•   
  •   
  •   

Canada Contradictions pile up in the federal government's approach to military misconduct

11:51  08 april  2021
11:51  08 april  2021 Source:   cbc.ca

Culture of silence on military sexual misconduct ’emboldens’ perpetrators: Expert

  Culture of silence on military sexual misconduct ’emboldens’ perpetrators: Expert Dr. Denise Preston said there are "many different risk factors" for the kind of person who commits sexual misconduct and sexual violence, but said there is no clear data right now. Part of coming up with a plan to eliminate misconduct, though, will require that data in order to form a clearer picture of the circumstances that let misconduct flourish, she said. "That is critical to being able to design better prevention programs, and response programs as well.” The military is facing a reckoning amid twin military police probes into the current and former chiefs of the defence staff: Adm.

a group of people sitting at a table in front of a television: Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan rises virtually during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa Monday, March 8, 2021. © Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan rises virtually during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa Monday, March 8, 2021.

Weeks of hearings and a parade of witnesses before two parliamentary committees have — at the very least — uncovered a cascade of contradictions in the Liberal government's approach to sexual misconduct in the military.

Anticipated, but sorely absent, has been the kind of "ah-ha" moment on which so many political crises are expected to turn.

Still, the contradictions are important and could have long-term implications — for politics and the institutions of the state, and perhaps for the prosecution of future cases, say the experts.

Liberals shut down probe into sexual misconduct in Canadian military

  Liberals shut down probe into sexual misconduct in Canadian military “Until we get to the bottom of who knew what when, we have not concluded this study," warned NDP MP Randall Garrison.That decision comes as the Conservatives and NDP members of the committee argue no one has yet taken responsibility and the probe should continue.

The first and most glaring disconnect involves Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan's long-held claim — which he repeated at Tuesday's defence committee hearing — that he could not look at supposed evidence of alleged misconduct involving former chief of the defence staff Gen. Jonathan Vance because doing so would insert him into the chain of evidence for a possible criminal case.

"My purpose, immediately, was to make sure whatever information the ombudsman had, I didn't want to accept it because I didn't want to possibly taint it," Sajjan said, referring to an envelope former ombudsman Gary Walbourne brought to a March 2018 meeting where Walbourne warned of possible sexual misconduct involving Gen. Vance.

"Based upon my own experience as a detective, I know in investigations, when something comes forward, it can possibly go to court. The last thing you want to do is interfere with that."

Top military police officer defends unit's handling of sex misconduct cases

  Top military police officer defends unit's handling of sex misconduct cases OTTAWA — The commander of Canada's military police found himself defending the independence and professionalism of his investigators on Tuesday as members of a parliamentary committee grilled him over how they deal with cases of sexual misconduct. Provost Marshal Brig.-Gen. Simon Trudeau repeatedly asserted during an hour of testimony to the House of Commons' committee on the status of women that his military police officersc were not beholden to the top brass. And he suggested the process of charging a chief of the defence staff or any other senior leader would be no different than for the lowest-ranking member of the Canadian Armed Forces.

But the Department of National Defence took the extraordinary (some would argue unprecedented) step of allowing the alleged victims in the ongoing military police investigations into both Vance and his successor, Admiral Art McDonald, to give media interviews — possibly tainting the cases.

A spokesperson for the Department of National Defence (DND) said the decision to grant Global News' request to interview Maj. Kellie Brennan was made by the assistant deputy minister of public affairs, Laurie Kempton, while Lt. (N) Heather MacDonald was given the nod to take part in an interview by the commander of Canadian Forces Base Esquimalt, B.C., Capt. (N) Sam Sader.

'If I were the JAG, I'd be furious'

In both instances, the military law enforcement and justice branches were left out of the loop.

The Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) and the Canadian Forces Judge Advocate General (JAG) "were not consulted, nor is their consent required for CAF members to conduct media interviews," said Dan Lebouthillier, DND's head of media relations.

Approximately 4,600 file claims of sexual misconduct or discrimination against Canadian military

  Approximately 4,600 file claims of sexual misconduct or discrimination against Canadian military Approximately 4,600 individuals have now filed claims about facing sexual misconduct or gender discrimination in the Canadian military and the defence department as part of compensation deal that will cost taxpayers $900 million. Present and past serving members of the Canadian Forces and the Department of National Defence are eligible to make the claims as part of a settlement reached in 2019. DND spokesman Dan Le Bouthillier said as of April 9 the number of people who have filed claims is about 4,600.

An expert in military law said he was left dumbfounded by the department's decision — and the apparent contradiction between that decision and the minister's pleas to protect the integrity of the investigations.

"Incredible," said retired colonel Michel Drapeau. "As a minimum, the advice of the JAG should have been first sought. If I were the JAG, I would be furious. Ditto for the NIS."

