World Analysis: Are the US and Iran about to restore the nuclear deal?

17:52  23 august  2022
17:52  23 august  2022 Source:   aljazeera.com

Biden admin continues negotiating with Iran despite plans to kill high-level American politicians

  Biden admin continues negotiating with Iran despite plans to kill high-level American politicians Critics are questioning the Biden administration's continued nuclear talks with Iran amid the regime being behind recent assassination plots targeting Americans."The foiled plot to assassinate John Bolton is another reminder, if any was needed, that Iran’s hostile regime cannot be trusted," James Phillips, the senior research fellow for foreign policy at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News. "The regime’s longstanding reliance on terrorism to seize power, stay in power and export its revolution is a major reason why Iran cannot be allowed to gain nuclear weapons.

Tehran, Iran – Iran and the United States have inched closer to an agreement on restoring their 2015 nuclear deal after 16 months of painstaking negotiations, but everything could hinge on what happens in the coming days.

Iran's nuclear ambitions have been a source of tension between Tehran and the West for years, even though Iran denies it is trying to obtain nuclear weapons [File: Dado Ruvic/Illustration/Reuters] © Provided by Al Jazeera Iran's nuclear ambitions have been a source of tension between Tehran and the West for years, even though Iran denies it is trying to obtain nuclear weapons [File: Dado Ruvic/Illustration/Reuters]

All eyes are now on Washington as it prepares to submit its response to Iran’s written comments on a “final” text proposed by the European Union at the end of talks in Vienna earlier this month.

Iran officials to demand penalty payment should US pull out of Nuclear Deal again: report

  Iran officials to demand penalty payment should US pull out of Nuclear Deal again: report The U.S. and Iran have used the approaching deadline for the agreement of the nuclear deal to push for additional demands, including an end to Iranian assassination efforts."Here you have Iran‘s regime calling the shots once again," Foreign Desk Editor-in-Chief Lisa Daftari told Fox News Digital. "They’re asking for everything and the kitchen sink as part of the latest round of nuclear talks, and they want to make sure that the U.S. does not pull out once they sign onto a deal shaped and demanded by the mullahs.

The bloc’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, on Monday said the Iranian response was “reasonable”, officially confirming the view a number of European diplomats had anonymously conveyed to Western media outlets since last week.

US Department of State spokesman Ned Price told reporters late Monday that a response will be given as soon as internal consultations are completed, adding that “we will not take one day longer than is necessary”.

This came shortly after Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Nasser Kanani accused the US of “procrastinating” in its response.

“The [US] response was supposed to have come already,” Borrell said, in comments that could put pressure on Washington, adding that a meeting in Vienna to seal the deal could happen soon.

The risks to Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia power plant, explained

  The risks to Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia power plant, explained Europe’s biggest nuclear power plant is also its most vulnerable.Zaporizhzhia is Europe’s largest nuclear power plant, and it provides electricity to Ukraine and to several European countries. Its location on the Dnipro River makes it a critical target for Russian forces, which have controlled the plant since March. Despite Russian forces allegedly turning the plant into a military installation, Ukrainian operators still manage the safety and daily operations of the plant, under significant duress.

Iran has seemingly abandoned a demand to take its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) off a US “terror” list, an issue that was deemed a non-starter by the administration of US President Joe Biden after months of media scrutiny and local opposition.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as the deal is formally known, was signed in 2015, putting curbs on Iran’s nuclear programme in exchange for the lifting of multilateral sanctions.

In 2018, the US unilaterally abandoned the accord, imposing harsh sanctions that are in effect to this day.

Al Jazeera spoke to several experts about the current state of the nuclear deal talks and the pitfalls they could still face.

‘No to new confrontations’

Diako Hosseini, a Tehran-based foreign policy analyst, believes the finish line may be in sight.

“Even though there can be no absolute assurance of success until the last moment, we’re probably only several weeks away at the most from success,” he told Al Jazeera.

Kremlin Official Reveals What It Would Take for Russia to Use Nuclear Weapons

  Kremlin Official Reveals What It Would Take for Russia to Use Nuclear Weapons Russian officials have been hinting at the need to use nuclear weapons throughout the war in Ukraine. But when push comes to shove, a top Russian official claims Russia will only use nuclear weapons in cases of “self-defense.” Nuclear war should be avoided if possible, and only emergency situations should prompt Moscow to use nuclear weapons, according to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov. “The use of nuclear weapons is possible only in response to an attack,” Ryabkov said in an interview with Izvestia.Moscow is well aware that resorting to nuclear weapons would touch off a lose-lose situation that could lead to cascading destruction around the globe.

