Canada: Crown seeks Supreme Court of Canada hearing in Via Rail terror case - - PressFrom - Canada
  •   
  •   
  •   

Canada Crown seeks Supreme Court of Canada hearing in Via Rail terror case

18:48  19 november  2019
18:48  19 november  2019 Source:   cbc.ca

Supreme Court sides with naturopath in manslaughter, negligence case

  Supreme Court sides with naturopath in manslaughter, negligence case OTTAWA — A Quebec naturopath is not guilty of manslaughter or criminal negligence in the death of an elderly man, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled. Roger Matern, an 84-year-old with heart disease, visited Mitra Javanmardi's clinic in 2008 at the suggestion of a friend as he was frustrated with conventional treatments. After discussing his condition, Javanmardi gave him nutrients intravenously and he reacted poorly, complaining of being hot and nauseous. Matern did not want to go to hospital and returned home, but he died a short time later due to contamination of a vial used during the nutrient injection.

The Crown is asking the Supreme Court of Canada to review an appeal court ’s decision to order a new trial for two men convicted of plotting to crash a Via Rail train. In a written submission to the high court , federal lawyers say the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned the convictions on the basis of a

OTTAWA — The Crown is asking the Supreme Court of Canada to review an appeal court ’s decision to order a new trial for two men convicted of plotting to crash a Via Rail train. In a written submission to the high court

Chiheb Esseghaier is led off a plane by an RCMP officer at Buttonville Airport just north of Toronto on April 23, 2013. © THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young Chiheb Esseghaier is led off a plane by an RCMP officer at Buttonville Airport just north of Toronto on April 23, 2013.

The Crown is asking the Supreme Court of Canada to review an Appeal Court's decision to order a new trial for two men convicted of plotting to crash a Via Rail train.

In a written submission to the high court, federal lawyers say the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned the convictions on the basis of a "highly technical error" in the jury selection process that did not interfere with the fair-trial rights of either man.

Raed Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier were found guilty in 2015 on terror-related charges arising from an al-Qaeda-inspired plot to derail a passenger train travelling between the United States and Canada. Both were sentenced to life in prison.

Supreme Court to rule on whether delays in youth criminal cases breach charter rights

  Supreme Court to rule on whether delays in youth criminal cases breach charter rights The Supreme Court of Canada will deliver a decision today that could set a new benchmark for how long a criminal case involving a young person can drag on before charges are dropped. The case before the court involves an Alberta teen identified only as "K.J.M." in court documents. He was charged with aggravated assault after he stabbed another teen with a box cutter in a drunken fight at a house party in 2015. It took more than 18 months for his case to be resolved.In the game-changing 2016 Jordan decision, the Supreme Court ruled that unreasonable delays in criminal cases violate the Charter of Rights.

OTTAWA — The Crown is asking the Supreme Court of Canada to review an appeal court ’s decision to order a new trial for two men convicted of plotting to crash a Via Rail train. In a written submission to the high court

In August, the appeal court ordered a fresh trial for the men on grounds the jury that convicted them was improperly chosen. Published 10 hours ago by TORONTO STAR ( Canada ) Categories: Mosaic.

In August, the Appeal Court ordered a fresh trial for the men on grounds the jury that convicted them was improperly chosen.

Following the decision, the Public Prosecution Service of Canada said it would proceed with a new trial, but noted it had 60 days to decide whether to seek permission to appeal from the Supreme Court.

In the submission, the federal lawyers note Jaser and Esseghaier were convicted of the most serious terrorism offences in Canadian law after nearly nine months of pretrial motions and a three-month jury trial.

"Overturning these convictions on the basis of a technical error that had no appreciable effect on the conduct of the trial is a triumph of form over substance," the submission says.

"Where, as here, there is no actual demonstrable prejudice to the fairness of the trial, the verdict properly reached by the trier of fact after a long and arduous trial should not so easily be set aside."

Former pastor testifies in own defence at sexual assault trial

  Former pastor testifies in own defence at sexual assault trial A former associate pastor at a church in Hammonds Plains, N.S., on trial for sexual assault says he had sex with a 17-year-old girl, but that his relationship with the teen never raised alarm bells in his mind.Michael Oliver Fisher, 40, is charged with sexual assault and sexual touching by someone in a position of trust. He finished testifying Tuesday in his own defence in Nova Scotia Supreme Court in Halifax.

The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada ) is the highest court of Canada , the final court of appeals in the Canadian justice system.

The Supreme Court declined to hear a Crown appeal after a new trial was ordered in the case of Husbands, the Eaton Centre shooter. The Court of Appeal has since found this to be incorrect, ordering retrials in some cases and upholding convictions in others. In this case , the Court of Appeal

SCC has to decide if it will hear the matter

Jaser and Esseghaier will also have an opportunity to make submissions to the Supreme Court, which is likely to rule on whether to hear the matter some time next year.

Before the terror trial, the case's high profile and the fact the two accused were Muslim and members of a visible minority meant that prospective jurors were asked about their ability to be impartial.

Historically during this process, two people were given the role of "triers" who listened to the answers for signs of bias. Lawyers for the Crown and defence then decided whether to allow the individual to sit on the jury.

The use of "rotating triers" entailed having each newly appointed juror replace one of the two triers for subsequent questioning.

Counsel for Jaser wanted the challenges to proceed with rotating triers, with the other prospective jury members excluded from the room. Esseghaier was unrepresented, as he rejected the criminal justice system on religious grounds.

Man who stabbed and killed Belgian tourist sentenced to life in prison

  Man who stabbed and killed Belgian tourist sentenced to life in prison Sean McKenzie has been sentenced to life in prison for stabbing a 28-year-old Belgian tourist 42 times in August 2018.Amelie Sakkalis' body was found on Aug. 22, 2018 north of Boston Bar, B.C. The 28-year-old woman had been hitchhiking from Penticton to Vancouver.

This is the Supreme Court of Canada ’s home page. It contains links to the following pages: The Court ; Cases ; Judges ; Act and Rules ; Parties There are also links to: hearings (today, scheduled, and archived) and to the latest judgments. You can also search for an SCC case on this page, read the

The 2013 Via Rail Canada terrorism plot was a conspiracy to commit terrorist acts in and against Canada in the form of disruption, destruction or derailment of trains operated by Canada 's national passenger railway service, Via Rail Canada .

Due to changes to the law in 2008, there was uncertainty as to whether the procedures Jaser requested were even still available, and the judge eventually approved another method set out in the new statute.

Both men appealed their 2015 convictions. Counsel for Jaser and a court-appointed representative for Esseghaier argued the jury was improperly constituted.

In its August ruling, the Appeal Court said Jaser was improperly denied his preferred option for jury selection. The court also said if Jaser should have a new trial, Esseghaier was also entitled to one.

In their submission, the federal lawyers say the implication of allowing the appeal-court decision to stand extends beyond the case at hand.

"As the law currently stands, a reasonable error by a trial judge on a disputed issue related to jury selection can and will invalidate the trial that follows, regardless of any prejudice."

Appeal of Anne Norris verdict dismissed by Supreme Court of Canada .
The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed an appeal from Newfoundland and Labrador's attorney general to review the Anne Norris case. In 2018, a 12-person jury found Norris not criminally responsible in the death of Marcel Reardon, whom she admitted to killing by striking him repeatedly in the head with a hammer. The Crown had filed an application to the Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador earlier this year to request a new trial, but that appeal was rejected in a unanimous decision. The attorney general then filed an appeal to the country's top court.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!