World Supreme Court should let 'We the People' debate and decide abortion

17:22  01 december  2021
17:22  01 december  2021 Source:   foxnews.com

The new religious discrimination bill could deter women from seeking health services

  The new religious discrimination bill could deter women from seeking health services Health experts say Scott Morrison's religious discrimination bill could stop women from seeking out healthcare; while the bill's implications are unclear, it could mean more stigma and less access.“We have to veer away from the artificial, phoney conflicts, boycotts, controversies and cancelling created by anonymous and cowardly bots, bigots and bullies,” he said.

Supporters of abortion often avoid engaging on the merits of legal challenges to Roe v. Wade, the radical 1973 decision that imposed abortion on demand up to birth across America, and instead claim that precedent protects it from reversal.

Mississippi's legal challenge in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization puts this argument to the test.


Instead of relying on the pseudoscientific musings of justices from fifty years ago, we should take into account scientific advances that show the undeniable humanity of children in the womb. Lawmakers ranging from Texas to South Dakota have been pushing back against the flawed jurisprudence of Roe for years, and Mississippi’s case is the Court's best opportunity to correct its past errors.

Supreme Court's Mississippi abortion case is a pivotal moment for all who value life

  Supreme Court's Mississippi abortion case is a pivotal moment for all who value life The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Dec. 1 in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which is about a Mississippi law that prohibits abortion after 15 weeks. Roe v. Wade in 1973 forced every state to legalize abortion before a baby was considered "viable," which was then assumed to be around 28 weeks but is now around 21 weeks. The Dobbs case will determine if states can protect the lives of children before "viability," which would strike at the heart of the Roe decision. Just for context, since the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, more than 50 million babies have been aborted in the U.S.

We hope to see Roe completely overturned, but any decision giving the people and their elected representatives (as opposed to unelected judges) greater flexibility to determine abortion policy would be a win for the pro-life movement.

Opponents of Mississippi's challenge rest their argument on the legal principle of stare decisis, or relying on precedent. Abortion supporters argue in their legal filing, "Two generations—spanning almost five decades—have come to depend on the availability of legal abortion, and the right to make this decision has been further cemented as critical to gender equality."

Standing by precedent may sound prudent, but this appeal quickly falls apart for several reasons. Firstly, precedent is supposed to provide workable guidance and establish a clear path forward, but Roe only muddied the waters. At the time, progressive legal scholars like John Hart Ely criticized the ruling, saying Roe "is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be." Edward Lazarus, a clerk for majority-opinion author Justice Harry Blackmun, stated that Roe’s interpretation of the Constitution "borders on the indefensible." Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg even conceded Roe "provoked, not resolved, conflict."

Cosby prosecutors ask US Supreme Court to restore conviction

  Cosby prosecutors ask US Supreme Court to restore conviction A Pennsylvania court in June overturned a conviction on charges the comic drugged and raped a woman.Cosby, a barrier-breaking comedian who became a household name for portraying the patriarch of an affluent Black family in the television series The Cosby Show, was found guilty in 2018 of drugging and raping college sports administrator Andrea Constand in 2004.

Secondly, supporters of abortion argue that without Roe, women would be reduced to second-class status. This is both false and paternalistic. Women are gaining representation in many professional areas even as abortion rates steadily decline. Legalizing abortion wasn't a panacea that allowed women to succeed; their hard work and determination, along with good policymaking, made that possible. To claim seven male justices saved women from gender inequality is ludicrous.

Women themselves hold a diverse range of views about abortion. For example, 79 pro-life female legislators from 45 states signed our amicus brief supporting Mississippi. The number of women in state legislatures has quintupled since Roe, and women have been a driving force behind many of the pro-life laws passed in recent years. Overturning Roe won't reduce the number of women in the workforce or repeal the 19th Amendment; instead, it will allow women to debate the issues that matter the most to them.

United States: Crucial Audience for the Right to Abortion at Supreme Court

 United States: Crucial Audience for the Right to Abortion at Supreme Court © Reuters / Leah Millis The Supreme Court examines this Wednesday a statement of the state of Mississippi on a law that aims to limit Access to the voluntary interruption of pregnancy (IVG). Here, opponents of the right to abortion before the Supreme Court, Washington, June 26, 2018 (picture of illustration).

Furthermore, science has advanced, rendering Roe grossly out of date. In his majority opinion, Justice Blackmun wrote, "Viability is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks." Today, a growing number of preemies are surviving and even thriving just beyond the halfway point of a typical pregnancy – such as Curtis Means from Alabama, who was born at 21 weeks and holds a new world record for premature survival.

The science on fetal pain and development, too, has evolved. We now know that babies can feel pain as early as 12 weeks. Ironically, one scientist that abortion advocates cite in their legal filings has changed his mind about fetal pain because of new research.

According to another amicus brief, babies can suck their thumb, respond to taste, touch and pain and have experienced nearly 16 million heartbeats by the time they reach 15 weeks. In this filing, Dr. Maureen Condic, an embryologist, and the Charlotte Lozier Institute document 12 new scientific advances proving the humanity of unborn children.


Many other nations have adapted their laws to scientific progress as 47 out of 50 European nations limit elective abortion prior to 15 weeks. In America, 80 percent of the public wants to limit abortion after the first trimester, and state legislatures have enacted over 100 pro-life bills in 2021. By clinging onto Roe v. Wade, America finds itself out of step with both the global community and its own people.


Harris says right to abortion 'nonnegotiable' as SCOTUS allows strict Texas law to continue .
Vice President Harris reacted Friday to a Supreme Court ruling which allows a Texas abortion law to remain in effect, claiming a woman's choice to have an abortion is 'non-negotiable."The Court ruled Friday that a lawsuit by abortion providers against Texas over its abortion law may proceed, despite arguments by Texas that the way the law was written made it so that parties could not sue against the law until it was enforced.

usr: 0
This is interesting!