Canada: Appeal court says doctors have to give referrals for services they oppose - PressFrom - Canada
  •   
  •   
  •   

CanadaAppeal court says doctors have to give referrals for services they oppose

18:17  15 may  2019
18:17  15 may  2019 Source:   msn.com

Court to rule on whether doctors have to give referrals for services they oppose

Court to rule on whether doctors have to give referrals for services they oppose TORONTO — Ontario's highest court is expected to rule today on whether doctors in the province are obligated to give referrals for medical services that clash with their moral or religious beliefs. A group of doctors has asked the Court of Appeal for Ontario to overturn a divisional court decision that upheld the referral requirement. The requirement is part of a policy issued by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario to address  issues surrounding, among other things, assisted dying and abortion.

TORONTO — Ontario doctors challenging a court ruling that found physicians must give referrals for medical services that clash with their moral or religious beliefs say there is no proof that removing that requirement would hamper patients seeking treatment.

Ontario doctors challenging a court ruling that found physicians must give referrals for medical services that clash with their moral or religious beliefs say there is no proof that removing that requirement would hamper patients seeking treatment. A group of five doctors and three professional

Appeal court says doctors have to give referrals for services they oppose © Provided by Canadian Press Enterprises Inc

TORONTO — Ontario's highest court says doctors in the province must give referrals for medical services that clash with their moral or religious beliefs.

In a unanimous ruling released today, a three-judge panel dismissed an appeal seeking to overturn a divisional court decision that upheld the referral requirement

The referral requirement is part of a policy issued by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario to address issues surrounding, among other things, assisted dying and abortion.

Last year, the divisional court found that while the policy does infringe on doctors' religious freedom, the benefits to the public outweigh the cost to physicians.

Legal in Canada, but barriers to abortion remain, advocates say

Legal in Canada, but barriers to abortion remain, advocates say While abortion remains legal in Canada, some abortion rights advocates say women continue to face hurdles in accessing the procedure. Funding, distance to medical facilities and a patchwork of provincial laws all mean an abortion is not as easy to obtain in Canada as some may think. "People often conflate the two, thinking that because it's decriminalized it's very easy to access in our country — and it's not the case," said Frédérique Chabot, director of health promotion at Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights.

TORONTO – Ontario doctors who have a moral or religious objection to treatments such as assisted dying, contraception or abortions must refer patients to another doctor who can provide the service , after a court found it is necessary to guarantee that vulnerable patients can access the care they need.

Ontario doctors challenging a court ruling that found physicians must give referrals for medical services that clash with their moral or religious beliefs say there is no proof that removing that requirement would hamper patients seeking treatment.

The court said doctors can ask their staff to provide a referral to another doctor who can provide the service, or choose to specialize in a type of medicine where these issues are less frequent.

In the appeal, a group of five doctors and three professional organizations argued the ruling was unreasonable because it gave more weight to an assumed problem with access to health care than to a real infringement of doctors' rights.

The group — which includes the Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada, the Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians' Societies and Canadian Physicians for Life — said there is no evidence that patients would be harmed by not receiving a referral.

It also alleged the court erred in saying doctors could pick specialties where fewer moral conflicts arise, arguing that presumes physicians can easily switch jobs.

The college, which regulates doctors in Ontario, said in documents that its policy aims to balance physicians' beliefs with the need to ensure access to care.

It said suggesting that people can simply find another physician to treat them ignores the barriers patients face, particularly vulnerable ones and those living in remote areas.

Paola Loriggio, The Canadian Press

Lawyer for ex-hostage Boyle cites dangers of mid-trial appeal about evidence.
OTTAWA — A lawyer for Joshua Boyle is suggesting a mid-trial appeal on a point of evidence could endanger the timely completion of the former Afghanistan hostage's assault trial. Eric Granger is telling a judge today that the challenge by Boyle's estranged wife Caitlan Coleman, the alleged victim, is resulting in "fragmented proceedings" that might run afoul of strict limits intended to ensure the constitutional right to be tried within a reasonable time. Boyle, 35, has pleaded not guilty in Ontario court to offences against Coleman, 33, including assault, sexual assault and unlawful confinement.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 3
This is interesting!