Retired colonel Rory Fowler, a former military lawyer now in private practice, said he also found it odd that the department didn't first consult with the bodies responsible for investigating and prosecuting crimes in the military.

"I would suggest that they are correct that neither the CFNIS nor the JAG must consent, but they'd be foolish not to have consulted with them," he said.

Minister kept out of the loop

By regulation, serving members of the military must seek permission from their superiors to take part in media interviews — the approval by Kempton, though unusual, is allowed under the existing rules, said Lebouthillier.

Both interviews were politically sensitive — even explosive. But Sajjan's office was not told in advance that they were coming, said Lebouthillier — while the office of the chief of the defence staff, while not being asked to grant permission, was given a heads-up.

Head of military personnel on indefinite leave amid sexual assault investigation

  Head of military personnel on indefinite leave amid sexual assault investigation The Department of National Defence said Vice-Adm. Haydn Edmundson is under military investigation over allegations he sexually assaulted a subordinate in 1991.In a statement to Global News, the department said Vice-Adm. Haydn Edmundson, who serves as the military's head of personnel, is on indefinite leave as the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service (CFNIS) looks into the allegation.

Fowler said keeping the minister's office out of the loop was also somewhat strange.

"There would be nothing improper about informing the [Minister of National Defence Office] or [Sajjan]," said Fowler.

A defence official, speaking on background, said the department was faced with a no-win situation because refusing to grant the interview requests would have looked as if the department were muzzling the alleged victims.

But Drapeau said it "goes against any concept of good governance ... and administrative law," for someone in government to grant permission to those involved in a case "to speak out or opine" on a matter which is under active investigation.

Oddly enough, MacDonald made a similar argument in her interview when she complained that both her and the admiral were being denied "due process" because some details of the allegations had been leaked to CBC News.

"This is more than strange," Drapeau said.

Defence lawyers could end up having a field day with the alleged victims' remarks, he added.

The contradictions don't end with the legal arguments.

Military ombudsman Gregory Lick has felt compelled to twice correct some of Sajjan's public assertions about what Walbourne could have done with the informal misconduct complaint against Vance.

Exhausted and discouraged, victims of military sexual misconduct plead their case to Parliament — again

  Exhausted and discouraged, victims of military sexual misconduct plead their case to Parliament — again A House of Commons committee heard heartfelt appeals today for meaningful reform within the Canadian military to end sexual violence. The ongoing misconduct crisis involving the country's top Armed Forces commanders is "a national embarrassment," the Status of Women committee was told today.Christine Wood, representing the group It's Just 700 — which led the class action lawsuit against the federal government over sexual violence in the Armed Forces — spoke forcefully and eloquently before the Commons committee on the Status of Women.

In testimony before both the Commons committee on the status of women and the defence committee, Lick pushed back at Sajjan's suggestion that the ombudsman's office could have conducted its own investigation and that allegations against Vance could have been referred elsewhere.

"The ombudsman cannot look into anything of a criminal nature or that could be a Code of Service Discipline offence," Lick said Tuesday.

"The ombudsman reports directly to the Minister of National Defence. Advising the person to whom you report about problems within that person's organization is generally an expected way of proceeding."

a man wearing a hat: Former chief of the defence staff Gen. Jonathan Vance. © Giacomo Panico/CBC Former chief of the defence staff Gen. Jonathan Vance.

Meanwhile — in what may be more of a contrast than a contradiction — the country's former top civil servant deflected criticism this week over the fact that informal allegations against Vance, made in 2018, were not referred to the top national security adviser.

"I think that is a hypothetical of what might have followed," Michael Wernick told the defence committee on Tuesday. "It's not clear to me how the national security adviser would have added anything to the equation at the time."

For the Liberal government at the time, the most direct route to addressing the problem with Vance was to convince Walbourne to hand over the information he had — even though he had no authority to do so.

When the former Conservative government dealt with similar informal (and, in one case, anonymous) complaints about Vance prior to his appointment in 2015, the national security adviser of the day, Richard Fadden, was fully involved and at one point took part in briefing then-prime minister Stephen Harper.

The country's top security official was involved in part because the chief of the defence staff holds not only top Canadian secret clearance but NATO security clearance as well.

Wernick insisted, however, that the circumstances faced by the current government were unique because, given the anonymous nature of the complaint, they couldn't talk to Vance "because that would have raised the risk of reprisal."

Sajjan says he had ‘number of conversations’ with ex-chief of staff on 2018 Vance allegation .
Witnesses are set to include Michael Wernick, who was clerk of the Privy Council when the office abandoned a probe following a 2018 allegation against Gen. Jonathan Vance. He is expected to face questioning over his office's conduct and decision not to probe the matter further, as well as about to what extent he may have discussed the matter with the Prime Minister's Office. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has said he did not know of any allegations against Vance in 2018, and only learned of them through exclusive Global News reporting on Feb. 2, 2021.

usr: 1
This is interesting!