•   
  •   

World Diplomacy Alone Can’t Save Democracy

21:01  10 december  2021
21:01  10 december  2021 Source:   theatlantic.com

The Russian Wagner Group would control part of the RCA

 The Russian Wagner Group would control part of the RCA © AFP troops - Florent Vergnes of the new recruits of the Central African Armed Forces in Berengo on August 4, 2018. The European Outdoor Service has written a 35-page dated report. 15 and 22 November for the version to which RFI may have access.

As Joe Biden convened his virtual Summit for Democracy this week, he warned that democratic erosion represents “the defining challenge of our time.” He isn’t wrong. Democracy is under siege, and this year has been marked by contested elections, coups, and autocratic brazenness. This was the fifth consecutive year in which the number of countries moving in the direction of authoritarianism outpaced those  moving toward democracy. Among the backsliders are some of the world’s largest democracies, including Brazil, India, and the Philippines. The bad guys are winning. And given Donald Trump’s persistent refusal to acknowledge his 2020 loss, even the United States’ own democracy is at risk.

America Is One Gut Punch Away From Throwing in the Towel on Democracy

  America Is One Gut Punch Away From Throwing in the Towel on Democracy I remember the political gut punches. They were moments that I could not believe were happening in America. They ran contrary to the idea of America that I had been raised with. But they also defied logic and reason. While America had been rocked by riots and assassinations when I was a kid, the first big political development in America that shocked me was the election of Ronald Reagan. He was a boob, a Hollywood actor, not even a very good one.

  Diplomacy Alone Can’t Save Democracy © Chip Somodevilla / Getty

As a candidate, Biden pledged to make renewing democracy a cornerstone of his foreign policy, in part by bringing together leaders and representatives from the world’s democracies to address authoritarianism, fight corruption, and promote human rights. By the end of the summit, which wraps up today, participating governments are expected to make commitments to shore up democracy at home and abroad. The status of those pledges is set to be reviewed at a follow-up gathering next year.

Reversing democracy’s global decline is a tall order for what is effectively a think-tank exercise. The summit faces some glaring obstacles, including the questionable sincerity of its more illiberal participants and America’s weakened credibility on the topic at hand. Perhaps the most fundamental challenge is the question of whether diplomacy can meaningfully achieve what Biden has set out to do.

meetings with Lindner, Macron and state leaders: these are the first dates of Chancellor Scholz

 meetings with Lindner, Macron and state leaders: these are the first dates of Chancellor Scholz Barely in office, even on trips: The first days on the job, the Federal busy. It's quite possible he that his government declaration postponing. © Photo: Michael Kappeler / dpa The new Chancellor Olaf Scholz travels a lot. The new Chancellor's office and dignity: On Wednesday was elected the ninth chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Olaf Scholz of the Bundestag.

Of the more than 100 countries invited to participate in the summit, the majority represent strong democracies. But the guest list also features many leaders who are responsible for driving the democratic backsliding that prompted the summit in the first place, including India’s Narendra Modi, Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro, and the Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte. Together, they’re in charge of some of the countries that have seen the steepest democratic decline. Indeed, more than a quarter of the countries on the summit’s roster were deemed only “partly free” in the democracy watchdog Freedom House’s latest “Freedom in the World” report. Three invitees (Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Iraq) are not considered free at all.

In deciding which countries would be included in the summit, the Biden administration sought to ensure that “a diverse slate of democracies” was represented, a State Department spokesperson told me. A more cynical reading of the guest list would be that the U.S. invited a number of countries too important to snub but where democracy is on the decline, such as India and Poland.

Queen's staff 'utterly dismayed' over illegal Downing Street Christmas party after she was forced to sit alone during Prince Philip's funeral

  Queen's staff 'utterly dismayed' over illegal Downing Street Christmas party after she was forced to sit alone during Prince Philip's funeral The Queen's staff are reportedly furious over revelations of an illegal Christmas bash at No.10 Downing Street in London, after Her Majesty was forced to abide by COVID-19 restrictions and sit alone at Prince Philip's funeral. Palace staff are "angry" and reacted with "utter dismay" amid news of the Christmas party scandal, which saw Prime Minister Boris Johnson allegedly host an illegal festive gathering in Christmas 2020 despite tough restrictions in place.

Irrespective of which countries are involved in the summit or how highly they rank on the democratic scale, preventing and reversing global democratic erosion will not be easy for diplomacy to tackle on its own. Democratization is a process that usually takes place within countries, not among them. Some of the gravest threats to democracy are internal: distrust, polarization, voter suppression, and partisan institutions. Diplomatic pressure can encourage and promote more democratic practices, but it is not what drives democracy forward.

