•   
  •   
  •   

Canada Liberals filibuster opposition motion to get details of Trudeau family's speaking fees

02:15  10 october  2020
02:15  10 october  2020 Source:   msn.com

'You can achieve a lot if you don't seek credit': NDP looks to thread a parliamentary needle

  'You can achieve a lot if you don't seek credit': NDP looks to thread a parliamentary needle The NDP is embarking on a familiar game by extracting a deal from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in return for propping up his minority government during a confidence vote on the throne speech It’s a minority government high-wire act that few political parties can pull off. The NDP has to differentiate itself from the Liberals in the battle for left-leaning voters, while working closely with its rival on vital legislation. “While in politics, you It’s a minority government high-wire act that few political parties can pull off. The NDP has to differentiate itself from the Liberals in the battle for left-leaning voters, while working closely with its rival on vital legislation.

OTTAWA — Liberal MPs on the House of Commons ethics committee mounted a filibuster Friday afternoon of the opposition ’s attempt to get details of the Trudeau family ’ s speaking fees — particularly as they relate to WE Charity events. The Liberals dragged out the committee’s

Social Sharing. Opposition MPs want the Speakers' Spotlight to produce receipts for all Trudeau Committee members were debating whether to adopt a motion that would compel Speakers' The motion also would give the committee the power to "review the safeguards which are in place to

a man wearing a suit and tie © Provided by National Post

OTTAWA — Liberal MPs on the House of Commons ethics committee mounted a filibuster Friday afternoon of the opposition’s attempt to get details of the Trudeau family’s speaking fees — particularly as they relate to WE Charity events.

Federal Liberals see small boost after throne speech: Ipsos poll

  Federal Liberals see small boost after throne speech: Ipsos poll The survey, conducted by Ipsos for Global News, found the Sept. 23 Throne Speech and subsequent address by Justin Trudeau gave the Liberals a small boost over the opposition.The poll, conducted by Ipsos exclusively for Global News, found that if an election were to be held tomorrow, 36 per cent of Canadians would vote for Prime Minister Trudeau and the Liberal party, while 31 per cent would vote for Erin O'Toole and Conservative Party.

The motion also would give the committee the power to "review the safeguards which are in place to avoid and The opposition parties have a majority on this Conservative-chaired committee. Liberal MP Brenda Shanahan attempted to argue that it was beyond the mandate of the ethics committee to

The Conservative motion would also allow for other items to be added to the committee’ s agenda At the ethics committee, on Thursday, the Liberals ran the clock on an attempt to get documents about payments to Trudeau family members, including the Prime Minister, for their speaking engagements

The Liberals dragged out the committee’s proceedings through lengthy speeches and repeated requests to adjourn. Finally, after four and a half hours, the meeting adjourned without a vote on the motion after a Bloc Québécois MP joined with the Liberals in voting to adjourn. The committee will likely pick up the matter again at its next meeting.

It is the committee’s second attempt to obtain the speaking fee records after the first was blocked when the Liberals prorogued Parliament on Aug. 18. Opposition MPs say they want to review the records to verify how much the Trudeaus were paid by WE Charity and its related organizations.

The motion, introduced by the Conservatives but with the backing of the NDP and Bloc, orders the Speakers’ Spotlight to provide details of speaking fees paid since 2008 for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his wife Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, his mother Margaret Trudeau and his brother Alexandre Trudeau. The documents would be reviewed by the committee “in camera,” meaning they wouldn’t be made public.

Liberals filibuster opposition motion to get details of Trudeau family's speaking fees

  Liberals filibuster opposition motion to get details of Trudeau family's speaking fees OTTAWA — Liberal MPs on the House of Commons ethics committee mounted a filibuster Friday afternoon of the opposition’s attempt to get details of the Trudeau family’s speaking fees — particularly as they relate to WE Charity events. The Liberals dragged out the committee’s proceedings through lengthy speeches and repeated requests to adjourn. Finally, after four and a half hours, the meeting adjourned without a vote on the motion after a Bloc Québécois MP joined with the Liberals in voting to adjourn. The committee will likely pick up the matter again at its next meeting.

Those motions came in retaliation for the government defeating a motion presented on Thursday by the WATCH: Tories accuse Liberal MP of filling up during filibuster . The Conservatives had threatened earlier on Thursday that if their motion calling for Jean to appear before committee was

The Liberal majority shot down a Conservative motion calling on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to let former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould The filibuster started Wednesday evening — one day after Liberals on the House of Commons justice committee used their majority to pull the plug on their

Because it’s a minority Parliament situation, the Liberals are outvoted on the committee if the Conservatives, NDP and Bloc Québécois all vote together.

Opposition MPs had originally hoped to vote on the motion at the committee’s Thursday meeting, but that was blocked by the Liberals. A new meeting was called Friday by committee chair David Sweet, a Conservative MP.

