Canada Conservatives wouldn't meet Canada's new UN climate target. Here's what that could mean
Singh, Trudeau attack one another on climate plans as NDP rolls out public transit promise
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh promised an NDP government would double public transit funding in order to meet his promise to electrify all public transit in Canada while using the opportunity to criticize the Liberals for what he says is their "failure" to deal with climate change.Singh said Canadians need to fight against climate change, but he added that "we will not be able to fight it, though, with another four years of Justin Trudeau, who has been an abysmal failure on the climate crisis," he said.
If the Conservatives are elected as Canada's government this fall, they've indicated they won't meet Canada's current greenhouse gas emissions targets under the Paris Agreement.
What does that mean? And what could the consequences be? Here's a closer look.
What kinds of targets do countries set under the Paris Agreement?
Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, Canada and 195 other countries have, in order to prevent the worst impacts of climate change, from extreme weather damage to rising seas.
Conservative lead growing slightly as Liberal, NDP election campaigns hit wall: poll
The Ipsos poll conducted exclusively for Global News found that 35 per cent of decided voters would vote for the Tories, up three points from last week. The Liberals would earn 32 per cent of the vote, up one point, while the NDP went down two points to receive 21 per cent. "I think what we're seeing here is a bit of a consolidation of the vote on the right behind the Conservatives," said Darrell Bricker, CEO of Ipsos Public Affairs. "(People are) starting to believe that the Conservatives actually might be able to beat the Liberal Party this time.
As part of the United Nations treaty, which is legally binding, countries are required to submit plans and targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions called nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in order to reach the global target as soon as possible.
What are Canada's Paris Agreement targets — and why have they changed?
Canada's original NDC, submitted by Stephen Harper's Conservative government, committed to cutting annual emissions 30 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, from 732 megatonnes to 513 megatonnes.
However, under the Paris Agreement, countries submit new, "increasingly ambitious" NDCs every five years, and were required to send new ones in by 2020,.
In April, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, requiring emissions to drop to at least 439 megatonnes by the end of the decade. The target was .
The federal climate platforms: What's in them and what sets each apart
The next government’s climate change plan will impact every aspect of Canadians' lives and will be key to the country's future prosperity, public policy researchers say. Here’s how the major parties' platforms compare and how they plan to transition Canada to a lower-carbon economy.Climate change impacts such as wildfires, extreme heat and drought are already affecting Canadians in concrete ways, said Dale Beugin, vice-president of research and analysis at the Canadian Institute of Climate Choices, a non-partisan, publicly funded think-tank.
But wait, didn't Erin O'Toole say the Conservatives will meet the Paris objectives?
Yes, the Conservative leader has said that throughout the election campaign., "We will meet the Paris objectives that were actually set by the tail end of the Conservative government and signed onto by the Liberal government" — that is, the outdated 30 per cent emissions cut, rather than Canada's current commitment of 40 per cent.
Kathryn Harrison, a political science professor at the University of British Columbia, said she thinks O'Toole's claim is misleading. "In fact, that's not Canada's Paris Agreement target anymore."
The Liberals, NDP and Green Party all say.
O'Toolethat he is not going to try to out-target his opponents just to get elected, but was proposing a plan that he felt his government could hit without damaging the economy.
The West Block — Episode 44, Season 10
Watch the full episode of The West Block with host Mercedes Stephenson – Sept. 12, 2021.Episode 44, Season 10
"What we have to do is make sure we deliver," he said.
Can the new commitment be changed or withdrawn?
Video: UCP Caucus meets to discuss COVID-19 in Alberta (Global News)
Yes. "A Party may at any time adjust its existing nationally determined contribution,", "with a view to enhancing its level of ambition." That is, while changes are allowed, downgrading is against the spirit of the agreement.
CBC News reached out to the Conservative Party of Canada to ask if they planned to change or withdraw their 30 per cent commitment, but they had not responded to the questions by Monday. That said, they've indicated that any change would not increase Canada's level of ambition in cutting greenhouse gases.
If a target is lowered, can a country be penalized?
No, not under the Paris Agreement itself.
