Canada Wilkinson says aid program to cut methane emissions will be reconsidered
Varcoe: Oilpatch and new resources minister promise to 'put elbows down' after meeting face to face
Alberta and Ottawa have been at each other’s throats for so long on energy policy, it’s become a reflex for each side to put their elbows up at every meeting. Like hockey players going into the corner to retrieve the puck, each side does so preparing for impact. The energy fault lines are deep between Alberta and the oilpatch on one side and the federal Liberal government on the other: Bill C-69, pipelines and now a cap on oil and gas sector emissions. But perhaps we’re heading into a new era, a period where each side realizes they must co-operate to achieve their own goals, while keeping a wary eye on the other camp.
OTTAWA — Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said Friday a pandemic aid program to help oil and gas companies cut their methane emissions will be revisited now that the industry is back on its feet.
But he said the government is not going to consider aid programs that help the fossil fuel sector cut their emissions to be the "inefficient fossil fuel subsidies" the government has promised to eliminate by the end of 2023.
The Onshore Emissions Reduction Fund is under an unflattering spotlight this week after an audit found it to be poorly designed and not good value for money.
Canada can spend to prevent or react to disasters but more will come: federal minister
Canadians can either pay now or pay later for the looming costs of climate change -- but pay they will, said Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson.But whichever path leaders choose, the effects of a changing climate and increasingly extreme weather are coming home to roost, Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson told The West Block's Mercedes Stephenson.
Environment Commissioner Jerry DeMarco's report released Thursday criticized the program for poor design, overstating the emissions cuts it could achieve, and possibly double-counting emissions that would have been cut without this fund. He also said the program was helping some companies increase their production without accounting for the increase in emissions that would bring.
With only about one-fifth of the program's $675-million total already awarded, and the third round of applications not closing until January, DeMarco said there is still time to fix the multiple ways this program is failing.
In Ottawa Friday Wilkinson said the program was conceived 20 months ago to help oil and gas companies stay afloat at a time when oil prices had tanked.
Breakenridge: Alberta has good reason to question Ottawa over the proposed emissions cap
Even as the Alberta legislature was debating the motion last week to formally call on Ottawa to enter into constitutional negotiations over equalization, the joint news conference between Premier Jason Kenney and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau highlighted a much more pressing matter. It was perhaps no coincidence that Kenney chose not to confront Trudeau over equalization, but rather called out the prime minister over the need to consult the provinces over Ottawa’s proposed emissions cap on Canada’s oil and gas industry.
"What I would say, and I agree with the commissioner on this is, we’re not in the same situation now," Wilkinson said.
"The economic crisis for the oil sector has passed and now it’s time to actually look at whether this program should continue in its current form."
In the first weeks of the pandemic, oil prices in Canada took a double whammy hit of plummeting demand as the world came to a stand still, and a production war between Russia and Saudi Arabia that caused a glut in oil supplies.
At certain points the benchmark price for Alberta oil was less than zero. But prices have rebounded, now sitting somewhere north of US$50 a barrel.
Julia Levin, a senior program manager for climate and energy at Environmental Defence, said the crisis period for the industry was very short-lived, and the projects to cut methane are required work under new federal methane regulations that are in the midst of being implemented.
Spread the message #BeKind, these celebrity hashtags went viral...
Social media now is a huge part of our lives. The world's stars use their platforms to connect with their fans and promote themselves, their work and good causes. The hashtags used to promote movements and for campaigns sometimes go viral for the wrong reasons as well as the right ones! #BeKind, #MeToo and #FridaysForFuture have all had a massive impact but which celebrity hashtags went viral?
"There is no evidence that public dollars were needed to help these so-called struggling companies take on spending that they should be doing on their own," she said.
DeMarco said it's not clear how many of the projects would have gone ahead without the ERF funding since companies were already required to do the work to meet the new methane regulations. As such he said it's not clear how many additional emissions cuts this program has achieved.
Wilkinson however said that 4.6 million tonnes of emissions were already avoided strictly as a result of the program. Therefore he said it does not qualify as the kind of fossil fuel subsidy the government has promised to eliminate by the end of 2023.
However DeMarco's audit found 27 of the first 40 projects funded also included in the application a claim that the companies would be increasing their production as a result of the program, largely because the technology it was funding to cut emissions meant they could produce more oil and gas and still meet the new methane regulations.
Wilkinson said the government only sees as problematic financial aid to fossil fuel companies that incentivizes "the exploration and the production of fossil fuels."
"Let me be clear, though," he added. "What (fossil fuel subsidy) does not mean is investments that the government may make alongside energy sector partners to reduce emissions. So things like carbon cap and sequestration are not inefficient fossil fuel subsidies."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 26, 2021.
Mia Rabson, The Canadian Press
Modular nuclear reactors a 'long shot' worth studying, says Yukon gov't .
The Yukon government is looking for ways to reduce the territory's emissions, and wondering if nuclear power is one way to go. Meanwhile, critics call small reactors an expensive and unrealistic "nuclear fantasy."The territory is undertaking a feasibility study, to determine whether there's a future for SMRs — small modular reactors — as a low-emissions alternative to things such as diesel power.