Canada Supreme Court of Canada sides with women in RCMP pension dispute over job-sharing
Pension at 63 or younger: These requirements must be met.
The valid contribution years include the years in which compulsory contributions were listed as employees or self-employed. But also the times during civil or military service, a mini job, parental leave and free caring for relatives count among the contribution years. Alternatives to early retirement without deductions As an alternative to early retirement without deductions, employees and the self-employed can take early retirement at their own expense.
OTTAWA — Women who enrolled in the RCMP's job-sharing program while raising young children were unfairly denied the chance to bolster their pensions, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.
In a 6-3 decision Friday, the high court ruled in favour of three mothers who worked reduced hours on the national police force in order to devote time to their children.
Joanne Fraser, Allison Pilgrim and Colleen Fox said the RCMP pension plan breached their equality rights under the charter by denying them the chance to accrue full-time pension credit for periods when they worked reduced hours for family reasons.
‘Terrorizing our people’: N.S. Mi’kmaw fishers have property vandalized, lobsters destroyed
On Tuesday night a facility was 'swarmed and vandalized' by commercial fishermen, said Chief Michael Sack of the Sipeknet'katik First Nation.The incidents, the latest in continuing tensions between Indigenous and non-Indigenous fishers in Nova Scotia, allegedly occurred at two locations, one in Central West Pubnico, N.S., and the other in New Edinburgh, N.S.
The claimants took maternity leave in the early to mid-1990s but experienced difficulties juggling their work obligations with child-care responsibilities upon returning to full-time service.
Fraser said she felt “overwhelmed” trying to balance work and family.
The three women were among those who enrolled in a new job-sharing program, introduced in December 1997, that allowed regular RCMP members to split the duties of one full-time position.
The women pointed out that under the RCMP pension plan, members can accrue pensionable service during leaves of absence, such as maternity, sick or education leaves, provided the member pays both the employer and employee contributions for the period.
But members who temporarily reduce their hours of work see their pensions diminished, as they are not given the option of "buying back" full-time pension credit for the hours not worked.
Michigan State coach Tom Izzo to his basketball players: Sacrifice if you want to play
Michigan State basketball enters an unprecedented season with the perfect man for the job: Tom Izzo.He won’t slip on a spacesuit or an Iron Man costume or a peace sign necklace, part of a 60s-era ensemble he once wore, replete with a Flower Power bandana and a mane that stretched past his shoulders.
The three women, all now retired from the force, were unsuccessful in the Federal Court and in a subsequent appeal, but the Supreme Court agreed to hear their case.
Video: Rideau Hall spent over $110,000 on legal fees in response to harassment claims (cbc.ca)
In its decision, the Supreme Court noted nearly all of the participants in the job-sharing program were women and most of them limited their hours of work because of child care.
Justice Rosalie Abella wrote on behalf of the majority that full-time RCMP members who job-share must sacrifice pension benefits because of the temporary reduction in working hours.
"This arrangement has a disproportionate impact on women and perpetuates their historical disadvantage," she said, calling it a "clear violation" of their right to equality under the charter.
The court highlighted the long-standing gender biases within pension plans, historically designed for middle- and upper‑income full-time employees, typically men, with long service.
Mobs are attacking Indigenous fisheries in Nova Scotia. Here’s what’s going on
Tensions between Indigenous and non-Indigenous fishermen have come to a head over fishing rights in Nova Scotia — a dispute that has a history spanning hundreds of years. In 1999, Canada's Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case R. v. Marshall that several treaties signed in the 1760s granting the Mi'kmaq the right to harvest and sell fish were still valid. The over 250-year-old agreement, known as the Peace and Friendship Treaties, specified that the Nova Scotia Mi'kmaq had the right to earn a "moderate livelihood." The Sipekne'katik First Nation would go on to open its own fishery in St. Mary's Bay, N.S.
The court decision is "a huge win for equality and women in the workplace, and in the home," said lawyer Paul Champ, who represented the claimants.
"When I called Joanne Fraser and told her of the win, her response was, 'It's about time.' I couldn't agree more."
Abella said it will be up to federal officials to devise the methodology for full-time members who reduced their hours under the job-sharing program to buy back their full pension credit.
But she said any measures should be in keeping with the court's reasons and apply retroactively to give the claimants in the case, and others in their position, a meaningful remedy.
Taking a broader view, Abella said the 1970 Royal Commission on the Status of Women in Canada set out a "galvanic blueprint" for redressing the legal, economic, social and political barriers to full and fair participation faced by Canadian women for generations.
"Many of the inequities it identified have been spectacularly reversed, and the result has been enormous progressive change for women in this country," she said in the ruling.
"But despite the sweep of legislative initiatives and the positive realignment of many social expectations, the long reach of entrenched assumptions about the role of women in a family continues to leave its mark on what happens in the workplace."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2020.
Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press
Boycott lobster imports not caught by Mi'kmaq fishers, Assembly of First Nations says .
Canada's First Nations are calling for a boycott of all imports of Maritime lobster and lobster products that are not harvested by Mi'kmaq fishers. Kevin Hart, the Manitoba regional chief of the Assembly of First Nations, has reached out to the European Union, urging them to support the Mi'kmaw moderate livelihood fishery. "Canadian exports of lobster to Europe are worth about $175 million per year. A European trade boycott of non-Indigenous lobster in support of the treaty rights of Mi'kmaq fishers would be consistent with the European Parliament's resolution to respect and support the rights and personal safety of Indigenous people," Hart said.