Hosseini said while the EU and Russia’s reasons differ, in supporting the nuclear deal they are both pursuing a similar goal in that “they don’t welcome a new front in confrontations”.

“Reviving the JCPOA is what they need to reduce international tensions and refrain from being exposed to hard choices.”

According to unconfirmed details of a potential agreement leaked in recent days, Tehran has called for two and a half years of guaranteed US sanctions relief, and support from other parties if Washington unilaterally reneges on the accord again.

Hosseini pointed out that there could be no absolute guarantees as governments only remain committed to such agreements as long as the benefits outweigh losses, and this is something leaders in Tehran are aware of.

“No guarantee can prevent the US from again exiting the JCPOA, but Iran hopes to impact US costs and therefore its calculus for exiting the deal through obtaining stronger assurances,” he said.

‘Difficult balancing act’

Trita Parsi, executive vice president at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said “the ball is in Biden’s court”.

Iran ‘carefully reviewing’ US response to nuclear deal proposal

  Iran ‘carefully reviewing’ US response to nuclear deal proposal Iran had sent a ‘reasonable’ response to EU’s proposal to restore the nuclear deal last week, as negotiations continue.Iran had already given its own response to the EU proposal last week, which was described as “reasonable” by the EU’s foreign policy chief, Josef Borrell.

“If this drags on too long, it will get too close to the midterm elections, which will deeply upset Biden’s own allies in Congress,” Parsi told Al Jazeera.

“The United States wants to give a response that will not be a complete acceptance of what the Iranians have proposed but will also not allow the Iranians to make further changes. This is a difficult balancing act.”

According to Parsi, some of the changes suggested by Iran to the text are perceived as beneficial to Europe as well, as they protect European companies investing or trading with Iran.

“Ultimately, providing assurances against a second American exit from the agreement, strengthens the agreement,” he said.

Parsi argued that such changes would have been unnecessary had the US not abandoned the agreement in the first place, saying “this shows the cost the US inflicted on itself” by exiting the JCPOA.

But the changes have also angered opponents of the deal inside and outside the US, who argue that what is transpiring is the opposite of the “longer, stronger and broader” agreement Biden had initially promised.

Several US senators have lashed out against the contents of the talks in recent days, which prompted the National Security Council to react by denying that the US is giving Iran major “concessions”.

Iran reviewing US nuclear deal response as Qatar mediates

  Iran reviewing US nuclear deal response as Qatar mediates Media affiliated with Iran’s security apparatus signals an Iranian response is not expected until Friday at least.Reviewing the US response at expert levels is ongoing and will take “at least” until the end of the week, Nournews, an outlet affiliated with the Supreme National Security Council of Iran, said in a tweet on Sunday.

Meanwhile, Israel remains the biggest opponent of the nuclear deal, and one major reason the US has delayed its response is believed to be consultations with Israeli officials.

Over the past week, Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid has warned both the White House and French President Emmanuel Macron against restoring the JCPOA, saying refusing to abandon the deal would signal “weakness”.

‘Credible cooperation’

Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association, believes the JCOPA remains the best option for both Tehran and Washington, but that the talks cannot drag on forever.

“If the United States shows flexibility in responding to Iran’s sanctions-related demands, Tehran cannot pocket the compromise and then ask for more,” she told Al Jazeera, adding that Tehran has used such a tactic in the past.

“If Iran wants a deal, Tehran must strongly signal to the Biden administration that these proposed revisions are the end of the line.”

Davenport pointed out that the longer the talks drag on, the smaller the chance for a restored JCPOA, more risk that Iran’s nuclear advances cross a US red line, and more chance that domestic opposition in both countries will erode the political will to reach an agreement.

The two countries have also been at odds over a probe by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) into traces of unexplained uranium particles found at several Iranian sites.

Iran has demanded the probe be closed for the agreement to move forward, but there have also been reports that a clause could be added to the agreement that stipulates the probe may be closed if Iran fully cooperates with the nuclear watchdog.

In an interview with CNN on Monday, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi stressed that “dropping probes is not something the IAEA does or will ever do without a proper process”.

Davenport also emphasised that Iran is the only country that can put an end to the probe.

“Nothing short of credible cooperation from Iran will close the file,” she said.

“Any perception that the IAEA is being pressured to close the investigation prematurely would have devastating consequences for the agency’s integrity and broader efforts to prevent nonproliferation.”

Ukraine nuclear plant worker says Russians evacuated its personnel ahead of attacks on Zaporizhzhia .
A former worker at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant said Ukrainian personnel knew Russia was behind the attacks after it evacuated its nuclear experts.Russia has occupied the plant since March along with a "limited number" of experts from Russia’s state-owned nuclear energy agency Rosatom, according to a March 12 update by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

usr: 0
This is interesting!