Domestic actors and movements play the biggest role in defending—or destroying—democracy. And for good reason: The foundations of healthy democracies, including voting access and civil liberties, are largely domestic matters. Poor access to public services, rising inequality, and declining material prosperity can also lead to democratic decline, experts have warned. “Direct players,” including the political establishment, civil society, the press, and the private sector, are most responsible for protecting democracy, according to the Brookings Institution’s Democracy Playbook, a set of 10 recommendations the think tank updated this week ahead of the summit. Foreign governments’ and international institutions’ role in promoting democracy is largely limited to supporting civil society and, where applicable, making financial aid and trade contingent on democratic outcomes. Although diplomacy can complement domestic efforts, it’s not a sufficient replacement for “a powerful and genuinely domestic movement to hold public figures and institutions accountable to democratic rules and principles,” the Brookings report notes.

Christmas Edition: This Sneaker trend of Adidas will love "Kevin - alone at home"

 Christmas Edition: This Sneaker trend of Adidas will love that man is a real habit animal, it shows up again every year on christmas . Because under normal circumstances for the fewest things are in question, to look a movie two- or even three times, the Christmas films run every year in a permanent loop. © ddp images sneaker trend: adidas' "kevin - alone at home" for christmas ddp images is one of the most popular Christmas films and remains " kevin - alone at home" (in the original: "Home Alone").


Video: Sen. Menendez: US should ‘strengthen’ Ukraine’s ability to protect themselves (MSNBC)

Diplomacy is “a critical ingredient in the mix of tools that can have a beneficial effect,” Norman Eisen, the former U.S. ambassador to the Czech Republic and a co-author of the Brookings report, told me. But ultimately, “the fight against illiberalism, the battle for democracy, has to be led and won by the people and the political leaders of a nation.”

In some ways, Biden’s summit takes this reality into account. By encouraging participating countries to propose their own targets, and by involving activists, journalists, and other members of civil society in the discussion, he is effectively encouraging countries to bear the brunt of the work themselves. This allows leaders to tailor their pledges to their own country’s needs, but also prevents the U.S. from being seen as dictating how other democracies should act—something that would unlikely be appreciated coming from a country with its own backsliding problem. The United States’ questionable authority on this subject isn’t lost on the Biden administration, which is approaching the summit from a “position of humility,” a senior administration official told reporters on Tuesday. Within the past year alone, 19 U.S. states have enacted laws making it more difficult for Americans to vote. The fight to install partisan loyalists in key election posts ahead of future elections is already being waged across the country.

at the G7, Farms Warnings to Iran and Russia

 at the G7, Farms Warnings to Iran and Russia © Pool / AFP The Iran has a "last chance" to seriously negotiate to save the Iranian nuclear agreement, has warned Sunday the chipe de British diplomacy Liz Truss at the end of a G7 meeting that also warned Russia against an invasion of Ukraine. "This is the last chance for Iran to come to the negotiating table with a serious solution to this problem," the minister hammered, whose country is currently chairing the Group of Great Powers.

[Read: Trump’s next coup has already begun]

“We have this archaic Electoral College; we’ve got this system that’s increasingly gerrymandered so that members of Congress can basically choose their own voters instead of the other way around; we have a system that empowers a minority party to act like a majority party, and that is being more deeply entrenched,” Matt Duss, Senator Bernie Sanders’s foreign-policy adviser, told me. “If we’re talking about protecting and preserving democracy, there’s a very real question of what have we actually been doing here at home to protect our own?”

Another challenge for the summit is the overarching narrative that the democracy crisis is inherently geopolitical and rooted in a contest between the world’s democracies and authoritarian states, rather than an internal conflict within democracies themselves. By fixating on the former, and the threats posed by maligned external actors, democracies risk overlooking more insidious threats that reside within, in the form of growing polarization, inequality, and distrust in the idea that democracy can deliver for people’s needs.

“The threats to democracy are much less from the autocracies than the ability of democracies to make our systems work,” Bruce Jentleson, a public-policy and political-science professor at Duke University and a former foreign-policy adviser to the Obama and Clinton administrations, told me, noting that although external threats such as disinformation campaigns are real, “the receptivity to that is because our systems aren’t working.” While Russia and China would no doubt cheer future efforts to subvert U.S. democracy, they can’t cause any more damage than Americans have already proved willing to cause themselves.

[Read: Is Biden doing enough to protect democracy?]

Laying the groundwork to save democracy is a lofty goal for any summit, much less an online one spanning two days. But whether Biden’s will be remembered as a net positive will ultimately hinge on whether it can yield tangible commitments. The best proof of concept would be for the U.S. to return to next year’s follow-up having taken the necessary steps to strengthen American democracy and prevent the constitutional crisis of 2020 from repeating itself. But this summit isn’t likely to galvanize U.S. lawmakers to take this matter seriously any more than it is to compel leaders elsewhere to act. Democratization begins at home.

Alexej Nawalny has received the Sacharov price: shows the names and destinies, in the middle of Berlin! .
Annalena Baerbock propagates a timely foreign policy. The focus should be the use for dissidents. A suggestion. © Photo: Jean-Francois Badias / AP / DPA Daria Nawalnaja, the daughter of the detained Russian opposition leader Nawalny, speaks in the European Parliament. Human rights are universal. Who instrumentalized them in political dispute, cancel them.

usr: 1
This is interesting!