spoke with a moderator of the Star Trek forum, who requested to go by his username, Corgana, I asked whether he thought Reddit should ban any community in which people were discussing the side effects or failings of vaccines. He insisted that the difference between intellectual conversation and active harm should be obvious. “NoNewNormal was not a ‘debate the efficacy of vaccines’ subreddit,” he said. “It was a subreddit for creating propaganda to spread to other parts of the internet.”

So maybe Reddit could just make a list of debunked vaccine rumors, like the ones NoNewNormal was dedicated to amplifying, and take down all of that content. “Reddit could adopt a policy about known misinformation, and then they just have to identify that misinformation and remove it,” Grimmelmann said. But that would be a lot of work, and it would be complicated because of the site’s reliance on volunteer moderators to keep their own communities in line. Reddit had a tool for manually reporting misinformation, which it seems primarily to have used for data analysis. A spokesperson said that most of the reports submitted through it “were not meaningfully actionable,” and that Reddit is now offering a tool to report community “interference” instead. (Another term, basically, for brigading.) More important, Grimmelmann told me, any such policy would be “culturally difficult” for Reddit to adopt, given the site’s history as a place for intellectual and “intellectual” debate. An explicit ban on vaccine misinformation would represent “a serious rethinking of what Reddit is and is for.”

‘Medical apartheid’: Fair Work deputy calls forced vaccination coercive and punitive

  ‘Medical apartheid’: Fair Work deputy calls forced vaccination coercive and punitive Lyndall Dean holds a dissenting view from that of her fellow commissioners: that mandatory vaccination is a violation of human rights.Vaccination is a harder question because it is medically intrusive. However, there’s no universally recognised human right that overrides the social principle that may dictate vaccination if that’s what is necessary.

The Reddit CEO’s initial response to his enraged users showed deference to that culture: He implored the community to have “a willingness to understand what others are going through, even when their viewpoint on the pandemic is different from yours.” Yet his post also hinted at the ways that different viewpoints—if they were sufficiently dangerous—could be moderated via other means. “Manipulating or cheating Reddit” to amplify an opinion is against the rules, he wrote, as is “fraud” and “encouraging harm.” As such, Reddit can indeed punish users or communities who advocate for fake vaccine cards or dangerous activities purported to beCOVID-19 cures, such as drinking bleach. The company’s subsequent response to the protest, written by a member of the company’s Safety team, clarified that its rules against impersonation, fraud, and manipulation also cover sharing faked World Health Organization or CDC advice or fabricated medical data. (A spokesperson emphasized to me that these comments did not represent changes to any Reddit policies, or to how those policies are enforced.)

Reddit has executed similar maneuvers in the past to make tricky moderation decisions. In June of 2020, the site banned a subreddit called r/The_Donald, which promoted violent and racist political rhetoric. Because its rules against hate speech were watery and inadequate at the time, the company leaned on the same justification it used this month to remove r/NoNewNormal: r/The_Donald, it said, had engaged in brigading. Similarly, when Reddit removed major QAnon subreddits in 2018, it was not explicitly on account of their wild conspiracy theories and fantasies of mass murder, or other problematic behaviors that upset other users. Rather, they were removed for doxing—publishing a person’s identifying information against their will—which is subject to a strong sitewide norm of disapproval. (Reddit’s content policy was significantly overhauled last summer, and now prohibits a wider range of abusive behaviors.)

Why people who don’t trust vaccines are embracing unproven drugs

  Why people who don’t trust vaccines are embracing unproven drugs Inside the upside-down world where Covid-19 vaccines are dangerous and ivermectin is saving lives.From the outside, these positions can seem not just dangerous but incoherent.

[Read: The blue checkmark’s evil cousin]

Social platforms find it useful to moderate content on the basis of those kinds of technicalities, Grimmelmann told me, because they can more easily defend any given enforcement decision as the simple application of a basic rule. A substantial part of Facebook’s efforts to corral anti-vaccine rhetoric, for example, has been acting against “coordinated inauthentic behavior,” which refers to networks of fake accounts, and “coordinated social harm,” which refers to real accounts that have a history of working together to evade punishment for rule breaking. But this approach depends on waiting for bad actors to commit actionable offenses, even as they engage in other harmful behavior. Users of these sites say it gives groups time to grow and recruit users to backup websites or even offline organizations before they’re banned.

Participants in the Reddit protest were hoping for something that requires a little less hairsplitting. They want a clear commitment of some kind that the platform will protect its users from ideas that could kill them. If they don’t really know what that would look like in practice, they know what it doesn’t look like. Many of the moderators were not satisfied with the banning of one egregious forum because of its other bad behavior. (Some even wanted to keep the blackout protest going until the 54 quarantined subreddits were banned as well, but they were voted down.) “A lot of people are disappointed,” Ben, a teacher from Rhode Island who moderates the anti-disinformation subreddit r/ParlerWatch, told me. “That’s kind of just a way for Reddit to de-escalate the situation and stall the protest but also avoid addressing the root issue.”

Why people who don’t trust vaccines are embracing unproven drugs .
Inside the upside-down world where Covid-19 vaccines are dangerous and ivermectin is saving lives.From the outside, these positions can seem not just dangerous but incoherent.

usr: 0
This is interesting!