•   
  •   
  •   

Canada Federal, provincial battle over carbon tax goes before Supreme Court this week

22:37  21 september  2020
22:37  21 september  2020 Source:   msn.com

Lindsey Graham Backpedals After Saying 'Use My Words Against Me' on Supreme Court Vacancies

  Lindsey Graham Backpedals After Saying 'Use My Words Against Me' on Supreme Court Vacancies Sen. Lindsey Graham, who said in 2016 to "use my words against me" if he were to advocate the nomination of a Supreme Court justice in any President's final year of their term, feels very differently in 2020. Following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Friday, Graham retweeted President Trump's comment that the GOP has an "obligation, without delay" to appoint a new justice to the Supreme Court, adding that, "I fully understand where President @realDonaldTrump is coming from." "Harry Reid changed the rules to allow a simple majority vote for Circuit Court nominees dealing out the minority.

The Supreme Court of Canada is set to hear appeals in three separate cases to determine if the federal carbon - tax legislation is constitutional or if it encroaches unacceptably on areas of provincial jurisdiction. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's carbon tax is going on trial Tuesday.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's carbon tax is going on trial Tuesday.

Jonathan Wilkinson wearing a suit and tie © Provided by The Canadian Press

OTTAWA — Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's carbon tax is going on trial Tuesday.

The Supreme Court of Canada is set to hear appeals in three separate cases to determine if the federal carbon-tax legislation is constitutional or if it encroaches unacceptably on areas of provincial jurisdiction.

Appeals courts in Saskatchewan and Ontario upheld the law, while the Alberta Court of Appeal ruled it unconstitutional.

Mourners pay tribute outside U.S. Supreme Court as battle brews over RBG's successor

  Mourners pay tribute outside U.S. Supreme Court as battle brews over RBG's successor Dan Levy, Annie Murphy On 'Schitt's Creek' Accolades Back in 2016, Cheryl Hickey sat down with now-Emmy winners Dan Levy and Annie Murphy to talk about returning to the set to shoot season 3 following their success at the Canadian Screen Awards.

The federal carbon tax battle heads to the Ontario Court of Appeal this week . TORONTO – The federal and Ontario governments are set to square off in the province ’s top court this week over The federal law, he said, applies in Ontario only because Ford scrapped the provincial carbon

The federal carbon tax was imposed on four provinces without carbon pricing plans of their own. Ontario says the tax is unconstitutional, but some call the court challenge a Airing six days a week , the show delivers news, feature documentaries and analysis from some of Canada's leading journalists.

The Supreme Court case could be a make-or-break decision for one of the central pillars of the Liberal climate agenda. It accounts for as much as 40 per cent of the cuts to greenhouse-gas emissions needed to meet Canada's obligations under the Paris climate change agreement.

The case is to be heard over two days, including submissions from at least seven provinces, the federal government, the Assembly of First Nations and nearly two dozen interveners that include provincial utilities, environment groups and unions.

Stewart Elgie, director of the Environment Institute at the University of Ottawa, says the case is not going to decide if carbon pricing is good policy, but rather who has jurisdiction over it.

"The basic issue is who has the constitutional power to price carbon," said Elgie.

Legendary Lands Rights To Crosby Selander’s Spec Script ‘Bring Me Back’ In Seven-Figure Sale

  Legendary Lands Rights To Crosby Selander’s Spec Script ‘Bring Me Back’ In Seven-Figure Sale EXCLUSIVE: In a competitive bidding situation, Legendary Entertainment has acquired Crosby Selander’s debut spec script Bring Me Back. The logline is being kept under wraps but is described as an epic love story. The deal closed Friday night with Legendary beating out a number of buyers in the auction with sources saying the deal closed in the seven-figure range.More from DeadlineDenis Villeneuve's 'Dune' Heading Back To Europe For Additional Shooting In AugustLegendary Entertainment Names Sirena Liu CEO Of China-Based Legendary EastLegendary Reopens China Office With Safety Measures In Place Selander is a New York based writer, director, and producer.

Federal , provincial battle over carbon tax goes before Supreme Court this week . Joe Biden entered fall campaign with US1-million cash advantage over Trump. 2020 serves another blow as Ginsburg's death ignites fight.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford takes his fight over the federal carbon tax to a Toronto courtroom this week , in a bid to have the measure ruled unconstitutional. This is the question being argued in the Ontario Court of Appeals this week as the province 's government appeals the federally -imposed

The Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan governments argue the law steps into their jurisdiction over natural resources and provincial taxation, while Ottawa conversely says carbon emissions are an issue of national concern, which do not respect provincial boundaries and require a national approach to address.

The federal Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was passed in June 2018 and sets minimum national thresholds for a price on carbon pollution, starting at $10 a tonne, and rising each year until it hits $50 a tonne in 2022.

The idea is that making it more expensive to produce greenhouse-gas emissions will change behaviour, provoking people to drive less, buy more efficient cars or homes, or adjust their buying habits so they pay less tax. At the same time, it spurs the development of technologies to allow individuals to curb their emissions.

Ottawa is returning 90 per cent of the revenues in the form of income-tax rebates to individuals in provinces where the carbon price is paid, and the rest is going to funds to help businesses make themselves more climate-friendly. The rebates are designed with the premise that you can save yourself even more money if you reduce your personal carbon footprint.

