•   
  •   
  •   

Offbeat The little-known feminist history of the US Supreme Court

11:50  14 february  2020
11:50  14 february  2020 Source:   qz.com

Supreme Court won't hear appeals of couple convicted in son's death

  Supreme Court won't hear appeals of couple convicted in son's death OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada will not hear the appeals of a Calgary couple found guilty of killing their diabetic teenage son. Emil and Rodica Radita were convicted of first-degree murder in 2017 in the death of 15-year-old Alexandru and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years. Witnesses at their trial testified the boy was so neglected that he weighed 37 pounds when he died in 2013 of complications from untreated diabetes and starvation.In handing down her verdict, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Karen Horner said the couple was in gross denial of Alexandru's disease.

The US Supreme Court didn’t always stand on the land where it’s now situated, as the Architect For most of the Supreme Court ’s history , the justices met in various places in the Capitol, changing The feminists occupied a structure once known as the “Old Capitol” because Congress had been briefly

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest ranking judicial body in the United States . Established by Article III of the Constitution, the detailed structure of the Court was laid down by the 1st United States Congress in 1789.

a statue of a person: Lady Justice in front of SCOTUS.© Provided by Quartz Lady Justice in front of SCOTUS.

The US Supreme Court didn’t always stand on the land where it’s now situated, as the Architect of the Capitol website explains. What official accounts don’t reveal, however, is that the government took the property from the National Woman’s Party (NWP) and that a feminist jurist fought tooth and nail to get top dollar for it.

The lawyer who argued on behalf of the NWP and other groups in the late 1920s was Burnita Shelton Matthews. She ultimately secured the highest award for an eminent domain case ever won up until that point, and would go on to become the first female trial court judge on the federal bench.

Supreme Court to decide next step in Via Rail terror case

  Supreme Court to decide next step in Via Rail terror case Supreme Court to decide next step in Via Rail terror caseThe Supreme Court of Canada is set to decide whether it will review a lower-court decision to grant Raed Jaser and Chiheb Esseghaier a new trial.

In this This Day in History video clip, learn about different events that have occurred on September 24. Some of the events include Black Friday and the USS.

The president of the United States has the sole power to nominate Supreme Court justices whenever there are openings on the court , and each nomination must be confirmed by Sign up for more history ! Twice a week we compile our most fascinating features and deliver them straight to you.

a person sitting in a chair: RBG at Georgetown University Law Center© Provided by Quartz RBG at Georgetown University Law Center

Notably, Shelton Matthews was also a model for high court justice and feminist icon Ruth Bader Ginsburg. At a Georgetown University Law Center event on Feb. 10—marking 100 years of women’s suffrage and the continuing struggle for an Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution—Ginsburg told the following story of Shelton Matthews’ battle against the federal government to secure the full value of the land for the NWP, calling the deceased judge “a soft-spoken woman, but made of steel.”

Treading gently and determinedly

Shelton Matthews had to be tough, of course, or she would never have overcome the many obstacles she faced as an aspiring attorney in the early 20th century.

Top court to decide whether to hear appeals of Alberta couple convicted in son's death

  Top court to decide whether to hear appeals of Alberta couple convicted in son's death OTTAWA — The Supreme Court of Canada will decide today whether to hear the appeals of a Calgary couple found guilty of killing their diabetic teenage son. Emil and Rodica Radita were convicted of first-degree murder in 2017 in the death of 15-year-old Alexandru and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years. Witnesses at their trial testified the boy was so neglected that he weighed 37 pounds when he died in 2013 of complications from untreated diabetes and starvation.In handing down her verdict, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Karen Horner said the couple was in gross denial of Alexandru's disease.

The Supreme Court also plays a fundamental role in ensuring the rights and liberties of individuals. James Madison once worried lest the Bill of Rights be only a “parchment barrier.” In modern times the Court has been active in enforcing the guarantees of the Bill of Rights, not only against the federal

The Supreme Court has ruled this clause makes most of the Bill of Rights as applicable to the states as it offset this advantage, either by protecting and attracting votes of former slaves, or at least by While there have been Supreme Court cases dealing with ratification issues, this particular question

Though she dreamt of being a lawyer throughout her youth in Mississippi, her father insisted his daughter study music instead. While at the Cincinnati Conservatory of Music, Shelton Matthews had her relatives send her legal treatises, which they did with a subversive mission. They mailed the dullest texts they could find, hoping to dissuade the young woman from her interest in the profession. It only laid the groundwork for her later love and mastery of what others might consider “very dry subjects.”

In 1915, Shelton Matthews graduated from the conservatory with a teaching certificate at 21 years old. Two years later, she married her high school sweetheart Percy Matthews, against her father’s wishes. He soon enlisted in the military, and Shelton Matthews decided to pursue her professional dream.

“In World War I, I was supporting myself by teaching piano and also sight singing in a town in Georgia,” she explained in a 1974 interview. “I saw advertisements for people to work for the federal government during the war, so I took the examination for a clerkship. I passed. I really wanted to study law. Not many places had law schools in the South where I lived. I was offered a job, and so in order to study law I came here to Washington.”

