World Ukraine takes swaths of territory, despite Russia’s mobilisation

02:11  06 october  2022
02:11  06 october  2022 Source:   aljazeera.com

Vladimir Putin has raised the nuclear threat. What capabilities does Russia have?

  Vladimir Putin has raised the nuclear threat. What capabilities does Russia have? President Vladimir Putin says he will defend Russia's territory with every means at his disposal, and it's put the threat of nuclear war back into focus.At the time, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said "nuclear conflict, once unthinkable, is now back within the realm of possibility".

Russia’s mobilisation of 200,000 conscripts seems to have had no impact during the 32nd week of the war, as Ukrainian forces recapture more territory in the east and south of the country.

On September 30, Ukrainian forces advancing from Izyum surrounded Lyman in the eastern Donetsk region and recaptured the town the following day. The spectacular encirclement of the strategic town and an expanse of surrounding territory trapped Russian personnel trying to flee.

Ukraine’s general staff said its forces discovered a convoy of civilian cars near Shchastya containing 200 Russian soldiers from the Second Army Corps escaping Lyman.

Russia’s mobilization won’t fix its military problems

  Russia’s mobilization won’t fix its military problems What Putin’s troop surge can — and can’t — do in Ukraine.Russian President Vladimir Putin this week announced that 300,000 more men would need to fight in his increasingly difficult and costly war in Ukraine. But amid Ukrainian victories, major strategic and personnel problems in the Russian armed forces, and domestic frustrations over the mobilization announcement, whether Putin can accomplish his goals in Ukraine — and the nature of those goals at this stage — isn’t clear.

“There has been a decrease in the level of moral and psychological state of enemy personnel, leading to numerous instances of soldiers … abandoning their positions,” said the general staff.

The fall of Lyman came on the very day Russia fielded new troops from its September 21 compulsory mobilisation.

In an address to the Ukrainian people on October 3, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said these Russian reinforcements were already being killed.

“Among the dead occupiers, we can already see those who were taken just a week or two ago. People were not trained for combat, they have no experience to fight in such a war,” Zelenskyy said.

“But the Russian command just needs some people – any kind – to replace the dead. And when these new ones die, more people will be sent. This is how Russia fights. That’s how it will lose, as well.”

Russia’s mobilisation sparks ‘backlash’ over its war in Ukraine

  Russia’s mobilisation sparks ‘backlash’ over its war in Ukraine Meanwhile, ‘sham’ annexation votes were held in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine in the 31st week of the war.Just under 100,000 Russians crossed into Kazakhstan since the mobilisation announcement on September 21, the Kazakh interior ministry said – three times the average weekly rate this year, which has itself been 70 percent higher than in previous years.

Lyman was considered a major logistics hub for Russian forces. In Ukrainian hands, it could speed up counterattacks in the Donetsk and Luhansk provinces and strengthen partisan action behind enemy lines.


Meanwhile, the militia of the pro-Russian self-proclaimed Luhansk People’s Republic said it had repulsed “repeated attempts” by Ukrainian forces to break through to the oil refinery at Lysychansk, the last city to fall to Russian forces in that region on July 3. The militia also reported “fierce battles” for neighbouring Kreminna.

Despite this, Russian forces in the east doggedly stuck to an advance towards Bakhmut, a transport node in Donetsk they have been trying to capture for weeks.

Three days after the fall of Lyman, Ukraine’s southern forces scored a major victory, too, advancing 30km (18.6 miles) down the west bank of the Dnieper River – their most rapid advance of the war.

How the Anti-war Camp Went Intellectually Bankrupt

  How the Anti-war Camp Went Intellectually Bankrupt Critics of U.S. foreign policy from both ends of the ideological spectrum have found common cause in supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.Eight decades later, as a fascistic Russian regime wages war against Ukraine, a motley collection of voices from across the political spectrum has called upon the United States and its allies to adopt neutrality as their position. Ranging from anti-imperialists on the left to isolationists on the right and more respectable “realists” in between, these critics are not pacifists in the strict sense of the term. Few if any oppose the use of force as a matter of principle. But nor are they neutral.

In a single attack, they destroyed 31 Russian tanks, Ukraine’s southern command said. The following day Ukrainian marines recaptured Davydiv Brid in the Kherson region, and a separate advance into Kherson from the west retook the town of Myrolyubivka.

Russian military correspondent Alexander Sladkov told Rossya1 television station that 17 towns had returned to Ukrainian control.

Should it continue, Ukraine’s recapture of the west bank of the Dnieper River could leave an estimated 25,000 Russian soldiers stranded.

“The fact we have broken through the front means that … the Russian army has already lost the ability to attack, and today or tomorrow, it could lose the ability to defend,” Oleh Zhdanov, a military analyst based in Kyiv, told the Reuters news agency.

Russia redeploys personnel from Crimea

Ukraine’s deputy chief of military intelligence, Vadym Skibitskiy, told the news website Krym.Realii that Russia had redeployed Black Sea Fleet service personnel from the Sevastopol naval base in Crimea to Novorossiysk, southern Russia, to avoid casualties, after a series of explosions.

Vladimir Putin used to call out America for its hubris. Now he appears to have fallen into the same trap

  Vladimir Putin used to call out America for its hubris. Now he appears to have fallen into the same trap Vladimir Putin has regularly warned the West of the dangers of getting stuck in foreign conflicts. So why does he appear to be ignoring his own advice and wading deeper and deeper into his ruinous war with Ukraine?The Ukrainian invasion he thought would take a couple of days in February is about to enter its eighth month.