'The View': Meghan McCain Goes on Anti-Abortion Rant About RBG's SCOTUS Replacement

  'The View': Meghan McCain Goes on Anti-Abortion Rant About RBG's SCOTUS Replacement Things got heated on Monday morning's episode of "The View" when a discussion about the open Supreme Court seat left by the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg turned into an anti-abortion rant by Meghan McCain. Opinions flew as to whether President Donald Trump will be successful in enforcing his choice for the seat, while at the same time, Democrats are trying to hold off the decision until the next president takes over at the start of the year. That was the case when late Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scalia died at the end of President Obama's term in 2016.

Federal , provincial battle over carbon tax goes before Supreme Court this week . Federal Court hears certification arguments this week in MMIW lawsuit.

The federal government will end up with the power to regulate almost every facet of life — such as when you can drive or where you can live — if its law Interested Canadians have a rare opportunity this week to watch Ontario's top court sort out a federal - provincial legal battle over carbon pricing.

The law allows provinces to meet the price threshold however they want, but if a province doesn't have a carbon tax or a provincial cap-and-trade type program that meets the standard, Ottawa steps in and imposes a federal carbon tax on that particular province.

In 2019, when the law took effect, four provinces — Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario and New Brunswick — didn't meet some or all of the federal thresholds so Ottawa stepped in.

New Brunswick's government has since introduced its own system after Premier Blaine Higgs conceded following the 2019 federal election that voters in his province had voted in favour of a carbon tax by electing mostly Liberal MPs.

Alberta was added to the federal carbon-tax program in January, after Premier Jason Kenney killed the provincial carbon tax that had been introduced by the previous NDP government.

Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson expressed confidence Ottawa would ultimately prevail, pointing to the fact two out of three provinces agreed with the federal government's interpretation of the Constitution. He said as well pollution does not suddenly stop at a provincial border.

PETA Confiscates 3 Lions From 'Tiger King' Zoo – Nala Can 'Barely Walk' (Video)

  PETA Confiscates 3 Lions From 'Tiger King' Zoo – Nala Can 'Barely Walk' (Video) PETA has "confiscated" three one-year-old lions from Jeff Lowe's "Tiger King" zoo, which was recently closed. The Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park (G.W. Park) ended up in Lowe's hands following Joe Exotic's arrest for hiring a hitman to kill Carole Basin. Yeah, it's all bananas. Check out "Tiger King" on Netflix if none of those words check out in your rational brain. The lion confiscation comes as part of PETA's successful EndangeredYeah, it's all bananas. Check out "Tiger King" on Netflix if none of those words check out in your rational brain.

WATCH ABOVE: The battle over the carbon tax between the Kenney and Trudeau governments continued The law that brought in the tax is being challenged this week by Alberta in the province ’s Court They are appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada. Ottawa argues its authority for the tax

1, 2020, the federal carbon tax kicks in. Albertans will be paying more to heat their homes and drive to work. Alberta government vows to continue fight against federal carbon tax . Ottawa’s carbon tax is set Ontario and Saskatchewan lost previous challenges in their top provincial courts but are both

"Greenhouse gas emissions have no boundaries," he said. "Our argument is establishing a nationwide minimum standard to release greenhouse gas emissions is a national concern. It is hard for me to imagine it is not a matter of national concern."

The courts in Saskatchewan and Ontario both found that the power falls with Ottawa under the broad constitutional principle that the federal government has the authority to make laws to promote peace, order and good government. In Alberta, the court found it infringed on a province's right to regulate its own natural resources.

In its written submission to the Supreme Court, Saskatchewan said the federal carbon price creates a new federal power over greenhouse-gas emissions, which "would profoundly upset the division of powers" laid out in the Constitution and violates fundamental principles about taxing powers in Canada.

“We have argued, since Day 1, that the carbon tax is an overreach by the federal government,” Saskatchewan Justice Minister Don Morgan said Monday.

Elgie said the whole reason the case is at the Supreme Court is because when the Constitution was written in 1867, nobody had ever heard of greenhouse-gas pollution or climate change.

Carbon pricing has become the subject of a major partisan divide in Canada, with successive federal Conservative parties campaigning against it. In the last federal election all the other major parties supported carbon pricing.

If the court upholds the law, nothing will change as long as the Liberals remain in government. If the court strikes it down, the tax will be dropped, but the Liberals could try to reimpose it in a different way, if the court leaves them room to do so.

In Ontario and Saskatchewan, judges who disagreed with the majority opinion that the law was constitutional nevertheless said pricing carbon could be done using federal taxation power, for example, if the system were structured differently.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 21, 2020.

Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press

Amy Coney Barrett Said SCOTUS Justices Shouldn't Be Replaced by Political Opposites in 2016 (Video) .
In 2016, Republicans in the senate falsely asserted that United States policy is to never appoint a new justice to the supreme court in an election year, as an excuse not to allow Barack Obama to appoint Antonin Scalia's successor. So it makes a lot of sense that plenty of people are calling them out as dishonest hypocrites now that they're rushing through the appointment of a new justice in an election year. But of course it wasn't just SenateBut of course it wasn't just Senate Republicans who justified those actions in terms that definitely apply to current circumstances only to advance the precise opposite opinions less than 4 years later.

usr: 1
This is interesting!