Dawson Creek woman who killed her mother-in-law acquitted of murder

  Dawson Creek woman who killed her mother-in-law acquitted of murder A Dawson Creek woman who savagely killed her mother-in-law has been acquitted of second-degree murder. Instead, Candice Dawn Shearer will be sentenced for manslaughter. According to a Supreme Court of B.C. ruling released Monday, Shearer was living with her common-law partner Berry Sheppard and his mother Anna Sheppard in Sheppard’s home when she beat and stabbed Sheppard to death on Nov. 12, 2016.  According to a Supreme Court of B.C. ruling released Monday, Shearer was living with her common-law partner Berry Sheppard and his mother Anna Sheppard in Sheppard’s home when she beat and stabbed Sheppard to death on Nov. 12, 2016.

Established by the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court began to take shape with the passage of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and has enjoyed a rich history since its first assembly in 1790. The Supreme Court is deeply tied to its traditions: Of the federal government’s three branches

Homes of the Court . Court History Quizzes. Oral Arguments. Supreme Court Appointments. The Current Court . Front row, left to right: Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Image Credit: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States .

While her husband fought abroad, Matthews battled to advance women’s rights at home. But she had to tread gently, ever careful not to let her feminism put her future career as a jurist at risk.

a vintage photo of a group of people posing for the camera: National Woman's Party protestors of yore.© Provided by Quartz National Woman's Party protestors of yore.

National Woman’s Party protestors of yore.

For example, she picketed for women’s suffrage in front of the White House on weekends. The feminists drew crowds as they waved banners demanding the right to vote, but they couldn’t speak freely.

“At that time, if someone came up to you and asked you a question and you undertook to expound on the suffrage movement, then you were arrested…for speaking without a permit to speak. So when anybody tried to get me to talk with them, I didn’t talk, I didn’t answer, because I was a law student; and I thought that if I got arrested and had an arrest record, it would be counted against me when I tried to get admitted to the bar,” Shelton Matthews recounted.

The 19th Amendment, which granted women the right to vote, was ratified in 1920, the same year that she graduated with a Bachelor of Laws, Master of Laws, and Master of Patent Law degrees. Shelton Matthews’ dreams were coming true, but there was much work left to do to advance the legal status of women in the US.

Supreme Court grants Alberta woman new trial in husband’s death

  Supreme Court grants Alberta woman new trial in husband’s death Supreme Court grants Alberta woman new trial in husband’s deathThe Supreme Court of Canada is allowing an appeal in the case of Deborah Doonanco.

Supreme court of the united states . Supreme court of the united states . Jaime caetano v. massachusetts. And, commendably, she did so by using a weapon that posed little , if any, danger of permanently harming either herself or the father of her children.

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest ranking judicial body in the United States . Its membership, as set by the Judiciary Act of 1869

She became the chief legal researcher for the NWP, which was working on identifying discrimination against women in state laws and advocating for change. Shelton Matthews’ efforts helped lead to the passage of new statutes that removed the disqualification of women as jurors in DC; eliminated inheritance preferences for men in Arkansas, DC, and New York; secured equal pay for equal work for male and female teachers in Maryland and New Jersey; and won women the right to sue in South Carolina without a husband’s permission.

Around 1929, Shelton Matthews was enlisted as a litigator on behalf of the NWP in the hard-fought condemnation case initiated by the federal government. She proved to be an exceptionally able adversary.

A valuable property

For most of the Supreme Court’s history, the justices met in various places in the Capitol, changing locations six times. William Howard Taft, who had been the 27th president and became chief justice, wanted a new and more noble home for the tribunal. Taft convinced Congress to approve funds for “a building of dignity and importance suitable for its use as the permanent home of the Supreme Court of the United States.”

But the location alighted upon, across the street from the Capitol and conveniently close to Union Station, happened to house the headquarters of the NWP. Shelton Matthews, as the organization’s counsel, went to see the president.

Legal roadblock thrown up against government’s move to deport former Nazi living in Waterloo, Ont.

  Legal roadblock thrown up against government’s move to deport former Nazi living in Waterloo, Ont. The government’s move to expel former Nazi death squad member Helmut Oberlander has hit another roadblock.It appeared that the 96-year-old Waterloo, Ont., man would be on his way out of Canada after the Supreme Court refused to hear his citizenship appeal on Nov. 6 but his lawyers have presented yet another legal challenge.

Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). U . S . Supreme Court : courtroomThe courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States . The Supreme Court was created by the Constitutional Convention of 1787 as the head of a federal court system, though it was

Building History . "The Republic endures and this is the symbol of its faith." Yet surprisingly, despite its role as a coequal branch of government, the Supreme Court was not provided with a The building was designed on a scale in keeping with the importance and dignity of the Court and the Judiciary as

“Taft, of course, hated to put the ladies out of the building, but he said that the Executive was housed suitably in the White House and that Congress was suitably housed—they had the Capitol and the office buildings—and he said that now the Supreme Court should be suitably housed too, and the government wanted that site for the Supreme Court,” she later recalled.

The government filed suit and offered a pittance for the property. But the feminists wouldn’t settle.

