•   
  •   
  •   

Money Xerox, once a business icon, is about to disappear

23:46  14 february  2018
23:46  14 february  2018 Source:   msn.com

Fujifilm Gains Control of Xerox to Form $18 Billion Company

  Fujifilm Gains Control of Xerox to Form $18 Billion Company Fujifilm Holdings Corp. is gaining control of Xerox Corp. in a deal that would create an $18 billion company and see the iconic American corporate giant launching into new lines of business to seek global growth. The deal would combine Xerox, which has a market value of $8.3 billion, with a joint venture the company operates with Fujifilm, according to a statement Wednesday. Xerox shareholders will receive a $2.5 billion special cash dividend, or approximately $9.80 per share, funded from the combined company’s balance sheet, and own 49.9 percent of the combined company at closing.

It was not so long ago that one could count on certain familiar guideposts of business: Xerox was the dominant provider of office equipment, Sears the biggest retailer, General Electric the leading manufacturer of, well, almost everything, and you couldn't take a photograph without Kodak.

Quotes in the article

Xerox Corp

XRX

Once-Hot Toronto Housing Hits Deep Freeze as New Rules Bite

  Once-Hot Toronto Housing Hits Deep Freeze as New Rules Bite The only thing that might be colder than Toronto in January is the city’s housing market. define("homepageFinanceIndices", ["c.deferred"], function () { var quotesInArticleFormCode = "PRMQAP"; var config = {}; config.indexdetailsurl = "/en-ca/money/indexdetails"; config.stockdetailsurl = "/en-ca/money/stockdetails"; config.funddetailsurl = "/en-ca/money/funddetails"; config.etfdetailsurl = "/en-ca/money/etfdetails"; config.recentquotesurl = "/en-ca/money/getrecentquotes"; config.commoditydetailsurl = "/en-ca/money/markets/commoditydetails"; config.

29.79
+0.62
+2.13%
Amazon.com Inc

AMZN

1,451.05
+36.54
+2.58%
General Electric Co

GE

14.90
+0.23
+1.57%
Sears Holdings Corp

SHLD

2.30
+0.03
+1.32%

This world is on the verge of major change. Xerox is about to disappear into Japan's Fujifilm, its longtime joint venture partner in Fuji Xerox. The parent company of Sears, after years of declining sales, store closings, and generally disappearing presence in the marketplace, last year told investors that "substantial doubt exists" about its ability to survive. Since 2010, the company has shrunk from 3,500 Sears locations to fewer than 600.

General Electric is on the verge of getting kicked out of the 30-stock Dow Jones Industrial Average. That would be a cataclysmic change, since the company is the only survivor of the 12 stocks in the index when it originated in 1896.

Fujifilm Buying Control of Xerox to Form $18 Billion Company

  Fujifilm Buying Control of Xerox to Form $18 Billion Company Fujifilm Holdings Corp. is buying control of Xerox Corp. in a deal that creates an $18 billion company and marks the end of the independence of the iconic American corporate giant. Xerox, which has a market value of $8.3 billion, will first merge with a joint venture the company operates with Fujifilm in Asia, according to a statement Wednesday. Current Xerox shareholders will receive a cash dividend of $9.80 per share. In a complex transaction, Tokyo-based Fujifilm will ultimately end up owning 50.1 percent of the combined entity, which expands the joint venture to encompass all of Xerox’s operations.

All three companies once appeared to occupy impregnable positions in American business, and all are facing extinction. There's nothing especially unusual about that, given the dynamism of business all over the world. But it's a fact of life easily forgotten.

That's a warning for today's occupants of the business pinnacle, including Amazon, Google (that is, Alphabet), and Facebook. Competitive advantage is not a permanent gift. Indeed, the more successful a company is, the more unassailable its competitive position appears, the greater the forces that gather to knock it off its perch. As Morgan Housel of Collaborative Fund put it in a recent blog post, "Brands are hard to build and even harder to span across generations."

That's not the only factor in the decline of a dominant business. Some become so wealthy that they turn their efforts to maintaining their wealth instead of finding sources of new wealth. Some become convinced that the skills that brought them success the first time around are transferable to other markets, and take their eyes off the original ball (we're looking at you, Elon Musk). Some run into technological changes that are simply too big for them to handle.

Today was the perfect example of why Trump tying his success to the stock market is a terrible idea

  Today was the perfect example of why Trump tying his success to the stock market is a terrible idea Today was the perfect example of why Trump tying his success to the stock market is a terrible ideaPresident Donald Trump really likes to tie his success to the stock market. Friday showed why it could come back to bite him.

This shouldn't come as a surprise to the masters of today's business universe. After all, Amazon, Google, and Facebook each got where they are today by dislodging one or more precursors - before Google there was Yahoo, before Facebook there was Myspace, before Amazon there was a panoply of department store giants and big-box warehouse stores.

Every generation grows up with brand names that are dim memories by the time they reach maturity. Gone today, or at least withered, are such once-familiar brands as Howard Johnson's restaurants, Smith Corona typewriters, Blockbuster Video and Tower Records, Polaroid and Kodak, F.W. Woolworth and Kresge (the latter, long ago rebranded as Kmart, now part of Sears Holdings). Aol.com last year assembled a photo gallery of disappeared and disappearing brands, yet somehow failed to include itself, a faint shadow of the company that once stood like a colossus over the internet as America Online.

