Canada The federal climate platforms: What's in them and what sets each apart
Why Canada could be burning coal well beyond the 2030 deadline set by the Liberals
An explanation of why some Canadians could still be getting electricity generated by burning coal well beyond the 2030 deadline set by the federal governmentLiberal Leader Justin Trudeau and a number of high-profile Liberal candidates running in the 2021 federal election have reiterated the promise that Canada will “phase out” or “power past” coal by the end of this decade.
The next government's climate change plan will impact every aspect of Canadians' lives, public policy researchers say.
Climate change impacts such as wildfires, extreme heat and drought are already affecting Canadians in concrete ways, said Dale Beugin, vice-president of research and analysis at the Canadian Institute of Climate Choices, a non-partisan, publicly funded think-tank. But beyond that, countries worldwide are shifting away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy to meet targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate future damage and costs of climate change.
Former B.C. Green leader endorses Liberal climate plan, slams Green infighting
OTTAWA — The former leader of the Green party in British Columbia has endorsed the federal Liberals' plan for combating climate change. Andrew Weaver says the Liberal plan is "both bold and thoughtful" and is the only credible plan put forward by any federal party. The endorsement is another blow for federal Green Leader Annamie Paul, who has struggled with internecine feuding and a lack of financial resources to run a national campaign. Paul admitted earlier this week that the party will not field a full slate of 338 candidates across the country.
"How Canada competes in that growing net-zero economy or a low-carbon economy is going to be huge for how well we do in the long term," Beugin said.
CBC examined the platforms of (in alphabetical order): the Bloc Québécois, Conservatives, Green Party, Liberals and NDP. If a party doesn't appear in a certain section, there was insufficient information in its platform on that topic, or, in one case, no modelling analysis was publicly available. The People's Party does not accept the science behind human-caused global warming and simply promises to cancel all climate-related policies and pull out of the Paris Agreement on climate change so it was not included in the analysis.
Here's how the major parties' platforms compare in terms of emissions reductions targets, the role of carbon pricing in meeting those targets, what evidence there is that the plans will work, and how the plans aim to transition Canada to a lower-carbon economy to compete in a changing world.
Liberal climate plan likely least costly, most effective, says economist assessing main parties' proposals
The federal Liberals come out on top of a new analysis on the effectiveness and cost to the economy of the climate change policies on offer by the four main federal parties running in the federal election, but the Conservatives plan sees them not far behind in second place. According to analysis by Simon Fraser University's Mark Jaccard, the Liberals have the most effective and affordable plan, followed by the Conservatives, the Greens and, in a distant fourth, the NDP. Jaccard, a professor at the B.C.
What are the parties' emissions targets?
Under the 2015 Paris agreement, Canada and 195 other countries haveenough to limit global warming to well below 2 C, and ideally 1.5 C compared to pre-industrial temperatures.
All the federal parties include as a central part of their plan a promise to cut emissions by a certain percentage below 2005 levels by 2030, but to varying degrees:
- It does not specify a target it in its official platform.
- This would meet the new Paris targets that the current Liberal government has committed to.
How do parties differ on carbon tax or carbon price?
The experts who spoke to CBC said the key to success on emissions reductions is to hit all sectors of the economy.
One broad measure that can do this is carbon taxes or carbon pricing. In general, a higher price drives emissions down more quickly but will cost businesses and individuals more.
1,500 NGOs call for the COP26 postponement on the climate of November
Climate NGOs have claimed Tuesday the postponement of the UN COP 26 Climate Conference "Given the failure to support access to vaccines to thousands people in poor countries ". © Reuters In the face of the low vaccination of the poor countries against CVIV-19, NGOs Climate asked on Tuesday the postponement of the UN COP 26 Climate Conference, estimating "impossible" the holding of a "fair and Inclusive "in Glasgow (Scotland) in November.
All the major parties support carbon pricing in some form. Here are details for each party:
- In 2019, the Bloc supported a tax of but only in provinces with higher-than-average per capita emissions.
- for personal carbon taxes.
- for industry but only if the U.S. and Europe match that price. The tax is based on output, meaning companies pay only if they exceed a certain limit. This already the current model for industry.
($25 increase each year).
- The tax the Liberal government introduced sits at and applies in provinces without their own carbon pricing.
- 90 per cent of personal carbon taxes are returned to consumers via rebates, with the rest going to business, schools, hospitals and municipalities.
- Output-based pricing for industry. Platform says a Liberal government would "continue to put a rising price on pollution."
How do we know parties will meet targets?
Video: Pressure to end exports of coal in Canada (Global News)
Some modelling and analysis has been done by experts to compare some of the plans using similar methodology, estimate whether the plans would achieve their varying targets and, to an extent, compare relative costs.
Fact check: have GHG emissions risen under Trudeau?
The NDP went on the attack against Justin Trudeau and the Liberals on climate change Tuesday, saying that emissions have grown since 2016 when the government ratified the Paris Climate agreement. But is this true?Trudeau and Singh traded barbs Tuesday on the campaign trail over plans to address climate change and lower emissions.
