Canada Legault condemns Bill 96-'Gestapo' comparison
Voting Liberal, NDP or Green would be dangerous for Quebec, Legault says
QUEBEC — Premier François Legault is urging Quebec nationalists to beware of three of the federal political parties, the Liberals, New Democratic Party or Green Party, because they want to centralize more power in Ottawa. On the other hand, Conservative leader Erin O’Toole is willing to give Quebec more powers over immigration even if he also wants to rip up the $6-billion daycare deal signed by Legault and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau just before the election. Legault is not satisfied with O’Toole’s formula for the federal health transfer to Quebec because it falls short of what Quebec and other provinces need.
Premier François Legault said he takes offence at his government’s new language legislation being compared to the Nazi regime.
Speaking at a news conference Wednesday morning, Legault reacted toby Anne-France Goldwater during being held on by the Quebec Community Groups Network.
Quebec nationalists should beware of Liberal, NDP and Green parties, Legault says
On the day after the final French-language debate of the federal campaign, Premier François Legault stopped short of telling Quebecers who to vote for. He did say, however, that nationalists in the province should be wary of the Liberal, NDP and Green parties.Speaking with reporters in Quebec City on Thursday, Legault said the stances of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh and Green Party Leader Annamie Paul on health and immigration matters are "worrisome" for Quebec.
Goldwater’s comments, made in English during the hearing, took issue with the fact that the bill as written would encourage Quebecers to report those who violate the language laws.
“I think our tax dollars should go more to education, than to creating a new form of — please don’t get mad at me, I’m a Jew, it’s the language that comes to mind right away — we don’t need a new Gestapo, where we’re starting to fink on each other,” she said.
Legault said her comments were insulting.
“I find it unfortunate to hear these kinds of comments,” he said. “When she compares Bill 96 to the Nazi regime, I find it terribly insulting for the Jewish community. I hope the Jewish community will take her to task. I take her to task now. It’s completely absurd to say things like this.”
L. Ian MacDonald: Legault spoils Trudeau's morning, and perhaps more
Justin Trudeau should have been feeling pretty good on the morning after the night before, about his strong performance in the second French leaders’ debate, and confident about his prospects for the upcoming evening’s one in English. And then François Legault went and spoiled his morning by tacitly endorsing Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole. As endorsements go, it doesn’t get any better in Quebec than that. Legault isn’t just the sitting premier of la belle province. He’s a highly popular leader, perhaps uniquely influential among francophone voters off the Island of Montreal. He represents a voter profile that is nationalist but not sovereignist.
There has been much strong language uttered against the law during the QCGN hearings, with others calling it unconstitutional and deeply troubling.
On Tuesday, Nakuset, an advocate for homeless Indigenous people, said, “people will die,” referring to the provisions in the law that will make it more difficult to receive vital health and social services in English, a language adopted by many Indigenous people.
She said Indigenous people already face racism and discrimination in hospitals, so adding another language barrier would make things far worse.
Le chef libéral— Hélène Buzzetti (@HBuzzetti) dit que le consortium des médias anglophones doit « s’expliquer et s’excuser » pour la question posée à liant racisme et Loi 21.
Despite the, the National Assembly on Tuesday unanimously adopted a Parti Québécois-sponsored motion calling for a formal apology for the “hostile trial launched against the Quebec nation during the anglophone televised debate of Sept. 9, 2021.”
Legault wants apology for 'unacceptable' federal debate question on Quebec laws
QUEBEC — A question about two Quebec laws at Thursday night's English-language federal leaders debate was an unacceptable attack on the province, Premier François Legault said Friday. In her first question to Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, moderator Shachi Kurl described two Quebec laws — one restricting the wearing of religious symbols by certain government employees, the other a language law reform — as "discriminatory." "YouIn her first question to Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet, moderator Shachi Kurl described two Quebec laws — one restricting the wearing of religious symbols by certain government employees, the other a language law reform — as "discriminatory.
The motion was in response to called aduring last week’s leaders’ debate saying Quebec has discriminatory laws, including Bill 96 and Bill 21, which ban the wearing of religious garb by certain government employees.
On Wednesday, Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said he agreed with the motion and that the consortium of media broadcasters that organized the debate should apologize.
This story will be updated.
'I do not regret it at all,' Legault on telling Quebecers that Trudeau Liberals' platform was 'dangerous' .
One day after Canadians elected a new minority Liberal government, Quebec Premier François Legault says he does not regret telling Quebecers that Justin Trudeau’s platform was “dangerous” for the province and that he would do it again if necessary. But the popular premier and leader of the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ)’s decision to jump headfirst into the federal election two weeks ago by tacitly endorsing a Conservative minority government over the Liberals, NDP and Greens — and subsequent lack of remorse — is rubbing many federal Liberals the wrong way.