Xerox is perhaps the best example of a company that became too big and successful to remake itself. It was said that the company had become a prisoner of the Chester Carlson legacy. That was a reference to the inventor of the machine that became the Model 914 copier, which upon its introduction in 1960 became the most successful industrial product in history.

These self-destructing electronics can turn your data to dust on command

  These self-destructing electronics can turn your data to dust on command A radio signal tells the components to vaporize. A piece of polycarbonate. In a new kind of electronics, this material will vaporize when heated by a chemical reaction. “It literally goes into the air,” says Amit Lal, a professor of electrical engineering at Cornell University and one of the researchers behind the new design. “Very little remnants of it are left behind.

The hulking 914 brought in stupendous revenue, in part because of the new business model it inspired. Customers could not buy a 914, but only lease it, paying Xerox by the page. Soon, the company had a worldwide sales force of close to 100,000, all of them accustomed to counting their income by the "click" of paper going through the machines they had placed in their clients' central copying rooms.

a box on a table: Father of them all: The Xerox 914 copier, introduced in 1960, was the most successful industrial product in history. But its dominance didn't last.© Xerox Corp./Xerox Corp./TNS Father of them all: The Xerox 914 copier, introduced in 1960, was the most successful industrial product in history. But its dominance didn't last.

The model was so successful that its inventor, Peter McColough, eventually was rewarded with the posts of chairman and CEO. McColough, however, was smart enough to perceive that his company's dominance might not last forever. Copier technology was becoming miniaturized, which pointed to the development of desktop units. And there was no guarantee that paper would remain central to the office indefinitely. So in 1971 he ordered a corporate laboratory to be established as far from Xerox's existing copier labs as possible - in far off California, where the Palo Alto Research Center, the legendary PARC, opened in a building that had recently been vacated by the Encyclopedia Britannica. Its new inhabitants were charged with inventing "the office of the future."

Elizabeth Moss to play Rosemary Kennedy in biopic

  Elizabeth Moss to play Rosemary Kennedy in biopic Elizabeth Moss to play Rosemary Kennedy in biopicElizabeth Moss has yet another epic project lined up and it looks incredible.

So PARC's young engineers and computer scientists invented the personal computer, the laser printer, and ethernet, but they could not get headquarters' attention until a conference of the company's worldwide sales force in 1977. At the so-called "Futures Day," they demonstrated all they had achieved, only to face an uncomprehending response from the audience. "They were all asking, 'Where's the click?'" one former PARC engineer recalled.

McColough's business model, on which a generation of salespersons had been trained, was now working against him. They couldn't understand how they would earn commissions in a world without paper. The company eventually did bring out a personal computer based on PARC's prototypical Alto.

The Star was a wonderful machine, with a high-quality graphical display and a level of software and hardware integration that would still be the envy of computer users today. But it was built and marketed on a Xerox scale - big, hulking units slid under every secretary's desk with a terminal up top, priced at $16,500 per unit, or nearly $50,000 in today's money. A full office installation could easily cost $250,000 or more, a much larger sum than the average office would invest to equip the secretarial pool (male executives in that era didn't type, much less compute).

And within months of the Star's introduction in 1981, the IBM PC arrived. The PC was a comparatively feeble machine – no graphics, no integrated programs – but its $2,000 price tag lowered the bar for office systems, permanently.

Few phone makers will survive industry's brutal economics: Huawei

  Few phone makers will survive industry's brutal economics: Huawei Richard Yu, chief executive of Huawei's consumer business group, said anyone at this stage in the decade-old industry's history that had less than 10 percent market share was losing money. Huawei is the world's third biggest smartphone maker, trailing leaders Samsung and Apple, with a 10.2 percent market share in the fourth quarter, according to market surveys from IDC and Strategy Analytics."In the future, only three to four vendors can survive, maybe only less than four," Yu told reporters following a product launch event held ahead of the Mobile World Congress.

Xerox is regularly mocked for having missed the PC revolution. But that's uncharitable. It may have looked impregnable in 1970, but it was already too big and too single-minded a ship to be turned around and refocused on an entirely new product serving a market that did not even exist yet. It's a rare company that can remake itself to that degree while still enjoying the harvest of its original model. Much more frequently, a company rides a wave or two to wealth and prominence, and then succumbs to a new technology or marketing trend to which it can't adjust.

IBM did manage to shift from big computers to desktop PCs. But it was already in the computer business, so the change was not nearly so massive. IBM only succeeded by hiving off its PC unit into an independent operation; even so, it eventually got out of the PC business by selling it to the Chinese company Lenovo. IBM once reigned as the champion phoenix of the technology industry, surviving wave after wave of elemental change; but even Big Blue has stumbled in recent years.

It's always tempting to think of the future as the same as today, only more so. That's why we imagine a future in which Amazon is the only name in retail and Google and Facebook control everything we read, hear and feel. Things have never worked out that way no matter how majestic are the kings of commerce at any given moment. Maybe these companies will grow so big and stay so smart that they'll prevail over the forces that brought down their precursors. But that's not a good bet.

RCMP arrest Nanaimo man wanted for scamming women .
RCMP arrest Nanaimo man wanted for scamming womenA Nanaimo man, wanted on a Canada-wide warrant for allegedly defrauding women he met on dating websites, was arrested early Thursday morning.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!