- Kathryn Harrison, a political science professor at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, said the plan hasn't been modelled to see if it would achieve its goal, but she thinks a 60 per cent reduction by 2030 would be "extremely difficult for Canada to do." "In practice, the Greens aren't going to form government. They know they're not going to form government, and they are putting issues on the agenda and speaking to a narrower subset of voters," Harrison said.
- But Harrison said the party hasn't provided modelling to show how the new measures proposed in its platform would get Canada to a 40 per cent reduction. "I think it's debatable whether they have quite enough policy in the window," said Ragan. Ragan is former chair of the Ecofiscal Commission, which found a carbon price of $200/tonne — higher than the $170/tonne proposed by the Liberals — was needed to get to just a 30 per cent reduction in emissions, well below the Liberals' current goal of 40 per cent by 2030.
How do they plan to transition Canada to a low-carbon economy?
As the rest of the world shifts away from fossil fuels, experts anticipate that demand for low-carbon technologies will grow, demand for fossil fuels will decline, and Canada's economy will need to shift its jobs and production to new industries.
Marlon Brando: The life story you may not know
Stacker compiled a list of 25 facts from Marlon Brando’s life story that you may not know, consulting newspapers, magazines, biographies, films, reviews, and fan websites.
That concept is sometimes called a "just transition," and the parties' positions on it differ.
- Harrison said this plan "really stands apart" in that it's the only one calling for a broad reduction of fossil fuel production.
- It includes a promise to cancel all new pipeline projects, oil exploration projects, leasing of federal lands for fossil fuel production; ban fracking; ban exports of thermal coal; and phase out bitumen production between 2030 and 2035.
- Would end $7 billion in fossil fuel subsidies, including accelerated capital cost allowance on liquefied natural gas (LNG); tax write-offs for oil and gas wells, coal mining exploration and development; flow-through share deductions for coal, oil and gas projects, and oil and gas properties.
- A Just Transition Act by the end of 2021 that encompasses the needs of workers and communities during transition.
- Promises to replace every "high-paying" fossil fuel sector job with a high-paying green sector job.
- $2 billion for a Futures Fund for Alberta, Saskatchewan and N.L. for job creation and a Clean Jobs Training Centre and "just transition" legislation.
- End thermal coal exports by 2030.
- Promises expanded EI benefits, retraining, job placement services and retirement benefits for workers affected by transition away from fossil fuels and "over a million new good jobs."
How else do the climate platforms differ?
All the parties have a climate adaptation component in their platforms that includes disaster response and infrastructure upgrades.
Face to Face 2021: Annamie Paul met 4 undecided voters. Here's what happened
Green Leader Annamie Paul says the only difference between the Conservative and Liberal climate change plans is that the Conservatives are being honest about their ability to hit their emissions reduction targets."The difference between the Liberals and the Conservatives is that the Conservatives are being honest that what they're planning to do is not going to get us past 30 per cent greenhouse gas emissions reductions," Paul told CBC News.
They also all offer support for a cleaner grid, electric cars, green retrofits and "nature-based solutions," such as restoring wetlands and tree planting for carbon sequestration, although they differ in the details.
Beugin said those types of commercially available and scalable solutions are safe bets and "almost certainly central to any path to net zero."
The parties differ in the extent to which they n addition to carbon pricing to cut emissions.
Harrison said in general, other regulations can achieve the same goals as carbon pricing if they're enforced but are more costly for the economy than a higher carbon price.
She suggested that the Conservatives and NDP in particular rely more heavily on regulations as a substitute for higher carbon pricing.
The NDP's plans include regulations for each sector, which need to be developed and implemented.
"What worries me about that is it's slow," she said.
The plans also differ in some of the they support, which Beugin calls "wild cards," such as carbon capture and hydrogen. Some of those could succeed and pay big dividends, but "there is a need to kind of acknowledge some of that uncertainty and to plan for multiple possible futures," he said.
Jason MacLean, an assistant professor who studies environmental law at the University of New Brunswick, cautions that investing heavily in them can also be a distraction: "These are very risky bets because if these unproven and expensive technologies don't pan out, then we won't have taken the more radical actions to rethink and redesign our economy and our society."
Here are some of the "wild cards" supported by each party:
Green hydrogen development in Quebec, which would be funded by cutting the existing national hydrogen strategy
- A national clean energy strategy that includes production of hydrogen and liquid natural gas.
- $1 billion for hydrogen.
- $5 billion for carbon capture.
- $1 billion for small modular nuclear reactors.
- Renewable gas mandate requiring 15 per cent of natural gas consumed in Canada be renewable, from sources such as food, sewage and landfill waste, by 2030.
- Net zero emissions from oil and gas by 2050 via carbon capture.
Research and development and hydrogen fuel cell technology for heavy trucks, freight, marine and aviation.
COMMENTARY: This election, we must act on the climate crisis. Our children are counting on us .
Iggy Azalea has taken to Twitter to discuss some of the outfits seen at this year's Met Gala.