Crimea, annexed by Russia in 2014, has acted as a staging area for Russian personnel and equipment, supporting the invasion of Kherson and Zaporizhia in the early days of the war.

Ukraine has made clear it wants the peninsula back and has made devastating use of 16 US-supplied High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) in its September counteroffensives.

On October 1, a lend-lease facility that speeds up the supply of US weapons came into force, and in two separate announcements, the US Department of Defense said it is sending Ukraine 22 new HIMARS rocket launchers and ammunition.

The head of Ukrainian intelligence services predicted that after a lull for the European winter, Ukrainian forces would likely enter Crimea by the end of spring, in mid-2023. Kyrylo Budanov said Russia’s mobilisation would not present a challenge.

“There is no need to be afraid of mobilisation. In fact, it is a gift to us. This will only speed up the process, which is already impossible to stop,” said Budanov in an interview with television channel 1+1.


A rift with Kadyrov

The fall of Lyman revealed a rift between Russian regular forces and Chechen leader and militia commander Ramzan Kadyrov, who openly criticised the Russian commander in the east, Alexander Lapin.

Russia has annexed more of Ukraine. What does that mean and what happens now?

  Russia has annexed more of Ukraine. What does that mean and what happens now? Ukraine’s army is winning back territory almost as fast as Russia claims to have taken it over. How are the latest twists in the Ukraine crisis unfolding? And why is everyone talking about nukes?The strange theatre of Russia’s annexation of roughly 15 per cent of Ukraine, some of which remains under Ukrainian control, has raised the stakes even higher in Putin’s grinding war. Western leaders have denounced the move as an illegal sham while the Kremlin buses in strikingly unenthusiastic Russian citizens to the Red Square to celebrate “the people’s choice”.

“The colonel-general posted mobilised fighters from the [Luhansk Peoples’ Republic] and other units at all the frontiers of the Limansky direction, but did not provide them with the necessary communication, interaction and ammunition delivery,” Kadyrov wrote on Telegram.

“If it were up to me, I would demote Lapin to a private … and send him to the front lines to wash away his shame in blood.”

Kadyrov is a valued Kremlin ally and his troops, along with those of the private Wagner Group militia, have been responsible for many of Russia’s successes in Ukraine. Putin on October 5 rushed to appease him, phoning him to tell him he had been promoted to the rank of colonel general.

The rift with Kadyrov may have begun as early as April, when reports surfaced that his militiamen had killed three Russian soldiers who were ready to surrender.

It became more open in July, when Russian President Vladimir Putin demanded a battalion from each of Russia’s regions through voluntary conscription. Kadyrov, whose Chechen republic has already supplied three battalions to the fight in Ukraine, said he would not contribute more.

Annexation and nuclear threats

After the fall of Lyman, Kadyrov also said Russia should contemplate the use of low-yield “tactical” nuclear weapons in Ukraine.

Nationalist Russian lawmaker Leonid Slutsky alluded to nuclear weapons as well, saying “all possible means” should be used for their defence of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics.

This had probably been the intended implication of Putin’s announcement of annexation on September 30 of the four regions his forces partially occupy – Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia and Kherson.

President Vladimir Putin signs laws absorbing four Ukrainian regions into Russia, in defiance of international law

  President Vladimir Putin signs laws absorbing four Ukrainian regions into Russia, in defiance of international law Russian President Vladimir Putin signs laws absorbing four Ukrainian regions into Russia, in defiance of international law. Earlier this week, both houses of the Russian parliament ratified treaties making the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions part of Russia.The formalities followed Kremlin-orchestrated referendums in the four regions, which Ukraine and the West have rejected as a sham.It's the biggest expansion of Russian territory in at least half a century, and Russia's total claim amounts to around 18 per cent of Ukrainian territory, though the exact borders are still to be clarified.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said any attack on the annexed regions would be considered an attack on Russia itself.

But on October 3 Peskov suggested the Kremlin would take a flexible stance with respect to what it considers Russian territory.

“We are going to continue to consult the populations of these regions,” Peskov said. “No doubt, any configuration will depend only on the will of the people who live in a particular territory.”

He also issued an implicit rebuke to Kadyrov for his statements on nuclear weapons.

“The heads of regions have the authority to express their point of view … all the same, probably, emotions should be excluded from any assessments, so we prefer to stick to very balanced, objective assessments,” he said.

The United States said it saw no evidence that Russia was readying nuclear weapons for battlefield use.

“We are looking very carefully to see if Russia is actually doing anything that suggests that they are contemplating the use of nuclear weapons. To date, we’ve not seen them take these actions,” US Secretary of State Antony Blinken told a news conference in Washington with his Canadian counterpart.

Ukraine’s reaction to the annexation was an application for fast-track NATO membership.

“We are taking our decisive step by signing Ukraine’s application for accelerated accession to NATO,” Zelenskyy said.

He explained what that meant in a phone call with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen.

“We need to get through this as quickly as possible without a Membership Action Plan. As it was done for Finland and Sweden,” said Zelenskyy.

His justification for rapid membership is that it is, in effect, an alliance member already.

“We are de facto allies,” he said. “We have already proven compatibility with Alliance standards.

Zelenskyy also hardened his stance towards negotiations further, calling for a leadership change in Russia as a precondition to talks.

Ukraine seeks weapons to counter Russia’s ability to strike .
In the 33rd week of the war, Russia retaliates brutally for Kerch Bridge blast and Ukraine calls for advanced weapons.This, in turn, has led to Ukraine stepping up requests to allies for bolstered air defences and longer-range weapons with which to hit Russian forces.

usr: 1
This is interesting!