They had plans for the land, and were hoping to attract women from around the world to work on the advancement of their legal status globally. At trial, Shelton Matthews showed jurors a picture of the NWP headquarters, beautifully tended and surrounded by a garden. The government’s counsel complained that she made it look too good, like the Luxembourg Gardens in Paris.

Critically, Shelton Matthews argued that the building housing the NWP was extremely valuable, enhanced by its place in history. The feminists occupied a structure once known as the “Old Capitol” because Congress had been briefly housed there in the early 19th century when the Capitol building was damaged by a fire. After lawmakers returned to their fancy digs across the street, prisoners were held there during the Civil War.

a vintage photo of an old building: The Old Capitol, now the site of SCOTUS.© Provided by Quartz The Old Capitol, now the site of SCOTUS.

The Old Capitol.

But in court, the government claimed that the Old Capitol had actually been torn down, which was patently not true. After Abraham Lincoln’s assassination in 1865, angry city residents flocked to the building, which held 800 Confederate army officers, and threatened to burn the structure. However, police and troops prevented the blaze and, soon enough, the prison held people charged in the plot to kill the president, three of whom were hanged in the courtyard (making the current location of the nation’s highest tribunal a poignant choice).

Canada and China both 'furious' in row triggered by Huawei arrest: Canadian envoy

  Canada and China both 'furious' in row triggered by Huawei arrest: Canadian envoy Canada and China both 'furious' in row triggered by Huawei arrest: Canadian envoyOTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada and China are both "furious" over the case of a Huawei executive detained in Canada in 2018 and its aftermath, but there are signs the two sides can hold constructive talks, the Canadian ambassador to Beijing said on Wednesday.

We face a similar guessing game as a nation every time a new Supreme Court justice is chosen. He is particularly well known for his articulation of the “clear and present danger” exception to the right of free speech in Three Towering Visionaries All of the great Supreme Court justices were visionaries.

Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of A People's History of the Supreme Court by Peter Irons. In the tradition of Howard Zinn's classic A People's History of the United States , Peter Irons chronicles the decisions that have influenced virtually every aspect of our society, from the debates

Just to cover all bases, the government’s lawyers also argued that even if the NWP was actually occupying the Old Capitol, it no longer had any historic value because its use had changed.

Shelton Matthews was able to contradict the government’s false claims. “We had some very good witnesses come and testify. There was a man in Washington, Harry Wardman, a big builder. He was one of my witnesses. He got up and said, ‘This is the world’s choice lot!'”

NWP counsel also produced physical evidence. Shelton Matthews and her legal team found a man who inherited a collection of civil war images by celebrated photographer Matthew Brady. In it, they discovered a picture of Rose O’Neal Greenhow, a renowned Confederate spy. The photo was taken in front of the Old Capitol, where O’Neal Greenhow was held captive, proving the NWP headquarters were indeed in the same historic building, however lovely its gardens.

Ultimately, a jury awarded the NWP just under $300,000 for the location, which was the largest condemnation award granted up until that point. Thus, Shelton Matthews gained a reputation for being an eminent domain expert and one of DC’s most esteemed litigators. She became the go-to lawyer in subsequent condemnation cases. “I was always interested in land law,” she later explained. “Some people think it’s a very dry subject.”

On the bench

Construction on the new high court building began in 1932 and was completed in 1935. The NWP moved to a new location, not too far away, and Shelton Matthews went into private practice, becoming one of three founding partners in an all-female law firm. She continued her advocacy for the feminist group and she never stopped fighting for the advancement of women.

In 1949, president Harry Truman appointed Shelton Matthews to the federal district court in DC. She was the first female judge to preside over a US trial court, and made it a point to hire only female law clerks, hoping to change this sad statistic. The judge continued to hear cases until her retirement in 1977.

By the time Ginsburg was appointed to the DC Court of Appeals in 1980, Shelton Matthews was 86 years old, the same age Ginsburg is today. The two giants of jurisprudence met occasionally and Ginsburg was inspired by the example her elder set.

Shelton Matthews died in 1988, seven years after the first female Supreme Court justice, Sandra Day O’Connor, was appointed by president Ronald Reagan. Five years later, Ginsburg was appointed to the high court by president Bill Clinton, joining O’Connor on the bench.

While Ginsburg laments the obstacles that remain for women in the law and beyond, she counseled the audience at Georgetown this week to remain determined, like Shelton Matthews and her feminist predecessors. “We have to be patient. What is it that [women’s suffrage activist] Susan B. Anthony said? ‘Failure is impossible.’ … In my long life, I have seen such positive change.”

Judge orders father of transgender B.C. teen not to give further interviews .
A judge has ordered the father of a transgender teen who violated several court orders not to give any further interviews about his child’s case. B.C. Supreme Court Justice Michael Tammen also ordered that a video that contains an interview with the dad that was posted online in the past few days be removed from the internet. The move came after lawyers for the teen went to court over concerns that the dad and several of his supporters — including former People’s Party of Canada candidate Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson and political activist Jenn Smith — had violated publication bans or prior court orders in the case.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

usr: 0
This is interesting!