Jutta Brunnée, professor and dean in the University of Toronto's faculty of law, said countries' legally binding obligation under the Paris Agreement is to prepare and communicate their climate targets and plans. That forces countries to be transparent about their climate action, or lack thereof.
Canada election: Tight race expected for South Okanagan-West Kootenay
Political observers say the projected tight race between the NDP and the Conservatives will be one of the most interesting to watch in British Columbia. The candidates NDP incumbent Richard Cannings narrowly defeated the Conservative challenger, Helena Konanz, by less than 800 votes in 2019. Cannings, a longtime Penticton resident and renowned biologist, is seeking a third term, having first been elected in 2015. He said he enjoys being the "voice of science" in Parliament and isn't ready to step away from federal politics. "That’s why I am running again.
But the targets and plans are not themselves legally binding. That means countries can technically downgrade their targets.
"They would not be violating an obligation under the Paris Agreement," Brunnée said, "but they would run counter to the entire normative architecture and the expectations that the agreement rests on."
What the reporting obligations do is make it clear to other countries if someone does set lower targets or fails to meet them.
"So it would become very public if a party went the opposite direction, so to speak," Brunnée said. "And that, I think, has actually proven to be a remarkably strong incentive, and also a kind of a mechanism to get parties to [do] their bit."
Is lowering the target worse than not meeting it?
"They're both equally bad," said Sébastien Jodoin, Canada Research Chair in human rights health and the environment at McGill University's faculty of law.
But they're also equally without penalties under the Paris Agreement.
It's worth noting that even prior to this election, under the Liberal government that set the new targets, Canada was not on track to meet them,.
The lack of penalties for not fulfilling plans or meeting targets is, in fact, a key difference between the Paris Agreement and its predecessor, the Kyoto Protocol. This was so the Paris Agreement would be adopted by more countries. In fact, the penalties were the reason Canada— by not meeting its targets, it was going to be found in non-compliance and would have had to pay $14 billion.
O’Toole dodges questions about whether he’d keep Liberal carbon tax
Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole refused to directly answers questions Wednesday about whether he'd keep the Liberal carbon tax if elected. Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole refused to give a straight answer Wednesday when asked if he would allow provinces and territories to keep the Liberal carbon tax if the Conservatives form a government.
Could there be potential consequences outside the Paris Agreement itself?
Brunnée said governments could face a hit to their reputation domestically and internationally if they fail to meet the expectations of the Paris Agreement.
"I don't think that it looks good on any country," she said.
Lowering targets or explicitly failing to meet targets might also encourage other countries to follow suit, she said. "And if that were to happen, the entire edifice would potentially unravel… This would be something that the other parties [who signed the Paris Agreement] wouldn't take lightly."
To prevent or punish those who go against Paris Agreement expectations, other countries could impose carbon border adjustments, levies or tariffs, which would penalize trading partners that aren't reducing their emissions quickly enough, said Jason MacLean, assistant professor of law at the University of New Brunswick.
"So countries are still free to work either individually or in concert to try and put pressure on other countries [so] that they are living up to their pledges under the Paris Agreement."
Jodoin said given that Canada is a trading nation and that our major trading partners,and , have been emissions targets, "that's a real risk for Canada."
But Canada also faces risks domestically, where laws such as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms have built-in penalties for violation, Jodoin said. Activists have launched lawsuits against the government over its alleged failure to take enough action on climate change,.
Jodoin said Canada's approach to its Paris obligations could give activists extra ammunition: "You're exposing yourself to the possibility of constitutional litigation."
Too close to call: Quebec ridings to watch on election night .
Until late last week, polls were indicating the federal election results in this campaign in Quebec would look very similar to the last, in which the Liberals won 35 seats, the Bloc Québécois 32, the Conservatives 10 and the NDP just one. But then Premier François Legault suggested a Conservative minority led by Erin O’Toole would be the best outcome for Quebec . And then the English leaders’ debate stirred controversy, with questions directed at Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet asking why he supports “discriminatory” Quebec laws like Bills 21 and 96, fanning the flames of outrage among many . Suddenly, the outlook for Quebec became much less clear.