“I’m ready to do this until it’s resolved, because we’re into a second meeting dealing with the same motion,” Conservative MP Michael Barrett said at the outset of Friday’s meeting.

“We need to verify and get these answers,” said NDP MP Charlie Angus. “I know this debate may go on as long as the Liberals want to filibuster and shut us down, but the work of Parliament must be able to return to the Canadian people and say we did due diligence.”

Earlier this summer, the question of the Trudeau family’s speaking fees became part of the controversy over the $900-million Canada Student Service Grant program. Trudeau did not recuse himself from the decision to have WE Charity administer the grant program even though he and his family had frequently appeared at WE Charity events.

Kelly McParland: An amazing thing happened — Erin O'Toole didn't fall into a Liberal trap

  Kelly McParland: An amazing thing happened — Erin O'Toole didn't fall into a Liberal trap Something significant didn’t happen last week in Ottawa. It was right there for everyone to see, the thing that didn’t happen. It involved Erin O’Toole, the new Conservative leader. After his victory in the leadership race, it was almost universally agreed by those in the know that O’Toole would face a tricky task as he tried to navigate the complicated currents of his party. O’Toole became leader thanks to late-ballot support from social conservatives. Most had backed other candidates in earlier ballots, but picked O’Toole over Peter MacKay when it turned into a choice between the two, O’Toole having put more effort than MacKay into wooing them.

Liberals filibuster opposition motion to get details of Trudeau family ' s speaking fees Back to video . WASHINGTON — If Democrats win control of the Senate and White House in November, many progressives want to get rid of a long-standing Senate rule — the legislative filibuster — to

Trudeau later told reporters she’d asked to speak to ministers but he didn’t specify what about. Canada’ s two major opposition parties have called for an inquiry into the ordeal, which the parliamentary ethics watchdog is already investigating.

After the program was announced, media reports revealed that Margaret and Alexandre Trudeau had been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees and expenses from 2016 to 2020. WE also said Trudeau’s wife  received a $1,400 honorarium for speaking at a 2012 event. Both WE and Trudeau have said that the prime minister was never paid for his appearances.

Angus set out his rationale for supporting the motion, saying he wanted to fact check the information provided by the co-founders of WE, Marc and Craig Kielburger.

“If the statements that the Kielburgers made are true in regards to the payments that were made, those documents will verify that,” Angus said. “But being that we have felt through our investigation of WE that we have not gotten clear answers, we need to be able to verify whether or not these payments are in the manner that they described. Were there other payments? Were these payments involving other matters? We need to know that.”

Liberal MPs on the committee repeatedly entered into long speeches that veered on and off topic, a standard tactic by parliamentarians seeking to delay a vote. The Liberals occasionally tried to amend the motion or have the meeting adjourned, but were outvoted by the opposition.

Opposition MPs brace for marathon Liberal filibuster over WE documents demand

  Opposition MPs brace for marathon Liberal filibuster over WE documents demand OTTAWA — Opposition MPs are bracing for another marathon meeting of the House of Commons ethics committee today as they ramp up efforts to revive their investigation into the WE Charity affair. Indeed, Conservative MP Michael Barrett says he and his colleagues are prepared for the meeting to drag on for days, if that's what it takes to finally force an end to a filibuster by Liberal committee members who've been blocking opposition demands for more documents.

The Liberals also outlined — at great length — various reasons why they felt the motion was inappropriate, including that the matter should be the responsibility of the ethics commissioner and that the committee has better things to focus on.

“It is all about COVID right now, this is what is critical for Canadians,” said Liberal MP Brenda Shanahan in protest.

“I don’t think it’s the expectation of the Canadian public to think that Members of Parliament are curtailing or auditing the activities of their family members,” Shanahan added later. “So to be going after the mother of a Member of Parliament, to be going after their brother…I found very inappropriate right from the beginning.”

At another point, Liberal MP Francesco Sorbara started reading into the record a media article about the government’s COVID-19 smartphone app before he was stopped by protests it was off topic.

Both Liberals and Conservative MPs had said they were prepared to meet all night if necessary, but the meeting finally ended after Bloc MP Marie-Hélène Gaudreau said she didn’t see a resolution coming any time soon and voted with the Liberals to adjourn.

• Email: bplatt@postmedia.com | Twitter: btaplatt

Is Pandemic Unity Between Ottawa And The Provinces Starting To Slip? (Analysis) .
OTTAWA — Has the blame game started? Canada’s pandemic response has, until now, mostly been defined by a collegiality between different levels of government. The sparring that existed a year ago, when Ontario Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford’s unpopularity found him guest-starring in the federal Liberals’ election attack ads, has been replaced with beaming smiles and kind words from one leader to another. Just last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Ontario premier were full of praise for one another.

usr: 0
This is interesting!